Fauci's Private Diary Exposes Stark Contradictions on Lab Leak, Lethality, Lockdowns & Vaccines

Daily Digest
, , ,
162

I agree but I haven’t verified the 1/3 figure, but I don’t doubt it. One modality I was following closely, AAV gene therapy, showed exactly why that pause should have been required.

Last year, Sarepta’s Elevidys an AAV-based treatment for Duchenne muscular dystrophy was linked to two patient deaths from acute liver failure. The FDA responded with a Boxed Warning.

Around the same time, Capsida, a company I know personally as a customer had a Phase I trial death. A pediatric patient with a rare brain disorder died from cerebral edema after receiving their AAV therapy. The trial was put on hold.

Two different companies, two different AAV vectors, same story: powerful new modality, pushed forward with incomplete safety data, and patients paid the price. This isn’t an isolated event. It is a pattern where death is assessed as a potential outcome.

So when you say 1/3 of new modalities get pulled, I believe you. And we should have been more careful. But when Nobel prizes and billions of dollars are on the line, critical discussions get filtered out and replaced with yes men.

1 Like
163

That is true but as I posted above “[t]he reason for mass production of the spike by vax was due to the fact that the spike was the binding mechanism. If you make a vax that produces antibodies to the binding mechanism, you neutralize the virus. Since the spike was relatively small, they didn’t think that the virus could innovate effective mutations around such a small collection of amino acids.”

That was the theory. It didn’t work and the spike proved to be incredibly toxic but I never saw any evidence that that was known in advance. The thing that the did know in advance was the possibility of antibody dependent enhancement. They took the risk on that one.

164

It all depends on who designed the spike in that lab, and what they saw in their animal studies. If that information didn’t “die suddenly” after release, then - presumably - that information was available. Just interview the designer. Since this was a designed bioweapon, with specific goals, and they probably had to iterate over different designs until they got the one they were aiming for…the information absolutely had to be there.

Unless we think this was just a big bioweapon-oopsie. “Wait, so our bioweapon turned out to be really unpleasant? Who woulda thought.”

165

That is what I think happened. Remember most biowarfare is designed - not to kill - but to disable a population quickly. A bioweapon that kills effectively is too risky if it boomerangs. If a bioweapon doesn’t kill the it is less risky if it ends up - as this one did - boomeranging.

The whole episode just proves the axiom made famous by Yogi Berra, “It is difficult to make predictions, especially about the future.”

1 Like
166

I disagree that the “information” about the spike “absolutely had to be there.”

There is a big difference between the virus and the injection. The virus did not contain a synthetic nucleotide. The injection did contain a synthetic nucleotide

That is a huge difference. The virus’s replication machinery was broken down in two weeks. The injection’s replication machinery often doesn’t break down in years. The result - in the injection - is that there is mass production of the spike protein over a long period of time. So testing the virus would not necessarily reveal the problem since there is no continuing production of the spike protein. Only testing the injection would reveal it and only if the injection had been tested and observed over a long follow up time. I know of no evidence that that ever happened until it was too late and then there was a mass coverup of the toxicity of the injection for obvious reasons.

167

Perfect example, albeit a mild one. There is far worse… Note the ratio.

image
image743×280 55.1 KB

2 Likes
168

:100:

https://x.com/MurielBlaivePhD/status/2084926303824699727?s=20

image
image743×343 49.7 KB

image
image743×788 110 KB

4 Likes
169

Everyone is welcome to their opinion but from my perspective

Here’s how I frame it…

.” Sorry for the extreme example but a college roommate who became a lawyer taught me sometimes shock drives home a point”.

