The End Of Stimulus? (And The Start Of The Crash?)

Back in January of 2016 we saw what appeared to be, and in my opinion should have been, the end of the Everything Bubble blown by the word's central banking cartel.

The carnage started in the emerging markets. Highly-leveraged positions and carry trades began to unwind. That's a fancy way of saying that all the big, sophisticated investors -- who were busy borrowing heavily in countries with cheap money (the US, Japan, and Europe) and using that debt to speculate in markets offering higher yields (junk debt, emerging markets, stocks, etc.) -- began to reverse their trades.

It quickly devolved into a “Sell everything!” scramble. We saw the dollar spike and stocks fall -- with emerging markets taking the full brunt of the carnage as their stock markets rapidly fell into bear territory, their currencies fell, and their bonds were destroyed.

Until...

Very early one morning in February of 2016 everything U-turned and rocketed higher. Suddenly and magically, the panic was over. This wasn’t the invisible hand of the market at work; it was the very-visible hand of central bank intervention. 

With the benefit of hindsight, we now have a clear picture of what happened. The central banks huddled together, a bold (desperate?) plan was hatched, and key printing presses around the world were sent into overdrive.  In the months to follow, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Bank of Japan (BoJ) went on a record-breaking money printing spree:

(Source)

The red arrows in the charts above mark this moment when the “markets” were saved.

Or, more specifically, when the portfolios the ultra-wealthy were "saved", as the assets within were boosted higher (yet again) by the central banks printing money from thin air:

(Source)

Addicted To Money Printing

So what caused the weakness in early 2016 that spooked the system so much? The central banks themselves.

After many years of force-feeding stimulus into the global economy to create a "recovery", the central banks have become increasingly concerned that asset prices have become too dependent on said stimulus. So in late 2015, the banks took their feet off of their monetary gas pedals for a bit to see what might happen.

They were hoping that the markets could be gradually weaned off of their stimulus dependence with few ill effects. They wanted to engineer a "soft landing", where if priced declined, they'd come down gradually and not too much.

That didn't happen.

Instead, the cheap-money-addicted markets instantly started expressing massive withdrawal complications.

To re-acquaint you with how quickly things were devolving back then, these are news headlines pulled from an article I wrote back in the middle of January 2016:

Sound familiar at all?  It should. These sound exactly like the headlines in the news today, here in May of 2018.

We are still paying the price from 2008, when the central banks committed a massive error by not allowing the markets and their bad debts to actually clear. Yes, it would have been acutely painful; but we would have been through the worst within a year or two and in the process restored the system to a much healthier and sustainable state.

Instead, the bad actors were protected (and rewarded!) and the root fundamental problems were literally 'papered over', left to continue to fester unobserved ever since. Similarly in early 2016, the central banks once again committed the same sin by rescuing everything with another wall of fresh, thin-air money.

To drive home how much, below is a chart showing the yearly change in world central bank balance sheets. The relative ‘area under the curve’ of each major period of money printing gives us a sense of the scale.  To help you eyeball it, I’ve placed similar-sized orange rectangles in each area.  Key to note is that central money printing has been increasing -- not decreasing -- the further out we've gotten from the Great Financial Crisis:

(Source)

If we've been in "recovery" for years now, as the central banks have been touting, then why has 2016-2108 seen the most stimulus ever injected into the system?

History has taught us that we should trust our leaders' actions far more than their words. And their actions at this time indicate panic.

What is it that has them so worried?  We should all ponder that question long and hard.  I’m convinced that they know as well as we do that, once the over-inflated ““markets”” created by the central banks can no longer be sustained at their current nose-bleed heights, the damage will be extraordinary and unstoppable.    

The End Of Stimulus? (And The Start Of The Crash?)

The pain of the 2008 crash will seem like a mere flesh wound compared to the devastation the next deflationary wave will wreak. 

Of course, the central banks have no interest in seeing that happen and will, once more, do all they can to "rescue" the markets.  

