Solved! Analysis Reveals Kirk Killed by Rifle Round, but Not From Robinson's Position

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/solved-analysis-reveals-kirk-killed-by-rifle-round-but-not-from-robinsons-position/

The Charlie Kirk shooting was traumatic, and the country will never be the same afterward. We deserve to know what happened. Accordingly, I have fired up another Citizens’ Investigation to see what we can uncover in our pursuit of truth.

After conducting extensive analysis of available information, I have a high degree of confidence in the following:

  • Tyler Robinson did not take the kill shot from the Losee Center sniper position we’ve all been led to believe was ‘the spot.’
  • The bullet that struck Charlie was a high-velocity rifle round, which did, indeed, stay in his body.
  • That kill shot had to have been taken from a location offering both a steeper angle into his body and a higher off-axis angle.

We can say these things after reviewing a critical video released on September 24th, which fortuitously captured the overpressure moment in Charlie’s neck and upper torso during one of the video frames.

The only possible way for that bullet to have struck Charlie’s neck in such a fashion as to ricochet downward further into his body was for it to have hit his neck at a much steeper downward angle and a much higher off-axis angle.

With medium confidence, we can begin to point to some other possible sniping locations. However, until (and unless) we get more definitive information about the (allegedly) recovered bullet and its initial path into Charlie’s body, we cannot do more than point to the entire roofline of the adjacent Sorensen Center building as the most logical and obvious sniper location.

Further, we can rule out palm pistols, phone guns, and exploding mics from the available evidence we now have. None of those could have caused the severe overpressure and near instant death (“pugilist pose”) and heart stoppage (no carotid spurting, only jugular drainage) that we all saw.

That combination of observed effects can only have been caused by a very sudden and large event, such as a high-velocity rifle round with its thousands of ft/lbs of energy.

As the old saying goes, do you know what a person who’s been shot by a pistol does next? Whatever they were doing before they were shot. That’s because pistol rounds basically make a hole through a body. Unless they hit the brain, heart, or spinal column directly all they can do is punch a hole and cause blood to begin leaking out.

Rifle rounds are different because they are traveling at supersonic speeds and much of their damage is caused by the enormous cavitation bubbles they create within the first ~1 foot of body impact. In this episode, I cover all of this and bring the receipts so everybody can understand what rifle rounds do.

One thing they do not do is deflect easily and head off in new direction. At least not appreciably over the ~5-6 inches of soft neck width that would have been in play for a shot taken by Tyler Robinson from his putative sniper position on the Losee Center Building.

Sure, if you hit something like a branch or a twig, a rifle round may deflect off of a target dozens or even hundreds of yards downrange.

But over a few inches? No way. The question becomes, what force would be required to convert a 10-degree downsloping round trajectory into a 45-degree angle to penetrate his body and remain lodged there? To deflect a bullet meaningfully over such a short range, physics apply. Invoking Newton, for every force there’s an equal and opposite force. To deflect a bullet with ~2,000 ft/lbs of energy would require just over 12,000 pounds-force; not something a human neck and head can provide.

Even the wimpiest consumer .30-06 round will be carrying nearly 2,000 ft/lbs of energy at 140 yards and traveling in a very straight line.

Which is exactly what it’s going to continue doing unless acted upon by a structure capable of meeting some or all of the force.

A neck struck off to the side, where Charlie’s was struck, is nothing but soft tissue. It’s ridiculous to propose that the bullet magically deflected off of that soft tissue, in just an inch or two, so that it could bend down into his chest cavity at a much steeper angle.

To suggest that is to suggest that sometimes buildings just fall at free-fall speed due to office fires. They don’t, and bullets do not suddenly veer off in new directions when they are carrying the majority of their muzzle energy after encountering soft, bone-free tissue.

Finally, we dispense with the idea that Charlie was wearing body armor. He wasn’t, and that’s easily proven from existing photos from the event. Even a compression t-shirt arrangement would have left visible lines under his thin-material t-shirt. None can be seen from any angle.

I hereby call upon law enforcement authorities to release the full and unedited videos from all buildings and angles from that day, and for TPUSA to release the recordings from the cameras and microphones that were on or right beside the stage that day.

In a future episode, I hope to be able to resolve the audio files into a coherent story. So far, I cannot, and I fear that someone has been removing source files and flooding the field with garbage in an attempt to hide the truth.

Please, let me know what you think, whether I’ve made the case for the major claims, and whether you have a different interpretation of the physical events and video evidence we do have.

 

55 Likes

Quite possibly Israel.
Charlie’s microphone.
Remember the pagers.

3 Likes

If you watch the video…no it could not have been Charlie’s microphone.

I’ve ruled that out conclusively.

But, yes, quite possibly Israel.

23 Likes

You’re the best at bringing data into a maelstrom of speculation. Extremely informative. Learned a lot about gun physics and anatomy. Magnum opus among your many others!

25 Likes

I listened to so many of these over the last 2 weeks. By far the best analysis I’ve heard. Keep up the good work. :facepunch:t4:

28 Likes

Have you watched the recent guest on Redacted? He analyzes video he obtained suggesting there may have been ISR communication jamming drones flying overhead the event.

