The actual cyclic rate depends on where the gas port is placed on the barrel. 600/min would be a rifle length (M16) barrel/gas port. Carbine length like a M4 is closer to 950/min or more.
When light bulb was used, it made interference and flickering. There ate 60 Hz and 50 Hz systems.
Wow, nice catch, really. 
I never thought I’d ever be considering such a small ammount of time applied to a combination of video and rifle shooting.
Here’s AI working your idea.
Let’s rework the math, taking into account the cycling delay of the AR-style rifle, which would introduce about 1.5 frames of delay due to the gas-operated system. We’ll then adjust the original frame count from 12 to account for this delay and see if the calculated distance better matches the actual distance of 260-270 feet.
Original Calculation Recap
- Speed of sound: 1150 fps
- Frame rate: 29.97 fps
- Sound distance per frame: Sound distance per frame=1150 fps29.97 fps=38.37 feet per frame\text{Sound distance per frame} = \frac{1150 , \text{fps}}{29.97 , \text{fps}} = 38.37 , \text{feet per frame}Sound distance per frame=29.97fps1150fps=38.37feet per frame
- Frames between visual (casing ejection) and audio report: 12 frames
- Original distance calculation: Distance=12×38.37=460.44 feet\text{Distance} = 12 \times 38.37 = 460.44 , \text{feet}Distance=12×38.37=460.44feet
- Observed discrepancy: About 5 frames (or 200 feet) too far.
Adjusted Calculation Considering the AR-15 Cycling Delay
- Corrected Frame Count:
- Since the visible ejection of the casing occurs after the shot is fired due to the cycling delay, we should adjust the frame count by subtracting about 1.5 frames (the approximate delay caused by the cycling mechanism).
- Corrected frame count: 12 frames−1.5 frames=10.5 frames12 , \text{frames} - 1.5 , \text{frames} = 10.5 , \text{frames}12frames−1.5frames=10.5frames
- Recalculate the Distance:
- Distance: Distance=10.5×38.37=402.89 feet\text{Distance} = 10.5 \times 38.37 = 402.89 , \text{feet}Distance=10.5×38.37=402.89feet
- Comparison to Actual Distance:
- The actual distance between the shooter and the camera is known to be approximately 260-270 feet.
- The current calculation still shows a discrepancy (402.89 feet vs. 260-270 feet).
Reconsidering the Original Frame Count
- The original estimate suggested a discrepancy of 5 frames (which we initially considered as a possible sync issue).
- If we consider that the correct frame count should have been closer to 7 frames (as noted earlier in your analysis), we can now perform the final calculation:
- Distance for 7 Frames: Distance=7×38.37=268.59 feet\text{Distance} = 7 \times 38.37 = 268.59 , \text{feet}Distance=7×38.37=268.59feet
Conclusion
After accounting for the AR-15’s gas-operated cycling delay, the correct frame count of 7 frames yields a calculated distance of approximately 268.59 feet, which aligns closely with the actual distance of 260-270 feet.
This suggests that the observed 2-frame delay in the video is indeed consistent with the expected delay from the cycling mechanism, and when properly adjusted, the timing of the visible ejection and the audible report corresponds accurately to the known distance between the shooter and the camera. This eliminates the apparent discrepancy and supports the accuracy of the original video recording without any manipulation.
@kwaka @offtheback just found your 2 missing frames. A very classy catch. @sgt-raven also chips in in regards to barrel lenght, so more scenarios can be tried.
I don’t think you should be decreasing frames, you should be increasing them.
2 Likes
You interpret that picture different than I do. He had placed the towel to slow down/stop the bleeding. At this point he pulled the towel away to assess how bad the wound is. He is still putting his body between Trump and the outside. When they start to move he would stay in that position shielding Trump. That one agent’s actions did not slow the team down.
Also, another thing to look at.
How high would you estimate the casing travels above the height of the ejection port at its maximum height?
