Did Retail Pile in at the Exact Wrong Moment?

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/finance-u-did-retail-pile-in-at-the-exact-wrong-moment/

Sometimes politics and markets collide. Now seems to be such a time with the explosive and radicalizing revelations about the sprawling and long-running conspiracy to abuse children by powerful so-called ‘elites.’

Mood and sentiment are important to markets, especially those stretched into nosebleed territory like the US equity markets. The chance of experiencing more ‘volatility’ going forward is now increased. By the way, ‘volatility’ is the code word used by Wall Street and the Fed to indicate that stock prices went down instead of up. For some reason, prices spiking higher isn’t volatility, only lower.

One possibility: Republicans are so disgusted by it all that they feel dispirited and they stay home on election day, thereby granting a default win for Democrats. That, in turn, leads to government gridlock and impeachment hearings. All of which could lead to “volatility.”

To counter this, the Federal Reserve has already begun aggressively printing more money. They don’t call it that…their newly minted preferred term is “reserve balance management,” but it’s printing.

Meanwhile, ‘retail’ (that’s you and me) have gone on an absolute buying spree for equities…almost as if programmed to take the most risk at the least opportune moment.

Wall Street lovingly refers to us as “bag holders.”

While headline equity indexes have been holding up reasonably well, Paul made the point that despite retail piling in, the indexes have not managed to break out to new highs, but only bump along for months.

Beneath the surface, things get more concerning. When equity markets get toppy and ready for a fall, we usually see “sector rotation.” That means away from the high fliers of the past and into defensive stocks, such as consumer defensive, REIT’s, utilities, and basic materials.

Here’s the Year-To-Date of the S&P 500… sector rotation is clearly in play.

The Big 7 are being quietly walked away from…which might turn into a scramble.

Meanwhile, homes aren’t selling, and student loan defaults and mortgage delinquencies are both spiking.

Add it all up, and now is the time for a risk-managed, cautious approach. Yet retail, as we noted, is piling in as if a brand-new bull market were just about to get started; they are fearful of missing out (FOMO) when they should be considering preserving gains.


Timestamps

00:00 The Darkening Economic Landscape
03:02 Federal Reserve’s Printing Press Returns
06:11 Retail Investor Behavior and Market Dynamics
09:03 Sector Rotation and Market Resilience
12:02 Political Uncertainty and Market Implications
14:53 Housing Market Stress and Economic Indicators
18:06 Rising Property Taxes and Economic Burdens
20:57 The Impact of AI on Employment
23:53 Global Economic Pressures and Commodity Markets
39:22 The Future of Work and AI’s Impact
41:33 Retirement and Meaningful Engagement
43:56 The Struggle for Purpose in a Changing Society
46:15 The Rapid Evolution of AI and Its Consequences
49:07 The Unpredictable Nature of AI
51:53 Preparing for Financial Uncertainty
55:51 Trust and Integrity in Financial Markets
01:01:08 The Importance of Character and Reputation
01:10:20 Taxation and Future Financial Planning


FINANCIAL DISCLAIMER:

The information contained in this video and the resources available for download through our affiliated website are not intended as and shall not be understood or construed as financial advice, nor should be interpreted as a solicitation to sell or offer to sell investment advisory services. No person who currently works for or contracts with Peak Prosperity or Peak Financial Investing is an attorney or accountant, nor are we holding ourselves out to be, and the information contained in the video and on the website is not a substitute for legal or tax advice from a professional who is aware of the facts and circumstances of your individual situation. While Peak Financial Investing is a registered investment advisor, please note that this podcast is not intended to be investment advice.

All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such. We have done our best to ensure that the information provided is accurate and provides what we feel is valuable information. The views expressed are subject to change based on market and other conditions.<

No guests or clients appearing on the podcast receive any form of compensation for their appearance and obtained no other benefit from either Peak Prosperity or Peak Financial Investing.

All investing involves risks including the possible loss of capital. Asset allocation and diversification does not ensure a profit or protect against loss. Please note that out- performance does not necessarily represent positive total returns for a period. There is no assurance that any investment strategy will be successful. All investments carry a certain degree of risk. Dividends are not guaranteed, and a company’s future ability to pay dividends may be limited.

Additional important disclosures for Peak Financial Investing may be found in our Form ADV Part 2A, which can be found at https://adviserinfo.sec.gov/firm/summary/319672.

7 Likes

Dec 2025 Fed repurchased $74.6B.

https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/fed-buying-record-repo-facility-use-steady-year-end-us-funding-markets-2025-12-31/

3 Likes

Try WALCL at FRED to see how much money the Fed has printed through today.

2 Likes

Help me understand. Why does the government need to print money as a reserve because people will be paying the government their tax dollars?

