Gold's Regular Morning Mugging

Not everyone is a morning person. And few people like Mondays.

But if you're a precious metals investor, mornings especially Mondays are brutal.

The Evidence

The precious metals are routinely sold off at or soon after the 8:20am EST morning open of the New York NYMEX exchange.

Below are the daily gold price charts (source: Kitco) for each Monday (or Tuesday, if Monday was a holiday) since early this year. The current day's gold price is noted by the bright green line. The morning takedown is highlighted by the orange oval.

Monday, January 7

Gold is taken down $10 immediately after the 8am NYMEX open

Monday, January 14

A late breaking rally begun on the London exchange is quickly contained at the NYMEX open, and then beaten down nearly $10. Notice that the previous Friday's gold price action (the bright blue line) also showed the same behavior at the same time, but with an even more severe response once the NYMEX opened.

Monday, January 21

The 8am sell-off is smaller here (only a few $), but still noticeable.

Monday, January 28

Again, a sell-off happens after the 8am open. Note again how the previous Friday's action was similar, but even more severe.

Monday, February 4

Finally, an outlier. While there was an initial dip in the first hour of the NYMEX, the price took off soon after. So let's not count this one.

Monday, February 11

An immediate $14 drop at the 8am open. The downward momentum started in London, but the vertical downdraft once the NYMEX opened is unmistakable.

Tuesday, February 19

While less sharp, the steady selling clearly begins at 8am, beating gold down $12 to the technically significant $1,600 threshold.

Volume & Timing

Running the above data by Chris, he noted two additional observations.

The first is that the price suppression is commencing increasingly in advance of the start of the NYMEX's open outcry process at 8:20am EST (i.e., how trading happens at the NYMEX). This suggests that it's being done on behalf of powerful players granted permission to circumvent the rules.

The second is that the volume levels in this pre-open trading is similar to that seen during active hours. That is very unusual in markets, and exceptionally high.

Silver

For those wondering, the daily price charts for silver indicate measurably similar action during these gold takedowns. Not in exact lockstep, but directionally similar both in degree and timing.

[Update: after initially writing this, I noticed Zero Hedge posted a related analysis today of the takedowns in silver for the month of February so far. Like gold, the selling is concentrated in the first few hours of the day on the NYMEX]

...they appear to be strangely collected in a brief four hour window at the start of the day... the black line is the average of the day's performance in February across the dates selected.

 

Charts: Bloomberg

The Conundrum

It's hard to swallow that these charts are evidence of a free and efficient market. Otherwise, a pattern this predictable would be quickly removed as traders and HFT algos piled in to a "sure" bet. 

Instead, this is behavior one would expect to see if powerful interests wanted to suppress the price of gold: hit the price hard and early at the start of the trading week to prevent the price from building upward momentum, as well as to make capital think twice before entering the gold market.

Who is doing this selling at the market open? Is it TBTF ("too big to fail") banks making profit on large short positions? Is it the Fed, through proxies, keeping the gold price contained so as not to signal how badly QE is devaluing the dollar? Allegations swarm across the Internet that it's one of these or both. But we don't know for certain. The exchanges don't make that information available to the public.

But while these charts above are not enough evidence to prove that the gold price is being manipulated, they sure exhibit the symptoms one would expect to see if it is.

So, the big question is: if the precious metals market is being manipulated, is it wise to be in it?

History is littered with the bodies of investors whose investment thesis was right, but whose timing was wrong. Even though precious metals investors may be correct in their fundamental rationale for buying gold, can the precious metals markets remain held in check (or driven further down) for long enough that it's not worth the risk of owning the metals at all right now?

The Decision

As I laid out in Time To Choose, investors are facing a junction where they need to make a decision. Since rising markets and fiscal policy have divorced themselves from fundamentals, the gap between "what is" and "what should be" is widening. The weighting of your capital allocation needs to be based on which side you see winning out here.

From our perspective here at Peak Prosperity, for all of the reasons explored in the Crash Course and discussed here daily, we firmly believe that fundamentals will ultimately matter most. And when they fully express themselves, there will be a tremendous re-pricing of assets largely higher for tangible assets that require energy to obtain, and markedly lower for paper claims on wealth (stocks, bonds, and their derivatives).

But as we've often said, the corrective process may very well take much longer than we ever expected to arrive. Frankly, we're amazed that the system has held together so well over the past 5 years with all of the thin-air money printing, trillion-dollar deficits, and $100 oil. If you are playing to the fundamentals, as we are, you need to be eyes-wide-open that you may be frustrated for far longer than you'd like to be.

