I AM TRYING NOT TO EMAIL, but recog that there is no confidentiality. Even from here people work to affect world events. I am extremely disabled and yet meet people. I don’t believe in synchronicity. I believe in Jesus and God’s purpose. But I do seem to get quoted as I email about my passions. There is nothing in what I say that questions the real event of an attempt to… I do not ever think that Pres T would risk and endanger others. i do think that he has capacity to know more than us, and rightly so. I think that he should have 2ndry layers of defence ready to insert themselves, and have NO issue with any precautions he might add by stealth at any time. He should never have to justify that or any communications to protect himself, etc - this is imagination at play.
SO A THESIS:
The look alike to M.C is the more likely shooter in disguise of wig, and differentiated by T Shirt.
AMBER:
I run with (cautious) assumptions, based on numbers of observations about crowd movement in the minutes prior to walking on platform. They r THAT Pres T’s team knew that IF there was danger then they would have done due diligence in risk assessment.
DISCUSSION: A non-prof would take that roof, or a naive person WOULD, ONLY IF told that they could become part of 3 letter org by protecting… The wider context of WORLD & US theatrics for THE LAST 4 yrs indicates a bigger play over-riding the econ collapse of the West and how it is being enacted by both many forms and complex layers of deception. no one dare explore. I don’t only mean Perestroika, but a layered sting of counter moves. The only explanation is spiritual w@rf@re in which the world will eventually (when?) follows its savior. That last is fact - so I will work backwards as well in my analysis.
Perhaps this is why the ‘Blacklist’ TV series was not completed (the S2 Ep 20 or 22 when key character is in a movie theatre exposing to media the network of evil - I have bad memory recall - may be deleted, so likely need old DVDs).
FACT & SPEC:
The grey shirt is LIKELY? taller with developed chest, confident, etc; he is meant to stand, was carefully selected to not be mistaken for M>C. He was/is composed, skilled, physically agile, capable, not a fool… While speculation, it is also obvious in that he then has eyes on M>C, then disappears??? or not???
Add the drive by LEO who claimed to tell that need a person on that rff. He positions car to vid the door of bld6, Likely his insurance policy (uncomfortable, with something, thus interestingly immediately goes to observe the area from where a person hits M>Cs stock, placing himself in the line of fire. Had he covered he signalled? He possibly saw something on the roof that surprised/shocked him causing him to drop, had had not had a drawn pistol (it was all so casual, that???) - ie, had anyone taken a shot at M>C on the roof at any time the shot would have ended all attempts to… and it be all over…
So, we are forced to consider a darker element, NOT only a 2 shooter cons…which is likely a deliberate messy, layered distraction, but of possible 2 person involvement: one set up as if doing good, the other the real deal.
Lack of competence in physical prowess seen in M>C’s crab crawl, and the whole tossing of a zeroed wepon onto a roof - old farmers knew that bread and butter meant to respect a wepon
The 1st complexity is the discharge of w noises and reports re 4-8… Strange that the pros have not commented on the above and 8Shts4-5. They went where?
The 2nd complexity is re evidence of shots 9-10 and all other tampered evidence. The buck is made to stop with 3 letters. But, now people will believe what they choose because there is no polic, work. It comes down to what lens we view the world thru.
This causes one to question all forms of reality, which is shaped by beliefs, econ, family, health, time, jobs, interests, passions - ALL COLORS VIEW OF FACT & SPECULATION
RED:
That videoGreg saw head-brain splatter??? what exactly? blood? from where, when, how? Was he the runner who was uncomposed and could not hold a camera/mobile? I get so confused by basics.
Though believable, it would be an easy clean up if dummied… BUT surely someone videoed some of the incidents post the roof events
Also, post cremat… might identify DNA, teeth - you have a better insight than I do about this, and you know if it would have been possible, but all is scattered to wind and wave.
Interestingly, Paramount Tactical gave examples of ballistics causing brn-head splat, and said, despite Greg’s report (who took the videos), that the shot went thru the side of M.C’s face pointing left to right, which we believe it was the right to left of M>C’s face by furthest 440yrd sh0t; so they gained early inside knowledge - I ques that would be a k shot hence no head splatter, but = the bleed shown - also, had butt of wep0n been shattered there was no evidence or mention of such when enforcem… went on roof. Not that I heard or saw. I have no comment on the casualness of it all.
Who is saying make yourself small??? WHY??? Run to the shed wall unless you expect explosives to go off.
CONCLUSION:
When lad had got up to be an easy target we do not know clearly what happened (explains all the mysterious time lapses of getting on the roof, and other idiosyncrasies about the day. He either wanted to die or he thought it safe, or was plain stupid (which I do not think) - seems illogical unless he thought he had earned an oversight position, done his job… BUT if sh0t his body position would have been sideways or backwards. The only time I am aware of a clean fall/slump is if a … trajectory passes thru the spine
I could suggest more, but this goes to questioning the said splatt of brain matter, the roof structure and cavity, etc. It becomes fanciful, YET that is the point. All evidence points from start to chaos at work, dismantling/clean up & lack of TV forensics, etc.
