This idea of an exploding lapel mic is obvious nonsense because you can see the mic in the frame where the “mic explosion” happens.
It’s still there! How does something explode and stay in place? It doesn’t and even the most minimal understanding of high explosives and their 26,550ft/s (for c4) would be sufficient to understand that 1/30th of a second after the explosion (a) the mic would be vaporized, (b) the shirt at the explosion site would be shredded, and (c) any remaining mic fragments would be 885 feet away (no air resistance) to at least many dozens of feet away and entirely out of the frame.
Let’s compare the boosting on X for a B.S. idea vs. a sound analysis that sticks to physics and facts:
Why we cannot see the rifle in his pants?
(Probably they would say - these photos were taken days before when he reconned the building. But for better face recognition these pictures were released.)
And yes, the surveillance camera could see the entire roof. But they didn’t show.
Yes. We’ve got a behind-the-scenes handler for these situations who has a YT license and is able to actually get strike "justifications’ answered and can get the strikes removed under many circumstances by altering and then re-uploading the video.
Nenad and his team work miracles…and get us deeper information about all kinds of YT shenanigans.
The text messages were to me the smoking gun. Once the FBI released those it was obvious the entire story was a lie IMO. It doesn’t make sense to lie about those unless the entire house of cards is fragile.
What about the shot coming from right rear and the neck being an exit wound and the audio analysis that pinpoints that spot along with the muzzle flash at that spot?
According to this theory, the bullet went into the back of the head and came out of the neck. It doesn’t account for the sheer violence of the jolt which Charlie experienced in the upper body. And it doesn’t account for the necklace breaking off and popping up with such speed. Also, a bullet to the back of the head would have jolted his head forwards. We do not see this in the videos. Instead, neck and upper torso are jolted backwards.
When you try to visualize where the shooter must have positioned himself, then cross-check this with the footage of the incident, it becomes very difficult to make this scenario work. There is really little to nothing in that area behind and to the right of Charlie which can be identified as a shooter.
Posting it on “X” might have been a tad wiser since YT is nothing more than a Leftist run advertising platform. That’s like me going on Bluesky and saying how Trump is the Greatest POTUS. This is all just fanning the flames for a future Civil War as Marjorie Taylor Greene suggested that perhaps a National Divorce is the better plan.
Killing a political activist because of his views who happened to be a peaceful activist, not like BLM, Antifa or Bill Ayers (Weather Underground) is a recipe for an armed serious national conflict in the making.
People are getting wise to the Government and especially the Media blowing smoke into their rectal orifice. They’re beginning to figure it out, which is why information is being (manipulated, censored and controlled).
p.s. Chris, lose the beard brother, you look much older and I thought Foster Brooks was back from the dead. j/k about Foster Brooks
There’s zero evidence for that hypothesis. We’ve got video from the right, no entrance wound there to be seen, and there’s no exit spray that you’d expect from a through-and-through and then we wouldn’t see the observed cavitation to the degree we did.
We can safely rule out “shot from the right.”
Editorially, I am heavily discounting any of the theories that are getting massive social media boosts as I see those are deliberate efforts to muddy the waters.
It seems like one of the main pushbacks on this hypothesis on YT is that Charlie was hunched over? Trying to do the analysis myself at a 10/10 trajectory, it seems like even a large hunch wouldn’t present enough high-density mass to keep the bullet in his body? It would need to be more like a bow?
Also, looked up his attorney (public defender) to send Chris’s video to https://www.nesterlewispllc.com/our-team. I know we all think he’s going to get offed or forced confession though it seems like there is a potential attack vector/winnable skirmish in this truth vs. lies war. Wonder if anyone in the tribe is a Utah defense attorney? Doesn’t seem like his relatively affluent family wants to go down with the ship.
First time I saw it, thought, he left something on the roof at the corner. It is his shadow. (Just like it was Murder by Death parody: he’s gone away, but his shadow remains there.)
Chris, you obviously don’t need another kudos but I have to post one anyway. You give me hope that by your example, America will get through this time of signal scrambling and come out on the other side with sustainable wisdom and resilience.