So, if you decide to bet on the continued success of the status quo, your choices are easy: Get in the paper markets and go long. The Fed will be adding $85 billion of liquidity rocket fuel each month for the rest of the year to push the prices of your paper investments even higher.

But if you choose the fundamentals, here are a few important guidelines to keep in mind:

  • Build your core position in allocated (or better, personally held) physical bullion. It will never go to $0, you've removed or minimized counter-party risk, it can't be rehypothecated, and is often the most anonymous way to acquire PMs.
  • If you invest in "paper" gold, do it with money you can afford to lose. Risks of all sorts (price manipulation, counter-party risks, market shortages, rule changes, trackability, etc.) are all much higher. Read the prospectuses carefully, and make sure to only invest in those funds that fully back their shares with bullion (vs. futures contracts).
  • Don't use leverage. Don't let your enthusiasm make you vulnerable. Many leveraged ETFs lose money over time due to transaction costs even if the metals rise. And when the markets stay flat for prolonged times or worse, go down they can be widowmakers.

A Time to 'Hold Fast'

It's only human to have your confidence shaken when the market acts so completely differently than you think it should for so prolonged a time. Chris and I feel the same pain, both constitutionally as well as in our wallets, as much of our net worth is invested in the PMs.

But every time we go through the exercise of challenging our assumptions, we walk away feeling certain that our charted course is the correct one and that at some point, fundamentals will prevail.

As for what those fundamentals are, there's a seminal piece Chris wrote back in 2011 called The Screaming Fundamentals for Owning Gold and Silver that is even more true today. I highly recommend revisiting it.

Chris has mentioned many times that this market feels an awful lot like 2007, when asset prices powered ever higher month after month, even though the underlying data was deteriorating fast. As then, he sees a high and rising potential for a violent correction that will take the market by surprise and vaporize a lot of wealth before players are able to react.

It's times like these when you need to have the courage of your convictions and hold fast to whatever course of action you have decided upon after careful, considered analysis. During these trying periods, it's helpful to converse with a community of like-minded thinkers who can help remind you of the facts underlying your rationale which is why I recommend joining PeakProsperity.com's Gold & Silver Group if you own PMs. It's a great source of both informational and emotional support. 

Chris and I will continue to closely track the developments in the precious metals markets and report back on any material changes to our outlook as they develop. In the meantime, we'll be holding fast. We hope you'll be doing the same, too.

~ Adam Taggart

This is a companion discussion topic for the original entry at https://peakprosperity.com/golds-regular-morning-mugging/

"Truth is treason in the empire of lies" ~Ron Paul

 
When I discussed the case for PMs based on the fundamentals several years ago with those who disagreed with me  (not that I or those with whom I discussed really understood the fundamentals - but let's call it the fundamentals as we understood them from those we trusted), I always refused to argue about it and just called it a "belief" on both of our parts and let the conversation end with the statement that "history will tell who was right." I have no idea when that history ends but if it ended today, I was wrong.   So far the Keynesian beauty is winning the contest and I am seriously starting to doubt my beliefs. Appealing to "manipulation" strikes me to be a little like a Christian believer blaming it on Satan. Maybe there is manipulation, maybe there is a Satan too.

Of course, I felt the same way in 2005 or so when my gut was telling me the housing market could not stand but it kept roaring on. I didn't completely understand what would bring down the housing bubble but I intuitively knew it was a bubble that was going to pop. (Okay, there was a little more than intuition involved but not a whole lot of technical analysis.) While I realize my past experience doesn't predict the future, it is the same doubt I had about the run up in the housing market - but just knew I was right despite all the evidence at the time to the contrary -that keeps me "holding fast" today to the case for precious metals.

 

Those Monday morning wiggles don't seem to me to reflect the true worth of gold; the metal doesn't rust, decay, or depreciate, unlike like everything else I own!
 

