Weak Employment and Housing, Yet a Massive Stock Market Advance + Volatility Crush. What Gives?

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/weak-employment-and-housing-yet-a-massive-stock-market-advance-volatility-crush-what-gives/

Paul Kiker (Kiker Wealth Management) and I kicked off this Finance U podcast by discussing the record-breaking smash of market volatility, which happened despite plenty of reasons to be uncertain about the economic direction. This volatility crush, the largest in history, seems at odds with the weakening job market, housing market, Trump tariff fickleness, and other mixed economic signals.

We talked about how the job numbers have been downgraded every month in 2025 (4/4) and have been revised downwards for 22 out of the past 28 months. Further, a massive discrepancy has opened up between the establishment survey and household survey data raising questions about what’s going on. Again, this should be a source of uncertainty, but markets have never been more certain as the volatility crush seemingly indicates.

But does it? Is it possible that the central banks are actively intervening in stock, bond and commodity markets? Well, the place where highly leveraged paper products on each of those markets are traded, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange or CME, has a Central Bank Preferred Buyer Incentive Program. This tells us that Central Banks are such heavy buyers and sellers of CME products that they get special high-volume pricing. On things like stock equity futures, gold & silver contracts, bond options, and even agricultural contracts.

(Source)

Now, why would foreign central banks need volume pricing on silver contracts when none of them report holding any silver on their books? Or ag contracts? And why is the GAO specifically forbidden from inquiring into any and all foreign transactions conducted between the US Federal Reserve and other central banks as well as the IMF? Is it possible the Fed has a point of view about what the “right” price is for stocks, bonds, corn, or silver and hides its market-moving actions through foreign cut-outs? These are the sorts of legitimate questions that arise with a lack of basic transparency and accountability.

The conversation then shifted to precious metals, where we noted the significant moves in silver and platinum, and how gold has now surpassed the Euro as a global reserve asset. This shift indicates a growing distrust in fiat currencies and a move towards tangible assets.

We also touched on the concerning trend of increasing consumer debt and delinquencies, particularly in credit cards and student loans, which are showing signs of stress. This, coupled with a stagnant or declining housing market in various regions, paints a picture of an economy at a potential turning point.

(Source)

Paul and I expressed our concerns about the market’s mispricing of risk, especially with the backdrop of high valuations and the possibility of a dollar devaluation. We discussed the implications of ongoing fiscal irresponsibility and the potential for a significant economic adjustment in the near future.

Lastly, we highlighted the importance of being agile in investment strategies, moving away from passive investing which might not serve investors well in the coming years. The discussion was a stark reminder of the need for investors to adapt to the changing economic environment, focusing on reality rather than narrative.

If you’re feeling the need to reassess your financial strategy in light of these insights, consider reaching out to Paul and his team at Peak Financial Investing. And remember, we’ll both be at the Peak Prosperity Summit in New Hampshire this September, where we can delve deeper into these topics. Until next time, stay informed and proactive with your investments.

FINANCIAL DISCLAIMER. PEAK PROSPERITY, LLC, AND PEAK FINANCIAL INVESTING ARE NOT ENGAGED IN RENDERING LEGAL, TAX, OR FINANCIAL ADVICE OR SERVICES VIA THIS WEBSITE. NEITHER PEAK PROSPERITY, LLC NOR PEAK FINANCIAL INVESTING ARE FINANCIAL PLANNERS, BROKERS, OR TAX ADVISORS. Their websites are intended only to assist you in your financial education. Your personal financial situation is unique, and any information and advice obtained through this website may not be appropriate for your situation. Accordingly, before making any final decisions or implementing any financial strategy, you should consider obtaining additional information and advice from your accountant or other financial advisers who are fully aware of your individual circumstances.

6 Likes

I recently watched a really awesome interview about private equity.

As far as I could understand, the thesis was: private equity is a bubble that is exactly the same as the sub prime mortgage bubble in 2008. And the reason they think that the government will bail them out the same way they did then, is because pension funds are invested in private equity, and they also own a lot of nursing homes, emergency rooms, hospitals etc.

“The DARK SIDE of Private Equity |
The Freddie Smith Podcast With Tiffany Cianci”

7 Likes
2 Likes

I would not put it past the fed to be doing exactly what our govt did in Covid…asking your 5 eyes friends to do in the us market what you cannot legally do…and of course they wre not a govt agency, they are a privately owned cartel.
But i also want to know what finks Aladdin is up to…not 9nly is it leased to vanguard and others, but also it is quasi leased i think by the fed.
When we cannot use market knowledge to help ourselves…i think its game over for ordinary people. Universal basic income, smart city oods,and fake protein is coming for us at the speed of light.

3 Likes

It absolutely is taking down the middle class and all our SMEs. Where the hell am i gonna get the fabric to sew drapes or re upholster my furniture? Who the heck can affotd to throw out and buy new? I think private equity is gonna kill whats left.

