He’s far from the only one that should be making right with their creator. Several in Canada should be right beside him on the gallows.
Bonnie Henry tops my wish list.
Note how he is switching from “50%:50% lab made vs. zoonotic” not only to “80%:20% lab made vs zoonotic”, but is now also adding an emphasis on “accidental lab leak”. When there was no need to include the word “accidental” in his reply. This is what narrative they are now switching to. Whereas the truth is, it came out of a lab, and it’s 80%:20% deliberate vs. accidental.
I’ve been saying since March 2020 that this was lab made and 70%:30% deliberate vs. accidental release.
The reason they have spent years claiming - despite obvious and copious evidence to the contrary - that the virus was of zoonotic origin, in my view, is not because they believed that in the long term there was any realistic chance of them getting away with that narrative - but in order to make people argue over whether it was zoonotic or lab-made, rather than arguing over whether it was a deliberate or an accidental release (in an environment in which everybody accepted that it was obviously lab made).
This has been a very successful strategy for them. At a minimum, it has bought them 6 years. At the time of the outbreak, Fauci was 79. Now he’s 85 and many people - even some otherwise very sensible people - are saying, let him be, he’s too old to go to prison now. As long as he can buy enough delay to either die of natural causes before facing justice, or becomes so old it becomes impractical for him to face justice, Fauci wins (not entirely, of course; what we are watching on video is a man looking at the gates of hell; so there is some punishment, but not enough).
The evidence of deliberate vs. accidental is less unequivocal than the evidence of lab origin, but in my view, the evidence still favours deliberate release, the most incriminating piece of evidence being the date of Event 201, which predates the first known person becoming sick.
Now that does not mean I’m saying Fauci was involved in any deliberate release. From the little of his diary I have read, it seems likely that he was not - but I have not read a lot of it. That, however, does not mean that someone else was not involved in a deliberate release.
If the release was deliberate, whoever released it may well get away with it without the history correctly recording what happened.
Fauci saying: “The stress of the fact that you are responsible for something that’s killing a lot of people … 400,000 individual people.”
It is a hell of a lot more than 400,000 people!
Jessica Rose sure is swearing a lot lately… with good reason!
Fun Facts:
The Great Barrington Declaration was based upon centuries of experience with epidemics. It was supported by some of the top epidemiologists and medical scientists in the world.
Fauci’s policy of total lockdowns had no science or historical experience behind it at all. Fauci just made it up since the thought it would be a good idea.
But the media and the government championed Fauci and the lockdowns and the condemned the proponents of the Great Barrington Declaration.
condemned the proponents of the Great Barrington Declaration.
In his recent interview with Trish Wood, Jeffrey Tucker said that Fauci, in his diary, called those proponents “the three stooges”.
This most likely the case, in his emails, he was clearly surprised it got out in the wild and clearly desperately scrambled to cover it up and shift the blame…. So him being involved in an intentional release doesn’t fit his behaviors. In his emails the comment by one of his staff “ do you think this could be one of ours” is the tell here one of your WHAT?!”
. If it was intentional by him and he was competent he wouldn’t have been surprised or scrambling…, a machine would have been put in place way ahead of time….If he was incompetent and he was intentional , the global Jab rollout coerced Machine would have never been as successful as it was because he was incompetent and did this intentionally .
Neither of these fit him being the master mind or one in charge… a very useful pawn sure…, but not read in on the entire plan.
The most likely reality role for Fauci was a compartmentalized he was in charge of illegal bioweapons development for the deep state and that why he was the highest paid government employee….. if it was I intentional “ and I’m sorry I’m not at 70%, I’m at 101%” Then some one else knew about it “ or even funded and ordered it” and released it. So much as I hate to say it he might be an evil mad scientist…., he is not himself Dr. Evil in charge…. He is in fact the scientist who works for Dr evil in. Janet’s Bond movie and after he develops the super weapon gets dropped in the shark tank by Dr Evil because he has no further use….
The fact that hey have gone to such lengths to protect him and not silence him by dropping him in the shark tank is an interesting tell…. Why? What value leverage does he still have on the deep state?
Interesting. When the Hamilton, MT Rocky Mountain Lab became suspect, I started looking around Hamilton to see what else was there. Low and behold, Glaxo-Smith-Kline has a manufacturing facility in that town of 4600 people, and a friend’s son did safety engineering there during the covid years. It’s interesting that a private corporation and a federally-funded research lab are in the same small town.
Re the highlight, me too! I remain stunned by how little rage we are seeing in society at large, as well as on these forums. The anger at what has been done to us should be volcanic.
Yes that was my sense. He isn’t very bright - but he remained in control of NIAID from 1984-2022. Clearly he did “good work” during AIDS - with AZT - so maybe he passed that “Tuskeegee 2.0 Test” that Rockefeller Medicine presumably gave to every candidate. He was a top performer as a bureaucrat, but not good enough to get a position at some drug company. That’s why he lasted so long.
Many of the other “directors” got fancy jobs after their government “service”. Just not him. Maybe that tells us - he was just that stupid.
And the reason they aren’t throwing him under the bus - they don’t want to “kill a Fauci Chicken” because it might scare the thousand Rockefeller monkeys currently in place.
Or is his diary there to misdirect.