Solved! Analysis Reveals Kirk Killed by Rifle Round, but Not From Robinson's Position

I would if I knew where to find it.

1 Like

However, people cannot hear the crack everywhere. Simplified textbooks show an eternal Mach cone. But what if the projectile hits the target? The shock-wave won’t just disappear. Let’s follow the evaluation of the truncated cone:

Along the path of the supersonuc projectile, the change in pressure propagetes outward by the speed of the sound. But you can har the crack only at the points of constructive interference.


But this is not an infinite cone. The green lines indicate the boundaries. These lines are perpendicular to the cone surface. Actually they are perpendicular cones.

Behind the rear green cone and in front of the frontal one: you cannot hear the crack.

I call them perpendicular boundary cones or anti Mach cones.

So, for example, if the shot comes from a window of north building - most possibly the interviewed people could not hear the crack.

I counted 19 or 20 frames. By 30 fps it is around 650 ms.

Given:

  • Frame delay: 20 frames at 30 fps → 0.67 seconds
  • Speed of sound: 343 m/s ≈ 1,125 feet per second
  • Speed of sound≈375 yards/second

Step 1: Estimate distance

Distance=Time×Speed of Sound
Distance=Time×Speed of Sound =0.67×375≈251.25 yards

:white_check_mark: Conclusion (in yards):

The sound of the gunshot reached the microphone 20 frames (≈0.67 s) after the visible reaction. Since sound travels at approximately 375 yards/second, the minimum distance to the shooter is about 251 yards.

This is a lower bound, because the bullet would have arrived (or the flash would have been seen) before the sound.

4 Likes

Good article and very complimentary of Chris’ video. It will slide behind a paywall soon.

4 Likes

Also, check out SaleDaddy1 on YouTube where he seems to have audio stating they DID not conduct an autopsy and asked to have notes added so there wouldn’t be any issues. Please listen to that as well.

I tagged you on X about this as well. Please check the timeline with the post from Erika Kirk that was posted on September 12th where she was caressing Charlie’s body in the casket. Charlie was already FULLY embalmed and prepared for viewing in that post. I found that VERY strange if they actually conducted an autopsy prior to preparation, which takes extra time when a body is in bad shape due to trauma. It seems as if this was all complete prior to the transport on the 11th on Air Force 2. That is quite the rush. I don’t believe they did any autopsy.

2 Likes

This is a critical point because, if true, it means the system is so corrupt that we can’t trust ANYTHING anymore 
 not from anyone, not from any source.

9 Likes

I don’t think they needed to do anything special in the autopsy. it was clear that he died of massive trauma caused by a gunshot. They won’t need to biopsy organs and do any toxicology screening etc.

I sincerely hope that Utah performed an autopsy. There were rumours that his wife Erika requested than an autopsy not be performed.

I find it hard to believe that the bullet remained in the body and did not have an exit wound. The medical examiner said the bullet was inside and just under his skin. This sounds bizarre but let’s say this actually is the case. They never said where the bullet was discovered, under which part of his skin. This would be very useful information as it would help identify where the shot was fired. Why are they hiding these details? Also they would have probably a ‘clean’ bullet as it hadn’t hit anything ‘hard’. Could they not trace this bullet back to the rifle they have recovered? Couldn’t they determine whether that rifle was actually fired in the previous 24 hours before they recovered it?

I know the police have to be careful with information to build their case and not jeopardize any prosecution but some information would be helpful to dispel all the conspiracy theories.

I am sure the ‘furry’ friend, Lance Twiggs is involved. Perhaps even the shooter, if there was a second shooter. He can’t be found now and is in hiding.

Regarding the cameras and the Turning Point security team removing the SD cards. I think this would be common practice for law enforcement professionals. They probably did this on instinct to preserve the data. I don’t find this strange in the least.

We have the 10 degree suspect Tyler Robinson. We may have a 22 degree mystery shooter. Perhaps a shooter from behind. A crazy idea of a shooter with a palm pistol.

So far there are no grounds for federal charges. They are looking for any reason to charge Mr. Robinson federally for this but so far nothing. For sure the Utah police and the FBI are not disclosing many details. I’m sure they have more information that they have told the public.

I need to get several white Freedom shirts. This mission and the movement must go on.

3 Likes

Have you seen any of Zeb Boykins analysis. He says this latest vid from new angle may have been tampered with, especially the single frame that you’ve focused on with the puffed up t-shirt and neck (around the 40+ min mark). He’s saying that frame is an anomaly and does not jive with other vids that were released soon after the event. Here’s the link: https://www.youtube.com/live/r_AIHY3elxk?si=hHJ2RbSfyxS48sox

2 Likes

Hi Chris, great work! Definitely a plausible theory. I would expect none less from you. However, don’t underestimate Tyler. I didn’t think it plausible but this youtuber recreated each step and showed it was: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DOwdySFWMQ&t=1411s. The shot with no exit wound I agree is also a problem. Another guy who is an expert with body armor is insistent that Charlie was wearing and the round clipped the top edge, deflecting up to the neck. He has spotted a gray smudge on the shirt appearing just after the shot and recreated the shot on a white shirt. Look at 30:32 for the recreation and before that for the actual shot. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMBL2O9XHMo&t=2356s . That jump off the 14 ft wall convinced me not to under estimate this kid.

Good article. Thanks.

Yes, I’ve seen his claims. But leaving aside whether the video in question has been tampered with, Zeb’s ‘exploding mic’ theory doesn’t hold water.

