They are not just focusing on a federal agency. They are lying about what the local responsibility was and whether the ESU snipers could see the roof. Counter snipers look for snipers, not the crowd
Excellent! Thank you.
For starters, there is this from the BuC Detail plan. They mispell Herold.
I trust you have seen his Congressional Task Force Hearing testimony.
FULL HEARING: Donald Trump Butler Shooting Congressional Task Force | LiveNOW from FOX
And then there is the text overlay method of un-redacting the transcript.
Great find! This should help explain what went on near the Bearcat with David Dutch, among other things. I’ll add it to the Research Tools, which I’m ready to post the latest revision of.
It would be nice to have the call log, too.
Here is an update to my Research Tools.
Research Tools (Rev 12).pdf (2.7 MB)
I’m actually glad you disproved my hair tuft hypothesis. THANK YOU. I didn’t like the thought of a modern day scalp collector but what THEY tried to do to Trump, especially with the one photographer who captured the grazing bullet, they were into gore. I don’t want to imagine what that photographer would have captured had the bullet hit more than an ear. THEY hoped this would be a high definition execution of an “out of line” politician. BACKTRACK: I don’t know if you believe there was a THEY in this assassination attempt? I’m jumping over here late. Honestly, this will probably be the end of my deep dive. Seeing how well you did debunking my hair hypothesis, I might as well lay out my other theories …
The markings on the back pack do not match the markings on the back pack on the roof. This topic has been discussed on X, not sure on this forum. I will see if i can find and upload the pictures. The rifle the FBI showed does not match the rifle crooks he had actually used either.
I look forward to hearing your argument.
My advice would be to carefully handle the facts in the case to protect yourself from potential defamation lawsuits. I’m not an attorney, so this is not legal advice, but it is something I try to consider when doing my own analyses, and is why I try to avoid speculation.
I’ve been reading pretty much every post in this and other July 13th related threads for a few months now and don’t recall that being addressed specifically on this site.
I’m curious, if both of those arguments are correct, was there any discussion of the trunk photo being fabricated? I use that to demonstrate that Crooks’ car was almost certainly the Hyundai Elantra parked across the street from the AGR main entrance. Since that photograph was reported as being taken by Allegheny law enforcement, who had their bomb squad at the event, I would have to assume the FBI would not be so stupid as to fabricate that photo.
Do you know where the guys from the CAT Hawkeye team were stationed before the first shots?
And how many were there?
We see one or two of them coming near the podium after the shots but I would like to know where they came from.
I get the impression that they were stationed at various positions around the stage/bleacher area, and perhaps near the front of the crowd. Watching the first few minutes of Lt. Pearson’s bodycam, BWC2-122104 – 1, you don’t see any rushing out of the tents behind the stage/bleachers. You can see where one Hawkeye member was standing before heading to the stage.
Therein lies the core issue I have with your theory. You base it heavily on what you think others are thinking. This is the second time you’ve made assertions about what I was thinking.
Regarding being charged with defamation, don’t we at some point need to move beyond slavery to an utterly broken & corrupt DOJ? Our DOJ is not interested in blind justice! Think about the J6 people rotting in prison vs the BLM/Antifa thugs who burned cities.
At some point We The People MUST take back the institutions of our government. We cannot continue in this state. If the corrupt courts will not try corrupt Actors then we must try them. At this stage, until we reform the DOJ, our only option is in then court of public opinion. I refuse to let scumbags hide behind a veil of secrecy/privacy any more. I’m 55 now. In the past I would let the courts do their job with discovery & trials. I’ve seen with the stolen election in 2020 & the imprisonment of J6 Trump supporters that our DOJ is hopelessly captured.
I don’t don’t care about defamation any more. If we see evil & say nothing we are enabling evil to continue & are part of the problem. These people need to be exposed for what they are. Their neighbors need to know who & what they are. It is our responsibility to keep ourselves safe.
Thanks. How does the text overlay method work?! The redactions are driving me crazy
I’ll be careful and will mostly let the facts speak for themselves. I’ve probably argued my point more strongly here than I will directly in the video. That’s kind of how I interpret what I will lay out, and hopefully viewers will too, but they are free not to
I did qualify my statement with “might”. I don’t know what your thinking. I could perhaps read all your posts but like I said, I’m tired.
I don’t even know if you ever addressed Kuss’ actions re that Elantra. I know you said in your Sidebar that you thought Kiko wasn’t bomb certified & that’s why he didn’t detect. Did you know that I didn’t realize that a K9 was even around that Elantra until about a month ago when I read your Sidebar? I was always focussed on the “fresh blood found in a bathroom” being broadcast over the radio.
So I guess you’re to blame for this theory of mine that they were going tie up loose ends by blowing up inconvenient witnesses.
I have a different viewpoint. For starters, the reference to defamation lawsuits was not in relation to the DOJ. They would get you on something else. Think more along the lines of Officer Kuss suing you for defamation, and you having to defend yourself. You’ll need facts to convince a jury, not just speculation and conjecture.
The western Pennsylvania area is largely politically red, Trump supporters. Many of the law enforcement officers involved had prior military experience. Being a Veteran myself, I have respect for those who served, especially those at the lower ranks, not so much the progressive leaders installed by Obama. My father and most of my aunts and uncles served in WWII and Korea. My father was also a LEO for 17 years. So, I come by my respect for Veterans and LEOs honestly.
I do not discount the potential for some Veterans and LEOs to be anti-Trump, corrupt, or even complicit in a possible plot to assassinate Trump. However, those Veterans and LEOs who are not deserve the respect due them, and do not deserve to be accused in the court of public opinion, based on speculation, rather than the Constitutionally protected right to trial before a jury of their peers, the very Constitution I swore an oath to protect and defend, an oath I never swore off.
Those are some of the reasons I avoid speculation and analyze the evidence instead. If the evidence suggests or proves error, incompetence, or complicity, so be it. I do point that out where I find it, but do not assume complicity. I may question whether someone was covering up something more nefarious than just error or incompetence, but I do not presume to know what their thoughts or motives were.
They’re hard to see, but you can actually find at least 3 members of Hawkeye taking the stage here!
Here is the process I use.
- Copy and save an image from the section of the document in its posted size, not enlarged or reduced in size.
- Use photo editing software (I use Gimp) to cut out the text in the redacted boxes, being extremely careful not to extend the boxes in doing so, then backfill with black.
- Using the blank box version, determine the font and font size used by trial and error. I know from previous work that the HSGAC uses Courrier New font, 13 point, which I include in the slide.
- Using a light-colored font, type the same wording and overlay it onto the text and see if the character spacing aligns with the text. Sometimes you might need to adjust the spacing, but that is why it’s important to copy it and use it in the posted size.
- Since light colors don’t always show well against a black background, I change the text in the black boxes to a white font.
Hope that helps. It’s a very useful tool.
There’s that eagle “eye” of yours again!