BTW, on your Recognition Tools document you have Col. Christopher Paris belonging to the “PSSP” - is that different than the PSP?
1 Like
Why does the Beaver ESU AAR state he went down the stairs into building 1? Is this a mistake? Is there other documentation stating he went out the other door?
1 Like
Those guys were already on site and wouldn’t have just pulled up in two police units.
"One marked vehicle and one unmarked vehicle pull[ed] in together.” 430 [The referenced evidence for footnote 430 is the After-Action Report]
Look at the upper right-hand corner of the timeline map, which I analyzed in great depth in my analysis of the AAR.
“PSP testimony later confirmed that a Butler Township PD car and a PSP car came into the parking lot on the east side of AGR, and officers were seen surrounding the building.” 431
The evidence of those two officers parking there, one marked and one unmarked vehicle, is in two or three bodycam/dashcam videos. The marked car being from the department referenced by the officer in the interim report.
I see no confusion to the statement that they parked their vehicles on the east side of AGR like the evidence clearly supports.
Thanks for pointing out the typo. I corrected it for Rev. 8.
Yep, those 2 didn’t arrive in police units. From the Senate report, those 2 are either the PSP Trooper and PSP Coporal (roving) or the 2 undercover who were at Sheetz and were called to help out. From the bodycam 1383_202407131821_BWC2122117-0, they identify themselves as that SERT team.
EDIT: Scratch that about them having arrived on an ATV/UTV… that ATV was not theirs!!! @rough_country_gypsy who showed up on that ATV/UTV were guys in full tactical/cammo uniforms (just got that from another bodycam).
1 Like
I didn’t write the report, so I can only infer from the related evidence why that building and room location was pointed out.
It would seem logical for Nicols to exit at Door 13,
in his search as Crooks had just disappeared round the corner just 35m away.
Nicols could have run that 35m in <8 seconds, he had a gun?
What did the two officers do after meeting Nicols?
WTF happend to Nicols in those vital minutes?
At 6:02 Crooks disappeared round the corner
At 6:06 he climbed on the roof
there is no way any cop would have missed him in that dead end!!
2 Likes
So what you’re saying is the Beaver County After-Action Report, radio communications, corroborating witness testimonies, and FBI and USSS-HSGAC investigation of that evidence is not evidence? Only video evidence is evidence? I’ve asked this before to others with similar mindsets. Can you prove you were born and not hatched? Was there a video of it, or just a birth certificate, which based on your logic is not evidence that you were born?
1 Like
IDK if it is the same AAR you are referencing. A early ESU AAR listed the buildings by their, ESU numbering, which was different than the AGR building numbers. IIRC, ESU #1 was AGR #6.
1 Like
I think the only thing we know is that he’s with Beaver ESU. We see him (we think it’s him) walking past at 19:04:28 with his helmet on.
The AAR timeline maps showed the location as the northwest corner of building 4.
Nicols specifically told them Crooks went into the dead end,
either the cop was a blithering idiot and didn’t diligently search the area,
or he was in on the caper.
Be reasonable. I said you assuming door 13 is conjecture, not the radio transcripts. About the reports, I haven’t seen an FBI report. The Senate simply replicated the After Action report. The After-Action report is ambiguous and incomplete, and not only that, it sub-references the patrol units arriving as a child information of the main information, as one being a detail of the other.
Same as it does here below. This thing happened, and this thing below is the detail.
Back on the going downstairs part:
First, it states an objective, not necessarily an outcome. It doesn’t mention which door he went to or if he did in fact meet with people as intended. From that text, one could either reason he went(or intended to go but didn’t) East to let them know they were on the wrong side OR that he went(or intended to go but didn’t) to door 13 to let others know they were on the right side of AGR.
I don’t have a problem with the logic for door 13 (it’s a very, very fair assumption), I just don’t believe it qualifies as Evidence with a capital E. In fact, the evidence that supports door 13’s logic is that the undercover guys were on that side. But then again, if even the after action report lists the patrol cars as child elements of Nicol going downstairs… who can say?
3 Likes
That’s the whole reason I spent days analyzing that document, and documented my analysis for others to benefit from.
I prefer the term “inference,” which is an idea or conclusion that’s drawn from evidence and reasoning.
3 Likes
It’s possible to give feedback about the interim report. I did it. It probably goes in the toilet, but maybe not. Contact Form - Committee on Homeland Security & Governmental Affairs
3 Likes
What if they are intelligence secret agents?
Was it at the western side of the building? That parking lot was MT (until a police car arrived at about ~1825). So if two cars pulled together around 1800 they might left almost immediatelly. (At the east parking lot there were 3 police cars pulled together.)
By the way, there might be video evidence, since the AGR building has security cameras.
based is also used in the context of non-woke 
and based matches very well with the MAGA views too 