Shocking NIH Cover-Up!

The insurance companies and the funeral homes statistics are the nails in the coffin of the vax mandates/narrative. And we still don’t know the long term effects of vaccines, so the death claims could continue to accelerate for years to come. Pretty sure the insurance companies won’t settle for paying for Maderna, Pfizer, NIH, CDC, FDA and many others fraud.

Think the All Cause Mortality, insurance and funeral home statistics are the final nails in the coffin of the vaccine mandates narrative. Don’t think the insurance companies will be willing to pay for the fraud of Maderna, Pfizer, NIH, CDC, FDA and many others. Lawsuits will be forthcoming and with stocks plummeting by 70%, it is the foreshadowing of Dr. Frankenstein’s monster returning home to destroy him.

3 Likes

Chris, in regards to your super creepy creepy video at approximately 39 minutes, you are correct we will never know the intricacies of how our human body works, because we were made by God. And God is smarter than us no matter how much computer power we amass or how many experiments we run. The more we search the more questions we will have. Those folks at the WEF, will never figure it out.
So, in the meantime what do we do to thwart these enemies.
In addition to being resilient, which me and my tribe are doing, we as an awake tribe (for those who pray) need to be in prayer that the powers of darkness will be overcome. This is a spiritual battle. Peace, Frank
He saved them from the power of the adversary; he redeemed them from the power of the enemy.
‭‭Psalms‬ ‭106:10‬ ‭CSB‬‬

3 Likes

I agree with the following comment posted by notanumber6 on YouTube:
The reason Chris didn’t find any references to NIH project R01AI110964 using Google is because he mistyped the project ID. Google finds references to the project just fine when the ID is typed correctly. Chris should edit this video to remove the parts about searching for the project in Google (which we all know he shouldn’t be using in the first place), because not only is he wrong, his mistake detracts from his otherwise excellent presentation of new “smoking gun” evidence that the virus was created in the lab. Also, he should edit this video to show the link to the project document that he found “right away” in DDG. It does not seem to be listed in the DDG search results (at least not on the first page), and I think some of us would like to access it.

1 Like

Chris, You probably meant Koch Institute… Perhaps it was a freudian slip…
Perhaps you meant to say Kock-Up Institute… : )

cock-up
[ˈkäkˌəp]
NOUN
BRITISH
informal
  1. something done badly or inefficiently.
    "we've made a total cock-up of it"
    synonyms:
3 Likes

I had something more Robust in mind.

Help, can anyone direct me how to find this US patent separately. One of my lawyer contacts is on the hook for starting to doubt things, and she wanted to call bullshit on that there was this patent that was also in the virus. We made a bet, help me win it where do I find this patent proof independent of what you address?? I tried it every way. Without the numbers on the end within without the space within without the dash, and this was my result I’m going to attach a picture

Dan
That is a Japanese unexamined patent application, which can be found by searching at the Japanese Patent Office.

Someone on Twitter is showing that there are close matches to the SARS-CoV-2 furin cleavage site in nature. He quickly found two host and two viral sequences that are close matches.
I don’t think this invalidates the claim that Moderna’s patented sequence likely ended up in SARS-CoV-2 by artificial means, but it’s one detail of the story that seems incorrect.

Here's something I just observed, I did the same search you did on Google and came up empty. I did several several ways, the first with two with the typos you had and got results, not what you mentioned but other things. The third search was on DuckDuckGo and was able to find the information. Here's the main question, once you showed the typo, I did the search again on Google and came across a number of links that would have allowed me to get there. Question - did you do the search I did without the typo? I ask because if you did, this isn't just an algorithm we're dealing with, it's probably an active effort of monitoring and responding.
Several things to note. First, I am clearly under some sort of YouTube, Google and Twitter suppression system. I have lots of data and anecdotes to support that. One of my 'features' is my brain will store data and prior searches with astonishing precision. I wish it would do the same for people's names. It refuses. So I recalled my experience searching for this Daszak patent two years ago, and it was easy as pie. It's true I had a typo back then and I simply pulled my 2-year-old PowerPoint deck up and grabbed the old search, typo and all. And I got a very different experience this time. Again, here it is: So, the options are (1) Google has simply changed its search algo and it is now less forgiving and therefore less useful than it was two years ago, or (2) they've purposely detuned it around some subjects to make them less easy to find. I run into option #2 all the time, and that's why I default to DuckDuckGo for anything sensitive, embarrassing to corporations or powerful people, or political in nature. Second, here's a direct communication I received two days ago: "Chris your last video was very tight! Well done. I wanted to let you all know there seems to be a new sort of throttling happening on Youtube. I have heard it a few times and now experience it. They can drop you into a commercial and then NOT return you to the video you were watching. It happened today twice during your video right when you started the MSH3 bit at the end." I also heard from a gentleman who reported that not only was he dropped, but that he was unsubscribed from my channel during that drop. It happens all the time... As I track it, I often notice that during the first hours of one of my videos running I will experience exceptionally low and even negative subscriptions... ... and this is despite my videos having lots of comment engagement (green) and a very high like to dislike ratio (averaged 98.9% before the dislikes were disabled from public viewing...still seeing the same ratio behind the scenes). Does it make sense to you that such positive and high-engagement material would tend to lead to a net loss of subscribers in the first hours of every show? Yeah, me neither. What I can't figure out is how personally I should take any of this. Is this an algo doing its thing, or am I the special project of a 27-year-old in a cubicle in San Diego whose tendencies lean towards man-buns and SJW causes? I have no idea, but I do know that most other channels don't put up with any of this crap because I've asked. At any rate, if I seem a bit sensitive about Big Tech censoring behaviors, I come by it honestly.
10 Likes

