Strikes Raise Risk of Gulf Nuclear Contamination – Plus a US Satellite Blackout and More Refinery Fires

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/strikes-raise-risk-of-gulf-nuclear-contamination-plus-a-us-satellite-blackout-and-more-refinery-fires/

Geopolitics

Iran’s Foreign Minister warned Gulf states that strikes on the Bushehr nuclear plant, which was hit four times with the IAEA confirming no radiation release so far, would send fallout toward GCC capitals like Riyadh due to northwest winds and Gulf currents. A US diplomat reportedly echoed risks to desalination plants supplying nearly all drinking water in Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, stating radionuclides could contaminate intake water within 15 days, exceeding one-week reserves.

The US government ordered commercial satellite imagery providers, including Planet, to indefinitely withhold images from the Middle East conflict zone retroactive to March 9, limiting independent verification of strikes, casualties, and damage. Officials described the measure as NOAA-mandated shutter control for national security. Originally, the US government had only requested a 96-hour delay.

US intelligence reportedly assessed that Iran rapidly restores bombed missile bunkers and silos using excavators and deploys decoys to preserve launchers. It notes a 90% drop in ballistic missile and drone attacks, though Iran reportedly fires 15 to 30 missiles and 50 to 100 drones daily. Two-thirds of production facilities are reportedly damaged, with air and naval forces largely destroyed.

Energy

Leaked images reportedly show extensive damage to Iran’s Mahshahr oil refineries and petrochemical plants from US-Israel airstrikes. Separately, an Iranian missile reportedly struck Bahrain’s BAPCO refinery, which was upgraded to 400,000 barrels per day capacity, causing fires at the nation’s refining facilities. Iranian officials reported limited damage to Mahshahr facilities with no pollution risk, while Bahrain reported the BAPCO fire was extinguished without injuries.

Iran has exempted Iraq from restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz, placing nations into one of three categories: hostile, neutral, or friendly. Hostile countries face prohibitions, neutral states reportedly pay fees starting at $1 per barrel of oil in Chinese yuan or stablecoins, and friendly states receive free passage. Weekly transits reportedly reached the highest level since the war began, with 13 ships crossing in one day, including French container ships, Japanese LNG tankers, and vessels linked to China or Iran. Iraq’s exemption could reportedly enable up to 3 million barrels per day of its oil cargoes, though shipping companies must assess risks.

Meanwhile, US shale producer Continental Resources plans to increase its capital budget to boost production. The move comes as the company, which produced 475,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day in 4Q 2025 across the Bakken, Permian, and other basins, responds to higher oil price forecasts with Brent expected above $80 per barrel in 2026. As one analyst noted, any oil company committing to higher future investment is signaling confidence that oil prices will remain elevated for an extended period, allowing it to capitalize on sustained strong prices rather than fearing a glut.

Lastly, analysis from Gail Tverberg suggests that losing the war with Iran could reorganize global economies around local energy resources. It notes pre-war shortages of diesel and jet fuel, derived from heavy oil, and Middle East population growth straining desalination plants, which comprise 42% of the world’s total. Oil prices averaged $65 per barrel in 2025, below fiscal breakeven levels for exporters like Iran at $124 per barrel, leading to subsidy challenges. Without the war, it states LNG oversupply threatened low prices for exporters needing $15 to $20 per million metric tons of LNG. The analysis describes the conflict as a crisis phase in a secular cycle, with economies as dissipative structures requiring specific fuels to avoid collapse, and suggests regional fuel use could preserve resources for essentials like food production.

Epstein Files

Representative Thomas Massie notified acting Attorney General Todd Blanche of a 30-day deadline to release remaining Epstein files under the Epstein Files Transparency Act or face criminal liability. The ultimatum followed President Trump’s removal of Pam Bondi, whom Massie and Representative Nancy Mace criticized for mishandling the files and stonewalling accountability.