Quote “That doesnt end well…”.
Agree

1 Like

If you raise your kids well, you get to spoil your grandkids. If you spoil your kids, you get to raise your grandchildren.

15 Likes

I think this is what Chris would call “techno copium” meaning there are all kinds of different technological solutions that could be used to continue to have energy to run the civilization. But the thorium plants and all those different new oil solutions are not here now. And we’re running out of the fuel that we run on now. Basically we’re running out of oil much faster then we can build all those other technologies at the scale that we need

3 Likes

These conversations are always great to listen to! However, I live and work in Japan. Would anyone know financial advisers like this but that can do business in Japan and understand how things work here?

I can remember when I was a student and we were taught why the free market systems is so superior to a communist planned economy. The facts as presented were indisputable. So why now, does The West feel we need a planned and managed global economy rather than a free market system?

I think we were conquered by communists and we didn’t even realize it.

6 Likes

I definitely think capitalism is the least bad economic system, but it has no plan for the people who end up on the bottom, so they rebel, and that’s why in my opinion that socialism is being tried over and over in different countries even though it fails every time.
Somehow the Scandinavian countries make socialism-capitalism mix work somehow but I don’t understand how.

1 Like

It’s no longer about building strong, sustainable companies. It’s about raping companies, the rapists making a killing with the debt holders, employees and vendors taking it up the you know where.

2 Likes

I got into politics a bit in the late 90s. We used to rage:

“How can you call it capitalism when the price of money, which is the most important price of all, is set by a committee of 12 eggheads?”

Back then the eggheads had the price set around 5%. We never imagined they set it at 0 and hold it there for a decade and then lend money to insiders to buy assets whose prices went up enabling them to borrow more for free to buy more assets.

3 Likes

I see some traits in these: JP wants positive people, not doomsayers. Possibly because every grandparent wants to leave better world for kids and grandkids. Second this guest is former politician /advisor and job requirement there is “to get things done” ie give hope and good vibes… doomsayers are rarely selected and voted for in politics.

I struggle to combine common podcasts like this and Chris’ peak energy charts showing problems… yes there are opportunities but scale is too big and our societies havent woken up.
At some point “western culture”, ie contemporary version, didnt like bad news and realities anymore and censored those people, liars are preferred everywhere or “good vibes”. Perhaps leaders and elite getting older is one factor.

Sounds like great taking happened already during that decade. Now higher rates are fine coz everyone elite and their frens got to loot during that time.

2 Likes

Uh Oh. Get ready for one of the biggest rug pulls (on retail) in history?

2 Likes

Not that I know of personally…I’ll start asking , around.

2 Likes

A non-economic participant deliberately crushing the VIX futures to shove the markets would show up as a persistent dispersion opportunity. That is, you could sell the puts (or more sophisticated options strategies) on the index components and buy VIX futures for stat arb profits with like 90+% win rate.

That said… another distortion that would occur from systematically crushing the front VIX would be… both of the stat arb strategies I’m running on the VIX and VIX/V2TX. They’re not at 90% reliability level, but they’re making me good money. Huh, interesting. That means I can say when the manipulation started.

When my wife (we trade together) first spotted the opportunity, I told her it was nonsense, much like the economist refusing to believe in the $50 on the ground in the parking lot. We looked into it and found it was real. I’ll ask her exactly when it started, but I think it’s about 4 years now.

1 Like

Yes! The JP podcast sounds exactly opposite to what Chris says, AND they have an example where the technology DID deliver: that was when they figured out how to do horizontal fracking with that shale.

So in the past technology did miraculously save us at the last second. Can we count on that in the future? :woman_shrugging:t3:

1 Like

Well Chris did explain that whole 2008 financial crash that made many families loose their homes, was that fall off the cliff, so in that sense fracking came too late. 2005 was peak oil and 2008 it crashed despite printing. I count JP(Toronto university professor at the time) and many others who kept their job didnt have to feel this pain like so many others who lost jobs during that crash, and as result also lost their house. So basis was in energy problems. People are like that, if it didnt bite their ass personally, they dont remember it.
(this is common phenomenom, early 1990s was similar financial crash all over europe, ripple effect from 1987 US crash I think, havent connected those dots, and those working in taxmoney based jobs have similar attitude but those in private sector felt the pain, eg construction or small business).

From that era is saying taxmoney jobs pay less but are “secure” meaning those bad times, private jobs have better salaries but private factory or company can any day practically go bust or merge or downsize.
Chris has perhaps always worked as small business person ? So that would explain this attitude difference(I know he has now already for years been running PP, dont know more than that).

Decent gains for TSLA today. What could possibly go wrong?


China’s BYD outsells Tesla in Europe for first time, report says | Reuters