Dan: there is much evidence of the patents and their numbers in this video of Dr. David Martin with the Corona Investigative Committee.
https://odysee.com/@thisweekinfascism:3/A-manufactured-illusion.-Dr-David-Martin-with-Reiner-Fuellmich.mp4:8
I highly recommend sharing this, as well as the following link to any of the skeptics in your circle.
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5
 

2 Likes

Something else I’ve noticed about your most recent video, Chris. Here are stats on your 3 most recent videos:
Shocking! mRNA and Spike protein found 8 weeks after vaccination in some people:

  • Title grab/shock factor by my biased personal assessment (should influence number of views): High
  • Number of views 316K
  • Released: 9.5 days ago
  • Comments per 100 views: about 1
JAMA: mRNA vaccines elevate myocarditis risk by 133x
  • Title grab/shock factor by my biased personal assessment (should influence number of views): Medium
  • Number of views 151K
  • Released: 5.5 days ago
  • Comments per 100 views: about 1
NIH Cover-up. It Didn't Have To Be This Way
  • Title grab/shock factor by my biased personal assessment (should influence number of views): High
  • Number of views 64K
  • Released: 1.5 days ago
  • Comments per 100 views: about 2
Engagement seems relatively high on this one measured by comments per view. Views are low Is that only because it hasn't been out long or are they monkeying with the number of views, either reporting a number lower than actual, or somehow preventing people from watching enough of the video to count.
1 Like

An important bill in Florida that will protect doctors who speak the truth needs your help.

If you live in Florida, we need as many people as possible to email the House Speaker and the House Health and human services committee.

this link emails them all: https://p2a.co/2cOFOX5

Please do it now! It has to be done today to be effective. Be sure to include your address or they won’t count it. Florida residents only.

3 Likes

If google censors or messes with the number of views and they are in a contract to pay you for ad revenue for the views, doesn’t that count as financial fraud that would be actionable?

6 Likes

Follow link below. There are a large number of patent family/related publications - including 8 US patents
https://worldwide.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/biblio?DB=EPODOC&II=0&ND=3&adjacent=true&locale=en_EP&FT=D&date=20150706&CC=JP&NR=2015518816A&KC=A#

Dan,
For some reason, Chris is showing what I assume is the Japanese patent equivalent of US patent 9,587,003 referenced on page 2 of the Frontiers in Virology paper. Both patents are listed in supplementary Table 1 of that paper. Here’s a link to the US patent:
https://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=09587003&IDKey=109E6A2D1D9B &HomeUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fpatft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO1%2526Sect2%3DHITOFF%2526d%3DPALL%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252FPTO%25252Fsrchnum.htm%2526r%3D1%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526s1%3D9587003.PN.%2526OS%3DPN%2F9587003%2526RS%3DPN%2F9587003
Unfortunately, after downloading this image PDF and creating a searchable PDF from it, I found no reference in this patent to SEQ ID11652 as stated or implied on page 2 or to either the 12-nucleotide sequence or the 19-nucleotide sequence identified in the paper, so I don’t know if you’ll win your bet. Maybe we need one of the paper’s authors or some other expert to tell us what to look for.

You can also find the patent here: https://www.freepatentsonline.com/9587003.pdf

Probably just a bad case of institutional embarrassment, but still, a hide.
If you've read the RFK Jr book about Fauci you can't really believe that they're just trying to cover up an embarrassing fact. The odds are very high it's covering up something grossly illegal.
8 Likes

You are so kind! Thank you and yeah, I’m trying to make it to tight. Several suggestions came thru after my query. I’m looking them up right now

1 Like

Thanks for all that you do, Chris! I started following your work probably around the the 08 crash, your Crash Course was a huge eye - opener that has stuck with me to this day. Your COVID coverage has been among the best out there. Anyway, I am a health care provider about to make my stand. I was coerced into taking the J&J in July (thankfully without complication - yet) but I have drawn a line in the sand. I am currently in the DC area and the “Queen” of DC is still forcing the booster mandate and I am NOT doing it. I submitted my religious exemption (and hired an attorney). My family and I are in the process of moving to Florida and I am hoping to buy another month or so but if not, I am fully prepared to walk away.
Anyway, keep it up! Your work is beyond vital in this day and age!
Peace,
J

8 Likes