A Time for Caution

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/a-time-for-caution/

It’s perfectly clear that we’re in yet another massive equity bubble, this time led by the shiny lure of AI and all it could potentially promise.

And that’s the important part, the ‘potential promise.’ Because once the actual reality of the object of bubbly attention is understood, the boundless fantasies are rather violently adjusted to a concrete level of actual profits.

Until reality asserts itself, bubbles are all fun and games.

Once again, by nearly every measure, US stocks are the most expensive they’ve ever been. Price-to-Sales, Price-to-Earnings, Price-to-Book, the Buffet Indicator (Price-to-GDP), are all at record extremes.

To buy stocks at these levels, you have to believe that this time is different.

Spoiler: It never is.

Which means if you’ve got money in a 401k or a managed portfolio, it’s time for caution.

The AI story is starting to get some doses of reality, such as the fact that every AI company is burning cash to build market share:

(Source)

On the other side of the story, companies that have attempted to install generative AI into their business processes have a stunning rate of failure so far (according to an MIT study):

With tens of billions spent, but not much to show for it yet, it’s pretty easy to predict what comes next – a slower, more thoughtful and careful level of spending and adoption.

In other words, a little dose of reality, which is the one thing most toxic to bubble psychology.

None of this means AI isn’t going to be disruptive and transformative, merely that it’s going to go through a very normal adjustment process of transitioning from the current throw-all-caution-to-the-wind frenetic pace of unquestioned CapEx spending, to a more measured level of spend that balances risk and reward so that profitability can be part of the equation.

Next, Paul and I also discussed more recession signs in both the home construction/real estate and trucking industries. Just anecdotes, but those are often very important as early warning signs. Think Mark Baum’s conversation with the stripper in The Big Short.

As well, we have to keep our eyes on sovereign long bonds which are clearly in a pronounced upward trend in 5 major countries:

While Trump clearly wants lower interest rates and is willing to fire the Fed Chair over it, getting the Fed to lower short-term rates may not do anything at all for the long bond rates, which set the rates for mortgages. So, pressuring the Fed to lower rates may not even be the economic and stock-boosting move that Trump imagines it to be.

What do these rising long bond rates tell us? Well, clearly, people aren’t comfortable with lending sovereign governments money for a 30-year term. Like us, they are probably thinking that the fiscal prospects of these countries are terrible, especially over a 30-year time frame.

Add it all up, and now is the time to consider how you are going to financially weather a storm. Businesses should be ready to scale back as necessary, and portfolios should be safeguarded from market-driven losses.

But, the storms pass, as they always do, and so it’s equally important to know when to reinvest and what to buy. Me? I am scouring commodities and hard assets.


FINANCIAL DISCLAIMER. PEAK PROSPERITY, LLC, AND PEAK FINANCIAL INVESTING ARE NOT ENGAGED IN RENDERING LEGAL, TAX, OR FINANCIAL ADVICE OR SERVICES VIA THIS WEBSITE. NEITHER PEAK PROSPERITY, LLC NOR PEAK FINANCIAL INVESTING ARE FINANCIAL PLANNERS, BROKERS, OR TAX ADVISORS. Their websites are intended only to assist you in your financial education. Your personal financial situation is unique, and any information and advice obtained through this website may not be appropriate for your situation. Accordingly, before making any final decisions or implementing any financial strategy, you should consider obtaining additional information and advice from your accountant or other financial advisers who are fully aware of your individual circumstances.

9 Likes

Exhibit A:
https://x.com/GlobalMktObserv/status/1958589963504599281

Exhibit B:
https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1958586396161311124

Exhibit C:
https://x.com/NorthmanTrader/status/1958598299683872866

Exhibit D:
https://x.com/_Investinq/status/1958554460566806750

Exhibit E:
https://x.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1958558211788677279

Exhibit F:
https://x.com/_Investinq/status/1958177270448722174

11 Likes

Exhibit E is interesting here in Georgia, USA. We’ve seen houses nearly double in price over the last few years. Several counties in rural Georgia failed to adjust their tax evaluations over the past couple of years and are now in a rush to do so. Instead of using their own accessors, they’ve chosen to hire a third party company to quickly revalue property. It’s a total cluster-F. The company has doubled and tripled home values and taxes are going through the roof in these poor rural communities. The comparable home values don’t match homes that have skyrocketed. The interesting thing is the timing and the use of third party companies, because home sales are crashing but asking prices haven’t dropped yet… They’re screwing the citizens at the last possible moment while asking prices are still high but before the drop in actual selling prices. This is happening in several counties.

