It’s been a bit of a break, partly due to the holidays and partly because of another community violation on YouTube. This time, it was about discussing Red Dye number three and its effects on children, which apparently YouTube didn’t like. But I’m here to keep the conversation going, censorship be damned. Today, we’re diving into the California fires, the UK’s moral issues, and more.
California Fires and Mismanagement
The fires in California are a recurring nightmare, now even reaching affluent areas. James Woods shared his experience as the fire approached his home, highlighting the urgency of the situation. The fires are exacerbated by mismanagement, with no water in the Palisades’ fire hydrants due to city negligence. This lack of preparation, despite warnings, mirrors the failures seen in other disasters like Maui. It’s a stark example of how incompetence and misplaced priorities, like focusing on diversity over basic firefighting needs, can lead to disaster.
Key Data
Los Angeles fire hydrants were out of water because the county refused to fill reservoirs.
California’s fire department funding was cut by 17.6 million just months before the wildfires.
Implications
Residents in fire-prone areas may face increased risk due to inadequate fire management and resources.
Insurance companies canceling policies before disasters could leave homeowners vulnerable.
UK’s Moral Abomination
The UK is grappling with a horrific scandal involving grooming gangs and the systemic failure to protect children. This issue, deeply rooted in political and social negligence, is now coming to light, threatening to overwhelm the current government. The revelations are shocking, with political figures allegedly involved in covering up these crimes. It’s a grim reminder of how power can corrupt and how the most vulnerable are often left unprotected.
Implications
The exposure of such scandals could lead to significant political upheaval and demand for accountability.
Public trust in government and law enforcement may be severely damaged.
Recommendations
Stay informed and critically evaluate the information presented by mainstream media.
Engage in community discussions to raise awareness and demand accountability from local and national leaders.
Do you have any comments on Biden giving the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Bobby Kennedy, posthumously? Given RFK Jr’s emerging political role. Any other comments on this ridiculous display of the clownshow?
And there’s the elephant in the room. Pins and needles for the next 2 weeks. And then what? They back down? Doubt it.
How do you balance the investments you make in long term resiliance on your property with the propensity of the govt. to set sights on small land owners?
I’m thinking of Rome, the communist revoltion, the holmodor, kulacks and our current leaders taxing landowners into obliviion. Seems investing in resiliance makes you a primary target.
My best guess is that he bought into the false guilt-shame the authoritarians like to pile at the feet of others to get compliance, but he’s not used to saying he’s sorry, so he doesn’t.
I’m having a similar thought- finalizing new construction plans on my farm build. What type of energy will the govt be least likely to prohibit/tax the shit out of in the future??
I would say that solar thermal design has the best chance of avoiding direct taxation.
Use passive solar with night time insulation as a primary design tool for your structures and active solar as a secondary space and domestic water heating source.
Stored solar energy in the form of wood is a good backup for space and water heating. Redundancy in systems is important.
Of note: firewood could be (is) taxed unless you own the woodlot.
Around here the US Forest Service charges you to cut wood in the forest even though they use taxpayer dollars (deficit spending) to support fuel reduction programs to ‘prevent forest fires’ to protect ‘your’ forest. And yes, it requires a LOT of fossil fuels to accomplish. Goobermint wouldn’t want to incentivize the little people to help harvest the ‘hazardous fuels’!
Could the “Great Taking” be an opportunity event for the nationalization of pension assets including IRAs and 401Ks? History has many examples of governments nationalizing pensions in times of crisis.
Given that the government can print money at will and give it to anyone without records of the recipient, I would think another financial crisis were huge stock market crash will never happen. Your thoughts?
What actual evidence do we see that Meta is serious about this? I work in leadership in Tech / Data Science / AI & have always thought Meta would be an interesting company to work for, but I’ve steered clear when receiving HR & recruiter inquiries from even considering them due to the obviously woke, leftist culture getting shoved down my throat.
I’m pro Merit based true diversity & didn’t think I could handle the DEI BS & unproductive corporate culture that comes with it. I welcome diversity of opinion & really could give 2-shits about what someone does in their personal life as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else. Things like promoting pedophilia, terrorism, human trafficking, & clear (obvious) racism (not made up micro-aggression BS) are red lines for me. In that way, I’m quite the free speech purist.
