How and Why Oil Could Explode Higher in Price (and Probably Will)

Originally published at: https://peakprosperity.com/how-and-why-oil-could-explode-higher-in-price-and-probably-will/

Many serious oil analysts, myself especially, thought that by now oil would have easily breached $200 a barrel. But it hasn’t, and it’s parked under $100, if you can believe that.

This Bloomberg article, which we’ll tear into together, provides perhaps the clearest explanation for why oil isn’t $200, and why it could easily smash to that level – and higher – given the fragility of the Middle East ‘ceasefire’ and rapidly dwindling oil reserves.

Twice a week, on Monday and Friday, I cover a round-up of all the news that you need to know and put it into a publication for subscribers, I call The Fat Pipe. I spend dozens of hours scanning and then assembling all the news that a well-informed person needs to know in order to remain properly oriented to world events, and to make better decisions about big, important things like protecting one’s wealth and preparing for the future and whatever may come.

This past weekend, June 6th and 7th, more missiles and bombs flew between Iran and Israel. Before they did, Trump told reporters that “he calls the shots” and that Bibi Netanyahu “won’t have any choice” but to keep the peace with Iran.

But Israel then immediately bombed Beirut, prompting Iran to lob ~ 10 missiles at Israel.

In response, Trump demanded that both sides immediately stop shooting and claimed, for what felt like the millionth time, that the peace deal was actually proceeding along well and would soon be completed.

In other words, typical pre-market Monday morning words meant to soothe the markets.

Oil, for its part, nudged up a couple of dollars upon the news of the war resuming, but then mostly gave up those gains again upon hearing the soothing words.

What gives? In times past, events far smaller than those of the past few weeks would have sent oil soaring into the stratosphere.

Things are so weird that, according to a Goldman Sachs survey, oil traders are more bearish on the price of oil than at any time over the past ten years.

And their bullishness is plumbing 10-year lows. How can this be? How can oil traders be more bearish and the most weakly bullish they’ve been despite these clearly alarming charts of lost oil production?

Note that the scales are different on all the left axes. The loss of ~10 Mb/d from OPEC is not even modestly offset by Venezuela’s increase of 0.4 Mb/d.

Returning to the Bloomberg article, beginning with the opening paragraphs:

Oil’s price has been held back by a combination of factors; record US exports and a truly stunning collapse of Chinese imports which are down roughly 4 million barrels per day (Mb/d) in May.

This is per China’s wishes. It is a deliberate decision to sacrifice its own stockpiles vs attempting to import enough oil for its own domestic needs.

So that has cushioned the blow by 4 Mb/d.

Another 2 Mb/d cushion has come from US exports.

As we’ve established previously, many times, the US is a net oil importer, not exporter, to the tune of about 2.3 Mb/d. Which means that for the US to be exporting 2 Mb/d more oil it must be eating into reserves and stockpiles, which, indeed, it is.

With the Iran war having passed the 100-day mark, and without any apparent desire on the part of Israel or the US to bring the war to a negotiated conclusion, we’re left with the idea that the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed indefinitely.

Coupled with the fact that the US and China are busy holding the price of oil down, which leads to far higher demand upon existing but dwindling oil stocks, it means we’re going to just keep on doing this until we smash into true shortages and market chaos.

One last quote set from the Bloomberg article:

If we’re not capable of sustaining exports at these levels, but we’re also not meaningfully progressing towards a durable ceasefire, and at the same time, oil prices cannot rise for some reason, how exactly does US leadership think this will all play out?

I think HFI research put it well this morning.

To which I might add, it didn’t have to be this way.

So we’re (by which I mean everybody in the world) streaming at high speed toward tank bottoms, and there’s nothing currently on the political table that might slow us down. Trump wants low oil prices, and he doesn’t want to concede anything ot Iran. It might not matter anyway because Israel is clearly going to do what it feels is in its best interests and ignore Trump’s pleas for restraint.

Oil demand will remain too high for the circumstances, and all parties involved will draw down their precious reserves until a true panic sets in. How long before that happens? It could be a couple of months, but speaking rationally, countries should already be limiting oil use and hoarding what they can for themselves. But politics and markets are rarely rational, so here we are, and here we go.

18 Likes

My tanks are full,

Just bought a Tesla 3

I have a 4500+ solar array.

Spending “dollars” on seed(and a Tesla)

What more can we do?

5 Likes

We know it is coming - but how long will it last?