But will they act in time?  More to the point, given all of their very public commitments to raising rates and reducing their balance sheets, will they allow a market correction to happen in the near term? (presumably, so they can ride to the rescue soon after as "saviors")

Politically, the prospect of showering even more wealth on the 0.001% is going to be a tough sell. This is especially true in Europe -- in Italy, Greece and Spain where the populace is suffering mightily already and is in no mood to further enrich the ultra-wealthy.

So it would seem that the central banks, at least publicly, have to stick to their stated plans to reduce their levels of money printing/balance sheet expansion. 

As of right now, they are on track to end worldwide simulus in early 2019, when their collective net change in assets will dip below $0 for the first time in many years:

(Source)

Given the importance of central bank purchases and market interventions, the above chart is probably the most important one in existence for divining where financial asset prices are headed.

If global monthly stimulus indeed drops to $0, then Watch out below!

Who know if the future will plays out anything like the projections given above? The central banks have proven weak-kneed at every tiny moment of market wobbliness.  To date, they've chosen to print and print and then print some more at every opportunity where the "“markets”" might have corrected.  

But we all know that this charade cannot continue forever.  Sooner or later it has to stop.  Given the blow-ups we're now seeing in the emerging markets, there’s clearly serious trouble brewing somewhere in the system.

In Part 2: The Breaking Point Is Upon Us we provide plenty of data to support that claim.

The currencies and bonds of five countries are now in the danger zone, and many more teeter on the edge. My analysis is that the central banks will resort to their usual money printing to resolve the issue, but for reasons I explain in Part 2, these efforts will fail at some point in the next year -- and spectacularly so.

When today's Everything Bubble bursts, the effect will be nothing short of catastrophic as 50 years of excessive debt accumulation suddenly deflates.

Given the dangers involved, you should expect the central banks to 'go nuclear' in their deflation-fighting efforts by sending “money to main street” -- likely in the form of a universal basic income, or a check from the Treasury refunding your last 3 years of tax payments, or maybe even an electronic deposit directly from the Federal Reserve into your bank account.

That's when the inevitable fiat currency crisis will begin in earnest. At that time you’ll need to run, not walk, to buy anything with intrinsic value that can't be inflated away -- before your currency becomes worthless.

Click here to read Part 2 of this report (free executive summary, enrollment required for full access)

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://peakprosperity.com/the-end-of-stimulus-and-the-start-of-the-crash/

Who knows, maybe they can kick the can down the road another 5 years. It’s hard to perdict and as a result I’ve stayed invested as least partially in this market. As Yogi Berra once said “It’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future”. I agree on many fronts to the analysis but when this will break is anyones guess. It could be a quite a while.

It’s interesting that Chris mentions UBI because in a recent Jim Rickards blog he also predicts you will hear a lot more about UBI or GBI )Government Basic Income in the oming months even though Finland scraped that program after 2 years. https://www.silverdoctors.com/headlines/world-news/jim-rickards-alkdfjalskdfjalksdjf/
Steve St. Angelo from the http:srsroccoreport.com in his most recent blog talks about the coming finanical meltdown from the massive govt debt but he makes a correlation that the coming meltdown is all driven by EROI aka energy. https://srsroccoreport.com/global-financial-breakdown-continues-economic-growth-chokes-on-massive-debt-increases/

I have wondered how UBI/GBI could work without places like grocery stores responding by raising their prices. Electronics and cars might not raise their prices because they would just be glad people are buying their products again, but since everyone HAS to buy food, wouldn’t food purveyors raise their prices if some kind of federal price controls weren’t put on certain items?

cowtown: Who knows, maybe they can kick the can down the road another 5 years. It’s hard to perdict and as a result I’ve stayed invested as least partially in this market.
Cowtown, I fully agree. If anything, we’ve seen the elites willing to do anything since 2008. No limits, No fear.
Chris likes to say the FED can’t “print prosperity”? Very true. But they sure can print MY prosperity and have been dutifully doing so for over 10 years (thanks Helecopter Ben & Old Yellen!).
I honestly could see this scam lasting my whole life (with a 2008-style crash thrown in each decade just to keep the working man from playing). It’s even low risk when investing in high dividend-paying blue-chips with 25 year track records (hell, they own both political parties) with the % based on the DOW yield…then plow 10% of yearly profits into physical metal. When this “everything bubble” finally pops & stocks go south? Still way, way ahead. What’s not to like?