However, Blanche stated on Fox News that the Department of Justice has released all files related to the Epstein case, closing the chapter, and emphasized congressional access to documents. He denied evidence of Epstein spying for a foreign entity and stated that partying with Epstein is not a crime. The DOJ reportedly reviewed six million documents but released about 3.5 million publicly, with the rest redacted or withheld. FBI concerns reportedly include potential document shredding and a hacker’s access to child sexual abuse material, alongside calls for transparency from survivors. Critics have described the DOJ announcement as a cover-up, with millions of pages reportedly still unreleased or redacted.

Sources

Why Losing the Iran War Could Be Humanity’s Best Bet

Losing the Iran War May Be the Best Outcome for the World

Source

Massie Issues 30-Day Ultimatum to Acting AG Blanche: Release Epstein Files or Face Charges

“Congratulations AG Blanche. Now you have 30 days to release the rest of the files before becoming criminally liable for failure to comply with the Epstein Files Transparency Act.”

Source

DOJ Closes Epstein Files Chapter Amid Claims of Hidden Millions

“The DOJ has now released all the files with respect to the Epstein saga.”

Source

Iran Warns Gulf: Bushehr Fallout Poisons Riyadh, Spares Tehran

“Israel-U.S. have bombed our Bushehr plant four times now. Radioactive fallout will end life in GCC capitals, not Tehran.”

Source

US Government Orders Satellite Imagery Blackout Over Middle East Conflict Zone

When you’re blacking out satellite imagery for a month, you’re hiding what’s really happening.

Source

Iran Exempts Iraq from Hormuz Restrictions as Weekly Transits Hit War High

“Brotherly Iraq is exempt from any restrictions we have imposed on the Strait of Hormuz.”

Source

Tehran’s Hormuz Toll Booth Sorts Ships by National Friendship

under Iran’s scheme, all states are divided into three categories: “hostile,” “neutral,” and “friendly.”

Source

Iran Races to Restore Bombed Missile Bunkers in Hours After Strikes

Iran Scrambling To Restore Bombed Missile Bunkers Within Hours After Being Struck

Source

Continental’s Shale Surge: Betting on Lasting High Oil Prices

Any oil company that commits to boosting future investment thinks oil prices will stay high and wants to cash in

Source

Leaked Images Show US-Israel Strikes Devastate Iran’s Mahshahr Oil Refineries, Risking Global Energy Crisis

the total destruction of major petrochemical plants and oil refineries in Mahshahr as a result of U.S. and Israeli airstrikes

Source | Submitted by Chris Martenson

US Diplomat Warns: Iran Nuclear Strike Could Poison Gulf’s Vital Desalination Water

bombing Iran’s nuclear plant will poison the entire Persian Gulf with radioactive material

Source

Iranian Missile Ignites Bahrain’s BAPCO Refinery, Nation’s Full Capacity Ablaze

BAPCO refinery ablaze after Iranian missile strike.

Source

In addition to sources submitted by community members, the following were also used in the creation of this report: Reuters, Bloomberg, Al Jazeera, National Petrochemical Company, Al Jazeera English, Al Arabiya English, Gunther Eagleman™, Melissa Redpill – Freedom Force, Planet Labs, CNBC, Lauren, Mario Nawfal, Stew Peters.

2 Likes

Did any who voted for this guy expect him to become unhinged and to drop F-bombs on the country he’s committing war crimes? Stay classy Trump, stay classy. This is NOT the behavior of someone who is in control of the situation. Many are suggesting he will authorize the use of a M.O.A.B. (mother of all bombs) over Tehran or use a Nuke.


The U.S. president wrote early Sunday morning on Truth Social that Tuesday would be “Power Plant Day” and “Bridge Day” for American forces selecting targets in the region, adding: “Open the F**kin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell, Praise be to Allah.”

3 Likes

It is very very difficult for modern westerners to comprehend the tone and the content of the Talmud. We DO understand the prohibition against allowing the Goy to read the Talmud and the reasons that Jews who share its contents with Goy “should be killed.”

https://x.com/DanBilzerian/status/1825211759906693465

1 Like

That book looks very different from OT. What’s relation there? I thought christians use mostly NT and jews OT, but talmud isnt OT then…

1 Like

IMO, it is neither as it runs. IIRC, having sex with a child in the OT got you stones and my friends who are Jehovah Witnesses tell me that God broke his covenant with the Jews sometime after Jesus’ death.

