Answering These Questions May Unlock the Trump Crime Scene

News & Current Events Public News & Current Events
,
1

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/answering-these-questions-may-unlock-the-trump-crime-scene/

Our Citizens’ Investigation has resolved a lot of items, despite a near-total lack of helpful input from federal investigators.

But there are a few intriguing puzzles left, which I now believe have the chance of unlocking the crime scene.

We need to know:

1. Why Did the Secret Service Leave Trump On Stage Even Though The Sniper Team Hercules 1 Had Already Swiveled Around To Face A Threat To The North?

2. What Exactly, Precisely, Were Greg Nichols and “The Other Sniper’s” Whereabouts From 5:45 to 6:12?

3. From where and when Did Crooks Retrieve His Backpack?

It’s painfully obvious that if the local three-man sniper crew had been doing their jobs at the most minimal possible level of competency, Crooks could have and would have been stopped before firing.

Now, we know that one of the 3-man crew left early, as planned weeks in advance. So they are not on our concern list at the moment.

But we still don’t know who the second sniper was with Greg Nicol and that does concern us. Why don’t we know? What were they doing between 5:45 and 6:11:33?

We’d ask Greg Nicol the same question.

More broadly, it remains a complete mystery how local LEO had numerous uniformed and plainclothes LEO assets all about the AGR building complex, including on the West side, somehow ‘lost track’ of

Crooks between 5:45 and 6:02. And then lost him again as he clambered up onto the AGR complex roof.

How did they lose track of him and why did nobody catch a glimpse of him until Greg Nicol, as we’re told, saw Crooks out of a second-story window at a picnic table with a backpack? Why did Greg Nicol then say “he’s headed toward Sheetz, when the far more accurate description would have been “he was just at the picnic table on the West side and he got up and headed north?”

That would have at least focused attention on the AGR complex and not a gas station a quarter mile away. And why didn’t Greg Nicol or Sniper #2 just shout out the open windows to the LEO’s down there while pointing or something?

Add it all up, and there’s clearly a cover-up underway. Whether that’s to simply cover-up gross incompetence, or something more nefarious, remains to be seen.

11 Likes
2

Looking at the top down view of the AGR complex and where the interior sniper teams were supposed to be as well as considering the various windows we know are in building 6 it struck me that they pretty much should have been able to view and track Crooks at any point that he was on the roof. There should be a clear view from at least one of the windows at any point in time.

3 Likes
3

I think that there is a fourth question.

Why did the sniper who killed Crooks wait so long to fire? It seems that if the guy is available, that is a question that should be asked.

I am also intrigued by Crooks himself. Something is wrong with the “lone nut” theory. Crooks did not come across as a psychotic killer or as someone suicidal. He came across as someone who thought that he was just going to walk away from this whole affair. Something just doesn’t make sense here.

10 Likes
4

I agree the question should be asked…but in my mind I can come up with immediately plausible answers.

Such as, “I couldn’t figure out if friend or foe until the firing started. As I was dialing in he suddenly lurched out of view. As soon as he raised back up I took the shot.”

That 9th shot ()that caused Crooks to lurch downwards) was the savior shot for a lot of people in the stands, I think.

4 Likes
5

I contemplated that if crooks really was at the site for an extended period of time early in the day, which is what FBI Wray testify to, he may have scoped out the building with his back pack, figured he didn’t need a ladder because he knew where he was going to be climbing the roof, then he may have put his backpack somewhere on the west side of the building in one of those dead ends. He would’ve done all of this on his first early trip to the site.

Maybe he initially thought he would climb the roof in that dead end closer to the south side, and accordingly stashed his backpack there on his first trip to the site that day, and then realized as it got closer to the time for him to carry out his mission, then maybe decided that the dead end further to the north would make sense to climb on the roof.

Under that theory, he would grab his backpack from that first little alcove closer to the south side, then go to the picnic table with it and then go to the little alcove where he actually climbed the roof.

So where was he between 5:45 PM and 6:02 PM? Maybe he was hiding in that first little alcove closer to the south side of the building along with his Backpack

All speculation on my part

6 Likes
6

You’re probably correct that the 4:26 comment was not about Crooks. I’ve always thought the comment referred to a vehicle pulling in and parking. I have a disconnect between someone pulling in and parking and somebody sitting on a picnic table. Are the two things even related? Anyone else confused about this?

6 Likes
7

I was trying to find the autopsy report and came across this article. It’s disturbing. Apparently the body was left on the roof all night. The coroner arrived at midnight to examine the body an was told to come back the next day. Then, there was no ID as you said at the beginning - so how did they know who he was? Too many things could have happened to that body during the night including, if there is a Max Yearick, the bodies were swapped out? That’s probably a bit tin foil for now. Anyway, here’s the article: Crime Scene Compromised. Alleged Assassin’s Autopsy Missing. What’s Going On? - AbleChild

9 Likes
8

We need to insert another time into the timeline…

According to numerous accounts from mainstream media outlets, Crooks was observed by someone in law enforcement at 5:56 pm near the AGR building, and at that time, he had the backpack.

Here are two of these reports:

“Just after 5:30 p.m., that same SWAT officer observed Crooks using a rangefinder and reading news on his phone, officials said. At 5:56 p.m., Crooks was seen walking in the vicinity of the AGR building, the FBI said.”

ABC News - July 29th, 2024

"July 13, 5:56 p.m.

Crooks was found carrying a backpack near AGR building."

Fox News - Running Timeline from date of shooting to August 2nd.