…and. bring those I’ll gotten gains and buy food, fuel, friends, first aid, firearms… don’t set oneself apart from the proletariat lest your head roll.
got the solar hay in, the garden still need Kelsey’s attn. She is due in July. Her third draft foal. If the rain holds and one techno kid is about will post a vid/pic. I am amazed how you self reliant folk have so much time to write/ type. Am glad

As long as you’re one of the lucky ones on the winning team, I would have to agree with you,MKI. However, there is quite a difference between business(the people that make money) and industry(the people who make stuff)! What it does for the working “schmuck” on Main St. is another thing:
http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/16/investing/stock-buybacks-tax-law-bonuses/index.html
You may be reading the trends correctly, unfortunately:

I honestly could see this scam lasting my whole life (with a 2008-style crash thrown in each decade just to keep the working man from playing).

A nationwide trucking strike in Brazil entered day six on Saturday, as blocked roads have prevented critical food and supplies from reaching their destinations.
Brazilian export group ABPA said that over 150 poultry and pork processing plants had indefinitely suspended production, while Brazil’s sugar industry - the world’s largest - is slowly halting cane harvest operations as their machines run out of fuel.
The military has been called out to clear hundreds of trucks parked in the roadways, blocking traffic.
Talk about a cascading collapse.
Local food production and stored food sounds important right about now…

Yep, SP, that’s a real-world test of what happens when the trucks stop running.
We did interview Alice Friedemann on that exact topic a while back, and here’s what she had to say:

Within a week, in roughly this order, grocery stores would be out of dairy and other items that are delivered many times a day. And by the week, the shelves would be empty. Hospitals, pharmacies, factories, and many other businesses also get several deliveries a day, and they’d be running out of stuff the first day. And the second day, there’s be panic and hoarding. And restaurants, pharmacies would close. ATM’s would be out of money. Construction would stop. There’d be increasing layoffs. Increasing enormous amounts of trash not getting picked up, 685,000 tons a day. Service stations would be closed. Very few people would be working. And the livestock would start to be hungry from lack of feed deliveries. Then within two weeks, clean water supplies would run out. Within four weeks to eight weeks, there wouldn’t be coal delivered to power plants and electricity would start shutting down. And when that happened, about a quarter of our pipelines use electricity, and so natural gas plants wouldn’t be fed natural gas and they’d start shutting down. It’s a big interdependent system. That’s part of the problem. It’s like Liebig’s Law of the Minimum. A plant needs about 20 different elements to grow, and you take one away and the plant can grow less or stop growing.
That sounds more or less in line with what Brazil is experiencing:
Empty stores, shuttered gas stations as Brazil truckers' strike continues May 26, 2018 A truckers' strike in Brazil left a patchwork of empty gas stations and barren supermarket shelves Saturday as drivers appeared unmoved by the government's threats to use force or fine people who didn't comply. Police forces conducted operations to clear blocked roads, and military vehicles provided escorts for trucks carrying emergency fuel to police stations and army facilities in Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paulo. The impact was being felt all over. "There's no food, no fuel," said Joao Roberto, an Uber driver in Rio de Janeiro who was parked at an empty gas station. Perishable fruits and vegetables all but disappeared from local supermarket shelves. At several Hortifruti chain stories in Rio de Janeiro on Saturday, staff filled vegetable crispers and shelves with soda cans and bags of rice. A popular Saturday farmers market, normally teeming with fruits and vegetables along several blocks, only had a fraction of its goods. Many vendors at the market were charging double, saying they had to pay more to buy what they could. "This strike is killing us," said Manuel Reis, a watermelon vendor who sold about 880 pounds of the fruit on Saturday, about half of his usual. Many gas stations nationwide have run out of diesel and gasoline, and local managers say they don't know when to expect more deliveries. Bus and metro services in several Brazilian cities were reduced and several flights, mostly domestic, were canceled for a third straight day on Saturday.
This is a good real-world example for people who have a difficult time grasping systems thinking. When everything is interconnected, the impacts are widespread and rapidly move beyond being an inconvenience. If the strike goes into a second week, real damage will occur as power stations begin to shut down for lack of fuel, and heavy industry has to cease operations for lack of fuel, electricity, and raw and intermediate goods. Nope, nothing linear about complex systems. I'm not sure why the Brazilian politicians are not caving to the truckers demands, but I can imagine they are being read the same riot act language by the international banksters that the Icelandic politicians were read. Those banksters need their interest payments and the people of the country be damned. Preserve those federal tax flows! Those are ours!!