I noticed that they hired a conservative board member lately & with Zuck getting more serious about MMA & having his own kid, do we really think it’s possible that the company may be shifting to a more reasonable free speech culture - OR - is it just window dressing & blowing with the $$ political populist winds?
Has Zuck come out publicly to denounce the clot shot OR had his eyes opened personally to RFK’s work?
The only way for a company like Meta to change is to hire more people like me to start to balance out the ranks. I just don’t know if it’s worth taking the chance or if the rot in that company runs too deep.
I don’t pretend that Trump / MAGA / the Right is/ will always be on the better side of humanity, but at this moment in history, a swing of the societal pendulum in that direction is necessary.
In any case, I’d like the PP tribe’s opinion on the level of sincerity we think Meta has in trying to right the ship.
OR, is Meta just as beholden to TOGA ( That other government agency / CIA contracts & Fed pumping as the rest of Big Tech?)
My assumption is that it will be nearly impossible for Meta to remove the leash / noose.
I am looking into Allodial titles, fee simple titles, whatever the correct term would be.
I hope to exit my crypto holdings the next couple of months and once that’s done, it will go into Silver/Gold, Cash briefly (for land search) while leaving some in the Crypto market in case they can take it higher.
I’m working on transitioning my crypto holdings into my private trust and plan to buy the property with Gold (if seller wants) with a fee simple title under that trust with no contract with the State that allows them to tax.
I’m still learning, but this is my contribution to freeing myself from their system while not letting them try to force me into a contract without proper consideration.
Last time I checked, indentured servitude was illegal.
A Democrat wrecked a beautiful non-profit that I worked for. Previous guy was very conservative. Broke my heart to leave the place, but I saw what was coming.
So the project formerly known as DARPA’s LifeLog which is wired into “the machine” for predictive behavioral analysis thanks to Palintir , Augury AI, Clearforce, etc. - now invites “free speech” on the platform.
There are a number of things regarding the behavior of the ruling elite which may perplex the common man.
Firstly, the “encrappification” of things. I don’t believe that the current manifestation of this has anything to do with the shortage of energy. We are after all talking about Malibu, California - among the richest areas of the US. They can more than afford to have a functioning fire-suppressing infrastructure.
No, the encrappification is intentional. The idea is to degrade everything - people, institutions, infrastructure, ideals, morals, values, thoughts, feelings, habits. Why, you might ask? The answer can be found in a book by Fyodor Dostoevsky called “Demons,” a novel about what happens when people abandon God and religious faith and nihilism sweeps across society. If there are no absolute morals and values in this world (handed down by God, as for example, in the Ten Commandments), then some people reason that they can create their own. They further reason that they can fashion their own utopia, grooming the people to serve them and their values instead of serving God. In the book, a nihilistic revolutionary called Verhovensky is seeking to destroy the existing culture before ushering in his vision of utopia. In a moment of candor he reveals that his strategy is to promote vice, moral relativism, permissiveness and lawlessness. He also reveals his true nature:
“Listen. First of all we’ll make an upheaval,” Verhovensky went on in desperate haste, continually clutching at Stavrogin’s left sleeve. “I’ve already told you. We shall penetrate to the peasantry. Do you know that we are tremendously powerful already? Our party does not consist only of those who commit murder and arson, fire off pistols in the traditional fashion, or bite colonels. They are only a hindrance. I don’t accept anything without discipline. I am a scoundrel, of course, and not a socialist. Ha ha! Listen. I’ve reckoned them all up: a teacher who laughs with children at their God and at their cradle; is on our side. The lawyer who defends an educated murderer because he is more cultured than his victims and could not help murdering them to get money is one of us. The schoolboys who murder a peasant for the sake of sensation are ours. The juries who acquit every criminal are ours. The prosecutor who trembles at a trial for fear he should not seem advanced enough is ours, ours. Among officials and literary men we have lots, lots, and they don’t know it themselves. On the other hand, the docility of schoolboys and fools has reached an extreme pitch; the schoolmasters are bitter and bilious. On all sides we see vanity puffed up out of all proportion; brutal, monstrous appetites. . . . Do you know how many we shall catch by little, ready-made ideas? When I left Russia, Littre’s dictum that crime is insanity was all the rage; I come back and I find that crime is no longer insanity, but simply common sense, almost a duty; anyway, a gallant protest. ‘How can we expect a cultured man not to commit a murder, if he is in need of money.’ But these are only the first fruits. The Russian God has already been vanquished by cheap vodka. The peasants are drunk, the mothers are drunk, the children are drunk, the churches are empty, and in the peasant courts one hears, ‘Two hundred lashes or stand us a bucket of vodka.’ Oh, this generation has only to grow up. It’s only a pity we can’t afford to wait, or we might have let them get a .bit more tipsy! Ah, what a pity there’s no proletariat! But there will be, there will be; we are going that way. . . .”
