It could have been from either, but it was only because his stomach had been shot, with the bullet against his spine.
Two frames, 256 and 284, so just less than 1 second of time between them.
Make them into a ‘slideshow’ and Copenhaver takes a bow.
But his mouth is open, and fluid from his abdomen shot is spraying north, underneath shirt fabric.
As you asked 2 weeks ago, “Can we get this over with?”
Apparently, audio is delayed more than video.
Also, audio timing is easier to fake.
It’s ridiculous and time wasting to say “Comperetore” and “Shot 3” in the same sentence, unless I’m saying he saw it, and heard it, and recorded it.
He was alive for ‘seconds’, and that could be proven in a courtroom.
Too many witnesses saw him alive after “Shot 3”.
Sorry for the delay replying back to you. In the UK, it is called the Online safety bill, in other countries, such as USA, Australia, it goes under different names. Many countries are bringing in this law for one purpose. To censor free speech. In the UK, there is talk of banning VPNs. I am still able to access this forum for the time being but finding it difficult to access other sites especially in the US.
Sorry, for going of topic.
1 Like
We have only got Dr Sweetland word fir it that Comperatore was shot in the head. He made a number of videos, and could not make his mind up which side of the head he was shot. There is more to this story, which is all i can say for now.
He looks a lot different to the other image of Baldy man, i have with a hat, and glasses.
I can do some good tricks with photoshop 7. I would not say it is beyond my capabilities, instead, beyond my knowledge of how to do it.
Due to censorship laws in the Uk, if i am thrown of this forum, i will contact you on another platform. 
Now that we have established that Shot 3 originated from Vent 1, and assuming a professional sniper was positioned there with the intent to assassinate Trump, the next logical step is to determine the trajectory by drawing a direct line from Vent 1 to Trump’s position.
Vent 1 is located 30 feet from the wall, calculated from 15 roof panels, each measuring 2 feet. The vent sits at an elevation of 8.5 feet.
When we trace a line from Vent 1 to Trump’s position, it passes directly through the spot where Corey was standing. According to the manufacturing drawing and the known setup, Corey was positioned on the lower half of the bleachers—specifically around the 5th or 6th row from the bottom—which places him squarely in the line of fire.
Given this alignment, it is evident that Corey was directly along the bullet’s trajectory from Vent 1 to Trump.
I will take a short break here in case anyone has questions or would like to review the evidence further before we proceed.
Can you(plural) remember to answer yesterday’s question?
I’ll remind The Court that I asked:
“If Corey Comperatore was hit by Shot 3, how was he able to continue recording for at least 3 more seconds?”
You’re absolutely right to find that surprising — many people did survive serious head wounds during World War I, and it’s a fascinating and tragic part of medical and military history.
Why did people survive head wounds?
- Improved battlefield medicine
- Casualty clearing stations and field hospitals were more organized than in previous wars.
- Wounded soldiers could be treated within hours rather than days.
- Advances in neurosurgery
- Surgeons like Harvey Cushing pioneered techniques for operating on the brain.
- Metal fragments were removed, infections managed, and bleeding controlled with new methods.
- Helmets
- Early in the war, soldiers didn’t have helmets. Once introduced (e.g., the British Brodie helmet), they helped reduce fatal head injuries — though they couldn’t stop all damage.
- Resilience of the human brain
- Incredibly, the brain can sometimes adapt to damage, especially if one hemisphere is hit and the other is intact.
- Some people survived with severe disfigurements but retained basic cognitive functions.
Before continuing our step-by-step investigation into Corey Comparatore, it is essential to remain focused on the AGR building. Evidence confirms that a shot was fired from vent 1, which strongly suggests the involvement of two shooters—as Crooks is clearly visible on the roof at that moment. In fact, his head is slightly visible in the frame during the exact moment a muzzle flash is observed from vent 1.
If two shooters were active, it follows logically that two separate weapons were also in use.
According to the Grassley Report, Sgt. Gregory Nicol M. and Mike Murcko were officially stationed in the two-story building, with weapons listed that were mounted on tall tripods—a setup suited for engaging targets through windows.
However, photographic evidence shows Nicol carrying a weapon comming out of the AGR 6 building—the same building from which Shot 3 was allegedly fired via vent 1. Notably, this weapon does not match the configuration described in the official report.
Let’s now assess whether this rifle could realistically have been used to fire from vent 1.
-
Caliber Size:
The rifle appears to be of large caliber, likely chambered in .308, which is consistent with long-range precision shooting requirements. -
Suppressor (Silencer) Usage:
The rifle is fitted with a suppressor, The use of a silencer may have been intentional, allowing the shooter to mimic the sound signature of Crooks’ AR-15-style rifle, thereby avoiding immediate detection. -
Foldable Bipods:
The weapon features small foldable bipods, designed primarily for prone shooting, and not typically used with tripod or window mounts. This detail supports the idea that the rifle was deployed from a prone or low-lying position, such as through a roof vent.
