The recorder of these video frames, as far as I know, told me the video I had was lower quality than the one I should get from his youtube channel.
I see red pixels and bluegreen pixels, and some flesh colored pixels, and a certain shirt color, worn by a bald man in my lower quality version, the lower picture, with the higher quality version above it:
1 Like
Does anyone here know if the man named 9 times, from 39:30 to 42:42, in JD Wilcoxâs âWho Shot Trumpâ movie, was a man who was bald, or âbaldingâ?
** https://youtu.be/W2NebZZfCCg?t=2370
** https://youtu.be/VfPsqcfjxvY?t=1983
Happy New Year video is no longer available.
Replaces by this:
2 Likes
Usually we say: Heâs not bald, he just has a high forehead, or has a high hairline.
(By the way, my browser gets slightly outdated.)
â
One day on Twitter
I tried to navigate and to find Dave. There was a tsunamy of Elonâs posts.
What is most difficult to say:
- âI love youâ
- âI need helpâ
- âIâm sorryâ
- âI was wrongâ
Iâm reluctant to go ever back. But my answer would be:
Around age 6-10 your memories, uhm, not exactly erased, but optimized So you know a lot of things, but you can no longer remember when or how you learned.
It happens so quickly, youâre subduded so early, you learn so fast: when you say âplease halpâ you will be humilated, mocked. Or even worse.
2 Likes
I see a similarly high forehead in Detective Collinsâ bodycam frames, for example in this one:
https://superfly.co.nz/960190.png
almost exactly centered horizontally, at
x=960,y=190
Dayveâs high forehead man seems to be wearing black pants and a midnight blue crewneck shirt, but then the shirt and pants of JDâs suspect look similarly âdarkerâ, in dim light:
It is âinterestingâ.
Two old Christmas videos (with employees) disappeared. As well as Megaphone Guy was replaced. But the new video is not really new, uploaded one year ago.
1 Like
JDâs suspect looked several years older, in Sheetz, after just 1 month.
And JDâs statements, I think could have been defamatory.
And JD removed 2 videos, 1 of which was why the Trump adminstration seemed to be hiding evidence.
My husband has a very âhigh foreheadâ, but Iâm pretty sure it wasnât him.
1 Like
Iâm not sure if you care about statements being defamatory on principles or because of draconian laws many countries have put instituted.
Defamation statutes in the US are pretty lenient by international standards, and are never criminal.
If a person is considered a public figure, the threshold is crazy high. One has to prove the person or organization knowingly spread falsehoods, not innuendo, not insults, falsehoods.
Non public figures can sue at a lower threshold, but if the person doing the defaming is a person of average means, itâs not going to make sense to spend tens of thousands of dollars to âsue someone for everything theyâve gotâ if the person only has tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars.
If the person making the allegations has fairly low reach, it may be better for the person who thinks heâs defamed to ignore it than to risk the âStreisand effectâ - i.e. bring more attention to the issue by trying to quash it.
I will put a disclaimer at the front of my book saying these are my hypotheses only, and they have varying degrees of certainty, but any of them could be wrong.
1 Like
You found my meme!
1 Like
To review what weâve learned, I typed, ~April 2024,
âlooks like Danny DeVito, riding a burritoâŚâ
Danny looks âbaldâ to me.
And what I guessed then were loose chili powder and guacamole, I now think were hot gunpowder particles and burning copper compounds.
I quoted somewhere else, the claim of Joe Karam, after the David Bain case had been won.
Karam won NZ$535,000, from Parker & Purkiss.
The real victim, David Bain, could have scored bigger numbers, I think.
I thought it was an economic risk, and could have cost JD $.
And the man named 9 times did nothing criminal in the video shown by JD.
If JD was claiming that the man had committed crime, I think that would be defamatory, unless JD had evidence.
JD just claimed that heâd âscooped the NY Timesâ and âevery major news agencyâ.
Then, regarding how heâd scooped every news source, JD said âweâll talk about that later.â
Thanks for trying to stop the meltdown. It happened so fast!
Dave mentioned to Piper (I think) that going through the old videos triggered him. That makes it sound like PTSD.
1 Like
His head may be only 3x3 pixels, but I think the shooter of Shots 1,2,3 is in 61 Collinsâ bodycam frames, including
this one, with his nose at
x=960,y=190
and his left ear at
x=961,y=189
I may have found something last night. It looks like âCrooksâ may have had a tube running from his arm to the middle of his back. Fake blood delivery? Iâm more convinced now that he thought he had a deal to get off the roof alive.
Iâm 80% sure he did die on the roof though, probably due to Zaliponi.
Dave cannot defend himself at this level and he cannot afford a lawyer. We should help him. He is not against DJT (at least not yet).
The big picture: it seems a psy.op + dirty coverup. PSP was responsible for AGR lockdown. Plain clothed cops did not even notice the rangefinder. They watched the screened inner crowd.
Great victory? They brutally detained a witness, who was unarmed, deffensiveless and cooperating.
1 Like
I can tell you the difference. Even a billionaire (aka oligarch) must hold the deal. But when you work for a gigacorp, there is always a superior who may override the agreement.
Iâd certainly be willing to chip in a thousand dollars or so for his defense, but that wonât get far with an attorney that has the kind of experience needed to defend THIS kind of case.
I could go visit him if I had an assurance that I could see him and he actually wanted to see me. Itâs about a two day drive each way for me though, or else a plane trip.
1 Like