So It's Back To First Principles (Part 2)

Archives Public Archives
1460

The bullets must have been traveling at supersonic speed when they hit the railing, David Dutch, and the telehandler.

Yes, source 4 would have had to record a crack, but it wasn’t a 120dB shock wave, but a 90dB sound wave that would have reached the microphone 1 millisecond after Crooks’ muzzle blast.

That’s why it may be impossible to hear this crack on the recording from source 4.

You cannot trust that a mind control victim will shoot safely and reliably 1 meter above the alleged target.

To enable credible audio recordings, real bullets had to fly through the air at supersonic speed.

In my opinion, Crooks was a victim of mind control.

He had an SAT score of 1500, which means he had an IQ above 130. Someone that intelligent cannot possibly think that he could run across rooftops for 30 seconds in broad daylight, lie on a roof for two minutes, and then Trump would still be waiting for him on stage.

Who knows whether the alleged posts really existed or were made by Crooks. For me, this is not hard evidence.

As for the claim that Crooks flew a drone at around 4 p.m., there is currently no evidence other than the FBI’s statement.

1461

@greg_n short question:

Is it possible for you to detect a crack-thump difference of 1 millisecond and reliably and validly distinguish it from a crack-thump difference of 0 milliseconds if the crack is not the 120dB shock wave itself, but rather the sound wave that continues to propagate after the Mach cone has “frozen”? Both the crack and the thump are approximately 90 dB, i.e., equally loud.

1462

I guess that’s theoretically possible, although it doesn’t strike me as being as plausible as the official story. What difficulties in the official story do you see, that led to formulate your theory?

1 Like
1463

Corey’s angle makes an irresistible path from David Dutch to the JCB container, beveled to angle slightly Northeast. The heavy yellow steel guards the plumbing from almost every angle, so I’ve gone full Bongino and closed that case.

The black cover was draped over ribbed steel of the open-ended ‘shed’ on the TV trailer, so I think Supersonic shot 1 hit that steel, causing shrapnel injuries to cornerman Dan, and also to David Dutch.
Dan doesn’t react to the rail impact, but his back arches as Copenhaver’s arm flips, so I think shrapnel hit his back from the shed surface behind him.

…seems too far south for a shot from the trees, so I’ll guess one of Max’s 5 shots, as he lost control of a high speed, bucking gun, causing high shots.

DutchJCB
DutchJCB1280×1080 110 KB

fluidtank
fluidtank376×680 193 KB

1464

I think it’s high level Democrats/globalists/communists (they seem to becoming all the same these days).

I think the plot was thrown together pretty late. Biden did poorly in the debate on June 27. The conspirators probably only started talking about it then. The Butler farm show rally was publicly announced on July 3. The location was quite possibly leaked before then, but at any rate, the conspirators had a pretty good idea there would be a rally or rallies in Pennsylvania between June 27 and the RNC.

So they rounded up local “talent” (notably including Crooks from Bethel Park, and likely including Maxwell Yearick from the Pittsburgh area).

They got Jill Biden to speak for 7 1/2 minutes at an Italian American event in Pittsburgh (which she only scheduled on July 10!!!), thus pulling away more competent people from the region.

Vice President Kamala Harris spoke for 16 minutes that day in nearby Philadelphia (the Asian and Pacific Islander town hall), further depleting Secret Service resources from the region. The announcement date of that engagement is not available on the internet. There a list of engagements dated July 3, 2024 from the office of the vice president that does not include the July 13 speech. The July 10 press release does not include any additional engagements.

IMO Myosoty Perez was selected to be Lead Agent because of her incompetence, and John Marciniak was made team leader of the counter snipers because he was the least experienced guy.

Ironically, David King, the most experienced CS, said “So Hercules 1 and 2, we try to get as close as we can to the protectee. Basically we would try to stand on their shoulders. Of course, that is not going to happen.”
If that’s true, the Secret Service REALLY needs to redo their training.

But I digress. As Daniel “Trump faked it” 59 suggested, a shooter could easily have been placed on AGR 9. Neither Hercules team could see much of that building. Neither congressional committee has mentioned that, so it’s a strong case of “the dog that didn’t bark” in my opinion.

I don’t claim to know what was inside the conspirator’s minds. They seem to have wanted to it to appear to be a lone nutter, but the Hercules 2 counter sniper’s testimony, plus their reactions clearly caught on video, throw a major monkey wrench into that narrative. I think it’s telling that the second Hercules 2 counter sniper refused to testify.

