So It's Back To First Principles

Thanks for the heads up! I give my feedback like everyone else, and have no problem correcting any errors I might make. I just reserve the right to not list someone or list them as “Unconfirmed” until I feel we’ve come up with a well corroborated match. It’s a CYA thing. I will go back and make any corrections needed.

That said, I’m just about ready to post Rev. 5, and I think you’ll like some of the changes or additions. I am now ready to capture any new people we ID, and have gone back 2 weeks to catch those that have already been discovered. You might want to check some of those for accuracy or updates. Give me a few minutes to make the corrections above and I’ll post it…with one request for input on how to best capture something. See you soon.

2 Likes

That sounds promising, we’re looking forward to your update. But take you time, no rush.

And of course I know how much work you put in here, be assured it’s highly appreciated. If I’d do the same, I also wouldn’t pick up every possible candidate somebody comes up with immediately. In my eyes you do it the right way :+1:

4 Likes

@brian60221 @daniloraf @gfgftt5d0q @prayingpatriot @RedRanAmber @sorey

Here is Rev. 5 of my Recognition Tool. A few improvements you’ll find:

  1. Extra slides to capture new people we ID that are not listed in the BuC Detail document.
  2. I added a slide for Other Counties, as well, in case we find more.
  3. I’ve added notation to those individuals whose bodycam footage we have.

On the County Department slides, you’ll see asterisks added. Those I use to link to the sections I have for each department documenting how we ID’ed each person. Basically, I’ve combined my notes deck with the tool so I have everything in one place, and hyperlinked. What you see in the PDF are 32 slides, but it’s currently 90 slides total, and I still have more to add in.

A question: One thing that would make this tool even more useful, is to be able to search it using the body or dash camera you are viewing to more easily find who that person might be. I eventually want to use field images wherever possible to make it easier, but being able to search by video number would make that much quicker. The individual pages I have hidden would have the room to list that for each individual, but I would really like to keep those hidden. Another idea is to add a few slides with tables that are hyperlinked to the names. That’s a tall order developing those tables, so I would likely just create them and update as we go. What are your thoughts?

A request: As we ID more people, please provide a photo and the evidence you have that ties it to a name. And most importantly, please include the link to the evidence. You will save me having to duplicate your efforts, as I am saving links to all the evidence we use to ID someone.

Thanks again for all your hard work and support. Please let me know if you find any errors.

Recognition Tools (Rev 5).pdf (3.5 MB)

Correction: Det. Bill Mayhugh image was incorrect, showing Chief Det. Fenell instead. It is corrected for when Rev. 6 gets released. Kudos to @daniloraf for catching the error and finding the right guy.

7 Likes

Once again, great work and well done :clap: :clap: :clap:
For today I’m off but will get back to you with my thoughts on the people/video search issue.

The theory I was referring to was from my initial post where I hypothesize that Trump participated in a staged event like the old time of David Copperfield.

The authenticity of the captured bullet photo you mention won’t prove or disprove that theory.

However, I would be interested to get a 3D model of the reconstructed scene that include the position of the forklift that got damaged by a bullet.

1 Like

I have a serious question. What if someone here finds incriminating evidence? What if someone figures something out? What if there is proof discovered of a cover up or an accomplice to crime? What do we do? Who do you turn to? I wouldn’t trust my own Sheriff to report it to. Who would we report to? Does Chris report it because it is his site? Whom to? Just thinking about this.

5 Likes

Then it would be a criminal offence to not report it to the appropriate state and/or Federal agency

Major Major.

Catch 22

2 Likes

I think we already have found a bunch of incriminating evidence. My inclination is to go to to press, even though 99.9% of them seem to be corrupt. If more people can simply understand the main issues, they will be asking themselves what they can do within their own lives, and they’ll be getting different answers, and that can be happening in parallel.

3 Likes

Do you have a State or Federal Criminal Code for that?
A news report of someone charged and convicted for it?

1 Like

So…call the f…b…i… Tip line?!! Hahahahaha I would rather rot in jail.

2 Likes

Go to the press? lol What do you think happens when the press reports that you are withholding this incriminating evidence from the authorities? Expect a box of chocolates?

It’s tampering, it’s spoilage,it’s obstruction…it’s a criminal offense. This is not difficult. You’re not Trump

And well you might. Being simple-minded is not a defense fyi.

If Elon Musk mentions a single word about it on a retweet, even Mars will see it. It would be harder to ignore it.

3 Likes

Yes, simple-minded people are all who do not comply and think logically and base their lives on experience and truth. I take offense to your comment but I do not expect everyone here to be decent, simple, united (for a real cause that has nothing to do with US) people. I am only here because of my children, and all those children in the future. So they don’t say “why didn’t people try to stop this tyranny”. If Trump gets killed, the world will be in for it. If we let this obvious inside cover-up job go, it will get worse. Thanks for letting me know how much you trust and believe in the very system that put us where we are.

2 Likes

All good advice…but…it still does not exonerate from the legal requirement to report to LEOs.