As then, he sees a high and rising potential for a violent correction that will take the market by surprise and vaporize a lot of wealth before players are able to react.
The primary argument being made for staying out the market is generally agreed to be the risk of a violent, unprecedented, or significant correction that will destroy wealth in rapid fashion. The article above presents compelling data alleging the high likelihood of  manipulative intervention of the gold and silver markets, and quite probably others  What prevents the same intervention from blocking or ultimately reversing a major market crash? The common rebuttal is that the markets are too complex to allow for a "do over" in what would otherwise be the chaotic aftermath of a violent market crash, but are they really? Conversations I've had recently have me questioning whether the concept is as far-fetched as I once thought it to be. The increasing centralization and electronification of trading platforms permit large scale and unprecedented intervention in actively changing markets. The "flash crash" demonstrated that adverse events in the market could be reversed if deemed necessary by TPTB. Given the fragility and inter-related nature of the global economic system, why would we expect that a hugely disruptive major market event would 1. be allowed to occur, or 2. be allowed to stand without reversal? If a scenario is now possible where major markets are "immunized" against significant loss, the decision to hold hard assets in the short to intermediate term becomes more complex. I think everyone agrees the present situation is unsustainable, but as was mentioned above, it may be sustainable through artificial means MUCH longer than expected. Perhaps long enough  for precious metals holders to be punished signficantly beyond current expectations.

That's the motto of any trade - stay in it until things change.
So in this case, the trend of the gold/silver market tanking prior to the NY open - I've observed the same thing, but it doesn't happen this regularly over the longer term.  This appears to be a particularly egregious phase right now.  But these things go in cycles.  Believe me, if it were this regular all the time - $10 moves each morning, every morning - I'd step up to the plate and join in.  Why not grab free money?  And I suspect rather than some shadowy force doing all the work, it might be a shadowy force occasionally doing some work, and a bunch more "me too" folks who notice this happening more rapidly than I do (perhaps they have better monitoring tools or they've studied detailed intraday historical information and they know what to look for), and then jump in there to…grab the free money.

But I believe the shadowy force can only profitably do this while there is a decent amount of speculative long open interest in the paper futures market.  You can see the spec longs evaporate during the huge spikes down - a massive number of shares get traded when certain support levels get breeched.  Once that open interest is gone (and right now its supposedly at the lowest level since Dec 2008), it will greatly increase their risk to force the market down since they don't have those spec long stops being triggered to help them cover their shorts.  I'd guess that's likely when prices will stabilize.  That's just my opinion though.

I only have access to public data at 3 points during the trading day - london AM fix (1030 GMT), london PM fix (1500 GMT), and COMEX settle prices (2115 GMT).  I did a study that examines these 3 time periods. The goal was to see in aggregate during what time period prices moved over the major gold bull market since 2000-01-01.  Here is what I saw:

  • Between London AM - London PM:  $-388 [avg -0.12 per day]
  • Between London PM - COMEX settle: $-1110 [avg -0.34 per day]
  • Between COMEX settle - London AM next day: $2824 [avg 0.86 per day]
Put another way, during a $1400 bull market move in gold, buying during London trading hours and selling at COMEX close would have resulted in you losing $1400.  Buying after COMEX closes and selling prior to London AM fix you'd be up about $2800.  However, the effect isn't pronounced enough for ME to actually make money, given spreads and trading costs.  If I had intraday COMEX data for the last 13 years I might be able to come up with something more interesting, but I'm just a simple guy with no access to that data.

Moves were more pronounced during a few different periods:

  • London AM-London PM: -942 [avg -0.50/day] when gold price above 50MA and 200MA (i.e. gold in a strong uptrend)
  • London AM Monday-London PM Monday: -368 [avg -0.55/day]
  • COMEX close Thursday-London AM Friday: $740 [avg 1.13/day]
  • COMEX close Friday-London AM Monday: $684 [avg 1.11/day]
To me there's clearly an effect, and it shows up over time.  If anyone has any studies they want me to perform, I'd be happy to do it and release the results to the site.

If anyone has access to intraday tick data for gold…well now.  Let me know that too!  :-)

 

Adam said:
"It's times like these when you need to have the courage of your convictions and hold fast to whatever course of action you have decided upon after careful, considered analysis".

Everything reverts back to the mean, and things are as frothy as they can get right now according to market fundamentals.

I have no expertise at all with the market, and rely allot on those who's character precedes them. I do know statistics though, and I consider my knowledge of them my strength, and I believe in the "gut feeling" as it has its place in a real pinch, plus I have a descent work ethic. So far so good then.

BOB

 

[quote=davefairtex]  Once that open interest is gone (and right now its supposedly at the lowest level since Dec 2008), it will greatly increase their risk to force the market down since they don't have those spec long stops being triggered to help them cover their shorts.  I'd guess that's likely when prices will stabilize.  That's just my opinion though.
 