In a fictional example …If the nice grandma down the street made a batch of cookies for Snow White and she got sick and or worse and we later find out there was rat poison in the cookies and the rat poison was in same cupboard as the sugar and she has signs of early dementia…., ok maybe it was an accident…..

but if we find out the cookies have rat poison, mercury and cyanide in them…” 3” deadly mistakes, accidental kinda need to be thrown out the window…,

Unfortunately it’s the same example with the jabs “ actually worse l”just didn’t have spike protein in em, which conveniently went to ovaries and testies and now we see a 2/3 reduction in full term pregnancy, calamari blood clots and heart attacks, they also threw in 2 HIV inserts that destroyed the immune system leading to 1,300+ serious life shortening side effects , and then for the cherry on top three in SV40 a known cancer causing promoter now we have turbo cancer and 1,000% diagnosis…

And that’s ignoring that there were jab patents at Moderna back in 2017, Pfizer tried to hide the 1,300 side effects for 75 years ,what the did to HCQ, Ivermectin or pushing medazalam or remdesivor, the censoring, the firing etc everywhere we look not just one accident but multiple attacks. The fact that the flu cases went to zero, the Vaers data base was not only limited but overwrote deaths in real time to cover their track I and many other caught em. Worse yet they stoped the mRNA trials because all the animals died and went to humans instead. Are going to excuse all this away as accidents or hubris ? There is a clear and consistent human behavior here again and again and again. It does not matter what people say look at their actions.

If fact if you paid me 100 million $ as a dr evil consultant to come up with a slow fuse silent depopulation weapon I could blame on something else but be able to control who got and who didn’t, I doubt after hiring the best Dr evil scientist experts I could design a better plan than what was executed across the board.. maybe I just not that smart… if you have a better stealth depopulation strategy I’d be interested on how this was not a perfect plan.

In our fiction example grandma was not a sweet old lady, she did not have dementia , she was the wicked witch and she really wanted to kill Snow White…….

And it’s not hubris either their behavior shows that spades too….. let’s say for a moment it was rushed or untested or hubris and. F-up …. Ok human nature is to cover your ass…….in this case as sooon as you found out they didn’t work and were harmful and covid wasn’t that bad…. What’s the natural CYA response? You bury it you bury it fast ….., ie you declare covid over, you say the wonder jabs are no longer needed, you pull them off the market and destroy all the remaining… are they doing that? Nope you need 10th booster, No they are still pushing em…, still can get em at my pharmacy in 2026… why because they have hit their target yet..,

Oh but the spike and hiv and the sv40 had to be in there for science reasons….., umm let’s not forget they didn’t work…. So they had to be in there to work fails because they didn’t work.

Or let’s approach it this way….. let’s just pretend even if you violently disagree for one moment pretend you are Dr Evil and virus and vax all of it it was global intentional, planned , silent and slow depopulation so it wasn’t obvious and could be blamed on existing causes of death just accelerated, but you want to keep a small subset of the population protected .. how would it look any different??? or another angle what evidence that is missing would it take you to move over to the planned intent side…?

yet another tell the new paper saying it a good thing to reduce the population to 4 billion… they know its slowly coming out and now trying to shift the narrative they are still the good guys

5 Likes
170

I feel the same way, but after disconnecting TOO much, I realized I was missing out on important things that were hurting my family. So now I have “shadow accounts” at the major platforms. Just an avatar account. I don’t post anything. I don’t “like” anything. I don’t “share” anything. I just “follow” important, credible news accounts that I wish to monitor. I disabled the “recommendations” algorithms (i.e., the “track everything you watched” feature). And this is the MOST IMPORTANT thing to do … disable the “for you” or whatever they call the AI recommendation algorithm, set your default to only see posts (and reposts) by people you follow, and ALSO set the default by “most recent” so you see the posts in the order they are posted. This will clean up your page feed so you can go on, skim through the information to see if there’s anything cooking that you want to watch, and then get out without clicking a single response. If anyone you follow breaches your trust, is just plain nasty, or turns out to be too spammy, simply unfollow. It transforms your page feed from a fire hose back into something useful.

1 Like
171

Thanks

172

I’ve designed “systems-that-work” for much of my professional life. A virus is a system. So is a shot. The steps to create functioning viruses that have specific effects are a collection of design decisions, implementation-attempts, followed by a testing period (call it “QA”) to see if it works. Then a re-development process to fix any bugs that appear in QA (darn, it isn’t working quite right, we gotta change this insert), re-develop, re-test, until it does what you want.

That’s a dev process. In each iteration, it involves a QA phase to see if it works.

I think there’s a zero percent chance this virus worked on the first iteration. That very seldom happens.