My circle of coworkers and acquaintances have no idea, and I cannot even broach the subject without ridiculous zombie and Mad Max cultural references shutting down very real considerations. Considerations like people driving 40 to 70 miles to work, one way, and returning in the evening five days a week. Driving company vehicles all day to get to far flung job sites, and back to HQ, every day, or this power or water grid literally disassembles itself. “It will be fine. We got Venezuela!”

Best I can figure is not try and recreate industrial civilization in my garage, and simply cut, cut, cut everything out of my life and get down to what is needed to feed and sustain the small number of people I live with until … 2028?

We know it is coming - how long will it last?


Post Script: I predict we are trading AI compute tokens at double the dollar denominated prices we are paying now by 2027 using our cell phones.

6 Likes

Berman’s take: "HFI Research argues that U.S. commercial crude inventories are on track to reach operational minimums by late July.

I am not disputing that the disruption HFI describes is real. It is. The disagreement is about the rate at which inventories are being depleted. HFI argues that the available buffers are insufficient to prevent U.S. commercial crude inventories from reaching operational minimums in the near future. My reading of the data is different. Current inventory deficits simply do not suggest depletion is occurring fast enough to reach “tank bottom” levels by late July.

The rest of the world appears to be adjusting through some combination of demand destruction, fuel substitution, logistical adaptation, and other market responses. If so, the case for an imminent global inventory crisis becomes considerably weaker.

I am not trying to minimize the seriousness of the disruption. My point is simply that futures markets are not obviously irrational or disconnected from reality. They are doing what futures markets always do: looking several months ahead

1 Like

Pick something you buy from others and see if you’d be open to prepay - such as your source of clean water.

Also doesn’t hurt to get a bit ahead on your vehicle maintenance supplies, or home consumables such as water filters.

Could also be a good time to do regular maintenance on your equipment that you need to keep working - cars, trucks, generators, mowers.

In short, just take care of your house and don’t let this thing stress you out. Whatever it does, it’ll do it whether you take action or not. Just use the knowledge to squeeze out an edge here/there, but avoid the temptation to try to time the cliffs/tops/bottoms. It’ll keep you on heightened alert all the time.

11 Likes

If a Unit of Oil pops to $200 per barrel, then doesn’t this mean that the value of the Renminbi will then rise given that the trend is to price Oil in Renminbi? Thank you.

How long will it last? If you mean for things to get back to normal or for the oil flow to be restored?

I’ve heard people say minimum five years, but In my opinion, things will never be the same. After the crash and energy shortages the world will be forever changed. Things will break, systems will break, people will break. The government will come in to save those who want to be saved and dependent. With the new surveillance build out, we will all be in the system (we already are). But maybe for some folks who are more resourceful, resilient, prepared, skillful, entrepreneurial, and healthy, maybe some of these folks will come up with solutions and a way of living that doesn’t require complete dependency on the system.

The people who are blind now will see the government’s handouts/help as what government is supposed to do (for the people!), and they will be grateful they vote the way they do. For others, I feel we will have to lean into our communities and seek out like-minded people for guidance, problem solving, and support (given and received). I can see people trading time and skills to support one another, among other things.

And of course if there are cyber attacks, grid down scenarios, and the like, well then things will get spicy.

Fascinating times.

4 Likes

Get right with God? Enjoy your time here and now while preparing. Be grateful, and use gratitude as a tool to stay connected to your higher self and All That Is.

I’m looking into Bitcoin in self-custody, not in a wallet. The rich will always need ways to evade the system. Bitcoin in self custody may be another tool.

4 Likes

Missing is how much of the exports from the gulf can be absorbed simply by increasing the efficacy of use. Personally, I can cut probably 20% of my current consumption of petroleum. I could drive less, eliminate vacations that I can afford. I can put off purchases. I can modify my diet. All of this at really quite little reduction in standard of living. Government can easily cut the same 20% if necessary . However, many modern businesses operate differently in literally all ways and need perpetual feed of petroleum stock. However, the high tech ones just spend like drunken sailors and could easily cut back. They make little difference in pay between those doing the work of development and those who are just overhead. If we go back to WW II, perhaps we can see how much consumption could be cut.