[/quote]
Your opinion and your analysis are highly valued.  My buy signal is less scientific, it's when I start to become nauseous, and now the moves in Silver getting my attention. 

At the moment I'm quite pleased the price is pushed down - it give me more time to slowly improve my physical holdings!
I think most of us following PP are looking longer term and realised gold is preserving wealth, and a hedge against the future, rather than an investment per se. If I was an investor I would be worried. Since I'm an accumulator [like the Chinese, Indians etc] I am pleased to see prices drift down. More Oz to my £. Although with a weakening £ to $ for me that makes it more interesting smiley

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-02-20/foxconn-freezes-hiring-iphone-production-slowdown
Is this a tell Folks? We shall see. Gold, Silver, Copper and Oil have been acting funny lately.

BOB

DavefairTex:  Ever heard of Ranting Andy Hoffman over at Miles Franklin?  He's been on the soapbox about manipulation for years!!He's tracked and charted many many movements you might be interested in.
On the reality side (if there is such), serious consideration must be made for holding G&S as TPTB can, and probably will, change RULES and LAW to their purposes.  Bugs of all metal type could end up that selfish 1% whose holdings are outlawed or taxes into poverty for the good of the state.

If you believe the three Es, or whatever way you visualize the coming change, assets are a no brainier.
Of course there is risk.  What's coming is a dramatic increase in risk, across the board, including investments/speculation.

I'm not planning to sell any physical assets in the next five years.  A lot can and will happen in that time.

Personally, I appreciate the continued buying opportunities.

Les

BTFD

Given the fragility and inter-related nature of the global economic system, why would we expect that a hugely disruptive major market event would1. be allowed to occur, or 2. be allowed to stand without reversal? If a scenario is now possible where major markets are "immunized" against significant loss, the decision to hold hard assets in the short to intermediate term becomes more complex. I think everyone agrees the present situation is unsustainable, but as was mentioned above, it may be sustainable through artificial means MUCH longer than expected.
I think this is a very good question, and none of us know the answer or can read the future.  I think we all agree that illegal manipulation is nothing new. When I was daytrading back in 98-00 I used to sit and watch the ECNs and was amazed at how bad it was. IPOs, trading on insider info, obscure derivatives contracts, etc, I guess why would th PM market be any different? It seems to me the more those who control the mechanisms of the market try do so by artificial means the more volatile it will become. This is why I think a flash-crash might be possible. Most of the integrity of the financial system is gone. This means it has become a system of obfuscation which equates to a high level of unpredicatability. I think we are seeing this on a daily basis. Markets are not reacting to the traditional rules, and therefore investors are sitting with their fingers on the triggers. Although it seems there is an immunization to significant loss, I think that the this 'artificial' immunization  you point out actually creates significantly more loss since our markets are ultimately supported by the faith of people. When that faith is fracturing, a small catastrophe can be the tipping point. I believe that TPTB really didn't see the crash of 2009 coming. How could they? They were so immersed in the system that was feeding on itself, and were incredibly socially distant from those who were ultimately effected. It's the combination of all these factors that I believe could bring a flash-crash if the future brings us an unpredictable catastrophe...which I think is highly likely. When? Who knows. Thank You

Adam,  Thanks for this thread, and for the reminder that you are Chris are cognizant of just how "non-free" these paper metals markets are trading.  I will remind anyone who is interested that there is in fact one market that reflects the true value of paper fiat money and trades free… that is Bitcoin.  When I started talking about it a few months ago… it was at $12 to the Bitcoin.  This morning, it is breaking $29.  I still have no position… lazy me.      
It's possible that a short term turnaround will happen post options expiry this Monday;

http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/2013/02/comex-metals-option-expiration-for.html

For now it is just amazing to see how successful TPTB are in delaying the rush to PM's and miners… and in fact making those of us who promote such ideas look like fools.  We know what the truth is… but it's near impossible to open anyone's eyes to this given the "signals" that the markets are giving.  Long term, the supply will simply dry up.  For now though, I am out of miners and using DUST to hedge the remaining metal I hold via PSLV and PHYS… there is blood in the streets with the miners now, and a buying opportunity coming for those with dry powder. 

For instance, has there ever been a more tasty value stock opportunity than IAG? (ImaGold);

P/E = 7.6,  EPS = $1.02, Div = $0.25 (3.2%!!!).  Go ahead and beat it down more… make my day!    

