Bollocks. Yearick had gauges in his ears, Crooks definitely did not.
Was that for me? I’m confused by your comment.
You MUST watch the Bret Weinstein’s Dark Horse podcast, " How Many Shooters? John Cullen on the Trump Assassination Attempt". https://youtu.be/0hKuo2qW6uE?si=vuM9ZRPKkuMGfXgz
See minute 1:06:51.
It clearly shows a first shot along the back row of the top bleachers. At least 3 people are affected. The shot appears to have been aimed from the woods, and the intended target was the first counter sniper team. A nearly simultaneous second bullet (Trump’s ear) arrives into bleachers milliseconds later, affecting a fourth individual. People and objects (a purse, a sleeve, a shirt) are affected.
4 Likes
Crook’s van was parked exactly by the water tower.
After Crooks was neutralised, this van was found allegedly w explosives inside not far from Crooks’s residence. I’ve shared the video here w the proper timing.
Deleted
Question about the photo that so clearly shows the bullet travelling by Trumps head. That was one fancy camera, no? Who was that taken by? Because, clearly this was designed to capture Trumps head being blown to pieces. This photographer needs to talk
4 Likes
Typical pro level canon camera. Professional photographers will take thousands of photos to get 1 or 2 great shots. Literally press and hold the shutter button while hoping they are in the right position. This was a one in a billion photos. Photog has talked.
1 Like
Question: I know Robert Gouveia is deeply suspicious and pursuing his own angle in terms of lapses in procedure and all the chicanery in the Secret Service.
Think it would be a good idea to be interviewed by him or interview him so his audience can see what you’ve got? Great way to get the word out.
Also…
2 Likes
This video is mint!
Brett Weinstein interviews John Cullen.
A must watch.
When Trump turns his head right it’s sudden, Trump looks at the Jumbotron, Crooks has no line of sight to Trump’s right ear in this position. However, it seems the shooter on the water tower aimed at the target’s head and with the sudden movement, pierced the target’s ear. So when Trump told the world that moving his head to look at the Jumbotron, he essentially told us the location of the shooter… which I call Shooter No 2 (water tower man).
Notice that the counter snipers in black clad took fire and took cover immediately, the bullet that missed the counter snipers is the bullet that hit the railing and the guy w the US flag on the right top corner of the bleachers behind Trump
I’m not an expert, but I’m betting on there being four shooters. I also believe the shooters were instructed to fire simultaneously at a pre-agreed time. This coordination may have been the operation’s Achilles’ heel, especially with Trump’s sudden head movement and the possible draft that might have diverted the bullet away from the target’s skull. The bullet from the water tower is the only one that could have pierced Trump’s right ear at the precise moment when he looked right at the jumbotron.
Thanks! I will watch this!
Yup, that’s how it is with the camera imo
Doug Mills of the NYT. Look at the other historic event he just happened to be at to document:
Agree w/ your analysis. There is another video in which an engineer that wanted to remain anonymous (likely due to fear) approached this incident by combining Trump head movement, video 3D modeling, bullets trajectories, and the analysis shows two shooters, further demonstrating your acoustic findings that shooter #1 to be inside a building that was behind and left of shooter #2 (Crooks), as the one that hit Pres Trump’s ear It also shows that Crooks bullet trajectories would have hit Trump’s ear and back of his head, thus killing the President. This video, also includes an aerial video from SkyNews showing top of the roof w/ Crooks body but also a building back and to the right of Crooks, on the 2nd floor, an opened window which coincides w/ the bullet trajectory that hit Pres Trump. Furthermore, this 2nd floor window was slightly higher than Crooks position, also giving a clear sight to Trump and was the only one opened (see the frame), on that side facing the direction of the target. Thus, Crooks shots didn’t hit the Trump. Here is the link of that video w/ “John the Engineer”. Everything is starting to fit together. There are 2 companies that made a computer 3D modeling of the shooting, using the Pres. Trump’s perspective, initially placed Crooks on the far LEFT which is wrong as video from SkyNews shows his body on the RIGHT. However, the trajectory of this position coincides with the 2nd floor opened window of building behind Crooks’ right side. It will be great if a video containing the acoustic and 3d head movement of Pres. Trump and bullets trajectories are all combined into one. Your analysis as well as from others should be obtained by the senators investigating this crime as they have not gotten anything from FBI nor from Secret Service yet.