I was unaware of what the Talmud teaches and it is abhorrent.

You can easily find the Talmud online and judge the veracity of the claims made in the previous posts for yourself. Just FYI, the word goyim means “nations.” It is a neutral word.

Edited to add, the Talmud is a collection of writings by Rabbis discussing practices and interpretations. Not either the Old or New Testament.

1 Like

It has absolutely nothing to do with the OT. Most was written after Babylonian captivity getting further from the actual context of the OT. Israel assumed their captivity was judgment by God only from idol worship. Both Talmuds focus on anything having to do with the law restrictions as death penalties for not observing, completely missing the point of their judgment. (It was a personal relationship issue and not a law observance issue-they totally missed that ignoring the minor prophets emphasizing failure in the heart bigly).

Neither the Pharisees nor Saducees were a thing prior to captivity. They became a self righteous arm and enforcers of the Talmuds writings and additions after the 70 year judgment in Babylon. In addition to the quoted verses, both Talmuds say that its words supersede anything written in the OT. That’s why Jesus completely ignored any Talmudic writings. He ONLY ever quoted and referred to the OT.

Every Talmudic verse above is easily refuted by OT passages. But if you don’t know its context or the OT itself, it’s easy to hate anything having to do with God wrt the OT when you see and do not like Israel’s massacres in Gaza, forcing Trump to attack Iran, etc. The Talmudic Jews know that and take advantage of it and produce tools like Mike Huckabee, Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz.

My opinion:

The God of the Bible is not the problem. Ignorance of it, ignorance of its purpose and the Talmuds’ lying about it helps create the left/right; pro-Israel/not pro-Israel condition instead of truth over narrative, just like our political system. Keeping the argument and resultant division alive and well is moving along nicely. Trump’s unhinged Truth social comment kind of demonstrates that. It’s getting frothy but revealing actual Talmud verses along with actual Koran verses is a good thing. They speak for themselves and much of it is very evil.

2 Likes

Bibi talks about the Amalek. Do you know any details about what happened there?

2 Likes

Does that include the first 5 Books of the OT?

1 Like

No. Edit: oops I mean yes, they believe the Talmud supersedes the Torah. The Talmud completely distorts the Torah with half truths then made up stuff by “respected” rabbis after the Babylon captivity.

My opinion: Israel is still under God’s promise to them (not a happy promise) in Deuteronomy 28:15-the end of that chapter. They’ve been fulfilling the conditions needed for the promises to take effect since Isaiah’s time which is upon what I base my opinion.

2 Likes

In my opinion, the Amalek nonsense from the Talmudic leaders (and the Beeb) blames any non-Jew for what the Jews did for a few hundred years before their Babylonian captivity: idol worship and worshipping other gods, Amalek/Molech being the god of choice. “It’s the non-Jews’ fault we left and pissed on the Source of our blessings.” In 1 and 2 Kings, there’s hundreds of years of history regarding Israel and Judah’s false gods worship including Amalek.

They’ve completely failed their original covenant and it’s all the goyim’s fault per the Talmud.

Their covenant mission was to be a light to draw non-Jews to God. The whole Joshua/enter the land episode was a one-off to Epstein-on-steroids people who were warned and given lots of opportunities to stop. God used Israel to judge them and they even screwed that up.

Don’t know if that answers anything Dave. Just how I see it.

2 Likes

Here are some references. First, in english. Key phrase:
"Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys.”

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Samuel%2015&version=NIV

“The Lord”, in this reference, is that fellow named Yahweh. He doesn’t like infants, cattle, sheep, camels, or donkeys affiliated with the Amalekites. They are to be killed. All of them. There are no innocents, even if you’re a Amalek-sheep.

I know this is Yahweh because his name is mentioned twice in the first line.

https://www.bibliatodo.com/en/interlinear/1samuel-15-1?v=KJV

To me, it feels like Bibi may have been infected by the “Yahweh approach” to issues like Iran. I mean, all he had to do was read the verse and apply Yahweh’s mindset to the modern era. Did Bibi get something wrong, if Iran = Amalek?

