So It's Back To First Principles

The “MERCO” misspelling on the map provided to Sen. Grassley to confirm the counter-sniper lists, makes me wonder if “Oshe” was misspelled (e.g. Oshea or O’Shea).

2 Likes

You’re right, look at those docs.

After thinking about it, I wonder if it’s because I used my deceased mother’s iPad to set it up, and she had an Instagram account. This is the reason they gave:

image

No, I have strong intuition that they simply detect stuff that’s not normal. The machine learning stuff detects that your account was just an information gathering account. They told me the same kind of thing on Facebook.

They want their “platform” to be a kind of zoo where they can monitor everything. No “guests” allowed.

1 Like

OK, I have a new understanding. Goodman probably really did do a FOIA request, and got back a thumb drive. The documents on the drive were improperly redacted. I’ve uploaded two of the three here, but I can’t upload the third one because it’s a pptx, but we’ve already seen most of it.

Goodman is probably a legit source, it’s just that he’s a bad journalist, which is fine. Kudos to him for doing the FOIA request.

2 Likes

Here’s the second half of the deep dive I did on the Butler & Beaver County documents. The AAR is full of mistakes. I can only imagine someone trying to document the events to respond to Grassley, and not having those involved to help compile it or at least review it before it went out. It’s a “flash document” as stated on Grassley’s website, and it’s not on official letterhead. That all needs to be considered when interpreting it. The timeline maps are the worst, along with the screwed up 8:06-18:11 entry. I explain how I interpret that entry.

1 Like

Mine. Sorry I missed this earlier.

I feel like nobody is understanding what I’m saying. I just uploaded documents that were IMPROPERLY REDACTED. You can just delete the redactions.

3 Likes

As I understood, he got it printed out via mail upon his right to know request. Not sure though if he modified something before he scanned it for downloading. To me it all looks legit.
But I have a feeling lots of new tel. numbers have to be issued soon…

I see what you’re saying now. I use PDF-XChange Viewer and can’t figure out how to go about removing the redactions.

So where did this different set o redacted files come from, and what was the creation dates?

If these predate Grassley’s files, maybe they were rushed to Grassley and Grassley’s team redacted them properly. Just giving an example of while the dates created are important to know.

1 Like

No, it arrived digitally, and he messed around with it before releasing it, probably to avoid getting nailed on various platforms that have rules about doxxing. But by messing around with it he made it look like a forgery.

2 Likes

I think Brian is correct. Real people no longer even read resumes. It’s all done by algorithums and AI(worked at Ziprecruiter).

Any idea who could be bsedlacek or more likely B. Sedlacek, looks like he/she didn’t do a good job.

I think they used something called a “KONICA MINOLTA bizhub” to do these redactions? I’m not sure. If they were adding boxes on a screen on some expensive copier/printer thing, maybe it seemed like it was going to work.

% pdfinfo Butler\ ESU\ Operations\ Order-redacted.pdf
Title:           SKM_36824071510440
Creator:         KM_368
Producer:        KONICA MINOLTA bizhub 368
CreationDate:    Mon Jul 15 22:44:51 2024 +07
ModDate:         Fri Aug 23 01:04:58 2024 +07

The thing is, nobody had my mother’s account passwords. While I was able to access the iPad and reset that password, I can’t go into her accounts and make any changes. They all recognize this device by her identity. I could be wrong.

I just read them. Amazing. We have all the names.
Also, now there is no excuse for anyone. It plainly says you are responsible for your area and will remain even if 1st attack is resolved because there may be a secondary attack.

4 Likes

That’s not good then. Do you know what exactly he altered, something that affects the content?

It could be an Apple thing.

I think he meant well and did his best. I bet he thought that if he just released the raw original files, he’d be suspended or banned. So he made his own document based on the original document, leaving in only some redactions he thought were necessary to stay safe.

So, I think it was just an unfortunate situation where by trying to stay safe he made it appear as if he was releasing forgeries.

4 Likes

He even spelled Greg’s last name wrong. We get the gist though.