This guy is wearing a gray cap, not a two-tone one like Corey.
When Corey turns his head north, you can clearly see that he’s wearing a cap that’s white on the sides and black on the front.
Look at frame 1090.
IYKYK
Major Update: Origin of shot 1 confirmed – two additional snipers identified
We’ve made a breakthrough in our analysis. Thanks to the video shared by @sonjax6 we’ve been able to pinpoint the exact origin of Shot 1. As suspected, it was fired near Window 2 (back traced bullet line from bleacher rail to Trumps ear) — but from a location we would never have guessed: directly next to Window 2, where there is no visible vent hole. Evidence suggests that a section of the wall was specially modified for this event.
Video Evidence of Shot 1
In the footage, we can see a concealed square opening being revealed just before Shot 1 is fired.
This is the source:
https://x.com/i/status/1818272145778344296
This hidden panel appears to have been deliberately manipulated. Upon close zoom inspection, the panel in question shows clear signs of tampering. A section of that panel has since been replaced, and we now have photographic evidence documenting the change.
Structural Analysis of ARG Building 6
The outer walls of ARG Building 6 are covered with standard 3-ft panels arranged uniformly along the building’s length. We focused on the three panels in the suspected area (see yellow lines).
- Picture 1: Shows the three panels, spaced at 3 feet each, appearing normal at first glance.
- Picture 2: A zoomed-in view clearly shows the separation lines between each panel.
- Picture 3: Reveals that Panel 2 has an unusual repair on its far right side. This is highly suspicious, as the video shows Shot 1 originating precisely from this location.
It appears that a square cut-out was made in this panel, allowing the shot to be fired, and then quickly closed again. Later, the critical portion of that panel appears to have been replaced with standard sheet metal, left unpainted, which clearly indicates the modification. Had the person who made this change taken the time to repaint it, we might never have discovered this critical alteration.
Significance
This finding is highly incriminating, as it directly connects a concealed structural modification to the shooting. Here is a analytical report from ChatGPT to validate the conclusion, and the result supports our suspicion:
Inspection Report – Exterior Metal Siding (Panel 2)
Location: Exterior wall section containing three adjacent 3 ft corrugated metal panels
Reference Images: Pictures 1, 2, and 3 provided
Inspection Focus: Verification of suspected modification to Panel 2
Observations
- Panel Arrangement & Dimensions
- Standard wall construction uses 3 ft wide corrugated metal panels.
- The examined section consists of three such panels.
- Panel 2 is positioned between Panel 1 (left) and Panel 3 (right).
- Surface Coloration & Wear
- Panel 2 exhibits two distinct color zones:
- Left Portion: Faded tone consistent with weathering on Panels 1 and 3.
- Right Portion (near drain tube): Noticeably shinier, lighter gray surface indicating significantly less weather exposure.
- This color difference is abrupt, not gradual, suggesting replacement rather than natural wear variation.
- Drain Tube Placement
- A vertical drain tube is mounted along the right side of Panel 2.
- The drain tube location coincides precisely with the boundary between the older (left) and newer (right) sheet metal sections.
- This placement effectively conceals the seam or join line from a frontal view.
- Seam & Fit Evidence
- Close-up views (Picture 3) show uniform corrugation alignment but subtle differences in panel sheen and edge cleanliness.
- These differences are not consistent with factory production uniformity and indicate a cut-and-replace procedure.
- The newer metal exhibits sharper reflections, minimal oxidation, and absence of surface staining seen on the older section.
Assessment
- Based on color difference, drain tube seam concealment, and fit irregularities, it is highly probable that the right portion of Panel 2 has been cut and replaced with a new piece of sheet metal.
- The modification appears deliberate, likely to repair localized damage without removing the entire 3 ft panel.
- The work has been executed with corrugation alignment preserved, minimizing visibility except for the tonal difference in finish.
Conclusion
Panel 2 has been manipulated.
Specifically, the rightmost section of the original panel was cut off and replaced with newer sheet metal. The drain tube’s placement over the joint likely serves both functional and cosmetic purposes, concealing the repair line.
End of Chat GPT report.
In summary, this newly discovered video evidence reveals a second shooter — distinct from the one firing from Vent 1 — confirming that there were at least two additional shooters, not counting Crooks.
As always, please share your questions, comments, or counter-evidence so we can continue the investigation together.
1 Like
I have mentioned it lots of times on this forum, and it has been discussed on other platforms. Every Butler Township police body cam footage has been AI manipulated. This does include the car cam footage from the car parked in front of the door of the AGR 1 building, People disappear, trees don`t match, and police officers that go grey and look like Robo Cop.
It gets worse, on another platform, reports are coming in, at least one of these videos is a reenactment. There may be more.
1 Like
Going back to an image you posted a while ago. There were 4 big mysterious objects that appeared on top of the AGR rooftops. What you are seeing is one of these objects that came up. There were at least 6 guys on it, i think what you are seeing is one of these guys on the object on top of the rooftop.
Thank you, that’s really useful and must have been a lot of work.
1 Like
Corey’s video shows Shot 1 hitting Trump’s ear and Copenhaver’s arm.
T Shirts, soon to be worn in London, Paris, and Miami, Ohio, show Shot One, 1/5 second before Trump and Copenhaver reacted:
The End.
