Ok, so what conversion has been made to reduce the quality? The key word here is conversion. Not copy. Yes, you will likely lose some quality upon certain conversions, but why would we rely upon clearly lossful data when you can easily use a less-lossful source?
Why do you try to paint the picture of them ‘dodging’ bullets? Like this were the Matrix and they actively moved out of their way? He obviously admitted what he perceived, that being shots were fired that ‘seemed endless’ as in he didn’t count them or couldn’t count them in the moment, where are you getting anything about 90 seconds before what? The stage shots? Because now how many shots are you claiming were fired at Herc2? And how many shots do you claim to have been fired at the stage? I don’t understand what your position even is in this scenario.
I can honestly say that I wasn’t programmed in Python. Like I said, I’m old school.
In my computer class in college I programmed in Fortran using IBM Key punch cards.
After typing up all of your cards containing the computer code, and we’re talking stacks and stacks of cards, we ran them through the reader. The reader sent the code to the mainframe, which ran the program and gave you a printout of the results.
You can’t get too much more old school than that when it comes to computer programming.
~Vegas pulls out his certified badass card~
Truly this is cool as all hell! It’s really incredible to see how computers have evolved into what we know them as now!
I used ‘soundconverter’ in Buster Linux to convert .mp4 to .ogg, mostly to show time separation in an old Audacity version, found on the Buster DVD 1(of 3 source DVDs).
the .mp4 was all I could download(only Dayve has the original, I think)
CS East was diving to roof surface, and said he thought his partner had been hit.
first shot I hear is 86 seconds before stage shots
a dozen or more, because other audio from other microphones contains shots not ‘heard’ by Dayve’s phone(e.g., Mia Kopps’ video contains at least 1 of those: Trump says ‘right out of thee’…POP…‘government services’
I can’t hear that 1 on Dayve’s 7:34.
My position in this ‘scenario’? I can’t remember so many lies told by so many ‘reporters’ about a historic event.
Also, I knew not much about file conversion, and have since tried converting to .flac, but don’t know much about them.
I have learned that .flac with 24 bit depth won’t easily play on a Marantz CD player; 16 bit depth seems to play OK.
O brawling love! O loving hate!
O anything of nothing first create!
O heavy lightness, serious vanity!
Misshapen chaos of well-seeming forms!
Feather of lead, bright smoke, cold fire, sick health!
Still-waking sleep, that is not what it is!
This love feel I, that feel no love in this.
[Shakespeare]
Oxymoron has entered the chat.
Same difference.
So firstly, this is incredibly deceptive. This is precisely the definition of cherry picking a ‘piece of evidence’, you have even gone so far as to remove the evidence (the visual portion of this clip, or any context) that might make it easier to see the truth in it. From this 5 seconds of audio alone, you cannot tell who is recording, where they are in relation to anything, or what’s actually going on around them, which are all key components to understanding the situation.
Second, can you please explain how this sound could even possibly be a gunshot? Why is there no reaction from anybody to this alleged ‘gunshot’? If it is loud enough for you to pick it up wherever this was recorded from and you can say that it is indeed a shot, how is it possible that nobody present had that same conclusion or reacted to it in any way?
I opened the “first” link there was some whip when three people walk through. Then there was the same link later, and I can no longer hear it. What the hell?
I have no idea and I try not going into assumptions.
Once I used predictive compression, not for audio. (Actually it was cardiograph.) It is sensitive about the starting point. When you start playing somewhere else, the level shift can be different.
I think I read somewhere that cell phones have better hearing than humans, like dogs do. But wait, I heard the “click” in the recording. Scratch that, I don’t think I read that anywhere.
I never used it, but I know some people who do. So this is not my experience.
It will a lot agree with you.
When you find a mistake in the answer, it also excuses a lot.
(However, I got another chatting bot in my account. I asked it if Feynman’s name has originated from gentleman as fine man. The answer was like copied out from a lexicon.)