I haven’t measured, but let’s say it is 1 foot. Basic ballistics, ignoring air resistance which is fine here, would say the initial vertical velocity would be 8 ft/sec upwards to reach a height of 1 foot. To go up a foot and come back down a foot would take 0.5 seconds, or fifteen frames at 30 frames/sec. Is the casing in flight for 15 frames? Is 1 foot rise wrong?
Just some simple physics that could be gut-checked here.
The main feature I used in determining when the shot started was in seeing the shoulder recoil. This is a clear sign the punch from the blast has started and things are on their way. The round is still in the chamber on this frame. Pops out in the next frame.
Improving the method with 4 images I manage to triangulate Trump position. The margin of error of Trump position is within 0.2m.
Here is the reference points I used like the buildings and light poles.
North bleacher footage- Green lines
Middle bleacher footage – Cyan blue lines
James footage (South Bleacher) – black line
RSBN footage - red lines
Zoomed Trump Position: region where bold lines cross.
4 Likes
I count the casting in the air for 9 frames. As an estimate, 9in high, 18 inches out. It takes 2 frames to get to max height, tumbles there for 4 frames, then 3 frames on its way down. The ejection port is higher than the roof surface.
If it rises 9 inches and then falls 12, that is .216 seconds up and .25 seconds down, for a total of 14 frames.
If it is significantly less than this in the video, this guy may be the same one that filmed the astronauts on the “moon.” 
1 Like
It is a parabola. y = b t^2
0.25 sec upward and 0.25 sec back = 0.5 sec
So y = 1 foot, when t=0.25 aka t^2=0.0625, therefore the coefficient is b=16.
y = 16 t^2
But it is not sure we can catch the highest point. We have 1/30 not synchronized.
Worst case if both sides 1/60 symmetrically we got.
Now we take (1/60)^2=0.016…
∆y=16*(1/60)^2=0.267
This is 27% error in worst case.
Now coms the probability. Guess what the distribution is…
It is not clear when he wiped away the middle bloodstain. I think it’s wrong that he did it at all.
I also think that is completely inappropriate.
One hit and he would have gone down. The second shot could hit Trump. That could happen within a second.
He may not have slowed the team down, but his job would have been to speed it up.
Watch the video again.
After Trump got back on his feet, he was on stage for 30 seconds.
I wouldn’t go there. Not with the resources we have available to us. Not only shell ejection is inconsistent from shot to shot, but also the angles involved in the video would put us all in madness territory.
1 Like
All we need is a decent estimate of how high it went and how many frames it took to go up and back down. Nothing else to make anyone crazy because nothing else matters. Either it went in a parabola in Earth gravity or it didn’t.
1 Like
It looks fairly parabolic in the enhanced images. it is very hard to define the path in the original images, what can be made out does match up. I will redo the gif image soon to fix up the errors, will also add in a path to help see the casting trail.
But we can do some high school physics for fun.
So I choose uniform distribution between 0 and 1/60.
The average value is 1/120, we take the square.
∆y = 16 * (1/120)^2 = 0.0011…
So the expected error is omly 0.11% would be.
Now we haven’t finished yet. We need to know the deviation. I must think…
I am all for the answer supporting whatever it supports. But once the casing leaves the gun, it must obey physics based on Earth gravity. If it reached a maximum height 9 inches above the ejection port and then fell 12, here is the height where it would be found at every frame, with 0 = ejection port height, (but don’t forget KINCSES half-frame uncertainty):
If it had to fall much further, it would be doing that quickly, so max 1 or 2 more frames before it bounces even if we get the drop to the roof wrong.
1 Like
Watch 20 seconds of the first video from this post here after you press play, on the other thread.
It’s a video from the Rifle World Shoot some weeks ago. Side camera is a bit dark, but you’ll see the shells going all over the place. Does it look like you can get a ‘decent estimate’ out of this inconsistency?