12 Likes

If you sell your house now and buyer pays 20% less, does it change that tax evaluation?

3 Likes

No. It does not. I know personally because when I lived in Greenfield MA my house was assessed for ~15% MORE than I paid for it.

I brought that to the assessor’s office and they said, “Tough luck.”

11 Likes

https://x.com/LukeGromen/status/1958887576837759280

4 Likes

It can, it did for me at least. I just sold a house and coincidentally the tax assessment happened concurrently to the sale. I called the assessor and he corrected the value down to the price of the sale. I think it really depends on how corrupt your local government is. I didn’t have to do it as its not my house anymore, but it felt good to save the new owner some money and help them keep that tax under control.

7 Likes

You are assuming the United States government is looking out for its own people.

1 Like

So, this is probably just ~$40 billion set on fire as businesses are struggling to adopt these tools, if the “initiatives” are not just token mentions in earning calls to not advertise they are falling behind.

But what if successful business adoption is exponential and 5% is more than half way time-wise to 100%. ChatGPT is only 2-1/2 years new. So, is 2-1/2 year an upper bound on 100% of businesses seeing returns on their AI initiatives? And will we then s-curve into businesses getting exponentially better at leveraging them?

Background? I’ve been doing software development for 30 years the hard way. Presently, I’m spending a lot of time getting proficient at a tiny subset of the tools available. I’m approaching the problem as if I’m strapping on a jet pack, any jet pack, and getting good at that jet pack. I see a lot of folks using the tools, not really successfully leveling up with them, and rather just getting marginally more productive at doing what they’ve always done (mostly). Humans and their routines are the bottleneck.

My personal experience is that how I do my job is changing regularly, not smoothly, but in step changes with each model release. ChatGPT 5 got off to a rough start, and maybe I was just forced to work around that rough start and learned something, but this past week was one of the most productive of my career. So, progress isn’t slowing down. It’s just not evenly distributed.

But, seriously, go get a jet pack now and get good at it. I see it. I’ll be able to absorb the work of several of my coworkers by myself very very soon. I’m not looking forward to it. But business being business, it looks like it’s going to happen. And it’s going to be the hunger games, office edition.

8 Likes

Good advice and a very practical approach. It is what it is…

5 Likes

Yes. If it looks like that’s what they are doing, it’s because it’s what they are doing.

Most people will fail to implement AI in a way that brings a net new benefit.

Even though software developers think it’s making them faster, most will implement it wrong and cost themselves time/effort/frustration. Most companies that use those developers to “write” AI powered code will suffer from an increase of entropy.

I already see it. I’m regularly asked to review code from contractors that it’s obvious the AI wrote the code, and I’m the first actual human to look at it - and the code is trash.

People who aren’t curious, when they see the output will just accept it. It’s going to be a **** show before it falls over enough that people recognize you can’t just buy the hype and win.

Imagine that I told you that I work cheap. $1/hr. Plug me anywhere.

How much access would you give me? When would you question my work output? Motives? Consequences?

Now, ask yourself. With AI, are we using a different standard?

6 Likes

Ah! Solarworks and couple other disasters in recent years happened like this, without AI. We know they try to hollow out staff to always fresher, greener, cheaper over time. That means time and other pressures, with lack of experience and knowledge. As those centrally managed pieces of software running everywhere are common, any one of them can work as vulnerability point. We know human trait is, anywhere they think they can save a buck, they will do and worry consequences later.
Was some case chinese or north korean hackers managed to get hired by US companies(90 laptop lady). We live in interesting times.

However I cant exclude planned malice operations but those require effort and planning, incompetence doesnt.
(Ive been seeing mostly indian truckers causing problems in US and Canada… widely reported issue circulating in social media, not related to IT but similar phenomenom)

2 Likes

My husband says the same thing. “Vibe coding” is synonymous with shit.

I keep wondering why otherwise thoughtful, skeptical people are bamboozled by AI. Ask AI a question and the results will be very mixed. Some superficially relevant answers, an occasional flash of genius, and a bunch of stuff out of left field. Now imagine output like that is used to program your phone, smart appliance, or car. Are results like this really supposed to replace humans? Or are humans who are capable of doing the work anyway needed to review everything and make sure the AI generates the correct results? Isn’t this just another step downwards in the enshitification of everything?

5 Likes

I think most people are drawn in by the idea of ‘money for nothing and checks for free’.

Re: Vibe coding and low quality software. Prototyping is a great application for such quality. Once you learn from the prototype, throw it away and do it properly.

3 Likes

Be interested in people’s thoughts on the main indicator that matters now is liquidity (and thats been the case since 2008). The question to the Real Vision team was if we are already in a recession, why are markets at all time highs? Is it just liquidity?

