RedWhiteBeigeshorts starts to drop ~9 frames after the rail top has been hit, about the same delay as Copenhaver’s arm flip.
Rail impact is on frame 79 here.
Count frames till you see RedWhiteBeige drop.
1 Like
OK, I counted the frames, and you’re right — the guy had a really good reaction time of about 0.33 seconds.
Just before the shots, he is looking down toward the barns, and maybe he saw some police activity. As we know from other videos (for example, BWC2-122104), the police were already running around at that time. So he may have already been on alert and ready to react. I can agree with that.
Looking at the TMZ video, this footage is the closest to the bleacher corner, so the sound delay is the shortest. The shot impacts exactly when Trump is saying: “Take a look what happened.” More precisely, it is on the “n” of “happened.”
“happened”
Now, if you look at any video of Trump being hit in the ear, it also happens exactly on the same “n” in “happened.”
So, I think we can agree that the first shot hit Trump’s ear and then the bleacher corner?
and then the first shot hit Copenhaver’s arm.
Look back at frames 79 to 89 above, that’s 11 consecutive frames at 30f/s.
The rail was hit at 79, RedWhiteBeige began his drop, and Copenhaver’s arm began its flip, both on frame 89.
The gap was 10 frames for BeigeShorts, and Copenhaver’s arm.
Yes, RedWhiteBeige is looking down, to the ground.
There were at least 5 suppressed shots after Trump said the words, “a bit old that chart.”
I think RedWhiteBeige was already edgy, suspicious of those 5(or more) suppressed shots that he heard.
See what happens when you ‘trust’/‘believe’ the ZMT audio?
I back-traced the line between Trump and Copenhaver. Looking at the following screenshots, the potential positions of the “balding man” could be either AGR 4 or AGR 2 (the two-story building), specifically from the right-side window.
AGR 6 is too high up. More detailed analysis is still necessary to confirm this precisely.
If I had to choose between this line (orange) and Crooks’s line (blue), I would assign a 99% probability to the “balding man” and only 1% to Crooks.
Crooks does not even have a clear line of sight and is not aiming at Trump at all — his line actually collides with the upper left corner of the bleachers.
I am now more convinced than ever that there was more than one shooter involved!
When the same shot hit Coppenhaver’s arm and the railing corner:
We need pictures from other directions to triangle Coppenhaver’s position.
Assumimg there were seats, he was 3 seats left and 1 row below from the corner.
So if TOB is A1 at chessboard, James was C2 - I guess.
The rail already had been hit 10 frames before the bullet that hit Trump and Copenhaver, as SonjaX6 counted.
I’d thought the gap was only 7 or 8 frames, but it looks like 10 frames(1/3 of a second).
1 Like
Is Butler, PA the answer to everything we are seeing?
Total speculation:
What if the conversation after Butler was, “You think we missed? — Run whatever campaign you like but we are in charge after you win else your loved ones — won’t be missed!”
1 Like
The Driscoll camera shows 2 people on the AGR2 roof…not sure about the window, but Driscoll’s 60 f/s video shows the balding man on AGR4 for 16 frames(0.267 second).
Dayve Stewart’s video caught him for 10 frames, from an eastern perspective.
Here’s the 10 frames made into a movie:
Does the first frames show a building, with a smokestack on its roof, west of bald man?
possible
That’s exactly what I think.
2 Likes
In his first extensive media interview since the assassination attempt, Aaron Zaliponi, a 46-year-old Army combat veteran, recounted firing the “ninth shot.”
1 Like
x-22Report pointed out that you won’t have fair trials until you clean up the judicial system. That begins at midterms…patriots get control of congress.
I thought that during Biden Admin.
1 Like
I think they have the evidence (know the truth) but aren’t ready to release it or prosecute.
Until (we) the Patriots get control of congress and judicial branches (constitutionalist) no fair trials; aka: Diddy, Epstein trials.
1 Like
Next, we will analyze Shot 3, including its interaction with the hydraulic cylinder.
After obtaining the technical drawing of the JCB 510-56 Telehandler, I scaled it using the G length measurement of 21 feet 7 inches (21.58 ft).
By rotating the boom to a 60° angle, I was able to replicate its position during the Trump rally. Based on this configuration, I measured a height of 9.65 feet.
According to RandyMajors, the sea level elevation of the Telehandler is 1,333.945 ft. Taking into account the difference from AGR 6 of -1.325 ft, we arrive at a total effective height for the hydraulic cylinder of 8.325 ft.
I have integrated this adjusted cylinder height into the 3D model.
When we draw the trajectory line for Shot 3 — originating from Vent 1 (as captured on official body cam footage from the Butler Police) — the line potentially first strikes Corey Comparatore, not hitting Trump, then injures David Dutch for a second time, before finally penetrating the hydraulic cylinder.
As Chris mentioned in his video, this suggests the use of a very high-caliber weapon, most likely a bolt-action sniper rifle, capable of causing such extensive damage in a single shot.
3 Likes
Outstanding info. (good work)
But ANY simulation has unknown vectors.**
i.e.: a quantity having direction as well as magnitude, especially as determining the position of one point in space relative to another.
You can only get approximates without FBI (?) data scientific measurements. (which they may not have taken)
**wind (you cannot know when a gust occurs , you only have averages.
** tire inflation, affects high of Boom
** imperfections in ground (any object touching ground)
** type of round (grains) jacketed, point. (larger-better trajectory)
Simulations can only get you close. our environmental conditions are not effectively reflective in software. (not the best software)
I know this because the end result never matches the simulation.
(its close- close enough for the finished product)
Your methodology* is very good, if you had the true datums, you would have the actual origination points. (close-inches)
*{system of methods used in a particular area of study or activity:
“a methodology for investigating the concept of focal points” · “courses in research methodology and practice”}
[opinion]
We have taken factors such as wind and gravity into consideration:
As you can see, these factors do not significantly influence the trajectories. Of course, a 100% perfectly accurate simulation is not possible.
However, let me illustrate the power of this back-tracing bullet project. When we first started, people believed the shots were coming from everywhere — the water tower, the trees, and the two-story AGR 4 building.
After our initial simulations, we were able to narrow the possible origins down to Building 6. This was a huge help for the investigation. Thanks to this knowledge, we made a major breakthrough and discovered that one of the shots originated from Vent 1. Without the simulation, we would not have stood a chance of identifying this.
Now that we have proven a shot came from Vent 1, the analysis becomes much easier. We can start front-tracing the bullets, check for potential collisions, and confirm whether the lines of fire are clear. While we are not achieving inch-level accuracy, the general trajectories are very clear and self-explanatory.
2 Likes