Fauci's Private Diary Exposes Stark Contradictions on Lab Leak, Lethality, Lockdowns & Vaccines

Daily Digest
, , ,
142

I’ve struggled with this one for while….. my best guess is people just can’t accept it’s real….. my best hypothesis is the full plan was:

Release the virus, scare everyone into locking down , until the predesigned jab was able to roll out in full global production…. Keep the global population in perpetual fear and on and off lock downs and perpetual boosters. “ remember the cards came out with more than 2 lines and printed on both sides” why? It’s like they knew boosters were coming” the EU was caught pre ordering 10 jabs for every citizen “ Bill and Klaus went on record as being shocked by the # of antivaxxers… it wasn’t supposed to be 20% it was supposed to be less than 1% . And my gut tells me those 1% were never intended to return . But the camps were simply not big enough to hold em all. And the plan took too long and fell apart when it was clear the jab did nothing positive.

So they had to scrap the plan to Get rid of the 1% non compliers with an excuse of Covid outbreak in the camps and unvaxxed winter of death behind the fence and no phones/ cameras to challenge the official narrative , keep the 99% locked down in 15 minute cities with constant jabs and” waves of new covid variants “ to explain the increased all cause mortality until the 99% become 90% and 80 % and 70% etc until the IDEAL % is reached, all nice and quiet with the government trying to save you and keeping you locked up for your own protection.

Forget free fries when the Austrian government offered free hookers as a carrot and a year in prison as a stick it was clear how serious and desperate they were…the global Swiss watch lock step coordination of it all….

And the minor fact the jab didn’t stop the spread or prevent you from getting it but did negatively impact your fertility, clog your arteries, kick in turbo cancer and destroy you immune system was a bit of a tell….. now instead of 3 jabs where it stopped for the most of the population, take that to 10 jabs or 20 or more? Are we still at 20% all cause mortality and 1.4 average declining birth rates or do you think it would be worse

If you were reading a science fiction novel with those ingredients and results and I asked you what the plot of the book was…., what would a rational non emotional invested hypothesis be? Honestly your first guess….

But make it personal ,a reality and put yourself in the hot seat bearing the consequences…..

Somehow the logical domino chain just skips around that that can’t be reality.

it’s just so much easier to pretend something else happened……,Anything else happened…especially if you were on the wrong side of this…

so they can’t get angry because it didn’t happen because it’s just so extreme it’s unbelievable and undesirable … In a way “THEY” won because even though we are not still taking booster death jabs… even though we know at least subconsciously what they do and government is still providing them…, we are still going quietly into the night and the back up plan after the jab fail ….well apparently that’s freezing and starving due to the coming oil shock.

because if it’s all real what does that really mean? It’s just too much…it blows all dystopian books and movies out of the water….. hunger games is a more plausible reality to accept ..in this case anger isn’t exactly the right response anyway..

Sadly I’ve reduced hope anybody is going to get angry about anything… unless it’s a silly Ukraine trump elon machine induced fury……

because if you aren’t going to get upset about what has already been done to and your family and loved ones ? What is it going to take? Really what is left? What is more extreme?

19 Likes
143

To the Joe Kent’s (and the donors that back them) of the world: take your voter roll data and your private consumer data and produce lists of Americans likely to mobilize and network, in person, to begin building sovereignty into their own lives and strategic regions in the United States.

Americans know how to work. We know how to follow leaders. If you would just lead, show us the way, we would line up and die for the values we share.

Look at the loyal minions who tortured their children and poisoned their wombs and their hearts in loyalty tests during COVID. Our noble hearts were betrayed by wicked leaders.

We rely, in America, on faithful leaders to muster the troops, provision our assemblies, and leverage our loyalty to force banks and rival powers to respect our natural rights and God’s law.

1 Like
144

There should be an industry built around understanding the flow of events, interests, money, duringbthis period.

145

https://x.com/JesslovesMJK/status/2084715755975934449?s=20

4 Likes
146

To me, these communications point to intention, not incompetence on Fauci and Collins’ parts. These vaccines were designed to do the very things Gallo warned about, and that Kadlec asked Collins to respond to Gallo shows Kadlec had some culpability, too.

