So It's Back To First Principles

There might be certain ways to motivate them.

  1. One for all, all for one. But this pattern also appears in Dirty Dosen film. If anyone makes a mistake, all of them to be under penalty. Is it fair? Of course not. But it is useful, when soft methods ceases to work.

  2. The gray suit guy was in charge. Period.
    (A retired colonel told me a story about a soldier who did not wear his cap, MP asked him what his decision was. He replied: due to the serious event he was sentenced to be shot dead in front of the entire regiment.)

Fox News has the FBI’s phone press conference (or at least part of it).

  • FBI test fired the weapon. It was and remains fully operational
  • FBI matched 8 shell casing with the rifle
  • Regarding the round fired by local officer, there is no forensic evidence that that round either struck the subject or the subject’s rifle.
  • No reason to believe there was ever a 2nd shooter
  • 10 rounds fired (8 + 1 local + 1 SS sniper)
  • no reason to detain any first responder
  • Negative results for drugs or alcohol abuse.
  • Overseas encrypted email accounts were no more sophisticated than any widespread email webservice
  • Parents have been and are cooperating fully
  • Internet searches:
    September 2019 until this summer: Detonating cord, blasting cap, how to make a bomb from fertilizer, how do remote detonators work, ammonium nitrate and other things
    jul5 when drc, rnc
    jul8 agr international
    jul9 ballistic calculator
    jul10 weather in Butler

discipline one, educate hundreds.

Was this in war times?
If not, that’s how times change. Today the colonel gets sacked and the soldier gets a medal for being a rebel and critical thinker. It’s sissie time and you have to be understanding and sympathetic. It’s ok, but everything has to have its limits, otherwise it’s anarchy soon.

1 Like

No. We had peace here within 50 years. Except some agressive military parade without a single gunshot.

But the colonel had to report to the general staff and explain his answer.
Actually he was very upset, because the MP officer had referred to the constitution in his letter. What the hell the constitution to do with a missing cap, he repled. And he added, shouldn’t I have to report to the president himself too?
I laugh loudly on this story again and again.

1 Like

I just overflew but didn’t find a statement on this. Can you provide a quote for that?

In general the FBI didn’t really say anything we didn’t know already. Confirming a few things and focusing on the shooters motive but who the f**ck cares.
We want to know why was it that a 20yrs old can get in a prime position within 150yd of the FPOTUS and release 8 shots. Who was responsible and in which degree. Were decisions or actions taken/made that are legally relevant.

1 Like

according my machine transcript of the 20 min presser, the FBI special agent in charge of the FBI Pittsburgh field office Kevin Rojak (or similar) stated this at 00:19:57 into the press conference audio:

“We know that there were 10 rounds fired that day, eight from our subject, one from a local law enforcement officer, and one from the secret service sniper.”

Interestingly, at 00:19:27 he also waltzed over a journalist’s question if medications were looked for apart from the routine alcohol and drug scan in the toxicological findings:

“And regarding the second question, we need to get back to you on whether there were any prescription drugs in the system.”

If Rojak doesn’t even know the toxicological report, what he thinks to be his role at a press conference?

But Rojak knows something else at 00:08:14:

“it is not the FBI’s role to investigate the actions, the security posture, or the responsibilities of the Secret Service or local law enforcement related to the campaign rally.”

Only to contradict that at 00:16:01:

“Next, regarding questions surrounding the release of first responders from the shooting scene on the night of July 13. The FBI had no reason or intention to hold or detain any first responders. As the law enforcement community assembled in Butler was actively responding to public safety risks and assisting with investigative activity throughout the night. The FBI appreciates the monumental law enforcement response that lasted hours […]”

And look at this lame excuse at 00:00:41:

“We continue to do these press briefings by phone because we found that it allows us to reach as many of you as possible. Right. We could do this in person, but that’s going to limit the amount of people could be in the room. And so we just continue to do this by phone.”

Sadly I can’t upload a text file here, but I’ll later add a pdf version.

edit: add machine transcript as pdf as attachment.

