You posted this some time ago. I am in line with you.
the first 3 were from the assassin (where???), next 5 was “crooks” to take his part
in history (not knowing he was Patsy).
of course the actual know facts.
a: 10 shots fired
b: a dead body on roof.
c: then official report narrative.
D: one of those early shots missed, but barely.
CIA MO is more than one shooter. and one patsy.
Your opinion?
Digital cameras may change the white ballance.
“may” operative word
Hi Kimtomg,
I am not here to draw any conclusions.
Just like Chris mentoined, get the evidence first and at the end you draw a conclusion. The fortunate thing that happend was that the first shot touched Trumps ear and then it hit the bleachers corner, locking 2 points in space which alows to back trace the bullet. This has been the challenge in this forum to back trace the bullit by simply defining the two points in space. That is actually only 6 data points namly: hight of Trumps ear in XYZ and the height of the bleachers in XYZ.
In this forum everybody helped defining the two points in space and I simply took this informatoin and back traced the bullet. Up to now there is no path back to Crooks which is according to the mathimatical calculatoin of the back traced bullet. I am fully open for somebody to challenge any number in the below drawing which has a reference number. If somebody brings convincing evidence that one of these numbers is incorrect, I would gladly update the drawing and back trache the bullet again. If it points to Crooks then the 8-shot hypothetis will be favored. Up to now we have not found that path… maybe you have an input on one of the below data points?
Biggest fairy tale ever.
So many things are provably false and others are completely outrageous.
The remaining two snipers positioned in this room were notified that a suspicious individual [Crooks] was lurking outside the building,” he continued.
First LIE
GN is the one reporting there is a suspicious person and reports to command “headed towards the Sheetz”.
Command enlisted Local LEO’s to search toward Sheetz no later than 18:01. Local LEO’s communicate suspect running on roof 18:08:30 over 3 minutes before 1st shot.
On what planet would this information not be reported via radio to GN and M immediately!
GN started the witch hunt over 10 minutes prior to first shots, if he went down to converse or look for suspect himself (which there is no evidence of) he would have been getting back into building well before suspect spotted on roof once message was conveyed. Time for M to come unlock Door 9 - farthest possible from post and for both to return to 2nd story easily less than 3 minutes.
Now if we were to believe this fairy tale and M leaves w/o his radio to let GN who forgot both his radio and key card right before it’s reported that suspect is running on roof at 18:08:30 and they take pee break together like little girls is why they couldn’t prevent Crooks from taking first shot.
But to continue this fairy tale, after hearing shots fired neither one of them bust ass back up to there post and do their job to get eyes on Crooks and share intel with command for the 4 minutes it takes for an army of personnel to finally get eyes on Crooks.
GN and M’s job as covert snipers is intel and cover for resources on the ground and keep them safe. This fairy tale ends with these 2 snipers NOT EVER DOING THEIR JOB for over 7 full minutes.
Here is a detailed accounting of the BC After Report, Radio Traffic, and Witness Interviews as reported by
I start the witch hunt, or what I call the “cat and mouse game” that ends with “catch me if you can,” at 5:10 pm when Nicol first sighted Crooks. There is evidence of him going downstairs to door 13 on the northwest corner of building 1 where their sniper nests were. I don’t disagree with you on their being a lot of missed opportunities, and possibly complicity, but all I have is the evidence available to work with. Everything else is speculation, and I’m more of a Dragnet fan when it comes to that.
Here is a resource I posted around midnight last night. It is the starting point for my deeper dive on Nicol and “Butler,” which I am doing right now. It is a timeline analysis that provides pertinent statements from the WP radio traffic transcripts and ABC and CNN interview articles, in chronologically order. You might find it informative. .
Thank you for your reply.
Theoretically this is correct: two point in space can trace a line to terminal and origin.
However, those number are not exact, and any deviation will skew the result.
I will print out your diagram and look it over.
The audio evidence Chris brought out early strongly suggests two weapons (at least) aimed at trump.
Thanks again
“”…In this forum everybody helped defining the two points in space and I simply took this informatoin and back traced the bullet. …"
May I get your numbers and how you arrived at those?
do you have a spread sheet?
How were elevations determined, verified??
How did choose which numbers to use?
You can redirect me to specific discussions.
Regards,