2 Likes

That’s the one-off judgment that applied only to the “ites” in the land God promised Abraham. All of those “ites” were warned for about two hundred years prior to their judgment that all that stuff would happen to them if they continued. Their final warning and offer to stop their evil was written on white cliffs by Joshua. Very few broke the code but some did. They were welcomed as strangers per the Torah and not killed.

Never again was Israel commanded to conquer anyone else nor invade foreign lands. Bibi and the Talmudists love taking that one-off out of context to justify their evil.

I know you’re not a fan of God’s dealing with OT “ites” and I too think it was harsh but after lots of begging, asking, warning them to stop offering their babies by cooking them while having orgies while their child screamed then dropped from the glowing brass hands into the fire, there was a Game Over date, otherwise God’s warnings had no power behind them. Again, my opinion.

1 Like

In the modern era, presumably it would be a violation of international law. You’re the one who had all the training. It looks like genocide to me.

It also set a precedent, which is in use - routinely today - by Israel, under Bibi’s leadership. He references Amalek, of course. Gaza, Lebanon, and now Iran = Amalek.

Because Yahweh ordered that it be done to the enemies of the Chosen People. All it takes is once, and the precedent is set.

Jesus gave us precedents too. He explicitly didn’t stone people [even though Yahweh commanded otherwise], he turned the other cheek, he healed the sick and raised the dead. Yahweh, in contrast, ordered his humans to engage in genocide.

2 Likes

So for Israel, it’s Yahweh or the highway. And you don’t get the highway.

3 Likes

Really? God told Judah to do what the king of Babylon told them to do prior to their own judgment/captivity which upends what you’re calling a precedent. They screwed that up too just like they did during the time of the judges. “Every man did what was right in his own heart.” Kind of a theme.

Uh, if “God” commands his “Chosen People” to commit genocide (because Amalek = bad) then … doesn’t that set a precedent?

I mean, Bibi sure thinks so. And certainly since “God” isn’t here right now to debate the issue (perhaps that “Ruach” is in the shop?), then Bibi wins.

I prefer the Jesus approach. No genocides. But that’s just me.

3 Likes

It is widely reported that those quotes do not exist in the Talmud. If they don’t then they shouldn’t be spread as such.

Is there a way to ascertain the truth?

2 Likes

To you it sets a precedent regardless of what we’ve discussed in the past and I’m not one who can convince you otherwise. The Jews have ignored precedent from the garden to 70AD, picking and choosing, taking wildly out of context by the Jews today what God made clear “the first time” for a one-off judgment in Joshua. The first precedent set by God was in Genesis 2. Eat anything you want except the fruit from this one tree. If you eat it, dying you will die. God changed His mind in chapter 3 and reset the precedent including no more free food but more importantly the solution of deliverance from the “dying you shall die” precedent. That one was ignored by most of the Chosen People without focusing on the necessary conditions. Bibi and lots of Israelis are ignoring every condition for their own sick gain.

If what Peter said (1 Peter 3:10) and what Paul said in Romans (Romans 2:5-8) and what is written in Revelation and what Jesus read when he quoted Isaiah 61:1-2 (but stopped short) is true, Jesus’ future approach may disappoint and surprise you someday. Like I’ve mentioned in our other discussions, it’s the same God.

@cmartenson,

Tracking down Talmud quotes is quite the confusing and difficult process. Lots of blind ends and different spellings, and many paragraph long discussions of jewish scholars that make finding a simple summary statement impossible.

My job here is to extract from 2,000-2,500 years of verbose discussions the basic principles of the religion and show WHY IT CREATES SUCH CHAOS, CURRENTLY.

If anyone would like, I can trace down specific quote that show:

  1. Sex with young girls, under the age of 3, is permissible (the hymen will grow back).
  2. Sex with young boys under the age of 9 is permissible.
  3. That Gentiles (Goyim) are of lesser worth than Jews and may be treated as trash.
  4. That the “best of the gentiles” should be killed in warfare.
  5. That Gentiles were intended by God to serve the Jews as slaves.

If anyone believes that this is NOT true, I will endevor to find and repost these quotes.

And videos of Jewish people explaining these beliefs in their own words.