Well, I’m certain this will help. Erdogan asks Turks to prop up the lira: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2018/05/erdogan-asks-turks-prop-lira-currency-volatility-180526143404023.html

Or, if I were in Turkey, I would see this as the biggest sign to get OUT of my own nation’s currency.

That’s the illustration I always call to mind, which Gail Tverberg likes to use a lot. Gail, defines it as a “networked economy” and your example of what’s happening in Brazil reinforces the point. Gail also says that it goes even further as that networked economy engulfs the entire global economic system. That’s why when a little country like Greece threatened the EU with defaulting on it’s loans the global markets felt it, panicked and responded in a negative way.

CM: Many gas stations nationwide have run out of diesel and gasoline, and local managers say they don’t know when to expect more deliveries.
What’s very funny? Brazil is the 9th largest oil producer in the world!
Meanwhile…Japan has no meaningful oil (I think they are 43)…were bombed to a pulp only 70 years ago…yet their trains run on time. Hmm.
Summary: people are one’s greatest resource. Eliminate fossel fuels completely from the earth and I’m confident Japan would be livng quite well…and Brazil would still be a basket case.

MKI wrote:
Summary: people are one's greatest resource. Eliminate fossel fuels completely from the earth and I'm confident Japan would be livng quite well...and Brazil would still be a basket case.
Your confidence is fact-free and therefore uninspiring. Fact #1: You do realize that 12 calories of fossil fuels are embedded in each calorie we eat? Fact #2: And you should be aware that Japan only has a 40% self-sufficiency rating on food production? They have to import the rest using...wait for it...fossil fuels to grow, harvest, desicate/refrigerate, transport and finally to cook the food. Fact #3: Japan only has 0.03 hectares of arable land per capita. For reference, North America clocks in at 0.55. Please inform us, in linear fashion, how you combine those three facts? How would the people of Tokyo be fed? How would you propose to boost the 40% self-sufficiency rating to 100%? Do you know of any country that is 100% feeding its population on 0.03 hectares? How about sustainably? As usual MKI, your inability and/or unwillingness to use facts runs counter to this website's stated policies, culture and mission. Your personal anecdotes and unbacked opinions do not add constructively to the conversation here. Speaking for myself, your confidence in Japan's ability to get along just fine without fossil fuels is pointless and useless to the conversation that's unfolding. A belief held without the benefit of being backed by facts is entirely devoid of usefulness if the purpose is to inform, sway or constructively debate, which is, of course, the point of this site. So either respond to the three facts I've laid out, intelligently, or bring your own, or don't bother with a response. If you insist on continuing with fact-free commentary and unsupported beliefs, in other words not adhering to the site rules you clicked on and agreed to, your posting priviledges will be removed.

And if there’s no fossil fuels what would Japan do with the gift that keeps on giving? That NPP is still not under control, seven years later and they have used all types of means/technology that are based around fossil fuels.

“Why should we tolerate a diet of weak poisons, a home in insipid surroundings, a circle of acquaintances who are not quite our enemies, the noise of motors with just enough relief to prevent insanity? Who would want to live in a world which is just not quite fatal?” ― Rachel Carson, Silent Spring

