Audio Analysis Is Most Consistent Two Shooters At Trump Rally

The Trolls have been crawling out of the woodwork.

2 Likes

StewartUnknownBroken

That’s one screenshot that looks like it’s from just 3 or 4 inches off the ground. I’m not saying I agree with with plexiglass foil theory, I just don’t know.

1 Like

Case closed. My bad.

Notice the angle, this is ground level, to the SW of Window 3. The red barns and white roofs or white clouds are being reflected.

This is common on all the low angled images.

Window 2 has many similar reflections. There’s no “plexiglass foil,” or other nonsense.
Now this was taken standing up, from the SE of these windows. Totally different angles.

In a different thread I posted every window screenshot over this relevant time and there’s only a 5 second gap where Window 3 is off-camera, and simply no possible way any person, even with a helper, could accomplish what is being alleged - a window removed, 3 shots fired, and window replaced in the exact 5 seconds coordinated that it’s off camera. And also not be seen by the cop standing right there looking at it, or the dozen people at the fence line looking at it. Simply impossible.

About 5 seconds before shooting starts, cop is standing right there looking in the direction of the window. No chance he’s going to not see someone removing a window.


Same cop exactly as shooting starts. No chance he’s not going to see the window removed with shots fired from it.

There were about a dozen or more people standing at this position as shooting began. In fact the cop was yelling at them to move so all of their attention was focused towards the cop and the building. Zero chance these people would fail to observe someone taking down a window, and a big open window, with someone firing out of it. Someone would have seen that with a dozen or more sets of observing eyeballs…

1 Like

I’m not saying someone is removing the window - I TOLD YOU THAT. I don’t know what it means - I TOLD YOU THAT. What I said was - I don’t know how that could be a reflection. The camera is at ground level, so a the part of window that is 5 feet up and mounted vertically would be reflecting something 10 feet up if it’s reflecting something from the same distance.

If it’s reflecting something from a greater distance, it would be reflecting something even higher up!

We all know there is nothing even remotely like the effects of window 3 in any of the other windows.

To give a comparison to another conspiracy: I know Oswald didn’t fire the shot that killed Kennedy. Who killed him? I DON’T KNOW!

To give an example from an older controversy: Mark Twain was a famous doubter that William Shaksper of Avon wrote the works attributed to “William Shakespeare”. He wrote a very well thought out short book on the subject. The 17th Earl of Oxford, the current top candidate, had not yet been identified at the time of Twain’s death. Sir Francis Bacon was probably the leading candidate as of the date that Twain wrote his book. Twain made the conclusion that he didn’t know who wrote “Shakespeare”, but he was sure it wasn’t Shaksper. As for Bacon, if I remember right, he said time would tell. Sometimes all you can do is say that the pieces don’t fit right.

1 Like

the sun would qualify as something from a greater distance…

3 Likes

as I have said many times before, it is very important to go for the highest resolution possible/available…

roger uses the most shaking and lowest resolution he can find to cobble together his fake animations and waste our time…

already on august 15th I posted the high resolution bodycam images that I reposted above, but he keeps his fantasy hallucinations alive by treating us like fools with his fraudulent animations…

this leads me to only one conclusion: he has no good intentions, probably even malicious intentions, and certainly no willingness to help discover what really happened…

4 Likes

Hi Sonja,

I think you are referring to these two pictures, namely T-6:83 and T-6:80.

To me it looks like a very clean cut, because if the camera would have to move so much in 30 milliseconds, it would go out of focus for at least a couple of milliseconds needing time to focus again. It also looks zoomed out? How does that happen in 30 milliseconds?

Since I am not a video specialist and this is just my personal opinion, maybe a specialist can come and give his professional opinion on this one, or else we simply disagree, which also fine. :wink:

Excellent points! I can clearly see the red barn, white roof. I really don’t understand people’s inability to understand that windows reflect differently from different angles.

1 Like

These three shells found to the left of his body, perhaps near where Michel had been positioned while administering whatever first aid she chose to administer? Michel appeared to be the closest responder on that side of the shooter. Her standing there could have obscured the original count, or she may have been in the perfect position to plant those extra casings.

Edit: If we then focus on Michel’s body language and actions, she comes up on the roof, IFAK looking items are strewn about, she acquires gloves, yet seems to perform some manner of at least checking immediate vitals without them, then finishing putting them on to then stand around nervously. 18:33:45 area of Beaver bodycam 2 shows her fishing around in her pockets for something, also a noticeable audible ‘thunk’ of something. Eventually asking about going back down, stating she has “other stuff” to idk I can’t make out what she mumbles. Also in the same area of footage, “I thought he wasn’t coming?”, curious as to who that’s a reference to.

3 Likes

exactly right…

only someone with malicious intent keeps using low resolution and mingled pictures through image compression and bitrate conversions…

If roger was really sincere, he would have admitted weeks ago that he was spreading a false story…

1 Like

whether or not she wears gloves to check if he is still alive or not is not really an issue…

whether or not you put them on is a business decision…

when I took a first aid course many years ago gloves were not even mentioned for this check, but when I took a follow up course for this during the COVID pandemic it turned out to be one of the main things they emphasized, but if you use your common sense a lot depends on the context…

1 Like

And to which that “business” remains rather unclear to me. When one could feasibly finish donning their gloves to perform the essential vital check, yet doesn’t, and then finds it necessary enough to finish putting them on afterwards. For what purpose are the gloves at that point? A possible attempt to prevent fingerprints on the extra shell casings? Does she anticipate needing the gloves after the vital check for some other first aid related reason? Or is she just in autopilot mode and does so without really thinking or assessing?

Universal Precautions under OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens regulations.

2 Likes

As such, proceeding to check vitals of a very bloody mess as Crooks was immediately without gloves, and then immediately after putting your gloves on. Am I wrong in finding this a little odd?

2 Likes

Here are the 8 casings, all positioned west of the shooter. 5 on the north side and 3 on the south side of the AGR6 roof.

As far as I know Michel was always standing east or north of the shooter. Maybe I missed something, but if you have any evidence that she planted something like 3 extra casings on the roof it would be highly appreciated you would share that information.

3 Likes

It may not have come to her immediately to don her PPE, realizing she better do so after taking the vitals and having her hands close to or in contact with his blood. When I’m working in my garage, I typically remember to put safety glasses on after I get sawdust or something in my eye. That’s my take on it.

3 Likes

Gif 1st shot
If the above spent casing animation is true fact,
they are being ejected slightly forwards and to the right.
Most Ar15’s eject in the yellow arrows arc below

1 Like

Oh, for crying out loud! How can the sun, when it’s off to the west, make that “broken window” or “plexiglass film” appearance in a window that’s facing south - from a person that’s almost due south of said window? The windows you are showing in the first shot are clearly showing sun glare. Not even close to the broken window effect.

And yes, the second picture you show is clearly a reflection of a barn. A reflection with SKY and a TREE at the top, unlike any of the weird screenshots from Dave Stewart’s video. Those all have red all the way to the top of the window, even when taken from a camera/phone that’s clearly almost at ground level.

1 Like

I made that gif out of screenshots from the Mike DiFrischa video (TMZ). If they didn’t manipulate the footage then it’s true fact. Shell ejection at the exact moment of the first shot.

I assume for the first 3 shots he leand a little bit over the roof ridge and than moved back slightly to release shot 4-8. That might explain why 3 casings on the south and 5 on the north side of the roof.