The sound on this video is interesting in that the first shots sound like the second shots, unlike in the previous video we’ve seen from near the shooter.
Summary. Forgive me for any typos.
(PLEASE NOTE, this may not be exactly accurate as presented, and I may have left details out. Please consider a subscription to the Solari report. Both SR and PP are GREAT!!)
Solari Reports Money & Markets with Catherine Austin Fits and John Titus. Spectacular theater
—gross incompetence by the Secret Service
—gross incompetence on the part of the assassin
—divine intervention protecting DJT
Images and video from event:
—time stamps on videos indicate that for over 40 minutes the counter snipers are focussing in on sniper’s “nest”, they never take eyes off the roof. No way they did not see sniper on roof.
—multiple rally attendees warning, pointing, acknowledging, calling out to police about the sniper (Crooks) on the roof (plenty of time to eliminate the threat)
—plenty of time for the counter snipers who must’ve seen sniper to respond, and for orders to be give to get Trump off the stage. The normal protocol would be to get the president off the stage, and if you see a sniper you take him out (shoot him), because you would already know he wasn’t supposed to be there.
—Trump, right before shot, asks the audience “do you mind if I go off teleprompter?” and told audience to look up onto a big screen where he showed data points regarding migrant invasion. It is rare for this kind of screen to be used at these rallies, and it is unusual timing to direct everyones attention (with their cameras) away from him and to the screen off to the side. (MY NOTE: reminds me of a magic trick. Look over there, not at me)
—so, both counter snipers (didn’t take out/shoot sniper) and secret service didn’t follow protocol (get president off stage).
—The first three shots fired were not fired by the sniper. The video shows that the first three shots, according to the time stamps on the videos and video of the counter snipers, they are actually shots fired by the counter snipers. One of the counter sniper’s (there are 2) rifles display visible recoil after each shot fired. The timing of the first three shots fired and the counter sniper’s recoil match perfectly.
—It is strange that there weren’t other counter snipers on the other dozen, or so, nearby roofs.
—there is video of the security detail working to “set up” the “Iwo Jima” photo, as they call it due to the fact that it highly resembles the staged photo of the flag raising photo at Iwo Jima. In the video, we see Trump’s security detail surround him in such a way that they are allowing the now iconic photo to be taken, instead of covering him in the usual way to protect him. In a situation as this they would normally never give a potential second shooter a 30-40 second window to get such a clear direct second shot at both chest and head. In these events security teams plan as if there will be a second shooter involved. This exposure to a threat would not have happened following the first hit. It appears in the video that they are “setting up” for the photo op. Interesting side note, the flag in the photo is upside down.
—The NYT “wizzing bullet” photo. Interestingly, it was taken by the same photographer (Mills) who took the photo of President George Bush at the elementary school classroom when he was receiving the news of 9/11. The camera that apparently took the wizzing bullet photo was set at 1/8000 of a second, and upon analyzing the photograph, the bullet “wiz length” measures around 1-1/12 feet long which would mean it would travel twice as fast as a commercially bullet/rifle combo anywhere. You’d have to go to a navy type gun that doesn’t even use gun powder to fire, it uses electric charge to fire, to get 1/8000feet per second, and in the photo the streak is longer than a foot, so…. anyhow it’s a bit more technical, but that’s basically it. A lucky shot/photo, no pun intended. Further, to have a waif of a kid get his hands on this type of rifle and actually pulling it off, not plausible. Boys a patsy.
—very little blood on Trump’s hand. There should’ve been more blood flow, no blood on white shirt.
—Based on previous experience with Trump, the notion that in the middle of an assassination attempt he would expose his head and body for 30-40 seconds doesn’t add up.
—Trump is a smart man. He owned casinos, was part of the wrestling community, had his reality TV show. He’s a showman. He was also on the morning of 9/11 explaining the falling building pancakes theory, referring to how the towers fell, implying he was in on the cover-up. He’s part of the power structure. On that note, he also has ties with Jeffrey Epstein.