MKI I agree with your statement: people are one’s greatest resource
Also you state that Eliminate fossel fuels completely from the earth and I’m confident Japan would be livng quite well.
Your statement is already proven by history and I dont see the point of having to answer questions about calories of fossil fuel to move food from farms to people, particularly since small farms located next to and in some cases inside big cities is a fact in Japan. The distance traveled from farm to mouth is 10-100 shorter than in America even now, and would be even more favorable if they stopped importing cheap food from America.
It is a fact that for over 200 years (1650-1850) about 30 million Japanese in a land about the size of California but mostly uninhabitable due to mountains, lived sustainably, recycled everything, imported nothing, burned no fossil fuel, and developed a civilization much cleaner and orderly than that of Europe at the time. Even to this day, about 40% of their food comes from their own farms, which are all small and not run by giant corporations but instead by small farmers (my wife is one). Yet there is so much fallow land and the technology of growing food has advanced so much since the 1850s that I am sure the small farms which are run by the “greatest resource” as you call it, can increase again to handle a collapse. Already I see some young farmers moving into this area. CM demands that you provide facts about arable land per person or something like that but from personal experience (I live in the countryside) I know for a fact that the amount of food produced in Japan could quickly double just by bringing old farms back into production again. I dont know where or how I could verify such fact, but can see it with my own eyes. (I myself am working old land as a new olive grove and there is so much fallow land that anyone can make a farm without paying rent for the land).
Facts: They had multiple currency collapses during their sustainable period and went on without everyone freaking out and killing each other. They are aware that they need another currency collapse. Fact: Having lost a major war, had two large cities atom bombed, their main city and capital region incinerated by fire etc. they are humble and can deal with the future, in part by reliving the past sustainable period. Fact: Already every household separates and recycles burnable waste, glass bottles, PET bottles, aluminum cans, steel, (and recently: polystyrene). I know that they are burning a lot of coal now to keep up their American inspired lifestyle, but that can change immediately if needed. When fukushima occured, everyone immediately stopped using much of their energy cancelled all festivals country wide for a year (albeit for spiritual reasons), office buildings turned off half of elevators, half of lights, all lights off during lunch (people slept at their desks), people took staggered vacations to minimize energy fluctuations etc… I dont have time to go into it, but I have personally witnessed extreme personal deprivations for the good or convenience of others, and this is in time of peace…
Unfortunately their population has exploded to over 125 million but Fact: that problem is being addressed (already decreasing) much to the chagrin of the bankers and the western press. We need to keep in mind that all of our reality about other places is brought to us by a biased media that seeks exponential growth and for which the Japanese history and culture is anathema and is constantly condemned and denigrated. One needs to seek out reports from those who live in other cultures (such as Black Pigeon, who lives in Tokyo).
The narcisstic American media assumes that a “good life” is modeled after American “values,” which generally means selfish consumption of resources. But it is a fact that before America even existed, a high population density, highly organized culture with arts music etc. existed as a closed society without environmental footprint in Japan.
“Black Pigeon Speaks” has made a short video on this topic which expresses his view that because “people are ones greatest resource” as you correctly put it, Japan will be the number one country again.
see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxFSFWZmtZs
on reflection, I think that a major problem here is that a totally different culture is being evaluated and judged from the viewpoint of Narcisstic American Exceptionalism. Notions such as a historical (rear-looking) determination of calories to move food are trumped by the reality of existing land and farms near and inside cities and new ways to order and distribute food, combined with a cultural trait of immediate change as needed, which is inconceivable to an American and therefore not considered as part of the “equation.” Physically the land and technology exists for 100 % food sufficiency and the people are very capable of immediately reorganizing their efforts. Westerners were surprised by how fast the Japanese accomodated defeat after WWII and rose to new challenges.
It seems like you hit a nerve regarding CM warning about banishing you from the site for stating an opinion that disagrees with his. I dont see anyone challenging his assumptions, but that is the route I would follow. So much here is based on assumptions that can be challenged… I dont have time for this.
Mots

MKI wrote:
Summary: people are one's greatest resource. Eliminate fossel fuels completely from the earth and I'm confident Japan would be livng quite well...and Brazil would still be a basket case.