Obviously most shooters don’t want to die or go to prison for life. So they go silent and hide or leave the area once it becomes clear that the patsy is not able to shoot the primary target anymore.

(I leave this untouched for hours)

OK, I’ve been alternating between staring at this, staring at overhead photos with lines on them, going over videos, and just thinking - for hours - maybe 8 hours. So many things don’t add up.

Not least of which is why “Crooks” would appear to be bald while he’s slinging a possibly explosive balloon at Detective Collins - left handed. (I probably got an extra tag on an NSA watch list for looking into what kind of balloons explode!) LOL

One new thought - maybe the sniper who was assigned to harass the Hercules counter snipers made a mistake. Why harass the counter snipers that CAN’T see the patsy? What if he misunderstood his instructions? We have video evidence from at least two videos each that shows that Hercules 2 WAS taking fire during the first few shots, and that Hercules 1 was NOT taking fire.

What if - the main conspirators got a hold of Crooks or Yearick. They promised help getting whichever one on the roof, promised that the Secret Service would leave openings, etc. But Crooks and Yearick were in the same network. Crooks contacts Yearick or vice versa and gets him to come and provide cover against the Secret Service. Except - they either screw up their communications or there isn’t any chance to communicate which team should be harassed (or shot).

Remember, Yearick hasn’t been seen since July 13, 2024.

I had the idea of a subcontractor because one would think that high level conspirators would really want it to look like a lone nutter, but the guy called in to be the “lone nutter” (really the patsy) wouldn’t really care, as long as Mr. Trump was killed. Just a wild thought.

We know damn well both the Biden AND the Trump FBI are lying to us and stonewalling any release of evidence.

1465

Do you also believe that cutting-edge tech was used to synchronize shots from AGR 6 & 9 so that the crack from the AGR9 rifle would be mistaken for the one from AGR6?

Could you give me links to those videos?

Why should Trump cooperate in protecting plotters against him? I don’t find it plausible that the most powerful man in the world with by far the greatest army behind him has anything to fear from any “globalists”.

1466

To protect the paunchy, aging bald man, as he jumped into position in less than 4 seconds, leaning forward(south) with his upper body supported by 3 dark haired men, and with a 4th man behind him, stabilizing Baldy’s legs.
If a tree blocked Herc2’s views of Crooks, distance/roof slopes north blocked views of King/Marciniak, Herc2, unharassed, could have seen Baldy, his helpers, and Max.

BaldySelectx8
BaldySelectx81024×768 66.1 KB

1467

There are many inconsistencies.

For example, Crooks had an IQ over 130, but behaved like a moron.

He used a rangefinder and behaved conspicuously with it, which was unnecessary.

He used a drone, which under normal circumstances would not have gone undetected.

He did not use a telescopic sight, but only a non-magnifying red dot sight.

The biggest failure of the Secret Service bodyguards, Sean Curran, left Trump standing on stage for 30 seconds, during which time a second shooter could have shot him 10 times. He was not fired, but promoted to head of the entire Secret Service.

John Marciniak, the biggest failure of the counter snipers, was not fired.

Trump is not demanding the release of the raw file of Doug Mills’ bullet photo. The raw file could be used to detect a fake. This could prove that the New York Times and Doug had prior knowledge of the assassination.

One of the bodyguards wiped a trail of blood from Trump’s face with a white towel, even though everyone’s life was in danger because a second shooter could not be ruled out.

There is much more, but I don’t feel like compiling a complete list. I have already mentioned most of it somewhere here in the forum.

1468

RSBN shows Hercules 2 under fire.
This is the wide angle
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m5NBC4ijymw&list=PLsbC53bZUNE95a6TaDSTuyt4FllaeNntr&index=105

This is regular. When shots start they have gone to wide angle, but have Mr. Trump in an inset
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OIR0dDJvJ38&list=PLuXXbBFpPc0njft812NUys8nRqE5HEZaY&index=4

Nico of New York has the video with the most detail of Hercules 2. The sound is lagged on it, though, I calculated it at 0.55 seconds last night. You can tell it easily because the guy in the foreground with the “bigfoot” pattern shirt has a huge flinch reflex that looks like it happens before you hear the first shot.
TikTok - Make Your Day

For Hercules 1, we have RagTagVagabond, who probably had a DSLR, not a cell phone. I really wish he’d release a version that is uncut and uncropped. I really don’t like the jumps he has there. But the motions of the team match up with the other one. He’s also got a valuable perspective on the telehandler spray. It’s in 4K, if you have a 4K monitor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ThZex2rVPXQ

Here’s one from just in front of the media area. I suspect at least some of the people in the foreground are AI fakes.
https://x.com/SteelMagsTwit/status/1952413317924114926

As a bonus, here’s one where supposedly D. King takes the 10th shot. I don’t see it. Those rifles have quite a kick, don’t they?
https://x.com/SteelMagsTwit/status/1952418973472965043

Be sure to say thanks if you want me to help again. I am a geeky woman, but I am woman, and women are like that.

