@blueshire
I made a torrent out of Chris’ original banned video and shared links before Chris reshared his on Vimeo. As far as I can tell no one used the torrent I made. Torrent’s may be “too nerdy” for most people.
We have to remember the real draw of Social Media and IOT is that absolutely every technical hurdle that could keep grandma from accessing is removed. Thats why they have such astounding reach.
But I do think that in the long run, some kind of a distributed peer-to-peer system is going to be required for citizens to share this kind of info as the noose tightens on us.
Vimeo is just another platform that when leaned on will work to clean up “fake science” in the same way google does.
I don’t know anything about bitchute et al, but I would assume they ultimately leverage AWS, Google or Azure cloud services which will duly shut them down in the same way.
Next, you could start a service and at great expense buy shipping containers full of servers and locate them near the backbone, but you still need to be connected by somebody subject to political pressure so its only a matter of time until that switch is flipped.
Anyway, bitcoin seems to have cleared the hurdle of getting a lot of people to participate in something distributed and “untraceable” so I would still look to a torrent type technology as the end-game here.
Well the first thing to realize is that the censorship ISNT only happening in regard to Covid. The censorship is aimed at eliminating alternative narratives about anything. The goal is to have only one narrative in regards to health, news, politics, finance, entertainment, genders, hobbies, and personal opinions about anything,
The censorship isnt new, they kicked alot of popular channels off youtube before covid was ever a thing.
In regard to algorithms; Some people suggest learning the algorithm and adjusting your content to bypass it. Again, this is a short term solution. Behind the algorithms and Terms of service [ and interpretation of said terms ] are PEOPLE.
Those people make the algorithms and interpret the terms to get an effect. The effect is shut down alternative narratives. If you bypass the algorithm or manage to game their system to get your message through they will change the algorithm, or change the way they interpret the terms or [ more likely ] eventually just ban you altogether.
The algorithm is not a end in itself, its just a tool being used by people who want to shut you down. If it stops working they’ll use another tool. At the end of the day they will just get rid of you.
What is coming soon at Youtube is going to be banning of people based on opinions and narratives they have pushed on platforms OUTSIDE of Youtube. They’ve already telegraphed this. So while you might trick the algorithm or try to use youtube in a benign way to funnel users to another site…thats a short term solution. You’re trying to use their site to promote an alternative narrative which goes directly against the agenda of the people who run it. Its a weak position to be in, and I’d be looking for a longer term solution.
Where are people sourcing their ivermectin? I’ve read of some people going into horse stores; I imagine one can try going to your PCP but that seems like an unlikely success as most docs are oblivious…
I order off the Canadian amazon site and its still the same price when I first ordered it about two months ago. It ships from the US too…
I guess Canada’s press is even more tightly controlled and the population here even more docile than Americas which is rather saying something. I don’t think Ive seen any coverage of Ivm here though I don’t exactly scour the papers.
I did see something a few weeks ago about Covid treatments in Canadian hospitals and they mentioned that drugs like HCQ that are “proven to harm” are not used but thats it.
As frustrating as it is to see the masses pushed towards the slaughterhouse like this, I am deeply thankful for the opportunity this leaves for the independent thinkers among us to act on the evidence.
I find the concept of Survival Of The Fittest to be deeply morally troubling at times and yet it does seem like the least worst way forward at this point. We can’t all stay on this planet forever at a Western Middle Class lifestyle and people do actually have a right to be genuinely disinterested in whats happening. To smoke their weed and play their xbox and drink their beer and just generally try to drown out the noise of people trying to tell them they don’t have to live in fear.