Mots - you are usually more level headed than this, so let me guess that your own beliefs are on the line.
Piece by piece:

Mots wrote:
MKI I agree with your statement: people are one's greatest resource
This seems to be confusing correlation with causation. If I were to speculate, what you meant to say was "culture is the greatest resource." If it were simply a matter of more people then Quito Ecuador would be more prosperous than Sendai Japan. Clearly that's not the case, and I can cite hundreds of mega-examples to make that point. So people are not the greatest resource. Care to restate your 100% support for the idea that people are one's greatest resource? Next:
Also you state that Eliminate fossel fuels completely from the earth and I'm confident Japan would be livng quite well. Your statement is already proven by history and I dont see the point of having to answer questions about calories of fossil fuel to move food from farms to people, particularly since small farms located next to and in some cases inside big cities is a fact in Japan.
Proven by history? How? Not even close, and I am surprised at you for this statement given your engineering background. Let's see what you cite?
It is a fact that for over 200 years (1650-1850) about 30 million Japanese in a land about the size of California but mostly uninhabitable due to mountains, lived sustainably, recycled everything, imported nothing, burned no fossil fuel, and developed a civilization much cleaner and orderly than that of Europe at the time.
....Uh....Mots...time to back away from the punch bowl?...I simply cannot believe you are using a time period from 1650 to 1850 as your frame of reference to support the idea that Japan is now, or could easily be self-sufficient, and sustainably. Seriously? Can I cite USA population to food or oil resources from 1850 to make any sort of relevant case to today? Of course not. I never thought any long-time member of this site would use such a period to make any particular claims about the year 2018 and beyond. I'm...stumped. But to take on your "argument" at face value, Japan is 4x the population of 1850, lives in highly concentrated cities, and practically nobody in those cities knows thing one about growing food at all let alone at scale and sustainably.
Even to this day, about 40% of their food comes from their own farms, which are all small and not run by giant corporations but instead by small farmers (my wife is one).
Yes. Exactly. 40%.
Yet there is so much fallow land and the technology of growing food has advanced so much since the 1850s that I am sure the small farms which are run by the "greatest resource" as you call it, can increase again to handle a collapse. Already I see some young farmers moving into this area. CM demands that you provide facts about arable land per person [C.M. yes I do] or something like that but from personal experience (I live in the countryside) I know for a fact that the amount of food produced in Japan could quickly double just by bringing old farms back into production again. I dont know where or how I could verify such fact, but can see it with my own eyes.
Ah. Yes. You are drawn to MKI's anecdote without evidence form of "logic." Again,...I'm just stumped. C'mon Mots, time scale and cost. What about skills and knowhow? What about nutrient (re)cycling and distribution? These are facts you could marshal towards your argument if you wished.
Facts: They had multiple currency collapses during their sustainable period and went on without everyone freaking out and killing each other. They are aware that they need another currency collapse. Fact: Having lost a major war, had two large cities atom bombed, their main city and capital region incinerated by fire etc. they are humble and can deal with the future, in part by reliving the past sustainable period. Fact: Already every household separates and recycles burnable waste, glass bottles, PET bottles, aluminum cans, steel, (and recently: polystyrene). I know that they are burning a lot of coal now to keep up their American inspired lifestyle, but that can change immediately if needed.
Now you are arguing that Japan has a useful and resilient culture. I could agree with that. But I completely disagree with the idea that, if necessary, Japan could change their big city ways immediately if necessary. The truth is Japan imports 60% of its food. That in turn depends on Japan's currency having value. If the yen tanks in another currency collapse (almost a certainty at some point) then how, pray tell, will Japan pay for all that imported food? Also, recycling is more valuable as a virtue signalling effort than a sign of anything important. Recycling polystyrene is pretty much irrelevant in the scheme of things.
When fukushima occured, everyone immediately stopped using much of their energy cancelled all festivals country wide for a year (albeit for spiritual reasons), office buildings turned off half of elevators, half of lights, all lights off during lunch (people slept at their desks), people took staggered vacations to minimize energy fluctuations etc........ I dont have time to go into it, but I have personally witnessed extreme personal deprivations for the good or convenience of others, and this is in time of peace........
Yes, an enviable culture. Way better than the USA in most places by far. But let's never confuse what a culture would do if given ample resources with what it can do given restricted resources.
Unfortunately their population has exploded to over 125 million but Fact: that problem is being addressed (already decreasing) much to the chagrin of the bankers and the western press.
Yes, the population is decreasing, but at what rate? How long to get back to 1850's level of 30 million? From what I've seen that might not happen until after the year 2100 at current rates. What happens if there's a perpetual fossil fuel emergency beginning in the year 2030?
The narcisstic American media assumes that a "good life" is modeled after American "values," which generally means selfish consumption of resources. But it is a fact that before America even existed, a high population density, highly organized culture with arts music etc. existed as a closed society without environmental footprint in Japan.
I think you're painting with too broad of a brush here. The issue is not the narcissistic American media, but the use of simple facts and straightforward logic to make a point. I will happily and readily concede that Japan has an enviable culture. It's people, however, are the same as people anywhere. Some are smart, some are dumb and the rest are average. In a pinch people figure out the best way to move forward. It's what we do. But let's never confuse people with resources. People consume resources. Given ample resources people and the right culture are, indeed, a resource. People without resources are competitive Mf'ers. Almost the opposite of a resource. No amount of awesome culture can overcome a starvation level of resources. I would have thought that was obvious and self-evident. So, Mots, seems a nerve has been touched, and I look forward to a calmer and more organized line of thought if or when you have the inclination.

