If we get a good estimate of the diameter of those buttons (I think they are control buttons) we can see what the diameter of the hole is.
I think it’s impressive the bullet went clean through that line, considering how thick it was, and that it was steel. You wouldn’t make a like like that out of aluminum.
@daniel59 Thank you for providing this video, which allows us to determine Corey Comperatore’s exact position.
By comparing it with the manufacturing drawing, we can see that he was standing on the 5th row.
Therefore, he was precisely in the line of fire of shot 3 coming from vent 1.
It is therefore possible that Corey Comperatore was shot by the person firing from vent 1.
Based on this analysis, I have outlined the following three shots:
Next, we will analyze James Copenhaver.
I find it extremely unlikely that some of the first 3 shots were fired from different weapons at different locations.
Why would the conspirators have opted for such a complex scenario?
The raw file of the bullet photo has not yet been published. According to Michael Yon, who is a professional photographer, a forgery could be recognized from the raw file. I have created a video for this purpose.
Incidentally, Doug Mills received the Pullitzer Prize for this.
Absolutely ridiculous.
This is not an assumption. Together with everyone here, I have gathered all the data and information and incorporated it into a 3D CAD model. I am simply presenting what the math shows us.
Having video proof that at least one shot came from Vent 1 fundamentally changes the entire scenario. This is not an assumption but evidence: at least one shot did come from Vent 1 of AGR Building 6.
Why do I say that shots 1 and 2 did not come from there?
One possible reflection worth mentioning is that the shooters may have been using bolt-action sniper rifles to increase their chances of hitting the target. This could explain why they were firing from different vents. However, this is only a hypothesis.
I have often been on the wrong track myself. For example, I used to strongly believe that the shots came from the windows. However, I have always updated my 3D CAD model whenever new information became available, and what I am sharing now reflects the most current data.
Can this change in the future? Yes, absolutely. But at this point, I don’t see any arguments that contradict my latest update. As I have always said, if anyone presents me with compelling information, I am always willing to update my data — provided I am personally convinced by the evidence.
I am not a professional photographer, and in fact, this photo does not provide us with much information — other than indicating that the bullet came from the AGR building.
The simple point I wanted to make is that it was shot 2, not shot 1, as many people seem to claim.
Daniel, I have always been completely transparent about my data, and I welcome you to challenge any of my points. I will be happy to update them accordingly if you provide convincing evidence.
Not quite ‘standing’.
Copenhaver just didn’t drop down.
Copenhaver was in shock after being shot in the abdomen.
NBC’s Tom Llamas said, “The bullet that hit Dutch split his liver.”
If 2 bullets had hit Dutch, Dutch would have objected to the use of the singular, ‘the bullet’.
The New York Post was wrong.
WARNING: this video shows graphic content of Copenhaver being shot with the bullet that was inches east of Trump’s head:
Watch Copenhaver’s EYE at the 5 second mark:
was the West edge of Copenhaver’s upper left arm.
I started with Copenhaver.
I estimated the point where he was standing and connected it to Trump to see where the trajectory line would lead. As you can see in the background, I have already added the hydraulic piston into the 2D base drawing.
At first glance, it might appear that the shot came from the two-story building. So, @daniel59, I am now forced to include the two-story house in the analysis. 
One interesting observation at first glance: Crooks’s trajectory seems to collide with the bleachers. It looks like Crooks is in trouble here, and the shot actually passes completely past Trump’s head. This shot from Crooks doesn’t make any sense.
This raises the question — who actually shot Copenhaver? Thanks to daniels video referencing the court case stating that shot 9 did not hit Crooks, perhaps this could in fact be shot 9 comming from the 2 story building?
However, it is still far too early to draw any definitive conclusions. I just wanted to share the latest update with you.
Don’t overlook the fact that we don’t know if Crooks was still lying on shots 4 through 8. Maybe he had straightened up. Then the bleacher might not have been in the way.
One more thing: Please check if Crooks had a line of sight to Donald Trump lying on the ground.
The balding man on AGR4 fired the 1st 3 shots.
If you could point out to me where you think the balding man is located, I can integrate him into the simulation.
However, I believe your sequence of shots is a bit mixed up — but that doesn’t matter. I would be happy to help you evaluate this situation for you.
Very, very close — but no collision. However, if the people in the lower left corner of the bleachers weren’t ducking, they would have been hit.
Thanks for your help.
edit: a folder containing
45 consecutive frames, from the 60 frame/second “driscoll” video:
The balding man, I think, is under the smoke cloud, which may be almost completely factory smoke, on the roof of the ‘central’ building which, I think, is numbered AGR4:
And I think the Driscoll and/or McCullough videos caught him, just after the “3rd shot” which, I think, was inches east of Trump’s neck or head, as Trump was starting to drop:
On another social media platform, for weeks, people have been complaining sending tweets to people in position of power, and this is the best they can do???
The FBI have never ever provided any evidence Crooks flew a drone at the Butler fairgrounds.
Putting a barn right where the stage was (of all the possible spots) precludes recreating the scene.
I’d consider this continuing proof of a coverup.
He made at least one fake promise to get himself elected. Reports are coming in that he is ill and has some medical issues. He is always hiding his hands. Is Trump a fake, he could be an Alien shape shifter, does that count?
Alien reptile shape shifters are being reported from different sources all around the world.
The FBI/CIA have released video/images of Epstein prison cell. On Alex Jones/Info wars they have now been proved to be faked. Also, i studied the images myself and they have been Ai manipulated as well.
Last year, i studied @realDJStew729 video and the window in question. It went on for weeks debating if there was a shooter at the window. I managed to zoom right into the window and can confirm the window was opened, a shooter fired a quick supressed shot then closed the window again which explains the window alterations. I even managed to identify the shooter. At the time, no one took me seriously.
During the last 12 months. on different platforms, this window image appears, and they have tried to cover it up. Taking another picture of the window, zoom in, and you will see a person, this time, a painting of an unknown man. These cover ups have always been going on.
I disagree. It looks like the guy in the white hat/shorts, red cap reacts about 10 frames after we see the puff of “smoke” off the railing - or about 1/3 of a second assuming 30 frames per second. That’s about average reaction time - average for nonelderly people that haven’t had the clot shot, anyway. He’s got a skinny build, and I’d dare say he might very well have been an athlete in his younger days, so his muscles can move fast as well. I’d say the person who is seen waving something was startled as well - he or she jerked a sign right about at the same frame.
At any rate, there’s no way the bleachers were so rickety that a guy dropping to the ground rapidly would cause all the people in the back row to react - and only in the back row.
PS
I put out a substack post and a post somewhere here about how absolutely crappy the reaction times were of SO many people (including the Secret Service protective detail). The video that was taken from ground level behind the stage is one good example. Apart from a Trump campaign staffer who has a good reaction time, just about everyone else in the frame takes at least a couple of seconds to realize anything is going on - and they are VERY close to the stage.
What was the timing of the shot?
(e.g., Trump’s speech word(s) when you heard or saw the shot)