So if the virus leaks from the lab, a smart government would drag the architect of this system into the palace to get her to tell you what the design goals of this system were, and what the results of each QA phase showed. I mean, this is what I’d do if I were the government, about five minutes after the lab leak happened.

Just my sense based on my experience.

2 Likes
173

The virus was developed on “humanized mice.” That means mice that were genetically engineered to have attributes of the human immune system. Those mice do not have human immune systems, only attributes of the human immune system. Usually, these mice are “harvested” (i.e. killed) after a “run” (i.e. infection) of the virus to check various attributes related to the infection. It is then assumed that similar results will happen when humans are infected. That is not guaranteed but it is assumed.

But there is no long term observation as to developing problems. Nor could there be due to the “harvesting” and due to the life expectancies of the mice.

Hey, if there was real evidence that the release of a toxic, long lasting spike was protein planned out in advance, I would accept it. So far there is none.

I do see an absolute cavalier disregard for human welfare as a whole. The evidence of that is all over the place. I do see an attempt by the self appointed elite to revert society to feudalism - this time technofeudalism. The evidence of that is all over the place. I do see many of the self appointed elite desiring enslavement of the population. The evidence of that is also all over the place. I even see some of the self appointed elite talking of the need for depopulation. Some of them all but come right out and say it.

But so far I see no evidence that the damage done by the spike protein was planned. If that evidence comes out, I’ll change my opinion on it.

174

I’m assuming there were specific design goals that were laid out in the design documents for the project (like I did routinely in my career), and there were tests on the humanized mice to verify the design goals were being met (say, blood clots, destruction of the microbiome), and modifications made along the way to improve the functionality of the end product.

This is just how things are created in my experience.

I am assuming this was a product, designed by an architect, for a specific purpose. That’s because I’ve been an architect, designed products, for a specific purpose.

Do you think this just came from a bat kissing a pangolin and out popped Covid? Or were those HIV inserts evidence that it was a designed product, as I have asserted?

If it was a designed product - then there was a product design document, along with repeated testing phases to validate it worked.

Sure would be nice to see that design document.

2 Likes
175

This about sums it up…

2 Likes
176

Okay. but that is an assumption, not proof. No one knows what they looked for. No one knows that they would even have a suspicion to look for blood clots. We know about blood clots only after the fact but there is no evidence that it was expected. Cancer is completely out of the question since cancer only develops after suppression of immune surveillance - which takes considerable time.

Dave, that is a cheap shot. I expect more from you than a reply like that. It is clear from my prior posts that I have long believed that this is a genetically engineered virus and deliberately engineered to infect humans.

Yes, it would. The closest is the “defuse” documents. And they don’t say much except that they are genetically engineering a virus to infect humans.

177

So it was a designed virus, there is a design document with specific design goals, and there was a validation process tested on the humanized mice.

And if I were in charge of the government in the region where this process had happened, step #1 would be to basically seize all the documents at the place where the design & implementation had taken place, and sort out what the goal was based on the documents found - including test results on those humanized mice.

And heck. Once the documents were found, there’s a 100% chance I’d run more tests on humanized mice to see what the longer term effects might be. And if I saw some really scary stuff, it might scare me so much I’d implement a “Zero Covid” policy to protect my people from the outcome I saw in the secondary-mice testing.

1 Like
178

A legitimate government that cares about the citizenry would do that. Unfortunately, we don’t have such a government.

179

Yeah I was referring to the government in Mainland China, which implemented Zero Covid for some mysterious reason. And never used the mRNA shots domestically, also for some mysterious reason.

Do we think the government of China just decided not to investigate the design documents at the WIV?

1 Like
180

I am sure that they did investigate. But they covered it up since they created it. And we covered it up since we funded it and facilitated it.

181

Agree 100%. I think the overall techniques of modification came from the US, along with the funding, and the implementation process (modify, test, repeat) happened at the WIV.

What did the government of China find in their investigation? My sense: it scared the pants off them. I sure would like to know what they found.

Now just imagine the shared liability of the US + China for the global damage suffered by all the rest of the countries in the world.

2 Likes