Yes, Anthony, you’ve nailed it—liquidity is the key driver here. The stock market hitting all-time highs while the economy is either in or teetering on the edge of a recession might seem counterintuitive, but it’s actually a classic dynamic. Let me break it down for you.

1. Markets Are Forward-Looking, Not Present-Reflecting

The stock market doesn’t care about today’s economic data—it’s always looking 6 to 12 months ahead. So, if the market believes that the Federal Reserve is about to pivot to rate cuts and inject liquidity into the system, it will start pricing that in now. This is why you often see markets rallying even as the economy deteriorates. It’s not about where we are today, it’s about where we’re going.

And right now, the market is betting on a liquidity surge. Why? Because the Fed has no choice. The recession signals you’ve pointed out—UPS, young adult joblessness, travel spending, fast food earnings, LEI, construction—all scream that the economy is slowing dramatically. The Fed knows this, and they’ll have to respond by easing financial conditions. The market is front-running that move.

2. Liquidity Drives Everything

This is the big one. Liquidity is the single most important driver of asset prices—stocks, crypto, real estate, you name it. When liquidity is abundant, risk assets soar. When it’s tight, they crash. And here’s the thing: even though the Fed hasn’t officially started cutting rates yet, global liquidity is already improving. Let me explain:

  • China’s Stimulus: China has been pumping liquidity into its system to stabilize its economy. This has a global spillover effect, especially in commodity markets and emerging markets.
  • Weaker Dollar: The dollar has been weakening, which is effectively a form of global monetary easing. A weaker dollar makes it easier for other countries to service their dollar-denominated debt and boosts global trade.
  • Market Anticipation: The bond market is already pricing in rate cuts, which has brought down yields. Lower yields mean cheaper borrowing costs, which is effectively an easing of financial conditions.

The result? Liquidity is creeping back into the system, and the stock market is responding accordingly. Remember, there’s a 90-95% correlation between global liquidity and asset prices like Bitcoin, the Nasdaq, and even the S&P 500

1 Like

Exhibit C - Northman Trader
I had a longer look at the chart (not only because I am a fan of Sven) and I noticed a distinctive pattern - call it market behaviour.

  1. When the market dips, Trannies dip deeper.

Then let’s focus on the dips → Dec15/Jan16 and Apr20. They could be taken as cycle start points. Of course, the Apr20 dip was deeper due to the specific event (Covid panic).

  1. After the dip, during the initial recovery phase both (Trannies and SPX) move in tandem. However, trannies gain is stronger.
  2. After this initial move both take a brief breather (Feb18-Nov18 and Jan22-Oct22) but then something changes.
  3. SPX is continuing trending up while Trannies enter a range.
  4. that eventually sets the stage for the next DIP

The rotation out of trannies (something pretty solid) into a more speculative asset class seems to be the “coal mine canary” in the lifetime of a bubble.

1 Like

Yep, keeping an eye on liquidity has a point particular when holding broad based assets (like SPY etc.)
Did you have a look at Michael Howell? He follows the global liquidity cycle… which is up at the moment.
According to him that will continue into the end of the year. (Interestingly, that would ensure that the astonishing phenomenon - The market has been up every “5th year” in every decade since 1885 - continues.
That means that there could be additional 9-12 month in the pipe.

I have some suspicion… I would look out for a disconnection between SPY, NASDAQ and Crypto. When stocks stall but Cryptos continue to move higher that could be the top of the cycle.

2 Likes

On the subject of health insurance skyrocketing, partly due to the use of prescription drugs: just a few minutes ago, my partner texted me to say that, at his routine annual hearing appointment that’s mandated by his employer (he works with large computer installations that can be very noisy), he was asked to sign a consent form that, among other things, said the following:

“By checking this box, I give permission to Concentra to perform the following services that the physicians and other non-physician providers and assistants may deem to be necessary: … (b) administration of injections, medications, and immunizations…”

I’m proud to say, he walked out. But I’m also wondering if he’s going to get fired now. Note that his employer is a Fortune 100 company you’ve 100% heard of, and they’re basically mandating that he allow himself to be subjected to any drugs that others “may deem to be necessary” cuz… reasons.

Maybe I’m naive, but I thought the whole forced vaccination thing ended a while ago. Not so much.

Also, on the subject of the Feds acquiring part of Intel… MAKE ATLAS SHRUGGED FICTION AGAIN. :confounded:

10 Likes

Have you tried Bribery™?

In the latest update, you donate to the assessor’s spouse’s charity of choice.

2 Likes