2 Likes
9

Whomever gave the order for the SOUTH counter sniper team to turn their attention away from the SOUTH sector towards the NORTH and AGR Bldg., should have given the order for President Trump to be removed from the stsge , IMMEDIATELY. How would the counter sniper team know to about face to the NORTH unless they were told to do so. They wouldn’t have known on their own. This question needs to be asked, it’s a must know!

13 Likes
10

Thanks for this update video, great work.
One important thing i’d like to inform you about. In your slice at 1:51 you refer to the bodycam footage of BWC2-122104. Please be aware that this bodycam’s timestamp is 12 seconds ahead of time. So it was not by 6:10:11 but by 6:09:59 and therefore 1 minute 34 seconds before the 1st shot (6:11:33).

Here is some additional infos concerning this topic.

8 Likes
11

Key questions: Why was the man in charge of Trump’s “protection”, Ronald Rowe, promoted? Why were not all DHS & USSS directors and personnel responsible for Trump’s “protection” put on temporary suspension immediately pending investigation?

3 Likes
12

It’s very important to know who told the south-facing team to turn around, because it may have been the north-facing team, and not anyone in the Secret Service site command post.

The two north-facing snipers may have been in a bit of a panic, because they knew something serious was going on, but their view of the area where it was occurring was partially obstructed. That may have prompted them to initiate the shift in position for the other team.

If this is how it went down, and the site commander deliberately stayed silent while this was all happening, that would obviously add further circumstantial evidence that this assassination attempt was allowed to happen by the Secret Service agent in charge that day, especially when paired with the inexplicable decision to leave Trump on stage for nearly a minute and a half after the south-facing team turned around.

10 Likes
13

This is the likeliest scenario to me. The counter-snipers take general instructions, but once they’re guarding an area, they just report what they’re doing, and command has to listen.

In my mind, it’s virtually certain that Hercules 2 told Hercules 1 (in whatever weird lingo they have), essentially, “I think there’s a bad guy over here but there’s a hiding spot, and I think he may be using it so I can’t deal with him”.

Hercules 1 would have radioed that they were turning. At that point, SS command should have sent out the order to take Trump off the stage.

8 Likes
14

One thing about the two snipers in the overwatch position: suppose they were totally goofing off, literally playing games on their phones or something, so they didn’t see Crooks on the roof OR the agitated crowd.

Still, even under those conditions, once the shooting started, they should have identified Crooks within, say, 10 seconds. They should have been the ones who shot him.

Instead, we just have 1) GN strolling out the door two minutes later and 2) Butler sniper “M” not known to have done the slightest thing. Never reported, never even hinted at. Was he even really there?

Here was my best attempt to track down M, maybe somebody can improve on it? Where Were The Two Local Snipers When Trump Was Shot? - #349 by brian60221

4 Likes
15

Please note, it is not 100% certain that one of the southern snipers (Hercules 1) took the kill shot, according to Higgins preliminary investigation report.

image
image1335×210 49.1 KB

4 Likes
16

Agreed…

And it’s what one would expect if the site commander was bending over backwards to let something bad happen to Trump that day.

He wouldn’t issue the obvious command to the south-facing team to turn around. And he didn’t…

He wouldn’t issue the obvious command at that same time to the close protection detail to remove Trump from the stage. And he didn’t…

And of course, even if it was the site commander who ordered the south-facing team to turn around, it doesn’t exonerate him, because the most crucial order at that time was the one that we know he didn’t give, which was to remove Trump from the stage.

In the context of a conspiracy involving the Secret Service to get Trump killed, it can be a very tight group of conspirators, literally just Cheatle and Rowe at the top, and the agent in charge of the security plan that day.

That lessens the chance that it would ever be exposed.

4 Likes
17

To me it seems like whoever was on the other side of the radio from Hercules was in on the plan to lead Trump into a death trap, and Hercules probably foiled it.

4 Likes
18

They’ve got some other things not quite right in their timeline, so until this gets elsewhere confirmed, I’m going to place this is the yellow category.

5 Likes
20

Well the other elephant in the room, which just perplexes the hell out of me, is the reports that came out a couple days after the shooting, that one of these two snipers saw Crooks on the roof 18 minutes before he started shooting.

According to Cheatle’s testimony on July 22nd, before Congress, this was information was contained in the initial FBI report:

"Rep. Jake LaTurner – Republican – Kansas: Is it true that at 5:45 pm, approximately 18 minutes before President Trump took the stage, the Beaver County Emergency Services Unit noticed the shooter on the roof and photographed him?

Is that a fact or not?

Secret Service Director Cheatle: That is the information that I have from the FBI’s report, yes.

Rep. Jake LaTurner: You haven’t been willing to share whether or when this was communicated to the Secret Service, so I’d like to get into the difference between suspicious activity and threatening activity.

Is it suspicious, or threatening, if an individual is seen around the perimeter with a rangefinder? Is that just suspicious?

Cheatle: That could be termed as suspicious.

Rep. Jake LaTurner: If that same individual, with the rangefinder, is found on a rooftop, is that still just suspicious? Or is that, is that considered threatening?

Cheatle: That could be termed still as suspicious."

So the implications of this, if true, are just enormous.

If true, Crooks was obviously on the roof twice, and he was spotted by local law enforcement on both occasions.

And nothing was done???

The earlier sighting, 18 minutes before the shooting, also fills in some of the timeline for that crucial but mysterious 5:45 to 6:02 period.

Has anyone seen any media reports of the FBI walking this back?

If they haven’t yet, you know they will, even if it’s a lie.

No coverup of this, whether it is a coverup to minimize gross negligence, or a coverup to hide a conspiracy to allow an assassination, can let something like that stand.

It has to be made to go away…

3 Likes
21

Roger that…

1 Like