Since you always seem determined to contradict my findings, I’d like to share some information with you. About a year ago, before taking a long break, I posted my final report to this forum, including the last theoretical impact point of shot 1 - represented by this screenshot:
Now, looking at the origin of shot 1, which has only recently been captured on camera, please compare it with what we all calculated together a year ago and with the screenshot from the video.
Perhaps now you will understand how we work in this forum: everyone does their research, and when convincing evidence is provided, we adapt the analysis accordingly. Declaring everything to be an artifact is the easy way out. Providing evidence and counter-evidence is the hard part—something I feel has been lacking a bit from you.
I don’t think we need to call in the manipulation specialist for this one — there’s a large blob of gray paint covering the exact spot where shot 1 originated.
Of course, maybe @phiphi-the-frenchie will call it an artifact, so just for safety, let’s hand it over to the judge — ChatGDP.
Here’s the report:
Evidence Summary: Suspected Manipulation in Frame 1
1. Objective
To determine whether the visual anomaly observed in Frame 1—specifically the disruption of vertical wall lines to the right of the tube—results from post-capture manipulation or a natural imaging artifact.
2. Methodology
Visual Comparison: Frame 1 was compared directly with Frame 2, which captures the same scene under similar conditions.
Error Level Analysis (ELA): Both frames were subjected to ELA to identify regions with differing JPEG compression signatures, which can indicate digital alteration.
3. Observations
Frame 1:
Presence of a gray-colored area interrupting the vertical groove pattern on the wall.
Disruption is confined to a defined region with sharp boundaries.
Frame 2:
The same area shows continuous, uninterrupted grooves consistent with the surrounding wall.
No abnormal tonal variation or compression anomalies in the corresponding region.
ELA Results:
Frame 1’s anomaly region displays a distinct high-intensity compression signature (brighter irregular patches) inconsistent with the rest of the wall.
Frame 2’s corresponding area has uniform ELA tones consistent with an unaltered surface.
4. Analysis
The combination of localized disruption in geometric patterns and an anomalous compression signature—visible only in Frame 1—indicates that this feature is not caused by natural lighting changes, lens distortion, or random compression artifacts. The absence of the anomaly in Frame 2, which otherwise matches Frame 1 in scene content, strengthens the conclusion.
5. Conclusion
The evidence strongly supports that the anomaly in Frame 1 is the result of post-capture digital manipulation or overlay, rather than a naturally occurring imaging artifact.
I’ve been organizing my videos, trying to avoid working on a book, to be honest.
I looked at three newish ones (to me): One is attributed to Joseph Meyn, who went on CNN and News Nation and claimed to have carried Corey Comperatore out of the stands. He also claimed to be a doctor, and that he was sitting right behind Corey.
I think he’s the same fool that claimed all sorts of stuff about being questioned by the Secret Service - he claimed he was a doctor too.
But he apparently DID do something useful - he sat fairly close in, and caught the Secret Service agent who was on the roof sprinting to get somewhere ASAP.
Here’s one of the videos where he tells BS, including how impressed with how quickly counter snipers responded - within a second. He also repeats what Rep. Kelly said about a woman getting shot in the hand, and doesn’t use terms a doctor would use. Just a cautionary tale…
Okay, I made another video focused on the BWC2-122111 body camera for Butler Township 1340:
Rumble version:
I also posted a video last month but it wasn’t that exciting so I didn’t bother returning here to post about it.
But I probably should have come here last month because I completely missed the Corey Comperatore phone footage that was released.
Yes, I saw that post looking at my notifications today.
Those 2 officers near the car during that screenshot would be BT 1340 (BWC2-122111) and BT 1383 (BWC2-122117).
