But I have suspicions he was hit from the northwest or west (back-right or right). The buttstock of his rifle was damaged, and there was no entry/exit wound pattern that would account for that from either King or Zaliponi.
Also, Zaliponi testified that Crooks rolled over to his (Crooks’) right when he was hit. He then had pulled himself up to where Zaliponi could see about half his head when he was shot. I don’t understand how Crooks would roll over to his left after all that if he was hit from the left front.
Good news: I’m going to re-make my T Shirt picture with the bald man, and the 4 guys on the roof with him.
Then, I’ll go to shopping malls with more witnesses, like Manilla, Mexico City, Calcutta, Beijing, and hand out free T Shirts there.
But…why am I talking about Baldy?
Shouldn’t I be talking about Crooks, the PATSY, who fired no bullets?
If Pittsburgh residents care more, they don’t seem to be acting, on their ‘concern’.
Someone yesterday looked at ALL of my website’s J13 pages, and ‘find location by IP’ said the viewer was in Rio Branco, Brazil.
I had to learn that Rio Branco is thousands of miles NW of Rio de Janeiro.
Detective Collins’ bodycam frames contain 61 frames of Trump’s bald shooter.
This picture shows faces of 4 other men, 3 looking East, and 1 apparently looking in the direction of Hercules 1:
The listing you shared is for an English-language edition of Buddha’s Brain: The Practical Neuroscience of Happiness, Love, and Wisdom by Rick Hanson (co-authored with Richard Mendius, and in some editions also associated with Daniel J. Siegel and Jack Kornfield). It’s a mix of neuroscience and contemplative practice aimed at helping you cultivate well-being.
Chapter about the amygdala / stress response
In summaries and related presentations, the book does discuss basic neuroscience including how the brain’s stress circuitry works (for example, the amygdala as the “alarm bell” of the brain and how it initiates stress responses). This is a theme across the book’s explanation of why we suffer and how practice changes brain responses.
the amygdala and stress neurobiology are woven into chapters like The First and Second Dart and Cooling the Fires, which explain how automatic threat responses can lead to suffering and how to temper them.
Chapter on “post-stress self-made wounds”
One of the central concepts in the book is the idea of the “first and second dart.” Here:
The first dart is the initial painful experience (external stress or hurt),
The second dart is our self-inflicted emotional reaction — for example, judging, criticizing, or hurting ourselves mentally after the fact. This is quite likely the “post-stress self made wounds” you’re remembering.
So, Is This the Book You’re Looking For?
Yes — this appears to be exactly the one.
It does indeed include the concept of the amygdala and stress neurobiology as part of its explanation of how and why we suffer and how to cultivate well-being.
It includes a key chapter on the first and second dart, which fits with your description of a section about post-stress self-made wounds.
Quick Recap of Relevant Book Content
Neuroscience of stress and emotion (including amygdala’s role) – woven through the text
The “First and Second Dart” concept (self-inflicted mental suffering) — a standalone chapter
Focus on combining Buddhist practice with modern neuroscience for emotional resilience and happiness
No, there isn’t a widely recognized scientific term specifically called “Anger Type II” in mainstream psychology or neuroscience that precisely matches the description you gave—controlled, focused anger that sharpens concentration and enhances performance, without explosive outbursts, yelling, slamming things, or self-destructive behavior (as opposed to the “hot-headed” reactive kind).
The closest concepts in scientific literature draw from distinctions between types of anger and related aggression/behavior:
Reactive (or hostile/affective) anger/aggression — This is the impulsive, hot-headed type you described as not this: emotion-driven, explosive outbursts in response to immediate threats or frustrations, often with high physiological arousal (e.g., yelling, slamming, self-harm risks).
Instrumental (or proactive/premeditated) anger/aggression — This is more calculated and goal-directed. Anger (or the energy from it) is harnessed as a tool to achieve an objective, often with lower emotional heat and more control/focus. It’s “cold” or deliberate rather than impulsive, and the harm or action serves a purpose (e.g., intimidation for power, dominance, or success). This aligns somewhat with Palpatine’s line about anger providing focus and strength—it’s channeled productively (from the user’s perspective) rather than erupting chaotically.
Other related classifications include:
Assertive anger — A healthy, constructive form where anger is expressed clearly and controlled to set boundaries, solve problems, or drive positive change (e.g., focused determination without destruction).
Controlled anger expression — In some anger regulation models (e.g., based on tools like the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory), this involves deliberately managing and directing anger inwardly or outwardly without losing control—reducing raw experience while using its energy adaptively.
Settled and deliberate anger — An older psychological distinction for episodic anger that’s thoughtful and responsive to perceived injustice, rather than hasty/impulsive.
One niche use of “Type I vs. Type II anger” appears in some self-help/anger management books (e.g., by Steven T. Griggs), where Type I is explosive (“act out”) and Type II is implosive (“act in,” like internalized pressure)—but that’s not a standard scientific term and doesn’t match your focused/controlled description.
In summary, the phenomenon you describe—anger as a sharpening, focusing force—is recognized in psychology (e.g., as adaptive channeling of anger or instrumental use), but it doesn’t have a single universal scientific name like “Anger Type II.” It’s more often discussed under terms like instrumental anger, controlled/regulated anger, or assertive anger. If this is from a specific book, study, or framework you’re referencing, more details could help narrow it down!
3 small videos showing James Copenhaver, David Dutch, FlowerShirtLady, and SunGlassLady all phone recording at times match 13.37 seconds
of Trump’s speech, from
‘great great gentleman’ to ‘vibrant Republican Party’:
@sonjax6
Just a note.
Even DJT doesn’t like to talk about J13, since it is painful. Not because of J13 per se. Due to the pursuit prior to that made by Wray’s.
@cmartenson
I don’t have a magical sphere to tell the future or truth. However… What if a Bayesian update doesn’t change anything? Teachers did not tell that.
Then the prior is a fix point, an eigenvalue.
Not all fix points are the truth. But the observation is a part of the eigenvector, and it might be easier to test.
Reframed by chatgpt:
I don’t have a crystal ball to predict the future or reveal the truth.
But consider this: what if a Bayesian update changes nothing? That possibility is rarely discussed.
In that case, the prior behaves like an eigenvalue—a fixed point.
Not every fixed point represents the truth, but the observation belongs to the corresponding eigenvector, which may be easier to test.
I don’t possess a magical sphere that reveals the future or the truth.
Yet what if a Bayesian update leaves everything unchanged?
That scenario is seldom mentioned by teachers.
Then the prior becomes an eigenvalue—a fixed point in the system.
Not every fixed point is true, but the observation lies within the associated eigenvector, and that might be more straightforward to evaluate.
Collins’ bodycam recorded pixelated images of a bald man and others.
Those images are centered, horizontally, and I think Collins saw them.
I left the images pixelated, which helps me see the faces.
Blasko walked away, but Paul Kuss watched the arrest from distance. However, he was clever to always move his camera, to get the frames fracturated and pixellated.
Does anyone here know the name of the man, shown in this picture with his back toward the camera, at about 5 pm on 13 July 2024, in Butler PA, near Trump’s rally?
This man may have worked somewhere nearby.
His clothing just looks ‘dark’, under shade of trees.
The bald man on the roof is wearing a shirt that looks similar, in color, to the shirt worn by the (apparently local) man, who’d been yelling at people, north of the fence, at the rally:
What Book This Is
So, Is This the Book You’re Looking For?
Quick Recap of Relevant Book Content
Neuroscience of stress and emotion (including amygdala’s role) – woven through the text