“It didn’t have to be this way, but it is this way”, as Fred Reed of FredOnEverything fame has said. Govern yourselves accordingly
@Iucounu
Good thoughts. Its also been pointed out that the vaccines we are getting were rushed through on an emergency use authorization. A prerequisite to getting one of those is there has to be no alternative treatments. No alternative treatment is what makes the risk of a not thoroughly tested vaccine a reasonable one to take. If there were cheap, widely available safe treatments to Covid then a barely tested vaccine would be an absurd risk to put on the public. Therefore "Dont listen to quacks who think horse dewormers cure covid and don't publish their names in the papers so as to protect the public from the misinformation they spread"I just bought some at my local Tractor Supply for $3.
https://www.tractorsupply.com/tsc/product/durvet-ivermectin-paste-187-608-g?cm_mmc=SEM-_-Google-_-DynamicAdGroups-_-AllSiteTSCExtAd&gclid=CjwKCAiA_eb-BRB2EiwAGBnXXgEgJTKfUmgymuSMEc8tIo4fGZ6a96Aigc-UgDHZ2unrgYkBFSbHNBoCpv4QAvD_BwE
This is why I read the comments here. Excellent point.
"
Your suggestion that Ivermectin become mandatory in any “politician’s diet” could be construed as a threat against them.
After all, Ivermectin does indeed kill “parasites, lice and worms.”
Assessments and claims need to be rooted in some sort of data and both need to be separated from assertions, which are usually just a claim without much if any backing.
Accordingly, I’ve taken the liberty of editing a warning on Ivermectin posted at Tractor Supply to eliminate an assertion that has no data behind it.
It is true that animal products have not been approved for human consumption.
I cannot find any evidence at all that they have been evaluated in any way for human consumption in their current formulations. So it’s not correct to assert that these products “are not safe.”
I get why they would word it that way, but it’s neither accurate nor correct.
Further, it’s kind of tricky to evaluate any further because Durvet is extremely cagy on their specification sheet.
Only one ingredient listed. That’s not very helpful. Based on my own experience with it, I’d be surprised if the vast bulk of the rest of the tube isn’t some form of petroleum jelly.
But that’s just a guess.
SDS sheet for the paste is on Durvet.com,
3 unknown ingredients plus IVM, here is lethal dose info:
SECTION 11: TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION
11.1. Information On Toxicological Effects
Acute Toxicity: Oral: Harmful if swallowed.
Bimectin Paste 1.87% (Ivermectin Paste 1.87%)
ATE (Oral) 534.76 mg/kg body weight
Proprietary Component A
LD50 Oral Rat > 100 ml/kg
Proprietary Component B
LD50 Oral Rat 37.605 g/kg
Proprietary Component C
LD50 Oral Rat 3160 mg/kg
Ivermectin (70288-86-7)
LD50 Oral Rat 10 mg/kg
Skin Corrosion/Irritation: Not classified
Serious Eye Damage/Irritation: Not classified
Respiratory or Skin Sensitization: Not classified
Germ Cell Mutagenicity: Not classified
Short answer: NO!
Alex Berenson on the author of said article: “the terrified dictator is strong in this one.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/12/business/dealbook/should-companies-require-employees-to-take-the-vaccine.htmlDepending on the poll you read, 40 to 50 percent of Americans say they will not get a coronavirus vaccine when it first becomes available to them. In a survey of firefighters in New York City, who are essential workers at high risk of infection, 55 percent said they do not intend to take a vaccine if offered by their departments.
The possibility that large swaths of the population may refuse — or simply delay — getting vaccinated presents a perilous challenge to the health of the nation and the economy. Widespread coronavirus vaccinations are not only the best way to keep people from dying, they will also help revive business and the economy.
There is a way to get greater compliance: Businesses, which have spent the past several years championing their social responsibility, can require vaccination of employees and, in many cases, customers.
Over the past week, I spoke with executives at companies in various industries to see whether they intend to require vaccination of employees or customers. None wanted to speak on the record.
Almost all said they planned to recommend the vaccine, but not make it compulsory. Several said that they have tried to create a culture of trust, and a vaccine mandate would undermine that trust. Others worried about legal liability if an employee had adverse side effects from the vaccine. Some said they would like to mandate the vaccine, but worried that a backlash could spiral into a public-relations nightmare.