1 Like

In the same way you dont want to read AI slop, you wont want to live in AI built houses, look at AI art, walk in AI gardens, talk to AI therapists.

Our souls are the ‘1%’ that cant be replaced.

I can see an argument here that all the extra free time might be the devils play to take over more souls. But you cant discount peoples drive to be good and prosperous-even if it is only about 10-30% of people who want to nurture their soul.

Nothing beats putting your own hand in living soil, being their to care for your own child, building a chicken coop with your own creative approach with your scraps. AI cant replicate that.

I see the impact of AI as another reason why to get rural, and know your neighbours.

(Also AI relies on interconnected electricity grids/energy abundance/connectivity.. hate to see it in a major CME event)

14 Likes

I did. This is what I came up with:

7 Likes

AI is extremely concerning. What is the real goal of the tech bros pushing it? In addition to wondering what people will do with their time, If 99% of jobs are eliminated, nobody will have any money to pay the tech bros for their AI services. So if the goal of AI is for a very small number of people to get even richer, it’s hard to see how that will play out.

And then there are those who advocate for the AI that will get implanted into your brain, so that you can download your consciousness into a machine and allegedly become immortal. Immortal to do what? And how does that mesh with the idea that our souls are already eternal? This could disrupt the very core of what it means to be human.

4 Likes

What will we do with that time?

We will spend even more of it ttying ot get normal things done on a day to day basis. In the same way that computers brought about even more complexity, AI will further the confusion and lack of competence.
things like dealing with insurance, utilities, government agencies will have even more layers to navigate because AI will be able to sort it. a phone tree that now has 4 layers, will have 24, and will take up an hour of your time.

We will have more fees and taxes to absorb any gains and even more money will make its way into fewer hands.

5 Likes

I am in the middle of all the AI / Copilot implementation going on in “Microsoft-World” and I have a couple of close friends who I’ve been talking to a bit and I’m not sure how smooth all this transition to the unknown is going to be. I have known Andy Forbes for about 3 decades now and he’s always been working on the cutting edge of technology. I met him when he was working for a company that was partnering with Bell Atlantic (pre-Verizon Wireless for young folks) to stream video (movies) back in the late 90’s. They even had a pilot for it that allowed you to stream and they did all the tracking on the movies probably similarly to what we have today with companies like Netflix. They were just too far ahead of the rest of us and it never went anywhere. Had they done it 10 years later . . . it probably would’ve been a huge success. He later worked with some amazing companies and is now a CTO for one of the largest Salesforce consultancies in the US. I just started reading his newest book called The Age of Information Symmetry: A Practical Guide to Thriving in a World Where Knowledge is No Longer Power. I haven’t made time to read a book just because I wanted to (and didn’t need to for work) in what feels like a long time. However, Andy posted on LinkedIn that he didn’t think that the change over to AI was going to be without friction involved and mentioned his book. So far his perspective on “asymetry” in how people think and live is fascinating and explains a lot of what we see going on with the “bad” or evil folks running things. I’m looking forward to reading what his perspective is on how it will affect us and what we can do to deal with this. I’m reminded of the fact that we have had many “revolutions” in history where similar things happened. For example, when automobiles started being used, we didn’t need as many people to breed and care for horses. When refrigerators became easily available, we didn’t need people to sell us ice for “iceboxes” and people changed what they ate because we didn’t need to ferment foods to make them last through the winters.

Another friend of mine, Rose Thun, has been speaking at the forefront of how to use AI for executives. I’m fascinated by her thinking, and she just started a weekly blog post about something called “Jerk” which she explained to me last weekend. I’d never heard of it in physics, but she said it is a known concept and the example she gave me is when you are driving down the highway and passing a semi-truck and it starts to come over into your lane and is about to hit you – and you are too far up to hit the brakes – you instead hit the gas to accelerate fast enough to get past the truck and it creates “jerk” which can also be associated with whiplash. She reminded me that when we worked for Network Solutions during the dotcom era, domain name registrations accelerated at a crazy speed. I remember the leadership trying to figure out how we were going to increase the database space fast enough and all the systems to accommodate the speed at which the registrations were coming in. The organization focused on position, velocity, and acceleration. It didn’t focus on jerk, but maybe if it had we would’ve had a better idea of what was coming. I’m thinking that a lot of what Chris and Paul are doing is trying to see the “jerk” along with the rest of the elements of change in order to try to figure out what is coming next.

I’m fascinated by the people who are not afraid of AI and are embracing it because they think it is amazing (and not because they just want to be sure to have a paycheck in the future). I hope to learn from them on how to continue to stay ahead of the game in the workforce and to share those concepts with others to help them also - like my kid who will be graduating from college in another year. Maybe it can help some of you as well. I think we could have a good conversation about it anyway. I’ll share more as I read deeper into Andy’s book and as Rose writes more about her thoughts on Jerk. (And @randommike I’m totally expecting some kind of play on words from you.)

