IDK, look at FBI HRT sniper Lon Horiuchi & Ruby Ridge. It finally ended with Horiuchi getting off the involuntary manslaughter charge because of Federal Immunity. Which went up to the 9th Circuit and reversed en banc. It went back to the State and via politics was finally dropped.
Still the State could investigate it under State laws. Normally they let the Feds take it, because they use Federal money and the State doesn’t have to spend State or County money.
I believe shots one to five were fired by Crooks- the first two clearly toward the centre stage and later shots possibly at the audience on the bleachers.
There were friendly snipers amongst the crowd whose duty was to respond rapidly in the event of shots fired, to identify any clear threat, and act against it without delay.
Initially some of those snipers would have been looking for a shooter close to centre stage.
David Dutch was apparent injured by the second round- so my view is that Crooks was the culprit in his shooting.
Which round hit Comperatore?
It does appear that Crooks at one point became aware that shots were fired in his direction and that was likely before his AR-15 was reportedly disabled.
Perhaps one of shots seven or eight may have been made by Crooks but directed away from the greater stage area and aimed at that apparent friendly sniper.
Recall the early reports that one of the Hercules team counter-snipers shot Crooks weapon away from his body after Crooks was reported “down”. That part of the narrative has certainly changed.
IDK how you can say Crooks fired shots 1-2-3 & 4-5. But not 6-7-8.
1-3 sounds different than 4-8. If you’re going to break them up, it would be between those two groups.
The current thought is #6 hit Comperatore because it is missing the supersonic ‘snik’ in that group. It would have hit him before making it past the stage podium mic.
I was searching around in desperation and I just had an idea.
The Comperatore family has now hired counsel in an attempt to get justice for him. “I want justice for my husband, and I’m going to get it,” Helen said.
Let’s work with @cmartenson on a dossier to help the Comperatores’ lawyer know who to depose or whatever. At this point we don’t know exactly what’s going on, but we can make WANTED posters for at least Greg Nicol, Butler sniper “M”, D. King and/or his spotter, Ed Lenz, and probably a few others.
Two birds with one stone: it helps the Comperatores and it helps crack the “magically exempt from investigation” force field that prevents us from asking people the obvious questions.
As Sgt Raven says, it could be either way. But wouldn’t you think the physics don’t lie. Therefore check this video by Mike Bell at 13:07 - 15:28 he makes an analysis using sonic cones.
Trump Shooting: How Early Did Snipers Spot Crooks? | Shots 9 & 10 Explained (youtube.com)
There has been a lot of audio analysis that all agree that the first 8 shots came from the AGR area.
How do you account for that in your hypothesis?
Chris,
Your video on Rumble was Great!! Your turning to side camera, was superb. visual que.
Regards,
K
If you are saying that the FBI are deliberately trying to quash anyone else from investigating then why wouldn’t they be working in this forum to steer the investigation away from what they are hiding.
This has to be the no.1 citizen investigation. You don’t know how far they would go if they are willing to kill the former and rightful president.
The acoustic report for shot #4 is almost coincident with the “snick” of the shock wave from the path of the projectile for shot #5. This affects the way we perceive shot #4 and #5 with respect to shots #1, #2 and #3.
I didn’t assert that Crooks did not fire any of shots #6 to #8, merely that the latter were not consistent with the first three with respect to the amplitudes and the timing of audio signal components.
About the missing “snick” for shot #6, the shock wave propagates at the speed of sound in all directions from a moving segment of the path of the supersonic projectile (immediately behind it). If the projectile stops the shock wave will overtake it but the maximum sound pressure level will be reduced.
I could discern no matching “snick” and “crack” for the audio signal regarded to be associated with shot #6. Which was missing- the snick or the crack? I cannot say.
I think most people use either snick or crack for the same thing.
What bannon said…we didnt stand up and demand an explanation of the 2020 electi9n steel which was the most brazen and in your face i have seen ourside of Venezuela or Zimbabwe
We were warned if we let that go…which we and our Congess did…the end of America. And here we are.
I felt the same way, but I wonder what Chris will think in light of his acoustic evidence that the final shot was from a sniper rifle
I would actually be shocked if the FIB (or CIA, or whoever) is NOT already doing that here in a variety of ways. I’ve blocked two people here who annoy me and seem to be keeping us busy with peripheral issues. Maybe they’re FIB, or maybe they’re just naturally annoying. 
I agree wholeheartedly! Always think for yourself. They will bait you with some truths so you will begin to trust them, then slowly reel you into crazytown so they can discredit you.
I think Chris is so smart he will figure it out…but i hope he keeps it to himself and stays safe. I have a bad feeling…i worry because these people stop at nothing now…
They also know the treason of joe biden…and are hoping it w9nt get a huge play in the compliant media…
And:
It goes on and on. Each representative of his agency has some bit of control of the event. Kinda’ makes sense.
Law enforcement has huge say over much of the event. Seven connected layers.Bottom line: If all this usual coordination did not happen, it was intentional. Any Fed knows this stuff.
Thank you OMaGosh for weighing in with your experience. It tracks…
[this was posted in the other thread, so cross-posting here]
Shot 10 comes from the SS sniper guy. The audio is 100% consistent with this on my end.
My proof: The ‘snick’ of the bullet crushes the limiter/gate on Trump’s mic, ergo it went over it. This ESU guy is past that mic, so the snick would not, could not, pass over it.
So the way I interpret that fist pump by that ESU guy is he was watching through his optics and saw the headshot and reacted to that.
You probably got that already covered but if not:
Here is the most early close up screenshot from the shooters weapon on the roof. Taken just after the first group of 4 made it ontop AGR6 (BWC2-122110).
I’m no weapon expert but maybe it helps specifying/confirming the shooters weapon regarding the audio analysis of shots 1-8. Maybe somebody can make out if the statement in Higgins preliminary, "Shot 9 hit Crooks’ rifle stock and fragged his face/neck/right shoulder area from the stock breaking up.” is accurate.
and zoomed in
The moment when the first group of 4 reaches the AGR6 roof, can also be seen from a position beside the northern crane holding up the big flag (BWC2-122104 => be aware: the timestamp in this video is wrong +12 seconds). I believe you can even spot when they dislocate the shooters weapon. Watch the roof between timestamp 18:16:49 and 18:17:20 (so in reality 18:16:37 - 18:17:08). That also matches with the timestamp in BWC2-122110
I thought his video was quite polished but strange for twice pushing, with missing or contrary evidence, that there was only one shooter.
Especially suspicious are latecomers to PP who start out cold but reference polished analyses and videos, or who sow doubt without supporting evidence, or who insist on pushing in a certain directions (maybe unimportant) with repeated variations.
Concerning the muzzle flash and the shooter on the roof. Watch from 13:48
Ep82 - Live Interview of Second Eyewitness - He Was Less Than 30 Feet From Shooter! (rumble.com)
