In 22.09 seconds, 660 frames, of NW view, from âWe gotta getâ to âthe world will see a vibeâŚâ, James Copenhaver begins aiming black phone North, and vertically, steadily, with both hands, then removes left hand, and seems to be holding the phone horizontally as Trump says â you get readyâ.
Jamesâ head is also tilted down at that point, and also seems aimed more Northwest, rather than North.
Could he have been checking the recording, preparing to switch the phone off?
I hadnât seen that reddit post post before - it was interesting.
I checked out the comments in the movie âWho shot Trump?â. Mr. Houstonâs comments donât seem well informed. He didnât know the model of the telehandler even though it was clearly marked in the picture in movie.
I would trust the opinions in the Reddit thread more.
I declare you to be the winner in these discussions by default.
I f***ed up and only bought one stock before the close today. Iâve still got something like $70K sitting fallow, those stocks are going up 2 to 10% every freaking day, and word is that they will explode once they declare their quarterly earnings. A miner that is just breaking even when silver is $40 makes how much money when silver is $100? A lot - close to the number of ounces mined times $60.
So Iâm âcheatingâ by looking at the holdings for the SILJ fund and trying to pick stocks that look appropriate from that list.
I overextended myself BIGTIME in 2008 and 2011 (undiagnosed bipolar) and got burned. Iâve been way the hell too conservative this time, but itâs become clear the shorts are getting squeezed, the longs have strong hands, there is a structural deficit in silver, everybodyâs fiat is going in the toilet, blah, blah, blah, stuff I was saying 20 years ago, but which now is really true. WHEEEEEEE.
Gee, I kind of sound like Dave, except nobody comes breaking down your door if you just say youâre on a stock buying binge⌠God, I hope he lives.
12.01 seconds of SonjaX6âs 9 minute video
contained 361 frames, 1080x1920 pixels.
The video below is
180 frames, 6 seconds, that seem to show James Copenhaverâs arms going down halfway through those 6 seconds:
A 6 second video makes it look possible that James Copenhaver might have quickly stopped recording immediately after the word âpartyâ.
Clipping the 11 second video after the word âpartyâ would mask cheating, if video from a different phone was used.
Why was the Fox video was only 11 second duration, and did a trajectory far from Crooks help?.
A line on SonjaX6âs site map
93 frames, 3.09 seconds, as Trump says âget ready McCormickâ, were enlarged and slowed, to help see if FlowerShirtLady or others with a more believable angle to Trump, could be seen recording.
James Copenhaver holds his phone with his head tilted down.
FlowerShirtLady holds a black phone, with her right hand on top, and left hand below.
David Dutch seems to be recording during part of these 3.09 seconds.
I think SunGlassLady recorded the 11 second video shown by Fox.
Her phone is ~1.5 meters west of Copenhaverâs phone, and her phone starts to tilt up, and slightly east, as Trump asks, âcan we bring him up here?â
Later, as Trump says, ânot since Ronald Reaganâ, SunGlassLady and FlowerShirtLady both have turned away from Trump, and towards David Dutch.
Itâs possible those 3 and Copenhaver all shared/swapped videos later.
After a stress situation people usually need help from specualists. That did not take place. So he got more and more angry.
We were able to see, how a Trump supporter became extremist.
I wanted to warn him that he is on the radar - both sides. And the other side most probably would contact him.
One detail is that Tucker Carlson, 1 year ago, never mentioned the victim shot twice, even though Tuckerâs guest, Sean Davis said, âand then a burst of 5, and the 5, like, all went way up highâŚone of them hit a hydraulic lineâŚâ after which, Davis describes the local officer shooting âCrooksâ(and it wasnât Crooks), and a 15 second delay, until (the real) Crooks got shot.
Tucker could have asked, âso which 2 shots hit Copenhaver?â But Tucker didnât ask, though he sure knows Copenhaver got shot twice.
Tucker is powerful enough to have interviewed Putin, and powerful enough to mislead his audience, and to obstruct justice.
(note: Davisâs â15 second delayâ between Zaliponi and Kingsâ shots was only 10 seconds)âŚand there was a long range shot in the 1/3 second before Kingâs shot
This 6.6 seconds matches Trumpâs speech words from âgreat great gentlemanâ to âalright, you getâ.
Copenhaverâs phone seems steadily aimed, while SunglassLadyâs phone seems to angle east and to tilt upward.
I think the reason her phone moved, was because her eyes were armâs length from her phone, allowing her to see motion on the rooftop north of her.