2 Likes
TWO GUNS WATCH.
3 Likes
Nice work. Judging by how you describe it, I take it that this was all from the podium microphone. Here they are together, if that helps people:
Shots 1, 2 & 3:
Shots 4, 5 & 7:
2 Likes
Yes. I have actually done much more work on this. I used the center stage SM57 mic only to avoid any confusion. The echo (reflect) for the first 3 shots are consistent with the rifle being inside. The volume is 3 to 4dbs lower than 4,5,7.
The echo for 4,5,7 are consistent with an AR15 outside. The temp was 90 degrees. Speed of Sound 1151. Elevation 1300. Sea level pressure 28.91. I ran all the math. The first rifle was most likely a lighter grain ammo. Very flat. Shot 6 is an anomaly. I’m still working on 8, and 9…I have theories, but I’m working out the math. Every bullet has three features. One - sonic crack. Two - Report - Three echo (reflection). All three features have a unique acoustic fingerprint and a volume that can be measured at dbfs. The ABC feed appears to be uncompressed and lossless. The Fox feed is over compressed and unusable. The SM57 has been around since 1965 and I know exactly how it reacts and how the diaphragm responds. Chris is doing amazing work with the various iPhone audio…but I’m still working out everything from the SM57.
10 Likes
Probable to covert action is use of codewords that are not noticed
Chris, I am a subscriber to the Solari Report with Catherine Austin Fitts. The Solari Report’s analysis is that this was an inside job and ‘staged’ and that Trump was in on the attempt. They are saying that there should be massive amounts of blood due to an ear wound, and there was not much blood coming from Trump’s ear, and that his white shirt had no blood on it at all. They are saying that there is no way that the angle of the shots that were fired went towards Trump. This is not a popular viewpoint, and I have been stretched to believe it. However, I think it bears looking into on your part if you truly want to examine all the possibilities.
The idea that Trump was in on it is theoretically possible, but highly unlikely because it makes no logical sense, especially in light of the stonewalling and coverups by the SS and FBI.
Option 1: Trump was in on it, so was the SS and FBI, and the Democrats also, because it’s all just one large Deep State cartel.
If that’s the case, why did a large part of that “group” fight Trump tooth and nail up until now ? Lawfare, J6, Russia hoax etc. They have been fighting Trump for the past 8 years, and suddenly, they team up with him ?
And to what end ? So he can become president ? Why would the Democrats go along with this ? They have nothing to gain and everythign to lose.
Option 2: Trump and the Republican staged it.
If that’s the case, why would the SS, FBI and MSM stonewall the investigation, and clearly create diversions and coverups about what happened.
Wouldn’t it be in their best interest to uncover this conspiracy ?
After all, if they could prove that Trump was in on it, he would be done. Guaranteed win for Democrats in November.
Option 3: Trump and the Republican staged it, with the help of SS and FBI, but unbeknownst to Democrats.
In this scenario, the Deep State (formerly run and supported by high level Democrats) has turned on the Democrats, and suddenly supports Trump.
Obviously, this is absurd. Why would the Deep State have a change of heart ? Same logical issues as option #1.
And even if they did, wouldn’t the Democrats try to uncover the conspiracy and have their media dismantle the cover story in order to expose Trump ? Why would they stay quiet and just give in.
I don’t know much about Catherine Austin Fitts, other than the occasional reports from people here. But more than once she struck me as very easily persuaded by wildest conspiracy theories that don’t make much logical sense.
4 Likes