3 Likes
147
1 Like
148

As a person with a disability, the highlighted part was deeply felt. I already experienced eugenics as a child, being told by a doctor it would be best if I never had children. These are personal experiences one never, ever forgets, or forgives.

https://x.com/uTobian/status/2084755475330211926?s=20

image
image644×580 82.6 KB

10 Likes
149

Such are called “Luigis”. It would be nice and proper if “the System” figured out how to redeem itself and make all this right and just. But it’s likely too late, and the Luigis will be forced to drill holes in the trunks of cars to seek justice. Which will only hasten our societal downward spiral. Praying for peace.

3 Likes
150

A lot of this is lack-of-rage response is addressed in Bret & Heather’s podcast last week (Dark Horse #336). Here’s the blurb from that:

On this, our 336th Evolutionary Lens livestream, we discuss the Covid Era in light of the Senate Hearing on the testimony of Anthony Fauci. First: excerpts from several Covid Era Stories, reminding us of the atrocities, tragedies, and ludicrosities (yes) of that time. Then: is Fauci’s refusal to answer any questions put to him by members of the committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs evidence that he is, in effect, a made man? We the people deserve answers, and the government should work for us—but it does not appear to do so. The polarization is as stark as possible: democrats think Fauci is science, republicans see Fauci as a great harm to science.

link: DarkHorse Podcast - Everyday Treason: The 336th Evolutionary Lens with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying | Free Listening on Podbean App

A great deal of this non-response, I think, is caused by people not being able to admit they were wrong. Wrong enough to permanently damage themselves, and their kids.

As for the rest of us, I think there’s seething rage, with the emphasis on the seething part.

3 Likes
151

As I remember, that was pretty much the origin of the term outlaw. You won’t agree to be bound by our laws, fair enough, you won’t be protected by them, either. No legal consequences whatsoever for whatever you did to an outlaw. Being declared an outlaw was seen as a pretty grave punishment, not a get out of jail free card.

2 Likes
152

My big concern is that we are going to have to re-live all the atrocities again as the multitude of truth deniers resurface, doubling down. There is lots of evidence of that on X. As was said many times in the first go round, the deniers can be hit over the head with an encyclopedia of data/facts to no effect. Whether they now have damaged brains from the :syringe: or are, as you say, unable to admit they were wrong, the end result is the same. They cannot and will not admit to their own fallibility.

Get ready for round two…

image
image643×680 129 KB

image
image311×336 23.9 KB

4 Likes
153

This was stunning…and brilliant thinking. I can’t help but agree…I think you hit the nail on the head. If it’s all real, it is just too much, is entirely correct. I think beyond this point, there be monsters…and I don’t think many people are prepared to fall off the edge of the known world…they will go stark, raving mad.

Can I please keep? Cause I’ve been sailing close to the edge of the ocean myself…and I’ve been thinking about Chris’s TOE. I do not know if it is people acting in groups, or specific people being psychopaths, or if it is CJ Hopkins late stage capitalism, which ends up devouring the world and everyone in it because it is just the nature of the beast…but I’m thinking of James Corbetts interview, where it all comes down to the nation state has already gone, and the world is a mafia, with different groups competing for leverage over all the worlds resources.

PS…and of course, if you guys are all dead, there is so much more for me.

2 Likes
154

I think the lack of rage is multifactorial.

Many people simply don’t understand the science. It was never effectively communicated. Others wave it off as conspiracy. And others, like me, don’t attribute it to malice, at least not primarily.

I think “they” manufactured a threat with a cure ready in hand. But like the global adoption of peptides, we accepted or became accustomed to a lack of robust prospective safety data.

I don’t think it was malice. I think it was hubris.

I also know manufacturing was stretched thin trying to keep up. And the body is remarkably resilient. I believe the clots and turbo cancers are attributable to the vaccine, but they’re a casualty of hubris and not malice. “They” genuinely believed it was safe.

