How is it possible to coordinate a second shooter to shoot at the precise moment Crooks shoots? He was distracted when shouted at by crowd. Then taken out by SS.
When considering shooting conditions, i have been seeing one glaring issue fail to be discussed, especially as more data comes in suggesting the sheer difficulty in recreating the amount of shots fired in the timeframe they were fired with the accuracy they were fired. If Crooks was truly a “lone gunman” as was responsible for all of those shots, this must be considered. He was wearing a thin short-sleeved t-shirt. He bear crawled several meters on a metal roof in July and remained in the prone position like an egg on a skillet for anywhere from 30min to an hour. While focused in on the stage awaiting his opportunity, he had the awareness to notice a policeman peering over the edge of a the roof “below” and “behind” him, whom he successfully managed to reposition his weapon to engage and scare off. Then he managed to rotate back into firing position, locate his target within seconds and fire an on target first shot head shot from 400 feet with a weapon system he didnt even own.
1 Like
You are not wrong, however I don’t believe any bolt action rifles are being used here, except for the Secret service snipers. The time between shots is in my opinion “aimed” vs “unaimed” shots. Shots 1,2,3 are aimed. Whoever fired that first volley was letting the rifle cycle, recover from the recoil, then come back on target. The next 5 shots are completely “unaimed”. But fired so fast a special trigger may have been needed. What do you think?
1 Like
First question, how is that possible that snipers located on that room shown on recent some video reporter from the inside of the room where snipers were located on the second floor or next building, knowing minutes before the shoots that guy is on the roof , didn’t easly take him out if they had full visual contact with him:
If the law enforcement long ladder shown on videos is not the ladder used by Crooks and they said he purchased the 5 ft ladder which is shown on my picture, does anyone saw exactly model on Home Depot?
As I can see on their range is only twin ladder but picture show it doesn’t look is twin.
Beside, where is the ladder shown as evidence anywhere? According CNN report, the ladder of Crooks has been never found…
Also, when layed down with his gun on the right side of shoulder, to make a movement with his body and
the gun on the left side it must take minimum half second so does anyone believe its not enough time for local officer to react knowing since a minutes that suspected guy with the gun is on the roof?
Does anyone near Buttler can make a test is it possible to climb on the nearest point so on the corner near parking area by using other person and be lifted?
Beside if he decided to climb, knowing that both hands will be used for the grip - what was the the officer purpose by doing so? He wanted to say him hello or elimitate threat by shouting on him…?
The last question: Does anyone has source to that blurred picture showing I think the shooter next to I think local PD officer as shown on picture?
This questions must be answered sooner or later.
best regards from Poland
Thank you!
I agree - good observation!
But wouldn’t it be common sense that on that style of roof, a LEO would kick that gun up or down the roof channel Crooks was laying in? Would the LEO kick it over numerous roof panels to get it out of the way? He obviously could have picked it up and moved it there, but wouldn’t that be outside the protocol for such action, particularly since there was no one there to move it immediately following when Crooks was shot and that the suspect was not mobile in any way, shape or form? Another issue is that while there was blood trail down the roof, there was no noticeable other body parts anywhere. Getting shot in the head, reportedly above his left eye, would have splattered skull and brain matter all around him. It’s all still fishy!
1 Like
If someone were able to overlay a photo transparency of Crooks’ head and the “other” shooter’s corpse’s head, one could see the features and whether or not they line up…chin, face shape and size, eye placement, etc.
However, I’m not sure I would trust the photo of the corpse as being true, if we don’t know the exact source.
Example: 4 photos:
1- Crooks’ photo as splashed everywhere
2- Crooks’ photo transparency overlaid onto corpse’s photo
3-other guy’s photo
4-other guy’s photo transparency overlaid onto corpse’s photo
And I guess you’d need the plain corpse photo as well, plus prove the source was indeed an FBI image taken then and there.
We have that photo of the shooter on the roof, in almost profile. Do we have photos of Crooks and the other guy in profile, with which the same thing could be done?
It seems suspicious to me they could suddenly find the guy, out of the blue, in just one hour, using DNA matching. Really? Out of the millions of people in the US, whappo, faster than you can get a pizza, you could identify him?
Is there a timeline graphic with when info came out in the media, and with what people on the scene, or their videos, portrayed? And do they match?
Another thought…FOIA requests for information on the event. Keep in mind they use code words and symbols to hide key words, such as what the subject message line might be.
And if there is someone local who could video non-stop footage of walking the site, taking measurements, shooting footage of the buildings in question, showing where the ladder and suspect(s) etc were, that might help too.
I say non-stop footage, so nobody could claim editing or photo trickery and the like.
1 Like
This video has new angles:
You can see what appears to be easy access to the roof via A/C and breezeway at time 6:25. However, from an overhead view, the A/C and breezeway seems to have some distance between them. There might be something behind the A/C. Given the view at the end of this video, there is not enough distance between the A/C and breezeway:
This hill allows people to see onto some of the roof:
Also, the video makes the point that the police could have looked up at Crooks from the side that faced the stage, putting them in Crooks’ line of fire without having Crooks turn around. However, that should have been easy to witness.