Because it is appreciating so fast compared to metals like Gold and Silver! 

 

source:  http://silvervigilante.com/bitcoin-runs-laps-around-metals-nearly-40-gains-since-feb-1/#comment-17866

…As the currency wars begin to unfold, tangible assets will be the protector of wealth.
Everyone knows that the suppression of real market value in physical metals cannot
continue, it’s the final date that no one knows. For the extra savoy stacker, bitcoin
is perhaps the darling of the group right now as it the only asset that the wealth
destroyers cannot manipulate.

 

 

Last time I checked, my PM's aren't getting any lighter.  This phase shall pass; its inevitable.
BTW what would you do if Gold were to jump to $6,500 by year's end?  Would you sell it and get back into paper?  Convert it to something you need?

When the price spike does happen (and it will) I fear that the situation will be so unstable that I will be afraid to sell into that environment.

I DO KNOW that if the prices were allowed to clear and PM's went where they are suppossed to go, then I would be DONE accumulating.  I'm OK with the program just like it is.

Rector

[quote=Oliveoilguy][quote=davefairtex]
  Once that open interest is gone (and right now its supposedly at the lowest level since Dec 2008), it will greatly increase their risk to force the market down since they don't have those spec long stops being triggered to help them cover their shorts.  I'd guess that's likely when prices will stabilize.  That's just my opinion though.
 
[/quote]
Your opinion and your analysis are highly valued.  My buy signal is less scientific, it's when I start to become nauseous, and now the moves in Silver getting my attention. 
[/quote]
Exactly this. 
When I see PM's taking a beating, I don't worry about my net worth, I start thinking that it just became less expensive to exchange my paper currency for tangible wealth.
Please! Keep beating Gold and Silver!
They'll be around long after the dollar, and I'm perfectly happy paying a few percent less, even if it means I'm a few percent less wealthy on paper.
Cheers,
Aaron

@OliveOilGuyTrying to pick the bottom in these things is quite difficult.  Traders who are far better than me slap me (metaphorically) in the head every time I try.  They say its better to wait for a reversal pattern and buy once you see that, since it is a much lower risk proposition than simply buying because something seems oversold.  The saying goes, "oversold gets oversolder, then it gets oversoldest.  And then it goes down some more before it reverses."
The internal nausea signal is a pretty good one, I think.  I'm most successful when a bunch of different signals all go off around the same time.  When the reversal pattern appears, bullish sentiment is really low, articles in MSM (and the talking heads on Financial Entertainment TV) hail the end of the gold bull market, articles saying George Soros has sold his gold (3 months ago, mind, but the article is for some reason just now showing up), the speculative longs have been mostly stopped out of the market, AND you have that sense of nausea - it all comes together to form a relatively lower risk entry point.
Are we there yet?  I'm not seeing that reversal pattern just yet.  The rest of it is in place though.  Gold miners can sometimes be a clue too.  If gold gets pounded but the majority of the miners hold ground or show reversals, it means big money is out there buying hand over fist.  That's another clue.  Big money leaves its mark.  Sometimes they'll pound gold in order to get people to sell their miners - they need volume to make the big bucks.  So to create volume, gold has to drop.  But you can see them buying when the volume is big, yet the stock price doesn't move much.
Its all just clues that taken together hopefully improve your odds of being right.  And unless you don't mind holding for a long time, putting a stop underneath your buy point will take you out with only a small loss if you are wrong.  God forbid, but it happens!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-02-20/caterpillar-sales-latest-cratering-confirm-global-growth-slowdown
Remember, all wage earners are out a nice piece of coin since the calender turn, and they're already strapped for cash with lost hours and stagnant wages. We do have our income taxes due to arrive in a couple weeks, and that little wind fall is NOT being spent on Stuff. It will be saved for a rainy day, and what I hope is a falling market.

Will they allow Sequester? So much drama.

I own Gold and Silver folks, and Jim H. hardly looks foolish nor should he feel it. PMs are a bet that should something horribly go wrong you can chop pieces off the PMs to pay for food, water, clothing, and pay your bills. A no brainer to hold, is finite, and you must have as protection. Really very smart too have. 20% is a good thing and more than that creates ticker tape stress. I do not care about the price of Gold,  a loss or gain so what, you have to have it in today's situation.

I have no idea why China hasn't manipulated Oil in the furures market. Their the only ones really buying the stuff. Just a Hmmm moment.  A well placed Iran memo would do the trick too without using the futures market.

BOB