I know!! If we do not see every single aspect of negligence that we have uncovered remedied (and then some) ((i.e. coms, posts, logs, cams, preventative measures, etc)) that is it!! I cannot believe he is going back. But, if everything is set up in the same way, maybe that could help us all. Maybe that would be the ultimate art of the surge.
5 Likes
I agree and think it is very admirable and important to support truth tellers! I just really do not like signing up for subscriptions. This is literally the only site I have signed up for in 5yrs and I do not yet pay for it, but I would/will. Most people here are common sense and awake! Hard to find without any bs. Chris seems genuine and I like him and his opinions.
4 Likes
Isn’t it going to be surreal that we will probably be able to pull up your AMAZING pdf tools and see everyone there again?! Do you think Greg will play a leading role or be mia? So interesting.
2 Likes
That is amazing! Action man! Thank you for your persistence and sharing the fruits of your work!
2 Likes
Have you REALLY scoured the “new” bodycam for differences other than wide angle? It is super weird to me that after all of this time they would post something different. I am going to post one of my photo differences later for everyone’s take on WHY? But, (to me) there must be something more to it, as I hope you will see.
1 Like
No, but I should.
The other day I watched bits and pieces of some hearing about the assassination attempt. I wasn’t finding it substantive, so I didn’t watch in detail, but I remembered seeing parts of a dashcam video that we hadn’t seen. What I noticed about it right away was that we could see the white hood of the car much more clearly than usual. I just wrote it off as, oh well, VIPs get more videos than we do, or it was a video from some other PD than Butler Township.
But then later that same video showed up on Lt. Pearson’s Dropbox. It seems like after the video was used at the hearing, somebody noticed the discrepancy and put the video on the Dropbox in the name of completeness or something.
I sent Pearson a request to put all the wide angle videos up on the Dropbox too, but didn’t get any response so far.
4 Likes
Greg Nicol is the last person I would expect to see playing a role in the do-over. He screwed up big time waiting so long to radio his sighting of a suspicious person to command, and then he lied his ass off to try and cover it up. You’ve probably seen this portion of my analysis before, but just in case you haven’t. and so others who haven’t can see I have a valid reason to feel that way about Nicol, I’ll share them again.
4 Likes
I trust your memory and intuition. Mine tells me something is off. That is why I asked you. You have a good eye and you are a fighter! Please look into it.
1 Like
Yes, but the deep state is so deep and desperate to just sweep this away, I feel like they may try to validate Lyin’ Greg. I, of course, agree with you.
1 Like
We’ll likely never know, though. This rally will most likely go off without a hitch, and we won’t have the benefit of getting copies of the Detail Plan, AAR, or body or dash camera footage.
It will be interesting to see if Trump speaks behind bullet proof glass. I’m doubting he will since it would send the wrong message.
4 Likes
I am not great with images, but hopefully this is clear.
Are you seeing what I am seeing? The original looks like a cupped, possibly bloody hand holding something and the later picture completely changes this.
These trees are not here. There are no trees that are close up behind the parapit. There is no light pole there as it shows in the 3rd picture.
When you watch it, one of the most peculiar things you’ll find is the perplexed reaction from this poor woman, whose hero boyfriend just left her standing there and ran away in the face of danger. What a gentleman…
6 Likes
Judicial Watch on X tells they have obtained among other photos, photos of Crooks sitting on a retaining wall. I think these should be from the original source but still can’t extract metadata telling these photos are taken on July 13 and what i REALLY like to know is the exact time. Could you or anybody else please try to extract the real metadata from these 2 photos of Crooks sitting on a retaining wall?
To me these just look like some images from the USB drive that the state sent in response to Jason Goodman’s RTK request. You can find all that stuff in the big zip file here: brian60221
On JPGs, the relevant metadata format is called EXIF. Let me see what I can extract from the photos of Crooks.
1 Like
Sorry, as far as I can tell, there’s no great metadata in images 6.jpg and 7.jpg (the ones of Crooks sitting on the wall from the zip). I used open-source tools called exif and exiftool, and two different online EXIF viewers.
I don’t think these are the originals, though. They’re too small. The ones from the zip are only 640x480.
If we want to pursue this, I do have one lead, which is that Detective Lt. Bonnie Sedlacek is the one who prepared that RTK response, so she may have access to better versions. If she doesn’t have it, it’s bad for us because maybe only Nicol would have the originals.
2 Likes
I’m from Finland, don’t think I have any right to request those photos from Her. I have really strong feeling this guy sitting on a retaining wall and the shooter on the roof is two different persons and if we had the exact time for the photos of guy on a retaining wall could be the key to unlock it.
@sgt-raven said it right, you don’t sign up just to see this specific docuseries, but you sign up to allow independet journalism offering you another perspective than the MSM.
In the broader picture it’s all about this:
Free speech may be your right, but unless you fight for it, you’ll lose it.
4 Likes
Posted this shadow issue a while back, it really requires more eyes on this and others to do the math to confirm its true.
1 Like
We know when the photo was sent out, just not when it was taken, right? If I understand right, the possible/probable scandal here is that Nicol took the photo earlier than he said, and sat on it for way too long before sending it out, right?