I do not want to be nit-picking, but they state that they fired AT crooks, not that they shot him…
the phrases in these reports are crafted and polished very carefully and mean what they say, not what they imply or suggest…
so, the only thing that that report says is that D. King shot at crooks, and they leave it open whether crooks was hit or not…
Here it sounds like D. King took shot #9,
but this would contradict with the Higgins findings saying USSS took shot #10.
But “mere seconds” doesn’t sound like the 10 seconds that was between #9 and #10
@brian60221 @daniloraf @gfgftt5d0q @prayingpatriot @RedRanAmber @sorey @kincses-zsolt @rough_country_gypsy
Here are the latest revisions of my tools, along with a recent deep dive into the sightings of two of the tactical vehicles. Again, thanks for all of your efforts and input.
I’ll be taking some time to read through the USSS-HSGAC Interim Joint Report and finishing up the first 2 of my Timeline Analyses Reports based on information from that report. If you find something new for the Recognition Report, please share it. I will keep a running draft of Rev. 8.
Recognition Tools (Rev 7).pdf (3.7 MB)
Research Tools (Rev 4).pdf (1.7 MB)
AR400 & SQ200 Sightings.pdf (1.3 MB)
Yeah so we don’t know. Like too many things we can’t find out. All we can do is what we can do.
No no… Local sniper took shot #9. Hercules 1 (south) took shot #10. Hercules 2(north) did nothing and believes bullets flew between shooter and spotter, who were 6 feet apart from each other. The “mere seconds” is the time Hercules 1 shooter had Crooks on scope before firing.
You’re right, they didn’t clearly state it was the kill shot. Also reading the report i become the impression it was shot #9 he took.
But maybe we just misinterpreting and when they say he fired his weapon, they mean like this…
Thanks again for doing this and sharing it with us, great job and very helpful 
Just noted one thing. Here in the smaller, left pictures it’s the same guy.
I think the Jurysta picture should be him with his black Medic backpack when they carry Corey into the tent. Was captured by Lt Pearson’s bodycam.
Thanks. I’ll make the correction.
Don’t forget about the sequel! :
Fantastic work! We’re very fortunate to have your efforts alongside us, these compiled resources are invaluable!
Is that not how you do it??
This is the assumption and what the Higgins report is indicating. But as far as I know we don’t have a real, hard facts proof that it really was like that. It’s just strange he mentions the first 3 shots but not the other 5+1
The detailed coroner report would help here.
Here I agree.
They were so well placed, they couldn’t see half of the area that should have been covered and therefore did nothing.
could become a classic
Corrected and replaced in my post above. Don’t ask me why that was the wrong image, I had the right one on his detail page.
Unfortunately, I think it already has! Script was written, directed, and performed before our very eyes in front of a live studio audience! Unfortunately it will have to fall under cult classic. Anybody’d like some Brawndo about now?
I think the implication that shots fired from ‘Crooks’ going in between these two snipers is interesting, to say the least. If true, it suggests that perhaps one of Crook’s volleys was potentially aimed to take out those snipers that could have a visual target on him. I’m not fully versed on the audio analysis angle of interpreting all of this, and I don’t think we have visual proof yet of where each bullet landed, but would there be a way to determine if this shot or perhaps shots are plausible based on the audio signatures that we have so far?
is this why the snipers flinched when the first shots rang out?
Sorry, my info from before is from this report: USSS-HSGAC-Interim-Report.pdf
Members of Snail Hunters club?
Thank you for this, I wasn’t really thinking much of the sniper flinch, and yet I see a predicament. Crooks’ first 3 shots rang out and hit Trump in the ear, hit the steel handrail, hit the lift, also hit (wait, how many were hit in the 1st volley?), and now also went in between these two snipers?
Hard to tell a red herring from a blue one these days… 
I agree, seems not to align with his track record. Identity theft perhaps? I don’t think we’ve placed him anywhere actually on the grounds yet.
