30 fps, about 19 or 20 frames
btw, there were law enforcement officers on top of hall of flags
Thatâs pretty hot for a .30-06.
Hereâs a range:
Going by the odds, a âmedâ load is what we might use as a starting point.
I will defer to you on the speed. I also forgot to account for the distance of the mic from the bullet trajectory which looked like it was about 100 feet.
Changing subjects, we have at least two high quality videos and more than a dozen low quality ones. Analyzing the audio ought to make it possible to determine the shooterâs location. Is anyone working on that?
You and Gary both know much more about this than I do, Iâd like to see a joint video in which you discuss this.
I wasnât sure where to put this. I put it here because it seems this is the place for all things Charlie Kirk. It is a commentary on a video interview with Alex Clark and Andrew Kolvett. Andrew is a commentator for Turning Point USA.
Original video
On whether Charlie was becoming Catholic. Alex says Charlie loved the sacredness of Catholic mass but was not becoming Catholic
On whether Charlie was turning on Israel Alex said Charlie was frustrated by the fact that he disagreed with some of the things Israel was doing and that was portrayed as a break from Israel. Also misconception that turning point had a lot of Jewish donors, Alex said they mostly had money from Christians.
Link 2 https://youtu.be/TBBqW2CQKbM?si=NxoRzLv1HE_9XcFd&t=331
On whether Charlie accepted $150,000 for turning point usa from Israel. Alex says he had never been told that and that he doubts it seriously because they had a policy not to accept money from any government. Not even the US government.
Link 3 https://youtu.be/TBBqW2CQKbM?si=NFp82iJu0riNbPYG&t=477
About the turning point team taking the sd cards out of the cameras on stage. There were people from the crowd stealing caps so they took the cards to protect them.
Link 4 https://youtu.be/TBBqW2CQKbM?si=fjlrF0lZTOxjG7CA&t=559
Who does Erika Kirk think did the shootings? Not definitively but likely Tyler R.
Link 5 https://youtu.be/TBBqW2CQKbM?si=fjlrF0lZTOxjG7CA&t=699
Heres another indicator against body armour: to hit a chest plate and change direction 90 degrees up into the neck would require an edge hit and so much force that the bullet would have been turned into a storm of fragments, it would NOT have remained intact. Google a few high speed vids of bullets striking AR500 to illustrate.
A video I came across from a higher level where you can hear the gun shot a lot louder. Around the 7:40 mark (end of video).
Plus; where is the rifle? We canât see him holding it⌠could he have time to stuff it in his pants again? If so he wouldnât be able to jog without limping OR when he lands to the ground, he wouldnât be able to bend his knees and then jog away again⌠this all stinks⌠thereâs definitely something going on here and it isnât the truth!
I personally know this campus through and through, I grew up in Orem and Iâve attended twice. Iâve been in every building and area accessible; Iâve even been on the roof where Robinson supposedly was.
I ALSO thought that the shooter was in the area you have pointed out, way before they arrested Robinson. I have a video of Charlie being hit that was taken directly in front of him about 10ft away. Iâve slowed it down and enhanced it to see frame by frame and it doesnât seem like a .30-06 from the Losee roof top would have given us the video footage we have seen. Thereâs that parking garage just north of your yellow cone; if there was another shooter there, they could have reached the garage and slipped away way faster than Robinson did.
Plus, Robinson, jumping from the roof⌠whereâs the rifle? If he stuffed it in his pant leg again, he wouldnât be able to bend his knees for the landing OR jogged away after.
@cmartenson Judging by this Still here, it seems like you may already have the video that this came from. This is the video that I said I have and wanted to offer you. If you donât have it, let me know!
Charlie Kirk was shot from his back-right.
YOU ARE MISSING rangedaybroâs VIDEO EVIDENCE:
âKirk Assassination: New Video Evidence Changes Everything!â
Ignore whether blood, fluid or his necklace flew out the back of his head. It really doesnât matter! What matters are the 3 things that happened immediately AFTER Charlie was hitâŚfrom behind and to his rightâŚ
FIRST, his head and hair immediately reactâforward and to his left and his hair flops/bounces
THEN the exit wound appears on his neck
THEN his shirt is stretched by the bullet (or pressure release as you educated us) AND/OR blood exiting his neck
Watch the video, especially at the 3:31-3:33 mark.
There is NO WAY that shot came from in front of Charlie, whether directly in front (10-10) or from his left-front. That would mean the blood on his shirt came FIRST, THEN the wound on his neck. Impossible. And the angle would not work from the front because the blood on his shirt is below the wound on his neck, not above it as if the shot came from above.
As Charlie Kirk would say, prove me wrong! ![]()
@cmartenson So, my boss Air Dropped me a video of Charlie getting shot literally 5 minutes after it happened. He had a friend who was attending the event and he was in the front row, just left, behind the guy who was asking questions. I havenât share it with anyone else and I havenât seen anyone on YouTube or any media outlet use this same video. Iâve tried to slow it down and enhance it to see it frame by frame. Chris, I would like to share it with you, if youâre interested in seeing it?!?!? WARNING; it is very clear footage and VERY graphic.
I came here to Tribe.Peak from your YouTube video you posted, I havenât finished it yet but am looking forward to doing so. Iâve reached out to a couple other people who have posted similar videos about what you are doing, but they havenât responded back. Honestly, they didnât really have any good links to get in touch with them anyway.
Please let me know, thanks!
Lack of shadow is possibly due to the area being oversaturated with light. Please look into possible genuine camera/compression/uploading artifacts before jumping to conclusions.
Iâm still looking at the Butler videos, and there are some that WERE manipulated. But others just have funky effects.
Yes, I would very much appreciate that video. Please PM/DM me here and I can arrange upload detiuls.
Charlie Kirk was pro Israel. He just wasnât pro Netanyahu.
These days, when almost ANYTHING bad happens, there will be thousands of people and tens of thousands of bots coming out of the woodwork to say âit was the Jewsâ.
People were saying that after a Christian church in Syria was attacked a few months back, for crying out loud.
Now, why the hell would âthe Jewsâ kill a guy that is pro Israel, when almost non-Jewish Democrats are fomenting hatred of Israel by repeating the Qatari talking point that Israel is committing genocide, and even half of Republicans are getting to hate Jews, and 40% more are getting suspicious of Jewish influence and/or think Oct 7 was a LIHOP.
So basically the only people MORE pro-current-Israeli-government than Charlie Kirk are about 10% of Republicans and the 4% of Democrats that are Jews.
What would âthe Jewsâ have to gain from killing him?
It gets worse. There are youtubers who are saying Charlie Kirk wasnât even killed - itâs all a hoax.
I guess I shouldnât be surprised that some haters are putting this shit out, but one guy is a devoted Christian who was trying to help the victims of the fires in Maui. Iâm not going to say his name, but you can probably figure it out.
Is the rooftop easily accessible? Usually access is locked these days.
Gary of Paramount Tactical went âto the dark sideâ on the Butler, PA shooting, so I wouldnât trust anything he says.
He tried to insinuate things with half truths. Specifically, he said that because the Hercules 1 team couldnât see the back half of the AGR 6 roof, they couldnât see Crooks - like he was a sheet of paper or something.
He also loudly trumpeted the fact that he did a careful survey of the complete area, but only showed the heights of the AGR 6 building, the stage and the south barn. Of course, the height of the north and south bleachers were crucial.
That first bullet couldnât have started from Crooks, hit Mr. Trumpâs ear, and then hit the south bleacher railing regardless of whether the height question worked out, though. Such a bullet would have ended up too far left of the spot on the railing that was hit.
Will you or @chrismartenson please share with others after his review?