The Pfizer Documents

The FDA and Pfizer wanted to keep the vaccine trial results hidden for up to 75 years. Now we know why. There are some quite serious anomalies that are begging for answers.

One such example is the fact that the lead author on the seminal vaccine paper in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), one Fernando Polack, MD, just happened to be the only investigator in charge of a site in Argentina that purportedly managed to recruit 4,501 patients in just three weeks!

Is this even possible with a full team and the backing of a major contract research organization (CRO)? It’s quite the feat and it needs to be investigated and answers given.

Without more transparency some might be left wondering if perhaps there was fraud involved or that perhaps patient records were sloppy because the on-boarding pace was too rapid. Regardless, no such questions should ever be part of the landscape, especially not when it involves a brand new medical intervention platform (mRNA) that was mandated as a condition of continued education and/or employment.

Why were these records fought to be effectively sealed? Why wasn’t complete and open transparency a cornerstone of the entire program of mass vaccination in the first place?

Such a stunning lack of transparency and the hiding of records…This. Should. Never. Be. The. Case.

Otherwise, there’s no possibility of informed consent.

One of the key issues made obvious in the document release regarded the dose-ranging studies (or lack of).

For clarity, a dose-ranging study is what happens first, before the larger clinical trial to determine vaccine effectiveness. Before you can give something to a bunch of volunteers, you have to establish how much you should give. They do this by giving a range of doses, usually low, medium and high, and then measure the effects. In this case, they were seeking to know how much of an antibody response a given dose would trigger. You’d think that this is vital information to get right. You might imagine they would give a wide ranges of doses to hundreds of people in each dose range.

But, when I dug into the new batch of 80,000 clinical trial records, I discovered that the only records (so far) showing the measurement of antibody levels in dose-ranging studies revealed three things:

  1. The grand total number of people tested in the 18-55- and 65–85-year-old age brackets was just 12 in each.
  2. There apparently was a gap without any testing of the immunogenic response of 55–65-year-old age bracket.
  3. There was clear evidence the antibody levels varied enormously (10x) between patients, and for all patients tailed off significantly by one month after the second dose. This means it should have been 100% obvious to all authorities and Pfizer, that the shots weren’t going to last all that long and boosters would be soon needed.
Taken all together, this means that Fauci’s continued insistence that the rationale for getting the shots was to “achieve herd immunity so we can get back on with our lives” was completely unscientific and provably and known to be false.

I sincerely hope there are hundreds of yet-to-be-revealed records showing lots and lots of additional antibody level testing because otherwise we have to believe hundreds of millions of people of all different sizes, ages, races, and comorbidity levels were given a 30-microgram dose based off of just 12 data points.

Again, it’s not surprising that the FDA wanted to keep such shocking findings hidden for 75 years. The data is exceptionally embarrassing from every possible scientific, ethical and public health standpoint.

I break it all down here:

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at

The Bad Cat Is On The Hunt Too

El Gato Malo is tearing this all apart too, in his exceptional style as always:

the pfizer data dumps are massive and disordered. they drop 50k pages without regard to completeness or organization.

here, have a huge box of who knows what!

this is a longstanding legal trick. and it works well. it’s the time honored fashion in which big companies bury small legal teams and create a $3 million bill just to sort and read the stuff.

but here’s a fun little wrinkle: this time is not going to be like that.

battalions of interested parties are all over it. the documents are posted and reading and sorting them is crowdsourced. and many hands make for light work. and a lot of very skilled sleuths are at work here.

no law firm in history has ever had an expert team like this. never.

the FDA and pfizer fought tooth and claw NOT to release this.

i have ZERO doubt that they are dumping all the least awful and incriminating things first. keep in mind these folks wanted to take 75 years to disclose this. only a court order pried it loose. but even with this first set of boxes, it’s starting to become apparent why they did not want anyone poking around.

they knew all sorts of things they failed to disclose and many are doing good work on this.

but what if the trial itself was pfraud?
because THAT would be seismic. it would not only severely implicate the FDA and pfizer alike, it would likely invalidate the liability protection granted under EUA and suddenly bourla and his merry band of vaxx aficionados might find themselves accountable. bigly.

and wouldn’t that be interesting?

so if this looks like a plausible possibility, we really ought to dig in like busy little mice and see what all we can winkle out. fortunately, some busy little mice have already been doing so. and what they found is, well, pfrightening.


Holy Shit!

Unreal. I have always had a hypothesis that the mob went into pharma Very similar tactics.


Barbra Streisand

It’s called the Barbra Streisand effect.

Coinbase Bail-in Risk

Though I don’t trust ANYTHING in the MSM there is one point this morning worthy of note.
For any of you storing on exchange, should that exchange go bankrupt, your coins there are subject to bail-in risk.
As we have been reminded repeatedly–move your coins off the exchange onto a hard wallet that you physically hold. And store your PIN and the “24 key words” in a separate location.


Buying Bitcoin During The Liquidity Crisis

Can’t guarantee this is the right thing to do, but I am buying BTC daily during this liquidity crisis driven sell off.

1 Like

Looking forward to a real Bombshell being released prior to the Australian Federal election. Go for it all you independent sleuths! We will honour you in the future for sure.

1 Like

Sorry, no, too late. Only 2 weeks to go. Drat.

1 Like

Peer Reviewed Study: Masks Were Harmful

“While no cause-effect conclusions could be inferred from this observational analysis, the lack of negative correlations between mask usage and COVID-19 cases and deaths suggest that the widespread use of masks at a time when an effective intervention was most needed, i.e., during the strong 2020-2021 autumn-winter peak, was not able to reduce COVID-19 transmission. Moreover, the moderate positive correlation between mask usage and deaths in Western Europe also suggests that the universal use of masks may have had harmful unintended consequences.”


Another set of questions to ask:
These vaccines target the Alpha version of the virus which is nearly non existent, yes? The boosters only boost the vaccine which is targeting a non existent spike protein? Why then are boosters and vaccines even discussed? The current variants more resemble a cold virus then a Covid virus yet we’re still talking like the vaccines and boosters could be effective which seems extremely unlikely. Follow the money

I like Turaj Zaim’s take on the dump too. I can’t find it right now but it’s also in his essay about how Squid Game is really South Korea’s warning to us about communism’s 5-dimensional war against the States. Made me think I should watch Squid Game

This Is So Great

 This gives a sense of gravity-defying movement, as the character can run on the walls and ceiling of the tunnels. As the game progresses, the tunnels become more complex and challenging, requiring quick reflexes and precise timing to avoid pitfalls and obstacles.
 Run 3