—Trump’s supports crypto guys. This event was a bellwether event. Referring previously to an article in Foreign Affairs, it looked like all the factions had made their deal and come together around Trump and were moving forward together. Staging an event like this would take all the factions coming together.
—Timing is suspicious. Happens right before Republican Convention, and right as all the law fare against Trump is coming apart at the seams.
—The “factions” have Trump in a box. It is not the president that runs the country.
MY THOUGHTS regarding how this could be done. What if…under Trump’s red hat there was a small pouch of blood that he popped when he put his hand to his ear? Having a little knowledge of theater, I can see something like this being plausible. This would explain when he put his hand to his ear why we only saw a small amount on his hand. Then he goes down on the ground where he could conceivably push the pouch more, or at least then whatever blood did come out it would run sideways down his cheek, being very visible when he stands. I did have a note-to-self moment when at the Rep Convention, he emphasized the blood as being SO much blood. I thought, hmm that wasn’t what I saw. I thought it was an exaggeration. A little programing perhaps?
I haven’t come to a conclusion for myself, but I would love for the PP Team to consult with the Solari Team. I find both analysis to each be very compelling.
2 Likes
Wow, very detailed, thank you Jennifer! I will read and digest this tomorrow.
Hi,possibly, but I was just worried Chris would put to much trust in a report by the BBC. I really appreciate the hard work Chris does on our behalf and I have noticed a change in him as the speed of the evil in this world accelerates, he is worried, there is no doubt about that in my mind.
In England, they are already letting out convicted criminals, spending more than we produce and are committed to freezing us all to death in the winter. When I point this out to friends and family they just roll their eyes and say I worry to much😳
2 Likes
OK here is another weird anomoly. In this video, it shows the bullet vaporize on the hand rail behind David Dutch. What is weird is there is another man in the top row at the far end of the bleachers next to the man in the red shirt who seems to fall clutching his stomach before the report of the second shot. He is not one of the reported injured or deceased. Who is he and why does he reacts as fast or faster than Trump? The reason I bring it up is that it would change the trajectory of the bullet that struck David Dutch and the rail.
Underneath the standing-seem metal roof would probably be 5/8 Oriented strand board (OSB). Metal trussed roofs creak too much is one of the problems with them because of the way metal expands and contracts, but the buildings where the shooter was are not barn style buildings, but heated work areas, so that means insulation. I was a roofer that owned my own company for many years, and help build a lot of buildings all over America. Sure somebody could be herd on the roof inside, but if it was me on the roof trying not to alert to anyone inside that I was on the roof, it would be easy to go unheard.
2 Likes
What I meant was PRIVATELY hired security experts hired by Trump himself? Didn’t/doesn’t he have anyone besides USSS?
3 Likes
Again, thank you for this. CAF appears to have the same observations that I do. I’ve thought about subscribing in the past, and maybe as the world continues to get crazier, it’s time.
2 Likes
I agree - but it’s more than just the neocons who want Trump dead. The deep state spans both parties. America needs to wake up! This shouldn’t be a battle between Democrats and Republicans. This should be a battle between “We The People” and the evil that has infiltrated all levels of government. The same team that brought us 911 and the collapse of WTC Tower 7 has now orchestrated another unbelievable false narrative. They show us indisputable evidence of something but provide a public narrative that what we saw is really not what we saw. This is psy-opps in full display!
1 Like
What stops the high velocity rounds is not the Kevlar - but the ceramic plates located in “carrier” pockets in the front and back of the vest (some cheaper vests have steel plates). Vests of the style you’ve shown have no bullet protection from a side shot.
You won’t see muzzle jump or kickback from an AR15 firing .223 ammo. That’s why it’s such a lethal firearm. It’s like shooting a BB gun. That’s why it’s unbelievable there are eight shooting victims in the crowd behind Trump.
You mentioned the 15.7’ height of AGR Building. Corey was reportedly shot in back of head with 5th shot. Would using further analysis of shot trajectory confirm if Crooks is his killer and not second shooter from possible window below or above?
Well it held a muscled FBI guy with a heavy water-filled hose, who was walking around spraying things down…whereas Crooks was prone, dispersing his weight.