I believe it is highly plausible that an actual sniper fired the first 3 shots, Crooks fired the next 5 (as a planned distraction), and a separate sniper fired the 9th shot from behind Crooks, which killed him instantly (also pre-planned). In this scenario, the final shot was fired into and already deceased Crooks from the Sniper team behind and to the right of the stage.
1 Like
Wrong information, change of story, who knows what is true what is not. I remember early on it was said they used DNA to identify Crooks. Lately I read that Crooks was identified by tracking the serial number of the rifle back to his father.
1 Like
I think the strong evidence needs to come from precisely knowing where the shots were fired from. The audio evidence is becoming even more interesting as well as that the crime scene has already been dismantled. Also interesting that it took this long to know that there were two shots fired by law personal. Even more amazing that the head of the Secrete Service doesn’t know @%#&! and is a weasel. Not even clear if the Secrete Service sniper killed him or other law enforcement. So far the most interesting analysis is the rapid fire of 4 or 5 shots and only minimal disbursement of the shots. Seems this would take a very good shooter or other type of weapon.
1 Like
There’s a bit of timeline in this hearing video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpvtOu3_7kg
I spoke with my x-special forces friend yesterday, and he said, not having been a sniper nor expert in the acoustics, he could not be much help. (Of course he concurred with the obvious lack of line of sight coverage, and the like.) But he asked for info, for which I included a PP vid and one other, and that may get him interested enough to have him refer a former sniper colleague.
1 Like
THEORY: The patsy took up a wrong position on the roof - he should have been near the edge under the open window. Hence he did not align with the real shooter.
MAIN EVIDENCE:
-
The original ABC News diagram had him near the edge. I’m guessing this information was all ready to go. (In case you haven’t seen it, the ABC News diagram can be seen at about 1 minute HERE on Rumble
-
Being a patsy, he would not know why it was such a big deal to take the planned edge position.
-
The video in which he is walking around rather pathetically in the background, as if looking for something near the building, could be explained because he WAS looking for his ladder. Someone had removed it in innocence, probably a police officer.
-
He bought a ladder, the Deep State was willing to tell us that. Now, the story has changed.
-
The lack of ladder caused him to get up another way which placed him more in the centre.
-
My gut instinct is that more went wrong than just missing the target.
I am not sure about numbers 3-6, but I do think the ‘wrong position’ theory explains a lot.
1 Like
Let me tell my assumption after i saw this video
mainly on 35 minute, before the officers climbed on this black ladder on the top of airconditioner there was cut of the video from some reason… Why ABC news which we all know is close to democrats didn’t show full aspect of the footage recorded? I think there were already someone on the roof who brought the shells to match the number of shoots heard from that area as I believe Crooks only did his first the one part of that series. Does anyone believe in transparent investigation proved that all 8 shells come from that exactly AR-15 even knowing that day after shooting the stands were already taken out - they would be necessary to make proper investigation to trace the bullet exact directions
‘BlackScoutSurvival’ has in his latest youtubevideo a clip where the police states they count 5 cartridges and urges nobody to come to the rooftop. In the following clip 12minutes later there were 8 cartridges. Video can be found in his ‘live’ section. In the title ‘bodycam footage’.
In his other video he has an unique view of the shooting sent by his subscriber. Also in his live section ‘new footage reveals they knew’.
So much info its hard to reach everyones ears.
You mention that someone said that the company installed a ladder on the building. On the other side of that building connection where you identify the ladder as a SWAT ladder there is another ladder. The ladder that you identify as the SWAT ladder is more consistent with Home Depot ladders. I looked up ladders at Home Depot and while they have similar telescoping ladders in stock; none of them come in stealth ninja black like the other ladder that is identified as the 5 foot ladder that apparently extends to at least 10 feet. Drone footage from after the event clean up shows that the interior ladder is gone. If access to the building was available it would be possible to walk the ladder or ladders through the facility from the far side where there are trees and then go up what may be a fixed ladder and then pull up and set the exterior ladder in place. That interior space by the fixed ladder could have been where he staged his rifle. Hypothetically, if someone encouraged his actions they may have provided him with an escape route. Down the fixed ladder to the building interior would be the initial plan for exfiltration. A plan that they did not intend for him to complete. Another story that came out is that after one of the ESU members from the second floor left to look for Crooks he called the remaining ESU member to let him back in the building as he had left his key card inside. So at the time of the shooting their post was abandoned. What do you think the reason for the pause is between the 3rd and 4th shots? Trump ducking down? Behind what? The shooter was elevated and would have to be near the ridge angled downward. Was the view to President Trump blocked by the bleachers or a piece of farm machinery?
I just have one simple question: In the videos of the shooter (with full, bouncy hair) shinnying up the roof, it looks like he is 3-6 feet from edge. We see a brief glimpse of him right as the first shot is fired before the camera pans away.
Less than 20 seconds later, this same guy is supposedly shot, but we see his body in the rooftop video more like 20-30 feet away. Count the seams in the roof.
I question whether the live guy on the edge of the roof in the bystander video is the same as the dead guy on the roof.
Does anyone have an explanation for this?
YouTube TheQuartering - Trump Assassin INSIDE JOB