That doesn’t excuse it. But it changes the frame. It’s different than war where casualties are expected. I don’t think they expected the level of inflicted casualties on their respective populations.

The anger people feel is real but it’s also diffused because of other more in your face realities imposed on our population. And if you accept the malice narrative, you have to accept that our government, our doctors, our institutions intentionally harmed us. That’s too much for most people to carry.

So, we aren’t angry. We are ignorant, misinformed or like me, accepting it as stupidity vs. malice also knowing that some vaccines were failed and our bodies are resilient. So, for my loved ones, I pray.

1 Like
155

I have generally agreed with such an analysis as that with one exception. I don’t think that they believed it was safe. I think that they had little idea if it would safe or not and took the risk that it would be safe. The history of new biotechnologies suggested that it was more probable than not that it would cause problems. I don’t think that most of them knew just how bad the problems would be. But the more medically knowledgable among them knew it was a crap shoot and they just rolled the dice with our lives.

It became pretty obvious, pretty quickly that the injections were neither safe nor effective. Continuing the injections after those facts became apparent was a crime against humanity.

2 Likes
156

I think you are probably correct. If we could verify:

  1. Whether there was any in vitro or in vivo data showing spike proteins forming complexes; that’s a small step toward at least entertaining the question of circulating clots.

  2. They did have in vitro localization of LNPs and persistent expression, but I didn’t dig through the data to see if there was in vitro or animal data on intracellular activity.

Honestly, I didn’t go digging for the data. So I’m left with questions, not conclusions.

157

Since Covid was a bioweapon (HIV inserts are the proof of that, along with the coverup of Uncanny Similarity which exposed this in January 2020), then it follows that the shot itself, which comes armed with the HIV-insert bioweapon spike, is also a bioweapon.

They could have picked other parts of the virus. They chose the bioweapon-spike. Uncanny decision there.

What’s it called when you force-inject most of the globe with a bioweapon-vax?
Just a big oopsie?

11 Likes
158

The history of new medical technologies shows that 2/3’s of them are eventually pulled due to lack of safety. There must have been people in the FDA that knew that.

3 Likes
159

Respectfully, my thought is that those HIV binding repeats are likely part of what makes the technology work. All viral gene therapies (AAV, adenoviral, lentiviral) rely on host virus machinery. The HIV repeats serve a functional purpose in that context.

And the use of the spike protein was a reasonable idea on its face: if our immune system targets that key binding piece, it should block the coronavirus from entering cells.

So I see it as manufactured by design but those elements were about functionality, not malice. I don’t think the choice of spike or the HIV sequences were intended as a weapon. They were tools that, in hindsight, came with risks we didn’t fully understand.

That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t ask hard questions. But it does mean we should be careful about assigning intent where incompetence or hubris may be the simpler explanation.

160

There is no question in my mind that the virus was a bioweapon. And there is little doubt in my mind that the vax was ready to go, just in case. But I am not sure the virus was deliberately released and I am not sure they knew that how toxic the spike would turn out to be.

The reason for mass production of the spike by vax was due to the fact that the spike was the binding mechanism. If you make a vax that produces antibodies to the binding mechanism, you neutralize the virus. Since the spike was relatively small, they didn’t think that the virus could innovate effective mutations around such a small collection of amino acids.

That was the theory. It didn’t work. But that was the theory.

1 Like
161

“The mature SARS-CoV-2 contains 4 structural proteins: Envelope (E), Membrane (M), Nucleocapsid (N), and the spike protein (S).”

They could have used (presumably) the other parts. But they weren’t lethal enough, I suspect.

Regarding being unsure about what came next - post-bioweapon development, once it got out, I suspect the government in the Mainland did studies on the bioweapon to see exactly what long term effects it had on the humanized mice. I mean, that’s what I would have done if I ran the place, so I assume they did it too. They think ahead - they aren’t stupid. Question: "what are the long term effects of this spike protein if this infects our population?

Maybe that’s why the seemingly-crazy Zero Covid policy was enacted.

1 Like