1 - if the mic exploded, there would be a big hole in Charlies t-shirt right where the mic was clipped.
2 - there would have been burn marks
3 - there would have been smoke and at least a flash of flames/light

Let’s recall the exploding pagers and phones:



That last one, above, shows the effect of a pager that went off in a drawer of a dresser.

Next, the physics are all wrong. The mic can be seen moving up and to Charlie’s left in every single video we have. All of them.

Physically, something that explodes cannot only move in one direction. Sure a shaped charge can put a larger portion of the blast in one direction but not all of it. This is pure Newton era physics understanding.

Most problematic for the exploding mic idea is that C4 expands at 26,550 feet per second, meaning it cannot possibly have exploded and still be visible in the next video frame. Full stop.

Finally, I had poor evidence of the over pressure event from the super shitty potato cam video from Charlie’s right side. But I could not be positive that I could resolve his neck expanding from his chin tucking down to go forward with the idea.

But it does comport with the other video, so we have two


Also, to be clear, the reason that we don’t see the exact over-pressure event on all the videos is because it is an extremely short-lived event lasting ~1/1000 of a second. I would expect that not every recording would have managed to capture it.

In closing , the exploding mic idea is not viable.

16 Likes

Was there an autopsy?

2 Likes

Very nice. Should make it really easy to triangulate the source with a bunch of mics, and pretty easy to figure out the speed.

Mongo and I were talking about the buzzing of the bullet after the crack passes, which is apparently regular enough to notice the doppler effect.

1 Like

I watched it on the weekend. Lots of :thinking:

https://x.com/AsplundPete/status/1971052770196172824
I just rewatched De Palma’s film SNAKE EYES:

-the man assassinated is Charles Kirkland.
-He was killed because he was changing his mind about funding a defense system for Israel.
-The woman who was also a target wears white, which gets splattered with blood.
-The film takes place September 10th.
-The tropical storm that hits in the film is called “Jezebel” — also the name of the online magazine that hired witches in August to hex Kirk to bring him harm.
-It was filmed at Trump Taj Mahal Hotel & Casino.
-there’s secret camera which films the assassination, but the videographer doesn’t let anyone know.
-the security team was military, and turns out to have plotted the assassination [belated spoiler alert], a betrayal.
-The boxer (in on the plan) is named Tyler “The Executioner”.
-the assassin’s initials are TR (he is killed and blamed as a lone gunman).
-check out the symbolic hand gesture on the movie poster.
-a long-haired man jumps and shouts to distract for cover, initiating the event.
-number 7 is prominently featured (it represents completion).

There are a few more esoteric similarities, but the list above is enough to ponder.

9 Likes

I wanted to drop a couple interesting videos on the ballistics that I have seen.
Mat Kester, who I’ve never heard of before, has been going deep on real world testing. Here’s his latest talking about the the bullet not exiting the body. Apparently some sources are saying the bullet struck the clavicle first, which bring up a whole host more questions if true. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xV8xzNOhrA He’s also done some analysis/testing of the Mauser down the pants, taking a shot after reassembling a rifle etc.

1ShotTv also did a meat + bone shooting test. Yes, it is graphic. The TL:DW is the bullet went right through a hunk of pork, a beef femur, and another hunk of meat. https://youtu.be/9PtkKUjN6Wk?si=XvHiznJPUZzItcfX

Hope it helps with your truth seeking.

4 Likes

Hmm. Very interesting. But regarding the idea that it may be predictive programming
 It was released in 1998, 5 years after Charlie Kirk was born. Are we to believe that our rulers can anticipate the future in such detail almost 20 years in advance, including Charlie Kirk’s rise to fame and influence? It strains credulity. I prefer to chalk it up as a movie bearing a striking number of coincidences, and nothing more than mere coincidences.

2 Likes

I forgot to block quote the summary by the X poster - perhaps you thought that was my summary. It was not. I will go back and edit it now to block quote it.

I make no inference whatsoever. I merely posted something that gave me (and many others on X) pause for thought. What one reads into it, coincidence or other things, is up to them.

1 Like

All facts lead to yes, an autopsy was performed.

News footage attached from 9/10 of a motorcade with vehicle marked ‘MEDICAL EXAMINER’ [1m18sec] mark] leaving Timpanogos Regional Hospital taking Charlie Kirk’s body to the State Medical Examiner’s office in Taylorsville, UT C

FACTS:

9/10: News broadcast shows a motorcade including MEDICAL EXAMINER vehicle leaving hospital to State Medical Examiner’s office.

9/11: at Press Conference, Beau Mason, the Commissioner for Utah Department of Public Safety states Charlie’s body was moved to State Medical Examiner office the evening of 9/10.

9/16: Tyler Robinson’s indictment. It explicitly states “The Medical Examiner’s report is pending.”

The dispatch audio correctly states there was not an autopsy performed at the hospital [BECAUSE it was done at State Medical Examiner office.]

Motorcade leaving hospital evening of 9/10 to State Medical Examiner office:

Report outside of State Medical Examiner office PLUS Press Conference with Beau Mason.

From Tyler Robinson’s indictment:

5 Likes

Sent to Dr Chris M.

1 Like

That makes sense, though I would say “astounding coincidences.” BUT what if some people can remote view the future and wrote the Screenplay to notify us in advance of their evil, Satanic plan? Apparently, that is required by Satan’s code of conduct. What if Satan himself dictated the screenplay?

What if Trump and key Administration figures were shown a demonstration of these abilities upon entering office and told to OBEY? That would certainly scare the bejeezus out of them and explain some very inexplicable message and priority changes since taking office. Those changes sure look Satanic to me.

3 Likes