4 Likes

Binkey, this all falls under the general heading of “demand destruction.” Remember in early summer 2008, when the number of cars on the road dropped by 1/3rd when oil prices shot to $140/bbl and gas to $5/gal? In a true market, this would happen gradually and automatically via price signals. The problem this time around is the price signal has been hotwired, and so instead of easing into this, we’re going to slam into a full-on supply shock sometime between late July and this fall. (estimates vary) How this jars around the rest of the economy remains to be seen. I don’t think anyone here in the First World is going to miss any meals, but it could get scary in, say, parts of Africa or in poorer Mideast countries.

Could well be. If the fertilizer and diesel shortages trip off famines, the world’s not coming back to our relatively peaceful January 2026 status anytime soon. If the Strauss-Howe calculations are correct, I don’t see all of these knock-on effects bottoming out until sometime around 2029 to 2032 – and that’s an awfully broad range. And even then, the post-crisis world will be a very different place.

7 Likes

I got triggered by the last few seconds of this scouting report. Chris mentions the PP components and almost forgets the Renaissance Report. Which has been positioned as the series to present the Grand Theory of Everything, yet we have seen two episodes and since then only heard the whooshing sound of end-of month deadlines passing by with no new episode, despite the report “ smolders right at the top” of the pile of projects Chris is working on.

So is the Renaissance Report series going to end up on the pile of oblivion with other abandoned initiatives or is there a chance we will see part 3 and further?

Not asking for those new members who fork out 3.33x my annual fee but just for me who is really looking forward to the big dot connecting series.

Not an excuse, just a guess that it almost needs rewriting daily with new information as we learn it. Dots and goalposts are quite dynamic… and yes I too am hanging on the edge of my seat for it, but don’t want it rushed for the sake of it, would prefer it be more correct than not

1 Like

Wise decision, Tesla backwards is
“Al set.”

1 Like

I look forward to another Renaissance Report as well. Are there any topics you’re interested in Chris covering?

Personally, one of the topics I’d love for Chris to dive into would be a bitcoin and crypto. I think I have a basic understanding of its more obvious drawbacks, but I’m starting to see it could be another useful strategy to implement in these uncertain times. My understanding it needs to be held in self-custody, so others can’t have access to it/confiscate it. Of course, I would not put all my eggs in this basket, not at all, but should I find myself leaving my house in a hurry, and needing to go elsewhere on the fly, having this self custody “asset” that doesn’t weigh anything, travels through borders, and cannot be confiscated, well to me that’s starting to look all right. The key is not to get entangled into a government digital currency. I know the government is trying to control bitcoin, but my understanding is as long as you don’t own ETFs and you have it in self custody you’re good. Anyhow, if Chris shined some light on this topic, I would be grateful and eager to hear what he discovers!

3 Likes

This…because being on “heightened alert” is the stuff that will take us down, perhaps even more so than any actual SHTF type event.

This is the dread that Nate Hagens talks about in this video. I know this was posted elsewhere on PP not too long ago, but it deserves another mention.

My husband and I watched this and it really struck me that this dread is where we’ve found ourselves on occasion. It’s hard not to experience a sense of dread when one is striving to live a conscious life and is awake. What really hit home to me, though, was that there is no place for the dread to go. Unlike the normal “fight or flight” response, the dread is actually doing a number on our ability to respond in a healthy way. This video kind of shifted something for me in a big way.

5 Likes

This! :innocent: :clap:

2 Likes

Let’s see the Reports Chris has in mind get published first before I make additional requests.

As for crypto, in my view that report could be just three words : don’t buy it. Yet to each his own and I know there are many crypto owners here on this site, and I do not want to get into a heated debate about the pros and cons. So I be me, you be you and let’s get the Reports Chris has in mind published first.

I’ve always loved this motto!

If (when) we hit tank bottoms and the price of oil skyrockets, that’ll have a knock-on effect on the economy the likes of which we’ve never seen. In a worst case scenario, that’s food shortages and all the accompanying ills that come with it. Even in a moderately bad scenario, things get ugly. I won’t bother describing that here.

The important point: People will ask, “Who is responsible for this?” Many will blame the Trump admin. Others will blame Israel. Many more will blame both. Because this shitshow of a war never had to happen.

History shows that people do have a breaking point, but that breaking point is often far beyond what one might reasonably guess. A fuel shortage like never before is the fast track to it, however.

I’m praying the administration comes to its senses — but I don’t count on it. The Israeli albatross tied to DC’s neck may end up strangling it.

2 Likes

Agreed. When Chris observed that China had reduced its demand, I realized that had ‘bought’ us a longer runway.

1 Like