I thought you’d hit improbability rock bottom, but I was wrong: you keep digging! How far will you go? That’s the frightening question many people must be asking themselves, who now are currently keeping a discreet silence.
And what’s more, you’ve awakened Rob Banks, who, when it comes to improbability, knows a thing or two and is giving you some serious competition…
1 Like
Let’s remain factual: you may challenge any point you wish, provided you present supporting counter-evidence.
There’s no point in proving it, you’re clearly delusional. Have you been smoking too much ChatGPT?
2 Likes
Look at this video:
At 3:04, you can see the same piece of metal along this other drain tube on the right of the four big exhaust pipes.
Was there an other sniper behind it? It would be a real army to shoot at Trump !
1 Like
In the same video, look at 4:54 + 14 frames, it’s less than one second before we hear first shot and there is nothing suspect where you think shot 1 comes from.
1 Like
Here’s the video that kept me up (in part) until after 4AM “last” night when my bedtime is 1:30.
(Spoiler - I think this is taken from the media area and messed around with - including adding AI generated people - to make it look like a rallygoer made it.)
I was going through my bookmarked videos, putting useful descriptions on them, and came to this:
https://x.com/prayingmedic/status/1812520922638610504
Call this video " YWN Hercules 1"
I’m already suspicious of that watermark “YWN”, which stands for
Yeshiva World News, having come across this video of Corey Comperatore getting shot (the footage in the bleachers are real, all the people in foreground are fake):
https://x.com/OAlexanderDK/status/1815046130335400215
Call this one “YWN North Bleachers”
Here’s another one, which our friend has saved on his server for us.
https://superfly.co.nz/mp4/gunsmoke.mp4
Let’s call this one “YWN South Bleachers”
Notice NONE of the people in the foreground duck even after 8 shots, and the person taking the video only appears to pan down - into the back of the person in front of him.
Both YWN North Bleachers and YWN South Bleachers can be seen to be taken from some elevation by comparing the head of the rallygoers on the back row to the screen behind them (or another reference line). The higher above the bottom of the screen, the lower the position of the video taker, and vice versa.
By this test the person taking the video has some elevation for both those videos. For the “YWN Hercules 1”, you can compare the distance the lectern is above the front cover/shield of the stage - it’s the same as for the professional feeds. In this video, not only does no one in the foreground duck - at the end, they have a young woman improbably rise above EVERYONE else. And other people are standing.
The whole point of this video was to show the Hercules 1 team. Their actions are not in synch with other videos. D. King comes off his binoculars just a few seconds before shots start, and then as shots are happening they seem to be continuing to make adjustments, with absolutely increase in pace. Assuming Stacy Bennett’s video hasn’t been doctored, King switches from binoculars to rifle scope about 18 seconds before shots start.
My point is: There is a very high definition professional video done from the media area that shows EVERYTHING from the North Bleachers to the South Bleachers, including the counter snipers. It was leaked to Yeshiva World News, and passed off in parts as amateur videos.
1 Like
I don’t know… I’ve gotten to be a freak about viewing a video using EXACTLY the same resolution (or sometimes exactly double) as the source video whenever possible, and I got this at the time of the first shot:
There are the black dash like things that are actually an electrical line that has black and white cables that twist around each other. For whatever reason it looks thicker next to window 2 at the time of the first shot here, but it’s too low to be the vent.
1 Like
The large man at the northeast corner of the south bleachers also never ducked, never went down, and he was closer, at least to the first 3 shots from BaldMan:
Sonja, you’ve been here since the beginning of this forum. Do you remember how we — or at least I — have always suspected that shots 1–3 came from the ARG building? At one time I was convinced that the first shots came from window 2. If you look at the newly discovered video we can understand why, becaus it’s origine is right next to window 2. We can look back in my posts to confirm, but I think you remember. I also recall you mentioning recently that shots might have been fired from a window?
Here’s why I suspected it:
The bullet trajectory traced from the bleachers to Trump’s ear points directly to that area. Crooks was positioned too high to have made that shot, since Trump’s ear is lower than the corner of the bleachers. While it’s difficult to verify without a 3D CAD system, both @phasefive and @schroederized confirmed the same conclusion using entirely different 3D CAD systems.
In addition, the first three shots are muffled, without echoes. Chris has proven that there were at least two shooters, and shots 1–3 most likely came from inside AGR building 6.
Now we’ve finally found a clear video showing an opening at the exact moment shot 1 was fired. Using simple common sense, this strongly suggests at least for me, that shot 1 was fired from that location — unless clear counter-evidence can prove otherwise.
1 Like
Yes, Phiphi, this is exactly the kind of discussion we should be having here.
You are presenting contradictory video evidence that does not show any sign of the opening we see in the other video.
It’s now up to us to analyze how and why this contradiction exists.
Using common sense, we know that Stewart’s phone was confiscated. If we assume the gun was visible in Stewart’s video, there’s a high likelihood that the footage was edited.
From my perspective, Stewart’s video — which is coming from second-hand (and which the FBI most likely had in their possession) — carries less credibility than the girl’s video, which she simply posted with her own findings. At least at this point, I would already give more weight to her evidence.
However, this is not my final conclusion. I will carefully analyze both videos at the exact time of the shooting to check for any inconsistencies — something I have already been able to demonstrate in Tyler Collins’ bodycam footage, showing that that video was most likely tampered.
Please give me a moment.
1 Like