2024-08-20-third-fbi-presser-on-Jul-13th.pdf (93.5 KB)

3 Likes

“We refuse to investigate the case. We’ve decided that it’s not our ‘role’ to actually understand what happened here.”

Fine, then get the F out of the way and let the local homicide detectives do genuine investigations.

4 Likes

Thanks for that detailed reply. My fault I didn’t watch the video and just read the article. It’s telling how they can completely contradict themselfs within just a few minutes.

1 Like

And that is one of the reasons why questions could only be asked by phone.

DEMISTIFYING THE BUTLER & BBEAVER COUNTY DOCUMENTS

Many of us were scratching our heads trying to figure out the Butler County Detail Plan, Counter-Sniper Positions, and Beaver County After Action Report. I did a detailed review of the commonly confusing aspects and the inaccuracies of those documents. It’s provided as a resource for whenever you’re doing any analysis related to that evidence, so you don’t get tripped up by them.

7 Likes

Maybe these journos are not even speeking with a human anymore, AI is everywhere.
Like when you call a helpline of a telco or so, after ending the call you’re left helplessly confused with even more questions than you had beforehand.

1 Like

Great wrap-up, thanks for sharing.
For slide 16: The car parked is not BWC2-122111’s car. He just filmed the car coming into the parking lot, check his bodycam 18:09:18 - 18:09:27
image
The cop who pulled up with the car is Patrolman David Tedeski
image

For slides 5-8
I wondered myself why they released the 3 sniper pictures from inside building 2. Should it give the impression “hey look, here are our three different sniper positions in building 2”
When I looked a bit closer, I quickly realised they just pictured 1 sniper position (west window) and made it look like it’s three different views (with the angle and zoom level the picture were taken).

P.S. At one point you had something like: confirmed sniper positions on the south facing windows, highlighted with a yellow frame. Can’t find it right now, could you help out?

3 Likes

Thank you. The graphic is a bit confusing I’ll admit. The screenshot is taken from BWC2-122110’s bodycam, who earlier in that video parking his car, the Butler Township marked vehicle (“propped up” guy). The unmarked car is captured pulling up by BWC2-122111. I am not stating that the unmarked car belongs to BWC2-122111.

1 Like

no big thing. There’s always different ways to display something and all of them may do the job. To me it just made the impression you connect the car with the BWC number Officer.

Trust me, I confused myself with it and first had the bodycam numbers jumbled up. I changed it to make it clearer.

1 Like

much less confusing for sure :+1:

The other thing
At one point you had something like: confirmed sniper positions in building 2 (south facing). I think screenshot of the facade with the 2 very left windows highlighted with a yellow frame. Was that from a report or testimony, can’t find it now. Before I have to scroll through all the posts, maybe you have a hint?

I don’t recall the graphic you’re describing, I’ve had so many iterations. If it’s just confirmation you need, this should suffice. I’ll grab you the link and post it in a little while.

Here is the link to Grassley’s letter.

2 Likes

exactly this was it bottom right in your slide, thanks a lot!
I just wonder why they say it’s the 2 windows on the very left. I ask myself because the 1st window wasn’t open, but the 2nd and the 3rd. Or is the 1st in a room that also covers the southern west facing window (pictures of sniper spot) and they were just too lazy to point that out in detail?

Interesting, the time offset of the bodycam is BWC2-122110 is +102 seconds compared to the device that I understand to be a GPS navigation system mounted between the front seats. Could that be? The screenshot was taken when the digital clock visible at the top of the small screen just transited to 18:01. The car is the cruiser parked in front of AGR Bldg. 6, with dashcam M500-010482. I really don’t know if the GPS also feeds the clock of the video documentation system and thus its clock bar display, but that could be established when comparing the clocks of BWC2-122110 video with that of the car at significant points along the way.

edit: correct BWC2-12110 → BWC2-122110

edit: BWC2-122110 and dashcam M500-010482 are almost in sync (dt < 1 s), but way off from the mid console display … The two stills are taken when the driver stops when having missed the dirt road leading up to the water tower.

1 Like

I sure wish we had a floor plan.

1 Like