Chris and Tribe,
Watched the teaser, about to watch the full PP version. I was talking with someone about your videos and your presentation yesterday and we both love how you are taking a step-wise logical, based approach to this crisis. This will prove most impactful when you reach an inevitable conclusion that will seem to defy logic.
When I say crisis, I don’t mean the pandemic. The crisis we face is coming to realizations as a human species that certain “types” have “risen” to the top. The MSM has done wonders on stigmatizing this way of thinking, but seriously, at what point can you no longer deny it? It is staring us directly in the face laughing with violent avarice in its eyes. A malicious, many-headed hydra that represents the worst all humanity has to offer - and they set policy, they perform elective surgery on our constitution without our consent.
These are the same “managers” that preach green policies, yet prop up corporations that engage in gain-of-function manufacturing, gene patenting, planned obsolescence, terms of service that remove ownership/ privacy, and imposed scarcity. All the while we watch our economy crumble under the weight of the Fed and their magic printer, no reasonable raise in wages for 15 years, under-employment, and astronomical real estate costs.
Our managers have merely been enablers that profit immensely from turning a blind eye. The true threat that is rearing its head now is that the people of many nations have allowed corporations to take silent control of their governments without the slightest protest. We used to protest this sort of thing, but crying injustice about deceased armed career criminals with intent to harm LEOs is what we protest today I suppose.
K street has got to go - permanently.
I see many comments on here asking “why the censorship,” “why are they not using effective treatments?” Shift your paradigm, and you will understand why this is happening. These people don’t want to help you - in fact quite the opposite. These people think they are superior to you because you don’t possess the same psychological defect as they do (sociopathy, psychopathy, dark triad) - they see it as noble ambition. These people are Malthusian, Machiavellian, and subscribe to eugenicist ideals. They truly believe there are too many people on earth. Who are they to decide this?
Who is “THEY” you ask? “They” are many. “They” are the loudest proponents of the vaccine and zoonotic origin theory. “They” are too big to fail. “They” are wealthy “philanthropists.” “They” are the talking heads programming normies to react violently to seeing a naked human smile. “They” are the ones making you stand in line outside in the middle of winter to carry on typical commerce so you can avoid getting sick. “They” are your greatest enemy. “They” are the enemy of logic and true human progression.
Take care, all. Though things may seem unbelievable during these times, just remember that the entire world has not been able to identify the origin of this virus and this is for a reason. My bet is on the fact that there has not been a meaningful audit of any BSL3 and 4 labs at this point. This is man-made. “They” always use controlled opposition to achieve their victories as they are incapable of a fair fight (ie. logical debate, accountability, actual answers to legitimate questions).
I have always liked this quote and feel it captures the spirit of our current time:
“One of the artifices of Satan is, to induce men to believe that he does not exist…” - John Wilkinson 1836
Stay frosty
Please add some way to play videos at higher speeds. We, the youtube watchers, are kinda spoiled by that 
Where has this information been? Just what Doc has been saying all along, but by many.
this is scary! or is it?? can someone transcribe for us??
IVM is only safe for those people who can safely take it. There are many common meds where it would be contraindicated to take concurrently. Like p-glycoprotein inhibitors. And it should be used with caution if certain other health conditions are present. Like maybe asthma or liver issues. I hope people are researching those details for themselves. I believe I’m a good candidate but I’m hesitant to recommend IVM to many of my elder friends. Still waiting to hear whether my doctor will prescribe it. I did just score on a few paste tubes from Amazon that hadn’t been drastically marked up in price.