1 Like
1469

Having a high IQ doesn’t mean much in day to day life. People with Bachelors and Masters degrees were more likely to take the clot shot than people with just high school diplomas. People with PhDs were a little less likely, probably because so many of them have kids with autism and have gone down the vaccine-autism rabbit hole.

I’ve got an IQ of 140 or 145 (double 780s on my SAT back in the 1980s, got accepted to Caltech, blah blah blah, then transferred out because I never could have graduated), but I do dumb things.

One of the more recent really stupid things I did was stand up while doing hole punching at work (yes I’m underemployed now). I stopped when my back started hurting. It wasn’t until days later that I realized I could have just moved the papers and the hole punch to my desk and SAT DOWN while doing the hole punching. Duh.

But back to the 130 IQ bit. These kids have been damaged with vaccines (I know, because I didn’t know better than to give my older kid all the recommended shots back in 2000 and 2001) and now are dealing with problems from wi-fi radiation (studies show memory problems - what else don’t we know?)

These kids have grown up with “smart” phones and have atrophied abilities to concentrate and do research and think for themselves.

I saw snippets of Crooks’ presentation for a speech class. Unimpressive. It sounded like he took the text straight off an ad for a Hyundai.

Based on his conversations online, he didn’t seem all that bright to me, not in sense of thinking things through.

Maybe he had decent visio-spatial ability and could handle calculus. But that doesn’t mean he could reason all that well.

1470

People with high IQs don’t always act intelligently. Sometimes it even encourages them to act stupidly because they think they’re too smart to be stupid. More important is that Crooks was an inexperienced kid.

Maybe he thought he was being “smart” in using a rangefinder. That he used it “conspicuously” is a subjective judgement.

Doesn’t this go the other way? If the whole thing were staged to work up Trump supporters, wouldn’t it have been better to use more professional equipment? Do make the “conspiracy” seem more formidable?

I agree that the SS response seemed incompetent, but that might just be due to incompetence.

The NYT doesn’t need Trump’s permission to release it. If the official story is true, what need is there to do so?

Again, this cuts the other way: Why not maximize the blood if the intention was to make Trump look heroic? I think, if anything, it’s just more incompetence.

1 Like
1471

Thank you!

I’ll add those clips to my collection for crack-bang analysis.

But I don’t see any strong evidence for H1 taking fire. They seem to have spotted Crooks and then reacted to the first shot.

Wait - you think the Globalists got a hold of this video, added figures, then returned the video to owner, who never noticed the change? That’s probably not technologically possible, and what reason could there be for it? What makes you think so?

1472

Where does the name D. King come from? A google search turned up nothing.

1473

H1 was David King and John Marciniak.
H2 were the 2 guys, never named, who were ‘under fire’, for at least 86 seconds.

1474

No. There is too much uncertainty in how a cell phone processes short-duration sounds to rely on a 1 millisecond difference to tell you anything.

I not quite sure what you mean by “frozen”. Can you cite a link for this concept? The way I see it, when the bullet impacts an object and drops below supersonic, the tip of the cone would begin to collapse, but the remainder of the cone would continue to propagate - just not continuing on beyond a line perpendicular to the point of impact.

2 Likes
1475

Ask me that question again in a few days if you like - but the short answer is the deep state - or swamp if you like - is very hard to drain.
I’m not in a place to directly debate that point, but as my task is writing a book (yes, a lot of what I am typing becomes part of a rough draft), let’s go into a little detail of why I was so pissed at Kash Patel the other day.

A couple of months ago Candace Owens releases a little bit of new info about Crooks and teases that she will release more, but does not. Then on Nov 14, Tucker Carlson releases the info - presumably all of it.

https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1989317393768951907

We see that Crooks should have been on the FBI’s radar back in late 1999 or early 2000. What’s more he did an about face from being pro Trump to anti Trump in early 2000. Then he seems to have largely dropped from the social media radar - which can be an ominous sign.