10 Likes

Frankly I don’t see the utility in getting paper copies of your holdings as a bulwark against the Great Taking.

Their response. That’s a cute paper promise of something that you think you own. We own it now, so Foff. Back in the passbook days the bank ran off their records, not what was in your passbook.

Might be of minor help in the case of a local EMP failure that clobbers their records. Still doubt they’d accept your outdated records. At best it would take decades to sort it out. Look at the difficulty the debanked have getting theirs back. Or the bail inned Cypriots.

I’m with Anne Barnhardt on this one.

3 Likes

Well, the best I can come up with now is “Our Town” by Thornton Wilder.

It can still help with proving that your account exists, or has existed at some point.
In a pinch, if you have built a relationship with your financial institution, you may be able to still pull out some cash where you otherwise would not be able to.
It’s been a few years since I worked at the branch-level, but back then we’d print out branch reports daily, and when the power/internet goes out we’d record the cash transactions on paper to input later when the power/internet is back (Bank-side. For customer’s we’d just input via the paper transaction tickets and then scan them).
I like paper. With the exception of credit cards I still receive my statements via snail-mail. I keep them in a nice 4 drawer lateral filing cabinet I got for free when my bank went digital.
The Great Taking? Yeah, at that point if you don’t physically have it in your possession, then all bets are off. The people you see in a bank branch and nearly everyone in the admin office will be just as hosed as you are.
Speaking of archives; I should really get to testing out burning an M Disc to see if they are something I should stock up on.

I don’t think the elites (those who own the technology, AI, etc.) would like having a lot of idle people sitting around just idly consuming. What they would like even less is having a lot of idle people sitting around with access to AI tools and capabilities. If you were in their position, using just cold logic and what you’ve learned about them, how would you solve this conundrum?

3 Likes

:raccoon: :raccoon: :raccoon:
:rocket: :rocket: :rocket:
:high_voltage: :high_voltage: :high_voltage:
:leafless_tree: :leafless_tree::leafless_tree:

3 Likes

Perhaps in a fashion similar to how Mr slammy adjust markets, we could see jerks ended abruptly…..management of energy and water cooling resources to data centers could happen systematically impacting jerks in cyclical manner.

Part way through your post the domain name registrations came to mind. I think we will see many such things with AI. As people figure out what it’s good for or even not so good for, we will see all manner or attempts to capitalize on it before the novelty wear off. A current example is people paying to have AI write a song for them through a website built to make that easy, when they could get the same result for free with a bit of a learning curve.

Remember the spinning globes that were part of the WWW culture. Everything internet related needed a globe and preferably spinning. We need a dorky icon for AI.

2 Likes

As far as AI use I embrace it at work (narrow focus AI) but don’t use it at home. I try and keep most “smart home” features out of my house. I have a 2021 jeep (note you can disable its call home feature easily) and don’t plan on getting newer stuff. My husband who doesn’t work with AI is all in on it and would bring all kinds of crap into our house if he could. At least he was… in the last couple months it is starting to unnerve him as well and he is swinging more to my view. Some of my good friends who also work with AI professionally are similar to me. All about it at work but keep it out of their home life and more embrace the physical world in their off time. I could lose myself in the digital world and take great care to avoid that at all costs.

4 Likes

Links to Paul’s politicians’ wealth vs average Americans’ wealth over time please. TIA.

1 Like

It’s coming, it’s bad.

6 Likes

It’s there to help in some cases, such as if there were a crash of the systems involved and backups were lost too, you’d at least have a claim to make. The person with the 404 error on their tightly gripped phone would have less of a claim.

If you knew just how ancient and archaic many bank systems actually are, you’d probably be frightened.

12 Likes

Here you go:

https://x.com/Rule5Tweets/status/2024857925101961254

8 Likes

I’m with you @mysterymet. I don’t have any of those smart home features in my house either. My kid wanted all of those to begin with when they came out and I had to have a long talk with him about what it really meant. I have concerns about even our closed security system and I was not excited about getting a smartTV to watch shows. (Made sure it didn’t have a camera on it.) I prefer my 18 yr old TV that I have to connect something to in order for it to display anything and is still considered a “stupid” TV. Although I will admit that last year when my kid bought a smart lightbulb to put in the common area of his apartment so that he could control when it was turned off (and the color of all things) because his roommates left the lights on all the time running up the electric bill.

My vehicles are over 20 years old other than the one my kid drives. I didn’t know you could disable any of the GPS on any of the new vehicles. I wonder if you can easily do that with any other vehicles.

4 Likes