IVM Durvet safety sheet says IVM suspected of fertility and fetus problems. Quick search:
https://www.drugs.com/pregnancy/ivermectin.html
The First Admendment doesn’t apply to private speech. A platform owned by a private party, such as Facebook, Twitter, Free Republic, YouTube, Google+ (when that was), and such, are not of themselves public platforms, they are private platforms. Are they somehow public, that is there something, some force of law, of force of law philosophy, which “pierces the veil”, or otherwise moves those private platforms into what is considered public space, where the First Amendment’s REMINDER of human rights would apply? There can be, we can find analogs in law history and civilization’s rules in the course of human events to the situation as avails. There are a number of “attack surfaces” at or along which one can consider these “deplatformings”, bans, penalties, censorship, and acts which make a person “persona non grata”, or which limit the particular or general expressions of speech, or create classes of membership status which limit benefits or create costings to some speech and not others, or some person’s on account of their speech, known or anticipated, and not to others.
Chris Martenson noted that the social media platforms of this time are themselves running on backbones and communications infrastructure which is public in part or whole. Certainly any university of this era, even the private ones with only the rarest of exceptions, are public services and public goods, because so much of their support in money, in tax breaks, in many manifold forms of connection to government at the local, state and federal level, that it is impossible to say where the “private school” starts and the government or public establishment ends. And it is unversities where Google and Facebook first started, on the internet which was once a DARPA project: a project of the post WWII era, post sputnik “Defense” Department, not much different in ownership conceptualizations than the Interstate Highway system. These, Facebook and Google, both thus birthed in the public womb. And their data streams are carried, especially today, in the airwaves, 4G, 5G, wifi of all sorts, which is a public space and can never be non-public, like the air, except by grant of government, that is the grant of the sovereign of a land under law. In America, land is privately owned, it is not a grant of a sovereign, likewise is tangible items. We have the natural right of ownership to things in hand, the tangible and to surveyable property. Many places only own things or land as an allowance of the sovereign of that land, that is their law, but I like the ideal of American law on such matters of individual ownership, and I think that is clear from Divine revelation that such is the true way of such philosophy of law.
Yet that leaves the commons, things not owned by registered published deed, or by possession by individuals or groups of individuals in contractual association. And the commons includes the airways, the electromagnetic spectrum, the world of ideas, and the public ways, harbors and rights of way. And the commerce concept of the common carrier, and the marketplace concepts of a open market in a community, and the community’s necessity of enforcing rules in the marketplace, and ensuring the peaceful and energetic commerce of places.
Then too, we have the modern development of the anti-trust and anti-monopoly laws, those are good, but need care, as they are spotty confections, and as a law philosophy, as hard to keep in good order as the old Law of the Seas, something which is still a battle to align rightfully and peacefully. That inchoat-ness is even worse in “IP” law, which is actually made a tyrant of law, a despotic form of law, because the giants are callous and greedy, and unrestrained by well grounded and understandable concepts of anti-trust and anti-monopoly.
But a couple of areas of law, established law and conventions of making judgements, apply to the modern social media platforms to my mind: common carrier law, and the law of harbors.
One of PP subscribers kindly posted the SDS toxicity portion for the horse paste…Durvet. I compared this to other suppliers and it is similar to the Canadian version. I believe one of the ingredients to be corn oil…hence the Vaseline texture IMO. I read corn oil somewhere but now can’t find it. In any case the way I read the SDS, the ivermectin is the most toxic of all the ingredients at 10 mg per kilogram of body weight. So for a 180 pound person (or 81 KG) that works out to 800 mg of horse paste. Interestingly enough the Indian Government recommendation is 1200 mg for each of 3 days. I think the SDS errors in stating a very low toxicity level in the their SDS to protect further. Again in my opinion.
Your browser is blocking the display of the video because it is not on the preakprosperity.com website. It is on Vimeo.com. The HTML code being used is <iframe>. I had that trouble some months ago using Firefox. You can try a different browser or you can go to the security settings of your current browser and lower the setting. This worked for me for a different website which I had problems with displaying iframes: In Firefox click the three bars in the upper right hand corner of the screen and select “options” then click “Privacy and Security” in the left hand column and find the “autoplay” under “Permissions.” Click where it says “settings” to the right of “autoplay.” Add https://peakprosperity.com to the list of exceptions and allow both audio and video.