Copenhaver seemed focused on Trump, probably not seeing the rooftop north of himself.
Iâm just speculating. I donât know what else would cause the administration and congress to let the FBI get away with producing no report, and why President Trump would say heâs satisfied.
Eric Trump has publicly said he thinks there was a conspiracy to kill his father, and heâs not happy things have been sidelined with no report. Melania Trump famously made video stating she was not happy with the lack of progress.
There was a video I saw on X last night with an interesting hypothesis. He said the assassination attempt may have been linked to Ukraine, and Mr. Trump is holding it over Ukraine as leverage.
Iâm inclined to think the leverage goes the other way. I think somebody is blackmailing or threatening someone important to Mr. Trump, or vital to American interests.
I have already started a therapy with Dave on YT to control his frustration. However it would take time, even for a professional. But Iâm only an educated layman.
I got lethal threats 3 times in my life.
When I was 7, we went to the fishing pond with clasmate, Suddenly a young kid picked up a knife and said âknife or your lifeâ (obviously wanted to say âmoney or your lifeâ). The knife was real, we rushed away. Maybe that experience gave me some vaccination effect.
Second time it was in the conscript army. A lieutenant told us to water the grass in front of command building. But he didnât inform the guard prior to that. So I faced an AMD, ready to shot about 20 rounds in the magazine. I can hear click-click as the guard loaded the first round.
Third time a billionaire told me to be shark food.
(Explanation: when key features cannot be achieved, no sense to polish the others. The team lead wanted to keep his job as long as he can, despite the inevitable imminent failure. He kept insignificant problems on the stage and always reported that I was not doing my job. However, a customer sent out 2 technicans to investigate. They believed the boss was right and tried everything to prove my fault. I was fully transparent. After 3 months they have given up. Then I said, now we should test what I proposed at the first day. Then the team lead received a lethal threat.)
So, I did not rush to the police. I went to buy a big inflatable rubber shark, a swimming toy. And I placed it over my work desk. It was an encoded message.
Dave is harmless, per se. But there is a risk that real felons contact him.
I wish we knew about his real problem earlier.
Well, people often say: why donât you do this, why didnât you do that. The short answer: circumstances (boundary conditions). I cannot blame Dave, he didnât know to contact and trust us.
Primum munus iustitiae est, ut ne cui quis noceat.(Cicero)
âThe primary duty of justice is to do no harm to others.â
When people add something like âthose who have not harmed othersâ
they are usually explaining or extending Ciceroâs idea, not translating it literally.
Cicero himself is saying:
Justice begins with non-maleficence: donât injure others.
Only after that can justice move on to positive duties.
In De Officiis, Cicero goes on to say that justice also involves:
helping others,
protecting the innocent,
giving each person what is due to them (suum cuique tribuere).
So your summary idea
âwe should protect who needs and deserves protectionâ
Thatâs philosophically consistent with Cicero, but itâs a second step, not the first one.
In Columbo â How to Dial a Murder, that opening explanation is basically about using a small mental ritual to interrupt an emotional reflex. It looks trivial from the outside, but internally it changes everything. Thatâs exactly the same principle youâre describing with your secret emergency word.
Hereâs why your trick works better than âjust count to 3,â even though they look identical on paper:
1. Counting is mechanical; a word is symbolic
Counting to 3 is a technique. Your brain knows itâs a generic self-control hack.
A secret word is a symbol. It carries meaning, intention, and ownership. Emotionally, symbols hit much harder than procedures.
2. The word creates a state change, not just a pause
When you use your emergency word, youâre not merely delaying a response â youâre switching modes:
from reactive â observer
from emotional â deliberate
That tiny moment of âthis is my wordâ pulls you out of the situation and back into yourself.
3. It gives you agency instead of restraint
Counting feels like holding yourself back.
The word feels like choosing a response.
That difference matters a lot when anger is involved â restraint feels like pressure, choice feels like control.
4. It externalizes the stupidity
Letâs be honest: when people around you are being unbearably stupid, anger spikes because it feels invasive.
The emergency word acts like a mental boundary:
âThis is happening out there. Iâm still in here.â
That separation alone lowers emotional intensity.
5. Ritual beats logic when emotions are hot
When emotions are high, the rational brain is half offline.
Rituals â words, gestures, habits â bypass logic and go straight to the nervous system. Thatâs why your word works emotionally, not just technically.
So yeah â technically itâs the same as counting to 3.
Psychologically, itâs a completely different beast.