I am well aware how little kick there is from a 5.56x45 in an AR-15. I saw the video that Chris mentions and don’t make much of the shoulder not moving.
Chris made a very good observation about the other indicators of an AR-15’s action cycling. The AR-15 is usually a bit over gassed and will spit out a cloud of combustion gases and carbon from the action. The case will also usually fly from the action at a high velocity. I did not see this in yesterday’s video. It is possible that the camera did not capture it because of the few frames that it gathered of the alleged shooter.
I would not expect to see much movement from the recoil of an AR shooting 5.56x45. Put a Bushmaster 40 upper on there and we have a different story. I would expect to see a small puff from the action and a case flying out the right side of the action. This puff is barely visible even when you are looking for it and I can accept that it was not captured on video. The flying case though is a dead giveaway. I would expect even a shitty camera to capture that case being tossed after it is extracted.
2 Likes
easily go through that. In fact, steel plates that are used in target are an extremely tough steel. My plates that are rated for rifle are 3/8" thick A500 steel. Thin cold rolled tubing would be nothing. My pistol plates are 3/16 inch thick, and I’ve heard even a 223 will go right through them.
I don’t even know where to go with the primer comment. Primers are incredibly hard to actually set off. Even the slightest error in loading a primer into a case, and we’re talking less than the thickness of a strand of hair, can mean you won’t get the primer to fire.
1 Like
1 Like
Dr. Martenson,
I have watched some of your videos and understand your analysis of the gunshots during the assassination attempt on former President and current candidate for President Donald Trump. I have brought another issue to the attention of The Gateway Pundit and Sen. Ron Joh but have not received any acknowledgment or communication from either. So, I am bringing my concern, of which no one seems to be investigating, to your attention.
My question relates to the positions of Crooks’ body and what is presumably his rifle on the roof of the building after being shot dead. If Crooks was killed very shortly after firing his last shot, wouldn’t common sense tell us all that the body and the rifle would be very close together? The aerial video and still pictures I’ve seen show the body of Crooks 4 sets of corrugated roofing panels away from the rifle. I don’t have much experience with this type of industrial metal roof, but I would estimate the distance between the body and the rifle to be 2 to 4 feet. How does the body of a headshot person presumably holding the rifle get separated by that distance? I, too, am smelling a horrible stench about that and much of the whole story, or lack of story, coming form our government.
I wonder if this issue has any merit for further investigation. Maybe it can be brought up in another video as you piece together the whole story.
1 Like
The first thing any LEO would do is kick away the gun from near a shooter who is down, I would assume the same here.
1 Like
You are correct. The first 3 shots are spaced out far enough that, whoever is shooting those first 3, shot then let the rifle cycle another round and then took a quick but aimed shot. Repeating that 2 more times. That’s what it sounds like to me. I just finished watching the newest audio analysis video. Those next 5 shots were all done in 3/4 of a second. That’s fast. You are right that aiming was not an option when shooting that fast. The reason being that when you fire a round there is recoil, the AR platform absorbs a lot of the energy. However you’re not giving yourself enough time to aim at the target so in that amount of time you are just shooting in a general direction with no way of putting the rounds where you want them.
We know the kind of rifle he had, it was a middle to low end quality rifle. He had an odd setup the way the rifle was configured for aiming. Used target ammo. The thing about those shots in that amount of time is I’m not sure I could do that with my AR. I think I would need a special trigger made for fast shooting. I’m not saying he didn’t have one but I can’t get past the fact that this kid by every indication doesn’t know much about guns. So why would he have a trigger like that?
1 Like
The delay is the difference between a semi-automatic and a bolt fired riffle.
Takes two hands to fire a bolt fired riffle or two hand movements. That is the difference in the firing pattern.
Coordination between the two requires the brain. Which slows down the process. A semi automatic can work on solely muscle memory. Bolt action cannot.
A person needs to receive signal from the trigger finger to the brain to pull the bolt back and get the signals from that action to pull the trigger again. They don’t need that signal to pull the trigger twice in close succession on a semi-automatic.