I think the jury is still out on the Copenhaver shots.
The tree was blocking them somewhat, but I don’t see how that’s a problem for anything I’ve said.
I think you’ve made your point about endless. I disagree.
40 yards isn’t very far. We have speakers, echoes, chaos, etc. Human perception, memory, and even honesty aren’t perfect.
Chris Nolan:
Have you heard gunshots 40 yards west of yourself?(I have, but never have heard one below my feet level). Speakers aren’t mentioned in the transcription, and they were facing West, and had no buildings from which to echo, for 400 yards.
Could Copenhaver, Dutch, and Comparatore’s family refuse to settle, and to get this into a civil case courtroom?
They could get a share of the advertising revenue.
When I was about 11 y/o I had a debate with class mate on color perception. His stupid question was about my favorite color. My inference was, despite the physical input is the same, our brains process that excitation in different way, so our internal experience might be different. So I told him he just learned the name of that color. But he might “feel” diferently. (And I didn’t know yet the cellular network at that time.)
Some thought about inferences:
The nature has no obligation to follow our logic.
Interpolation usually works well, but there were exceptions. (For example, carbon atoms have a little probability to be created by fusion. Astronomer Fred Hoyle assumed there should be a resonance frequency at a certain energy level. Former data did not support that. There were a few data points and they connected them by straight lines. But later they made more data points, and a very sharp resonance peak was found.)
Extrapolation is more dangerous.
Damn, @kincses-zsolt, I might start calling you “Eagle Eyes.” I tried that once with @redranamber, but it ended with me calling her “Eagle Eye.” 
Soli Deo gloria. 
Probably not, since you are asking about it.
I’ll admit, some genuine people may genuinely be afraid to think of the ramifications of two or more shooters. But the thinking that’s behind the “single shooter” hypothesis looks more and more like contortions to me, with the Hercules 2 testimony and the NBC news video of Mr. Dutch and Mr. Copenhaver.
Let me give a blatant example of shilling I saw not too long ago:
In May of 2022 I was presented with a facebook ad from Pfizer telling me that getting my COVID booster was the best way to protect my health.
When I looked at the first level comments (comments that weren’t reactions to other comments), there were many dozens of them that were slight variations on “My husband and I are going to get ours today!” and “I got mine yesterday, I feel great!” Now, you all know that even in the absence of BAD side effects from those “vaccines”, people feel shitty for the next day or two as often as not. If someone doesn’t AT LEAST have a very sore arm, it’s probably a sign they got a dud vaccine, or they have a poor immune system.
Anyway, it was a really funny contrast between all those shill comments, and the REAL comments made responding to those comments. Let’s just say Pfizer didn’t pay any shills to do response comments, and it showed.
I may continue to be a jerk and ask any “lone Butler shooter” whether Oswald was the lone shooter in the JFK assassination. And then I may follow up and ask if they have that backward head snap figured out yet.
Oh yeah, with 9/11, planes with aluminum fuselages don’t go into buildings with reinforced concrete floors like a hot knife through butter. And they don’t dive into the ground, leaving no visible remains. And they don’t 99.8% disintegrate, not even leaving puddles of melted and resolidified aluminum, steel and titanium (Pentagon).
Ooops, buttons jkl control the yt player.
But I’m not a premium user to download videos.
#https://raw.barf.bz/sorey/Dayve%20Stewert%20video_X.mp4
How the video compression works: Full frames are stored rarely. The frame data usually contains only the changes. Thus there are artifacts until the next full frame. I cannot simply scroll back.
Here it is:
The evidence hasn’t even been collected by a party that’s interested in collecting the evidence. Trump needs to be inaugurated, there needs to be a couple of months for Kash Patel to be confirmed and then the top few layers of scum scraped off the FBI, THEN some of the existing transcripts could be turned over. A couple of months after THAT the congressional committees could let us know some of what’s going on. Meanwhile, the interrogations that SHOULD have been done in the first few days can start.
I haven’t heard gunshots 40 yards from myself, no.
Speakers are mentioned in the transcription, just that they are at his level. That the cracks would have been amplified from them is worth nothing.
You’re right that my echo point is probably not very good there.
I do hope they all fight for the truth as best as they can.
I’ll admit to being hesitant to accept the 2 shooter theory for whatever reason. But I do want to find the truth and if that’s where it takes me then so be it. But I am just not convinced at the moment. I think I’ve made good points about the Herc 2 testimony and NBC video here. I don’t think they are contortions.
For the single shooter theory we now have visual evidence of Crooks firing the first and second shot. We do not have visual evidence of a shooter in the trees, let alone him firing. Crooks, Corey, Trump, David and James are basically in a straight line. Multiple audio analyses seem to suggest all 8 shots came from the roof.
My focus has been on a potential inside job to allow Crooks to get on that roof and take those shots.
I could be wrong, and I appreciate you entertaining that I could be genuine. It’s probably a bit weird for some guy from Australia to be digging into all this. I can explain my story and will do in a proper video at a later date. But you never know, so you can’t rule out who any of us might be, really.
No Covid shots for me, Oswald wasn’t a lone shooter in the JFK assassination, and 9/11 was pretty suss to say the least.
Is AGR guy Dimmick? Has anyone here got much info about it definitely being him, and what he was up to?
Perhaps our big guy is a Sheriff Slupe? He seems to be a pretty big guy.
@kincses-zsolt certainly does indeed have sharp eyes! Quite thankful to have them on our team! Oh, and I’m guessing the ‘Amber’ in my handle led to the ‘her’? I am, in fact, he, but I can see as it can be used as a female name. 
Damn, I just knew it would bite me in the ass if I used a pronoun. I’ve been so careful up to now to avoid that in my posts, not knowing. Thank you for correcting me, and my sincerest apology for the poor assumption.