Do as you wish. Incarceration is a bitch.

Hi VegasPatriot. Regarding Det. Bill Mayhugh (No Assigned Role) - Butler County - Other Personnel: how sure is that ID? I ask because I saw diverging info. Also, that Higgins report mentions detective for DA’s office, but on their website the name is not mentioned.

Links:

Butler Eagle: photo roll (find the thumbnail below the main photo area).

2 Likes

I’m glad you caught that. I got the wrong guy. I have Chief Detective Tim Fennell. I had a few related images on the slide for him that were leads for trying to track him down. When reorganizing ~60 slides and cleaning up my notes, I grabbed Fennell’s image assuming it was Mayhugh. Now you know why I wanted to clean up my slide deck. :crazy_face: I’ll use what you have, since you found him. Thanks, and kudos for the good detective work!

2 Likes

More details to add to our investigation

Senate Hearing on Trump Rally Shooting
Aug 5, 2024


USSS Director Abbate, can you just talk a little bit about how did Mr. Crooks… How was he able to get an AR-15 onto the roof of that building? Does your investigation illuminate anything that we have learned to help to make that point more clear?

Deputy Director Abbate (01:19:19):

We don’t have definitive evidence yet as to how he got the rifle up there. Based on everything that’s been collected thus far, photos, video, eyewitness accounts, we do believe he likely had it in the backpack.

Sen. Butler (01:19:33):

Broken down in the backpack?

Deputy Director Abbate (01:19:34):

We’re still assessing that. Our laboratory has looked at the rifle itself and measured that against the backpack itself. And if placed in this backpack, it would extend outside. It would’ve been visible. But we don’t have anyone who observed him with the backpack with a rifle barrel or other part of it sticking out of the backpack. But the rifle would not have fit fully into this backpack to be concealed in whole. We have video that was recently found of the shooter walking in a distance from his car just before 6:00 PM, about 5:56, I believe.

(01:20:17)
And based on everything we have, we assessed that he returned to his vehicle at that time, got the backpack, and then proceeded back to the area, into the AGR building. And then he’s observed, of course, on the roof just minutes later holding the backpack in front of him. In fact, there’s dashcam footage from a police vehicle that shows him briefly traversing the roof with the backpack in front of him. And then it’s just minutes after that that he’s actually seen by the officer, who I described, with the rifle on the roof. It’s possible that he broke the rifle down, but we don’t have conclusive evidence of that and took it out of the bag on the roof in those moments before and reassembled there. That’s one of the theories we’re looking at and working on right now.


Mike Lee (01:56:54):

Yes. So did the assailant get out eight shots or were those shell casings left from the day before or where did they come from?

Deputy Director Abbate (01:56:59):

The shooter, Senator, we believe fired eight rounds. We had the shooting reconstruction team go out there for a period of days and collect all that. So we have bullet holes, bullet fragmentation, all taken back and we’re still putting together the trajectory and ballistic analysis, although we do have fragments of the bullets and bullets have been collected in the distance from the shooter as well.


Mike Lee (01:57:21):

Gotcha. It’s my understanding there was a sniper team assigned to a window with complete overlook, complete view of the roof, the same sloped rooftop where the shots were fired. It’s also my understanding, according to some whistleblower accounts, that that post was abandoned. What can you tell me about that? Why was it abandoned?

Acting Director Rowe (01:57:43):

So I saw that from the colonel’s testimony, sir, and it’s something that I’ve asked and our mission assurance is getting to the bottom of. There were two two-man counter sniper teams from the locals that were in that AGR building.


Senator Marshall (02:19:00):

So there’s no protocol that says anything within 300, 500 yards, direct line of the President should be in or out of the security zone? There’s not a protocol that describes that?

Acting Director Rowe (02:19:11):

So Senator, what we try to do is we try to either control the high ground or mitigate line of sight concerns.

Mike Lee (01:57:58):

And so at some point they just left?

Acting Director Rowe (01:58:02):

I don’t have an answer for you on that, Senator, but it seems to me that if even one of them left, there should have been remaining some additional eyes left in that building.


Acting Director Rowe (33:50):

So we’re actually putting out targeted recruitment opportunities. So we’ve just recently put it out within our uniform division for our counter sniper unit, our hazardous agent, medical emergency response unit, our counter assault team on the special agent side. So we’re actually trying to gather the best and the brightest. And I will tell you that we are having great success with a lot of these vacancies. But what I want to reiterate is that, for example, on the counter assault vacancy, we had 700 applicants that applied for this. Really, what we will glean after they make it through the process, and they have to be able to hold a top secret SCI clearance, will be, if we realize 15 out of that tranche, that’s a 2% pass rate. So it is very competitive and we are trying to make sure that we are getting the best and the brightest without dropping standards.

In this year alone, we are going to end the year on the positive of 200+ agents. …But what I want to re-emphasize is that we have not dropped standards. Only 2% of every applicant actually makes it through the hiring process.

5 Likes