Let’s examine the bipod configuration more closely:
- Estimated bipod length: 10 inches
- Deployment angle: 10°
- Resulting vertical rifle height in prone position: approx 9.4" (0.7833 feet)
Let’s use the proveded document from phase5:
When this height is factored in with the roof line documented by Phase5, it aligns precisely with the positioning observed in the Butler Police body cam footage. This reinforces the hypothesis that a sniper nest was positioned at vent 1.
Conclusion and Open Discussion
Based on the three key factors—caliber size, suppressor usage, and bipod configuration—this weapon appears technically and tactically suited for use in a prone firing position through vent 1.
That said, we must remain receptive to critique and evolving evidence. This is relatively new information, and there may be unconsidered factors that could challenge or contradict these conclusions.
Disclaimer
No individual is guilty unless proven so in a court of law. The above is a neutral and analytical review of potential scenarios based on currently available evidence.
Invitation for Input
I welcome any constructive feedback, alternative interpretations, or technical assessments. Only through rigorous, multi-perspective analysis can we ensure that all angles are considered.
There were two snipers, Nicol and Murcko, and we only see one rifle mounted on a tripod. The other may be the one Nicol was carrying as he left the building, and it may be different from the one seen in the photo behind the window.
You say there’s evidence confirming that a shot was fired from vent 1, but this bright flash isn’t necessarily due to a rifle; it could be a reflection of light, so there’s no evidence, just speculation.
If there had been a professional sniper behind vent 1, he’d have had to be terrible to miss Trump at such a distance!
And again, the .308 caliber isn’t compatible with the time differences between crack and thumb.
You say no other sniper used silencers, but the two counter-sniper teams positioned on the barn roofs did.
No gun was fired from your vent, and this is at least the 3rd time that you’ve posted faked ‘evidence’ in this thread.
As SonjaX6, says, ‘please stop trolling us’.
I could accept your explanation that the flash coming from “a window” might be just a reflection rather than an actual shot. However, it is clearly originating from Vent 1—exactly where a flash should never occur.
When you watch the GIF animation, there’s no room for doubt: the vent opens, the shot is fired, and the vent closes again—all perfectly synchronized with the audio of shot 3.
As for the silencer—my apologies, I wasn’t aware of that. Thank you for pointing it out; I’ve updated my post accordingly.
To my knowledge, there are two rifles assigned to different sectors within the second floor of the AGR building, as indicated in the sketches. Both are mounted on tripods and feature short barrels designed to enhance flexibility. Neither appears to be equipped with a silencer—though please feel free to correct me if I’m mistaken.
The rifle with the small foldable bipods—seen being carried out by Nicol—is typically intended for use in a prone (lying down) position. As Chris pointed out in his YouTube video, the barrel is far too long to be used effectively for shooting out of a window.
May I ask you a question? Could the rifle in question be a plausible candidate for firing from Vent 1? Is there any evidence or technical detail that would rule out this weapon as the source?
Another video for your collection.
This video of Crooks on the AGR rooftop has been seen and discussed before. Whoever the person is who edited this video has done a brilliant job of zooming in further.
No doubt about it, Crooks never fired a single shot. A man in a black suit was hiding on the rooftop and killed Crooks. All these details i have discovered myself. 1 new detail, there was another person on the rooftop holding up a white flag pointing it in the direction towards the secret service white tents. The flag is the signal Crooks is in place and taken out.
So if I follow you, there were at least two people behind that vent: a completely useless shooter who missed Trump, and another who opened the vent and then closed it after the shot.
Is that right?
Doesn’t that seem a little too complicated to you?
It’s true, why make it simple when you can make it complicated? 
1 Like
And you think there are two more behind vent 2!
1 Like
However, you’ve simply faked another frame in another video, and don’t forget the “synched” audio, re-synched by yourself to create more faked fiction.
And, you continue to forget my question:
How did Comperatore turn his head and body from South to North and continue to record for 3+ seconds after your alleged Shot3 claim?
On dashcam footage we can see Murcko sitting on the picnic table. Without weapon. However, he was leaning out of the window wuth his rifle. Added to my todo list, Check Collins’ dashcam when Murcko comes out of the building.
But they could have checked it in advance and arrange the stage, and everything.
You know, a voice in my head says:
That’s the scene where Inspector Milo Perrier (the Belgian detective) warns:
“One of us will be one million dollars richer, and one of us will be going to the gas chamber to be hung.” reddit.com+13en.wikiquote.org+13reddit.com+13
Then Jessica Marbles (Miss Marbles) cheekily responds something like:
“Maybe two? After all, all of us have an assistant.”
That prompts Sam Diamond (Peter Falk) to reply:
“Why not four? Or six? I don’t trust anybody here.”
The exact wording may vary slightly in different transcriptions.
I’ll watch it later.
By the way, I cannot resist to tell you a joke grown in my garden.
Who is the famous playback singer? Placebo Domingo.