“Listen. I’ve seen a child of six years old leading home his drunken mother, whilst she swore at him with foul words. Do you suppose I am glad of that? When it’s in our hands, maybe we’ll mend things … if need be, we’ll drive them for forty years into the wilderness. . . . But one or two generations of vice are essential now; monstrous, abject vice by which a man is transformed into a loathsome, cruel, egoistic reptile. That’s what we need! And what’s more, a little ‘fresh blood’ that we may get accustomed to it. Why are you laughing? I am not contradicting myself. I am only contradicting the philanthropists and Shigalovism, not myself! I am a scoundrel, not a socialist. Ha ha ha! I’m only sorry there’s no time. I promised Karmazinov to begin in May, and to make an end by October. Is that too soon? Ha ha! Do you know what, Stavrogin? Though the Russian people use foul language, there’s nothing cynical about them so far. Do you know the serfs had more self-respect than Karmazinov? Though they were beaten they always preserved their gods, which is more than Karmazinov’s done.”
“Well, Verhovensky, this is the first time I’ve heard you talk, and I listen with amazement,” observed Stavrogin. “So you are really not a socialist, then, but some sort of … ambitious politician?”
“A scoundrel, a scoundrel! You are wondering what I am. I’ll tell you what I am directly, that’s what I am leading up to. It was not for nothing that I kissed your hand. But the people-must believe that we know what we are after, while the other side do nothing but ‘brandish their cudgels and beat their own followers.’ Ah, if we only had more time! That’s the only trouble, we have no time. We will proclaim destruction. . . … Why is it, why is it that idea has such a fascination. But we must have a little exercise; we must. We’ll set fires going. . . . We’ll set legends going. Every scurvy ‘group’ will be of use. Out of those very groups I’ll pick you out fellows so keen they’ll not shrink from shooting, and be grateful for the honour of a job, too. Well, and there will be an upheaval! There’s going to be such an upset as the world has never seen before. . . . Russia will be overwhelmed with darkness, the earth will weep for its old gods…”
Secondly, why would the elite turn a blind eye - nay, even promote - the trafficking and sexual abuse of children? It’s because this is what they do in private. They really ARE pedophiles who are heavily into human- and child-trafficking and ritual abuse. Wilfred Wong - a UK barrister who had been investigation satanic ritual abuse of children before he was wrongfully imprisoned after a trial which was conducted in bad faith - stated in a 2019 interview with ex-policeman Jon Wedger that the ruling elite (who are really Satanists) seek to radically transform society by forcibly imposing their values, beliefs and practices upon society from behind the scenes. It is a ritualistic defilement of all of society. (Think of it this way: Where before Man was created in the image of god, the ruling elite now want to defile and degrade Man, thereafter re-creating him in the image of the devil.) The relevant bit is about 1h 2min 30s in the video, though it’s worth watching the full interview:
How does one tune in on SIGNAL? Mention was made by @cmartenson in the first minute or two of this video. He was naming ways to watch. Did he mean THE SIGNAL APP? Or was he speaking to the title of this segment on the PP site, THE SIGNAL HOUR?
