Some before and after frames would be helpful. Is that a pistol? Is he SS?
Thanks for the link.
Here’s some pics from it.
Man in grey suit.
As requested by @ebydfp to check his shadow. Taken when Trump pumped his fist in air.
Edit to add more pics. Pics are in sequence. He looked in the direction of the building in the background and then turn left to see the podium area. Then he got up.
refer to the post above of the baldie grey suit man crouched down next to the red carpet aisle which is to the left of the screen or Trump’s right side when speaking at podium.
Now let’a take a look at the other baldie SS dude you are looking into ie Marc.
Your video link of Marc walking unperturbed behind the podium and up the steps.
Notice he was looking out in the direction of red carpet which is where the grey suit man is. Then came down and join the SS hurdling Trump. It’s like he’s checking on the grey suit man.
His demeanor throughout the linked video is strange. Almost nonchalant about what just happened to security lapse of SS to its duty to protect their protectee.
Notice he took or put back something on his back right pocket.
Then after climbing the back podium steps he looked at what seems the grey suit man direction and has both his hands out.
Just strange behavior.
All Allegedly of course.
Watch him come on screen at 30 sec in.
In this bodycam footage I feel like the guy in charge is actually a sleezy used car salesman trying to sell them a beater car and the police guy to the right in black feels the same. He (black police uniform) devuldges that they had others detained in other location. While the car salesman is explaining away this info, black uniform is shaking head “no” many times. Then the woman (Michelle) speaks. Someone really needs to enhance what she says. They radio for water tower drone and then talk about deceased, if the guy in the white van survived. Any leos? The reason that caught my interest is i watched an interview with a beautiful lady (in her kitchen it looked like) telling her experience at the rally and that her friend lived a few blocks away and they came to her house to question her about the white van they found nearby. Then another video said they saw them towing the white van from the rally and the people thought it was the shooters vehicle. These things are not imaginary! There has been no mention of this in reports.
Here is the white van info with the woman in the kitchen describing friend interviewed! Now its even more important if the van was parked under water tower then found by her house. Wow
It’s like they waited to release any evidence and now are filling in the holes of their story. Release is from MSM, red flag. Additionally, they are preaching to the low IQ low information public not curious minds like us. Edited 10 seconds later to: and very poor lousy replies with obvious “lying eyes” in the background. Quick replies are unreliable.
First post here, so, apologies if this is not the correct location. In the ZH article below there is this paragraph about half way down…
" Apparently, someone was making frequent trips between the home of the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks ’ and a building in Washington DC that’s located near an FBI office. This revelation was based on a Heritage Foundation analysis of metadata of 9 pertinent smartphone devices."
ABC reported - obtaining (highly selective excerpted) bodycam footage [1:13 minutes] . . . supposedly showing extemporaneous investigation of the crime scene/Crooks shooting/death position on July 13, 2024, on the roof of AGR Building #6.
Video Link: x.com. The earlier report from MSM that law enforcement bodycams were all turned off that day – was apparently false! The goal posts keep moving.
- [Minute 0:05] . . . ABC comment during webcam footage”. . . showing moments law enforcement raced to that roof . . . .”
- [Minute 0:28] . . . ABC comment during webcam footage “. . . there appears to be a small device next to the shooter that was not seen before . . . . [What? Ok, when?, Who? – I thought this was being billed by ABC as a first impression on the crime scene - the first time – “moments law enforcement raced to the roof” – I guess someone else was at the crime scene before the crew featured in the highly excerpted webcam video]
- [Minute 0:45] . . . ABC comment during webcam footage “police seen counting shell casings . . . .” [again the intended suggestion is that the crime scene has not been tampered with] [Right – this does not exactly fit with - no one was at the crime scene before this webcam footage]
- [Minute 0:48] . . . webcam audio - officer “Looks like what, about eight? . . . ooone, twooo, three, four, five, six seven, eight . . .at least eight.” [Ok – case closed - clear untampered with first impression (/NOT) of evidence on a secured crime scene - showing that there are a total of eight shell casings and the ABC report intending that folks conclude that Crooks fired the eight shots at Trump]
It is still possible that in view of other mounting evidence – that inquiring minds will still consider whether - the DS sponsored the failed plot to assassinate Trump - by using a rogue tactical team stationed in Building #3 - to fire the first three shots through one or two windows in a second story room, and at the same time of the shooting then allowed (planned for) the set-up Crooks-patsy on the near-by roof of Building #6 to then take his follow-up rapid fire shots (shot count 4 – 8) before one of the tactical shooters leaned out the window and executed Crooks by putting a bullet (9th shot in the count) in his head from close range. And finally then having someone who was there and could do basic math - go on scene (under the color of law investigation) and drop a few (three) more shell casings next to Crook’s dead body before - a team arrived on scene with their webcams turned-on (for the theatrical event that would be released later) - to make it look like Crooks took all eight shots at Trump – so that Crooks would be blamed in accordance with the lone-shooter narrative.
Question – were one or more of the tactical team that rushed to the roof of Building #6 part of the tactical team stationed on the second floor of Building #3? Obviously, there are many other questions.
pbd
Once again, we see SS leadership working to insure that there was going to be some level of plausible deniability for the roof being unwatched…
First witness interview of the Red Haired Man. He stated he saw the shooter firing all 5 shots, the BBC interviewer asked again - all 5 shots - answer = YES. It seems neither of them heard the first three shots.
Same grey man again. Tim Burke ?
Who is Tim Burke?
He is the Secret Service Special Agent in Charge at Trump’s rally in Butler, Pennsylavania.
This time same grey man is standing in front of ambulance near/overlooking the injured area.
Hope no gag order placed on those injured.
Day of rally - July 13, 2024
See time stamp 18:27:10
Taken from the video link below. Grey man can be seen 9 sec in onwards.
Possible evidence - Claimed account of Crooks on Gab
In case it’s removed before you view it, or do not want to create a Gab account, I attached a PDF.
I can’t tell who posted it first, but I see many redacted claims showing the posts claiming this is his. Example:
https://x.com/BasedTorba/status/1816192214294569275
epicMicrowave - Comments - Gab Social.pdf (251.6 KB)
Officer in black appears to keep stepping on evidence 15:53. Also, a officer is said to possibly need stitches. Is it possible that when wound is treated the method of cleaning the wound area may destroy evidence of gun powder residue on the hand? Is it possible?
Just amazing… finished watching the whole video and at 25:08 a SS appears to step on Crooks rifle! Is this the same agent in previous pre-rally planning video? If so, he will be the third pre-rally planning agent I have identified present during Trumps attempted assassination attempt. All three have questionable demeanor associated with this rally.
4:28 Where is the first ladder? It was there before they got on the roof.
Sorry for the question and your efford by drawing it in case it’s you, but may I know what this family tree bring valulable to the case?