Further, he states that this info is stuff that was achieved through techniques available to any private investigator. There was no NSA worker who delved into his online history and smuggled it out, in other words.

Immediately after that, Kash Patel puts out a short note saying basically “we looked into it a lot, and Crooks acted alone”. Nothing else.

https://x.com/FBIDirectorKash/status/1989418950971854976

Next, the FBI put out a three page letter titled “Correcting False Media Reporting on Crooks”. It’s more like nitpicking. And they are out and out lying when they say that Crooks didn’t “tag or mention” Willy Tepes". He responded to Willy Tepes once, talking about “the only way to fight the government is with terrorism style attacks”.

That letter, some other information and a timeline is found here:
FBI: Trump shooter acted alone — exclusive findings in monthslong probe | Fox News

Then Patel gave an interview with Katherine Herridge. I’m guessing she either was told she could not follow up on questions or was given a strict list of questions to ask. If you note the way the video is cut, it’s possible a lot of stuff is cut out.

https://x.com/C__Herridge/status/1993159385187598588

I don’t really want to get into the full details of the idiocy he blurted, but here’s one question and answer:
Herridge: “What are the findings on the attempted assassination in Butler, Pennsylvania?”
Patel: “Our job was to both treat the president as the President of the United States and a victim and remind the American public that there were three other victims, and tragically one person even lost his life, so there are certain victims rights we have to honor.”
“But what we did and we presented and what we released, the full findings that were able to publicize to the world that definitively answer questions regarding Butler, we seized dozens and dozens of devices, we exploited and got into every single one of those devices, we got onto all the online platforms and social media sites of the assailant Crooks and we did a recanvassing just to double down.”
“We got in and inherited this case, and we gave out information to congress and the public that the prior administration refused to do.”

First: what victims rights? The right to know nothing? Mr. Trump was aggravated at how slow the investigation was going. The other victims/victims families were suing, and still are, as far as I know, for information.
Second: He didn’t answer the question.
Third: He hasn’t given out ANY information to the public, other than trying to spin the information that Tucker Carlson leaked, and saying without any supporting details, that Crooks acted alone.

The public and congress want a report, and apparently we won’t be getting one.

As a bonus:
Here’s Kash Patel displaying some Kim Cheatle level stupidity. He tells a congressional committee that he’s never heard of Stu Peters. He’s been on Stu Peters’ show 8 times. I guess this was during the confirmation hearings.

So he’s either ready to be charged with perjury or he can be sacked for having dementia. His choice, I guess.
https://x.com/aldamu_jo/status/1991907439852068937

1476

D. King is on his equipment bag. You can see it in this still. I don’t know who found his first name. John Marciniak’s name was revealed because of the disciplinary process, I think.

Pearson062851
Pearson0628511329×911 460 KB

That’s a still from the bodycam of the Lieutenant in the Butler township police department, and well worth watching, if you having seen it yet. It’s rather sad. Mr. Comperatore’s wife and daughters were ushered over to the side of that barn, and you see them in that picture. The snipers who failed to shoot Crooks in time to save him then walk right past his family.

Mr. Comperatore had to wait until February just to get her husband’s phone back, and has hardly gotten any answers as far as anyone knows.

Be advised the time stamp is 12 seconds off in that video. The shots start at 6:11:33, and the time stamp will be 6:11:45.

1 Like
1477

I don’t think the CIA, FBI, and SS are hotbeds of liberalism. We’ll have to agree to disagree.

Right after his birth?!

Crooks stated this?! Or do you mean Candace Owens?

Don’t Republicans regard that as just a white lie to get confirmed?

I see the following possibilities for Patel:

  1. He’s with the anti-Trump Deep State;
  2. He’s loyal to Trump and and playing 10-dimensional chess;
  3. The official narrative is true.

Did I miss anything?

If he’s really dumb, we must be in case 3.

1478

You can also tell crack from thump by their frequency content and volume envelope:

crack: high freqs, short;
thump: low freqs, longer

1479

I wrote a very simple javascript calculator last year, saw that google had it #1 for ‘crack thump bullet calculator’, so linked it to another calculator, really so I could add a bald man’s picture to the new calculator…I’m not even sure if it works…
If it doesn’t work, or if you disagree with the method, please let me know.

https://superfly.co.nz/cu.htm

Bald man? Bald man?? What bald man???

tee3300
tee33003300×3300 424 KB