Neither of us were rude. Just because we hold a different viewpoint, one we have taken the time to produce the evidence to support, doesn’t mean we’re being rude.
Bottom line after months there are no solid conclusions about Trump assassination. Everyone is a troll that points out the obvious
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
First, hello to all you tireless and intrepid truth warriors.
I stepped back from reporting on the Trump July 13th misadventure because I was waiting for new and fresh information to arise. I thought we’d have another of those west side of AGR6 videos to work with by now, but I think we’ve got all we’re going to get.
I totally buy into Greg_n’s audio analysis…AND I still can’t get past the audio differences and echo mismatches we can clearly discern on Stewart’s recording and both of the west AGR6 recordings.
Those, as yet, remain completely unexplained.
Perhaps if someone performs the necessary experiments someday with a barrel poking over the ridge and then pulled back, possibly with a rotation of the muzzle break due to the off-set iron sights, etc., and can reproduce the observed audio signatures the matter will be resolved.
However, I’ve really been waiting on the interview notes from Nicol and Murko which - surprise! - just came out late last week. While not hard evidence, we can glean a few things from them upon the first pass:
1 - For some reason they waited until Sept 11th to conduct these critical interviews.
2 - Murko claims to have not compared notes with the other (third) sniper in that room about whether that was, indeed, Crooks he saw on the picnic table on his way to his car. I find this uncredible in the extreme. The biggest thing in these guy’s Podunk lives and they - what? - forgot to discuss it?
3 - The minority questioner(s?) are constantly asking the weakest of questions and working to build up the case that Murko and Nicol did the very best they could and were obviously stymied by their narrow windows.
At any rate, I have a request.
Last week I was at an event where Senator Ron Johnson was there.
Upon meeting me he said, “Hey you’re that ‘two-shooter’ guy aren’t you?”
We discussed the case a bit, and he was impressed by the Hercules 2 team’s clear communication to him that they perceived a round passing (cracking) between them. My problem; I have zero audio match for that. For starters, for them to hear a crack, the round had to be supersonic. That means even with suppression we’d have that on tape. I got nothing. So maybe they mistook a nearby round for one that happened between them? I do know that those sonic cracks are quite loud and easily heard from a far distance away.
At any rate Sen Johnson said he’d and his staff would be digging in to all this more next year, I told him we had the best analysis to be found anywhere within this crack team here, and that if he or his staff had any questions we might be ab le to assist. He asked for my card, and pocketed it.
I don’t know what may or may not come from that, but I’d like to be responsive. So the request is for us to start a thread with only the latest information on it, easily discoverable so we can send links, PDF’s or whatever may be helpful.
I’ve got a rough bin pinned here:
Nick is looking into ways we can be more tech-gifted about this given the constraints of Discourse (our forum s/w), but until then we can begin to place the most complete materials there.
If anybody has a better idea about how to go about this, or maybe has already started, please chime in!
Chris,
Glad to see you back and fully understand your perceived absence. If I haven’t said this before, thank you, immensely, for continuing to host this forum. While many of the early contributors have stopped posting along the way, some of us are still busy investigating.
In case you don’t recall or were never aware, @brian60221 hosts a shared file browser where a group of us have posted our work and other resources. The username and password are both “public” for general access. I mention this because some who have contributed materials have not posted here in a while, so their work may not get added to your new thread.
Those of us who have posted to the browser have our own access so we can update our files as needed, which has been very convenient, especially for me since I am frequently revising my materials as new evidence is released. I am in the process of revising again due to the recent Task Forces release.
I am wondering if a similar approach could be used, such as another Dropbox account, where contributors have access to their folder to keep their files current. I’m thinking another thread would end up getting overloaded with conversational posts and make separating the wheat from the chaff difficult. Food for thought anyways.
Edit: I see that the new thread does not accept replies, so I’m curious how one goes about getting content added to it.
I’d like to figure out, how the sound of a shot or detonation occurs. Maybe you know some highly educated people to ask.
When I wrote the Lagrangian of the air, it is nothing else but the ideal gas laws, like Boyle-Mariotte and Gay-Lussac. It makes no sound at all.
However, I may think about a couple things to take into count.
- The Lenard-Jons potencial between atoms.
- The cavity of a tube, like the barrel or a whistle. (Trumpet makes no sound if you just simply blow it.)
0:04
My first question: How did TMC get the kitchen aid job? I think it was a summer holiday job. But anyway, how did he get it?
Time to dust Chris’s investigation into the Butler Shooting soon. Josh Shapiro named by a federal whistleblower to have been involved in the attempted assassination of Trump.
If Biden can barely make it up or down the stairs of Air Force One, or put together a few coherent sentences, why should I believe he could make several trips to PA to conspire with Gov. Shapiro?
https://x.com/OSINTWarfare/status/1888892790265794615
Here is an archive of an X post containing screenshots of the filed complaint, for those who care to read it.