CM: Your list of facts make no point to respond to. My point: Japan is the worlds 5th largest economy with very little natural resources. Why? They have very smart, hardworking people. Hence, people, not resources, are key to living the good life. You haven’t addressed this point at all. You just ignored it.
But to answer your questions:
Do I realize there are 12 calories of fossil fuels in each calorie we eat
Yes. The reason is…wait for it…because we can! Because they are so cheap. Once they get more expensive (like, say, whale oil did) we will start to conserve and replace. Are you suggesting we cannot cut that number down to 1 calorie yet still live a good life? Because I have no doubt that we can. But even if we can’t, that will be well outside of our lifetimes. I’m not ego-driven enough to think I can make that kind of prediction about our future.
How would the people of Tokyo be fed?
Japan is involved in a world-wide trading network. It’s silly to assume any nation would wish to manufacture all their own cars PLUS create all their own energy PLUS grow all their own food. That’s crazy. Rather, humans trade back and forth based upon supply and demand and what is easiest; we did this even in the stone age. Your implied idea, that all wealth is generated strictly from natural resources, is simply not so, as my emperical evidence (not mere antidotes) about Japan clearly demonstrates. A huge amount of wealth is just living smarter.
How would you propose to boost the 40% self-sufficiency rating to 100%?
I don’t propose they do. But, judging from their history of wealth generation, I have no doubt they could do so if they had to.
Do you know of any country that is 100% feeding its population on 0.03 hectares? How about sustainably?
Again, you create a false dilemma. I don’t propose they do so (although again, I have no doubt they could survive in a pinch). Rather, they will generate wealth in other ways, and trade that wealth for they need.
As usual MKI, your inability and/or unwillingness to use facts runs counter to this website’s stated policies, culture and mission.Your personal anecdotes and unbacked opinions do not add constructively to the conversation here. Speaking for myself, your confidence in Japan’s ability to get along just fine without fossil fuels is pointless and useless to the conversation that’s unfolding. A belief held without the benefit of being backed by facts is entirely devoid of usefulness if the purpose is to inform, sway or constructively debate, which is, of course, the point of this site.
Methinks you are touchy to your ideas being challenged and not open minded to new ideas. If you can’t see the point I’m making, how Japan avoids resource-driven wealth creation yet still lives quite well while resource-heavy nations don’t, and what this means, I really can’t help you. I’m not the first person to make this point, a point backed up by nearly all of human history to date. People merely adjust their consumption to what is easiest, and shift their lifestyles accordingly.
However, since you feel my opinions lack value, I won’t return.

I’d love to know where some people get their wealth of knowledge concerning the history of Japan and its supposedly peaceful, harmonious, or balanced ways. Cite some valid academic journals or books on the subject, please. Tokugawa Japan was hardly a paradise, and hardly harmonious. It was definitely far more technologically behind modern-day Japan, as well as most civilizations of that time period as well.
/shrugs
MK1, I’ve seen Chris get challenged before, with verifiable and sourced facts using sound reason and logic. I’ve also seen him back off things when contrary evidence is presented. I’ve never seen him do so when presented with logic based on assertion, emotion, or anecdote, all three of which you toss about on a constant basis.