Peak Prosperity Citizen investigation team is proud to present the smoking gun!
Below is a video for download showing alleged evidence that the first gun shot came from a shooter from window 3 in building 6. This is the smoking gun!
Based on the original video from Steward, the audio was offset by 0.8 seconds not matching the sound with the visual gun fire. This is why we always thought that the shots have not been caught on video. This alleged evidence proves the contrary! We have the first shot.
This would also add up with the new “back-traced” bullet, having revised the data of the stage being much lower than estimated.
It also adds up with Chris’s 3 buffered shots without echoes.
Thank you so much for all this work. Nothing about this looks like a recording of a natural signal.
There are a variety of noise sources. I think the lower frequency rumble is probably the car idling; the midrange is the AC fan; the high frequencies are police radio static. Some could be the microphone amps and ADCs, but probably not much. Not sure what else would be creating noise in the car. But the initial pressure waves of the shots look like they were created with a function generator with no noise at all (for the most part).
You mean like this interview? I’m just saying. Then you also have to take into consideration the fallibility of human memory, which only gets worse over time. Witness testimony always has to be corroborated with other evidence to ascertain its veracity.
TXT at 17:38 – {Nicol} sends text to group text to Sniper Group about suspect” Witness Interview – “’The first thing I did, I sent those pictures out [Fact: It was 24 minutes later, 5:14 pm to 5:38 pm.], we had a text group between the local snipers that were on the scene. I sent those pictures out to that group and advised them of what I noticed and what I’d seen,’ Nicol said. 'There was a text back that said, ‘Call it into command.’ I then called into our to the command via radio. And they acknowledged.’ ‘I assumed that there would be somebody coming out to – you know, to speak with this individual or, you know, find out what’s going on,’ he added.” (Source: ABC)
Boy, I don’t know @roger-knight. That’s a stretch. I can’t see the video, but the shot(s) would have to come from the top of the window to have any chance of clearing every obstacle. Also, the window isn’t open in the picture you posted claiming it is.
I thought your trajectories were tracing back to the vent. You can get me in the vent easier than the window, but I have serious doubts about either. I was under the impression that your backtracking led to the vent, and the conspiracy of them being removed from the Steward video bolstered that suspicion.
If that’s the best you’ve got it’s insufficient. That’s just one of many weird reflections due to old glass imperfections. We can easily see this in the Stewart video, all these windows have weird light reflections from various angles. It’s clearly not open in any pictures or videos. Nobody saw them opened either. Police immediately looked at them too.
Also, somewhere an official determined these 1st floor windows are fixed, don’t open. Sorry I can’t recall, I didn’t focus on it because none were observed in the open position so it’s a non-issue.
Even if they did open they’d presumably be the old crank style like the 2nd story.
If you have any experience with those they are slow and not subtle. Those take a minute to obviously slowly open and shut. Literally impossible to do that and have a window open for sufficient time to aim and fire while being undetected. It would require several minutes to open, then set for aiming, then fire, then close, etc. Impossible. Even with assistance. All eyes were focused on that wall before during and after the shooting.
And again the audience is obviously directly in the way of any clear line of sight as we see from victim Copenhagen’s video.
Copenhagen’s video does not show the audience is in the way between Trump on the podium and the 3rd window. That video is not a direct line up behind Trump. What it does prove is that the third window is visible from at least an angle southern of Trump…
And if we want to be gruesome, CC did get in the way at a certain point.
Further, we don’t know which exact windows were checked. And, a permanent window is easily faked and replaced after the event. It’s so easy it is a non-issue.
A replacement window is not the issue. It never opened. A glare on a window is not proof it opened. It’s not open.
Paint us a plausible scenario where the window is opened wide enough to aim, fire, and close it in plain view yet not be seen. Show a single clean image of it opened. Shouldn’t be hard, we have video of the entire wall at all times
And again this overlooks the FACTS The 3rd window is entirely obscured by the crowd and bleachers in the Copenhagen video. Extrapolating the location of others are even worse line of sight. And there’s a 6 foot fence so the shooter would need to be elevated too, near the top of the window. Is he standing on a ladder as well??
One of the Washington county snipers appeared in the unofficial committee (the one with Cory Mills and Eli Crane) hearing a week ago. He specifically said he didn’t take the shot and he didn’t see the guy on the roof.
People keep pointing out issues with shootings spots on the front wall of Building 6. Everyone that spots an issue has a point. But the main issue is that audio analysis rules out the first three shots from being closer to the podium than Crooks. They MUST come from behind (but not 150 yards behind).
I had previously mentioned the roof of the building behind Crooks as a possibility. I have an improved spot. This breezeway behind the second building.
A) access from a courtyard that I believe is accessible from the sniper oversight building
B) one Hercules team is blocked by a tree and the other by Crooks himself
C) can raise up enough to make sure no cops are way out in the parking lot, but Crooks had drawn them close in
D) raise up a bit more, take three shots, drop down into the courtyard
E) disappear (back to your post)
If you’re the same guy that’s been posting and trying to push a theory that a 2nd shooter was someone further away…don’t people keep telling you no way would that work??
No one can say anything without placing at least one shot somewhere. Most people place the last five shots with Crooks; they came from the same location and five casings were found by him. If you are not one of those people then we are in wide disagreement. I place the last five with him.
If the first three came from closer, whatever distance was shortened to the podium, it was shortened LESS to the other mics because they were off that line (simple triangles). So the other mics would appear further away.
But the audio shows the opposite of that. They appear closer (except for TMZ, which loses a line of sight view to the shot location). Which means the shots had backed up along Crooks’ approximate line.
So don’t know what those people are smokin’, or who they are working for. If they are showing different arrival times, I have receipts.
