I felt the same way, but I wonder what Chris will think in light of his acoustic evidence that the final shot was from a sniper rifle
1 Like
I would actually be shocked if the FIB (or CIA, or whoever) is NOT already doing that here in a variety of ways. I’ve blocked two people here who annoy me and seem to be keeping us busy with peripheral issues. Maybe they’re FIB, or maybe they’re just naturally annoying. 
4 Likes
I agree wholeheartedly! Always think for yourself. They will bait you with some truths so you will begin to trust them, then slowly reel you into crazytown so they can discredit you.
1 Like
I think Chris is so smart he will figure it out…but i hope he keeps it to himself and stays safe. I have a bad feeling…i worry because these people stop at nothing now…
They also know the treason of joe biden…and are hoping it w9nt get a huge play in the compliant media…
And:
It goes on and on. Each representative of his agency has some bit of control of the event. Kinda’ makes sense.
Law enforcement has huge say over much of the event. Seven connected layers.Bottom line: If all this usual coordination did not happen, it was intentional. Any Fed knows this stuff.
Thank you OMaGosh for weighing in with your experience. It tracks…
[this was posted in the other thread, so cross-posting here]
Shot 10 comes from the SS sniper guy. The audio is 100% consistent with this on my end.
My proof: The ‘snick’ of the bullet crushes the limiter/gate on Trump’s mic, ergo it went over it. This ESU guy is past that mic, so the snick would not, could not, pass over it.
So the way I interpret that fist pump by that ESU guy is he was watching through his optics and saw the headshot and reacted to that.
6 Likes
You probably got that already covered but if not:
Here is the most early close up screenshot from the shooters weapon on the roof. Taken just after the first group of 4 made it ontop AGR6 (BWC2-122110).
I’m no weapon expert but maybe it helps specifying/confirming the shooters weapon regarding the audio analysis of shots 1-8. Maybe somebody can make out if the statement in Higgins preliminary, "Shot 9 hit Crooks’ rifle stock and fragged his face/neck/right shoulder area from the stock breaking up.” is accurate.
and zoomed in
The moment when the first group of 4 reaches the AGR6 roof, can also be seen from a position beside the northern crane holding up the big flag (BWC2-122104 => be aware: the timestamp in this video is wrong +12 seconds). I believe you can even spot when they dislocate the shooters weapon. Watch the roof between timestamp 18:16:49 and 18:17:20 (so in reality 18:16:37 - 18:17:08). That also matches with the timestamp in BWC2-122110
2 Likes
I thought his video was quite polished but strange for twice pushing, with missing or contrary evidence, that there was only one shooter.
- His graph does show much more variation in location for shots 4-8 than for 1-3
- He claims something is said in D Stewart’s video that is not, namely, that the man next to D Stewart definitely saw muzzle flashes over the roof from every shot 1-8.
1 Like
Especially suspicious are latecomers to PP who start out cold but reference polished analyses and videos, or who sow doubt without supporting evidence, or who insist on pushing in a certain directions (maybe unimportant) with repeated variations.
5 Likes
Concerning the muzzle flash and the shooter on the roof. Watch from 13:48
Ep82 - Live Interview of Second Eyewitness - He Was Less Than 30 Feet From Shooter! (rumble.com)
This interview with Kurt and the one Gary Melton did with Jon Malis the day before were two of the best eyewitness interviews I’ve seen, Melton’s propensity to ramble on notwithstanding. Kurt’s statement that he saw muzzle flashes stood out to me, as my research of flash hiders, which may have been seen on Crook’s rifle and some current DPMS AR-15 models come with, suggests that a flash hider all but eliminates muzzle flash during the daytime. I only mention that because it stood out to me.
Whenever I listen to eyewitness testimony I keep in mind the fallibility of human memory. (See linked post.) Jon Malis did a great job acknowledging some of those in his interview. I think I recall some good examples in Kurt’s interview, as well, but I do want to listen to it again since I only viewed it once. So thanks for bringing it up.
In sharing this post I’m not questioning the credibility of Kurt or Jon by any means, just pointing out some good to know related information.
1 Like
Just fyi. Grey vehicle (Ford) at AGR main entrance is most likely the car of officer BWC2-122104. He takes some barrier tape out of the trunk and drives away.
1 Like
I remember seeing that and watching him repark his vehicle, which seemed odd.
I forgot about your initial Audio analysis. That is certainly solid evidence. The only way I can explain it is they both fired at the same time and the Buttler Swat dude believed he made the shot. Can’t believe he had him in his sights and didn’t shoot, since he had already proven that he doesn’t hesitate.
2 Likes
Thanks for bringing that important point up. Perception can and most likely will change over time, especially when there is such a news and information overflow like in this case.
1 Like
Not likely because of the audio differences. We should have audio signs of two shots if that happened.
I lean towards the USSS sniper not being the shooter.
I think it was the local swat guy. It does explain the wound appearance. AKA no head explosion
Thanks again for calling out that interview. After watching it again I heard Kurt stating that he arrived as Trump’s intro song was playing, which prompted me to tie up this loose end.
Who was Crooks talking to? Because…he is.
This link shows Crooks walking near merch booths at the rally and he’s talking to himself or someone.
1 Like
Here is the other interview from Paramount Tactical (Gary) with Jon Malis
Dangerous Liberty Ep81 - Trump Assassination Attempt Eye Witness Interview (rumble.com)
Thanks for posting. If the video states the correct time, that puts Crooks in 2 places at the same time, near the vendor area and the picnic table near AGR 6 entrance. If Jason Woods did sight him at 4:26, the time shown on this clip is wrong at best, or disinformation at worst.
2 Likes
Yes, I’ve watched that one a few times. Both he and Kurt are very credible witnesses, both recognizing the fact that things they’ve seen or read since the event could blend with their memories from the actual event. I wish all the witnesses to incidents I’ve interviewed over the years were half as good these guys.