I think most people still just look at the (faked) followers, previous guests and tick the box
1 Like
Real science even challenges the doctrine of the speed of light as being the absolute speed limit of the universe.
About fifteen years ago, there was evidence of faster than light transmission in a European research facility. When it happened no one said “sorry, there is a scientific consensus against such a claim.”
No one said that. Instead, they conducted studies and investigated it. A second study again demonstrated faster than light travel.
Now as it turns out, later studies concluded that there had been no faster than light transmission.
This has been called the 2011 Opera faster-than-light-neurtino anomaly.
But that event shows the difference between real science and politicized pseudo-science.
Real science does not operate by consensus.
If you hear someone talking about “scientific consensus,” they are talking politics - not science.
9 Likes
This 
6 Likes
It was posted sarcastically but it’s good to hear the ‘just trust the science, bro’ hasn’t permeated that area else quantum mechanics/entanglement might’ve had a very different outcome
1 Like
I have been studying science since I was a kid. I am in my mid 70’s and I am still studying it.
It just galls me to see the perversion of science by climate cultists, big pharma reps, bureaucrats, media whores and politicians. Science is a noble endeavor. It is one of the most noble endeavors that the human race has ever embarked upon. It really angers me to see it cheapened into just another political tool.
10 Likes
If the “2011 OPERA faster-than-light neutrino anomaly” had actually shown faster than light transmission it would have relegated relativity into the same conundrum as quantum theory - true but unexplainable.
I actually sort of like things that are true but unexplainable.
It deflates human hubris.
4 Likes
Concrete can be hard to deflate
1 Like
It’s just like a mold creeping around…probably will go in whatever direction offers nourishment.
1 Like
An example of this was the dramatic change in Scientific American magazine some years ago.
2 Likes
It seems we have all been set up for a perfect storm of maximum pain. Specifically designed that way. And I would contend this plan has been in operation for a very long time, conceived in the higher realm.
For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against principalities and powers, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places.
[Ephesians 6:12]
5 Likes
In terms of why things have been escalated, if we know anything about these people, they exhibit typical narcissist behavior, which means they are never satisfied and always deeply paranoid about losing power. With Epstein and the shots and the fact that “truthers” have almost gone mainstream, they must strike now. Not to mention their 2030 probably astrological timeline.
Which would lend credence to the globalist behind things, but I can’t let go of the theory that Trump has broken from them in some ways and there is schism among them. Different factions fighting for power now. It’s a complicated landscape to understand and predict.
Satan’s church will always be fractured. It’s a feature, not a bug. Oh, here’s another Bible verse…
Every kingdom divided against itself, shall be brought to desolation, and house upon house shall fall.
[Luke 11:17]
Which is why they don’t win.
1 Like
I can’t help thinking that 2032 will be 2,000 years since Christ’s death and resurrection. It’s possible that the “Age of Grace” aka The Church Age ends after 2,000 years. After which kicks off the seven-year Tribulation.
3 Likes
Are you saying you think it’s the end of the world? I don’t think so.
Data centers being built in places where there is not the water for cooling them, and the electrical generating facilities that don’t, and can’t exist because they also must have water to cool the steam back into water to be recycled, hmmm? Enormous empty warehouses? Concentration camps for useless eaters to be worked to death or exterminated. The similarities between the rise of the Third Reich and what is happening right now in America are astonishing. They were astonishing 20 years ago when I read Rise And Fall Of The Third Reich. When stated motives are patently absurd, there is a logical motive that is being hidden. Not logical for we-the-people, but for those doing the lying.
3 Likes
Your theory makes sense, unfortunately. But my question is, who is going to run these things? Are the Democrats running the concentration camps for Republican? And vice versa? I can’t see that happening at scale. The proposed Utah data center is the size of 2 Manhattans. Are they planning on using military age men from Africa and Asia?
Maybe the concertina wire going around these things isn’t meant to protect the data center and keep people out.
1 Like
I believe that is what Martin Armstrong has said–governments bring in foreign forces to administer laws/prohibitions/lockups the local population would rebel against.
3 Likes
Sinclair Lewis’s “Arrowsmith” captures much of what we see today in an early 20th century context.
It’s just a theory. Obviously most of these ‘data centers’ will not be built, because they can’t be built. On the other hand, population extermination is on the agenda. We-the-people are now a growing threat to the Avaricious Class, and we will become an increasingly dangerous threat to their welfare as civil society breaks down. I know this, which means they know it better. The extent of the corruption in America is so bad that brutal totalitarianism might be the best solution for the most people to survive, but societal corruption is so bad that totalitarianism might not congeal. A truly frightening prospect, but the chaos of a complete societal/civilizational and economic breakdown will be even worse.
The extent of the corruption in America is so bad that brutal totalitarianism might be the best solution for the most people to survive, but societal corruption is so bad that totalitarianism might not congeal.
Not a fan of total societal collapse but I’m even much less a fan of totalitarianism. They have a habit of exterminating large segments of their population anyway. So, I’d rather take my chances on a breakdown of civil society. Of course, if I had my druthers, I’d pick neither.
1 Like
I don’t see it. These days, they’ll figure out how to create more useful idiots and not need full totalitarianism - the illusion of choice.
As bad as it seems, the answer to whether you can have less is always, yes.
2 Likes