By the way Chris, been following you since 2009. As always, thank you! I feel like part of your family even though we only met once over the phone when I was active duty.

10 Likes

What if Charlie was hit by a ricochet? From Robinson’s gun?

2 Likes

Any chance there can be just one dedicated thread on Charlie Kirk’s murder? Kind of like the one that’s dedicated to the events at Butler, PA? Thank you.

6 Likes

livestream several times broken - way before

very unlikely

2 Likes

@cmartenson have you seen the stuff about the Robinson’s name changes? This gets weirder and weirder…:

https://x.com/realgeorgewebb1/status/1971534323817033789?s=46

3 Likes

Why did the entrance wound seem moderately large? Could there be a small entrance wound somewhere else and this was the exit wound? Why was this not an exit wound?

1 Like

After reflecting on this for the last few hours, isn’t the implication that Robinson has to walk (or can only be prosecuted for intended murder) if he has a non-clownish defense and it’s not just a show trial? There’s no way this doesn’t introduce reasonable doubt in a jury (obviously barring additional evidence being introduced)…a major difference being between this and Butler that the “lone-shooter” suspect is still alive? Will be interesting to see if he makes it to trial and the societal implication of a clear cover-up with a suspect still alive (seems like all the other “conspiracies” didn’t have a living suspect or a trial at a time like this where institutional trust is completely broken among a majority)…

4 Likes

I believe the data that leads to that conclusion is the bullet being found in his body and also Candace Owens stating that she saw the footage from his back side and did not see a wound. If that information turns out to be incorrect, then it would open up other hypothesis.

3 Likes

Thank you for doing this in a respectful and non gory manner.

We still have many questions about this but one thing is certain: Charlie left this world instantly. I had no idea about the shock wave. What a tremendous injury. :persevere:

17 Likes

Great work, Chris.

14 Likes

Shall we take bets than on whether or not someone shoots the shooter prior to trial? (JFK…)

19 Likes

This is why I’m a member at PP. As always, great analysis, cutting through the noise to start to pain a picture of what actually happened. Been following this story and this is the first I’ve seen of cavitation and analysis of angle to explain lack of exit wound. Looking forward to more analysis

20 Likes

Thank you for breaking this down. It’s disturbing to watch the impact of the bullet hitting Charlie at the very second his life was taken :pray::, but because the feds are clearly involved in a cover-up, this work, your work, plays a critical role in getting to the truth of what happened. It is a tribute to Charlie Kirk’s life, considering his focus of bringing people to truth. I imagine this event will wake even more people up. Do you think we are at the tipping point of critical mass? Things are looking soooo obvious to me. I LOVED you saying “you just won’t do it anymore” when referring to 9/11. That’s how I feel. It’s just so insulting. I feel like saying, “Just STOP,” the way you would to a child who’s telling a tall tale. I wonder if this is part of the fifth generation warfare you talk about. “They” must know their actions and narratives are absurd, no? They can sit back and gloat at the chaos they have created, and they know there’s nothing we can do about it. They want the chaos. They want people to go off the rails, so they can justify rolling out their control grid. I’m in the middle of the book Chaos by Tom O’Neill (as per recommended by Candace Owens). It’s crazy how long these shenanigans have been going on.

14 Likes

The conspiracy surrounding the Kirk assassination isn’t all this magic bullet nonsense that people are mining for content… replaying videos already posted to Twitter and going “Now look closer” is the cheapest laziest content you can create, and takes no effort.

The conspiracy is the Feds are still basically running cover for the fact that half of all the Trans people in Utah seemingly knew this was going to happen and were posting about it in advance (as 4chan noticed immediately), did not conceal their intent really at all… Somehow never got a door knock or anything related to the fact they were all largely openly talking about political assassination (almost as if someone had told local PD to back off, when 1 of the 20+ people who knew inevitably leaked)… And that if 20+ Right Wingers had been this brazen about assassinating a left winger and openly celebrated it after betraying foreknowledge of the assassintion… about 10-30 people would be arrested by now on co-conspirator and accessory chargees.

[…]

Now Charlie Kirk was shot from a downwards angle into the neck just above the shoulder…

Now I’m afraid I’m going to speak ill of the dead ladies and gentlemen, you see Charlie Kirk actually had a character flaw, something his mother should have beaten out of him but didn’t…

Charlie Krik had bad posture.

Now Imagine you’re the surgeon operating on Charlie Kirk and its hopeless and he comes in basically dead and there’s nothing you can do… And you have to tell his friends, religious people, deeply distraught, and maybe you have to answer their questions after the fact when they reach out to you again.

If the bullet deflected and there actually was an exit wound no one saw… because it was in Charlie’s ass? Would you repeat that? Especially with leftists looking to mock him? If the bullet shredded like 8 vertebrae, ripped apart a lung and stopped in his bladder making him piss himself… Would you repeat that?

4 Likes

Scientific, empirical, and to the point. :+1:

4 Likes